Past Performance Survey.doc
DOC document 60 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Multiple Award Electrical IDIQ Construction effort Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 6973GH-23-R-00152
About this file
This document is a past performance survey for a contractor proposing on a multiple award electrical construction services contract with the Federal Aviation Administration. The survey requests ratings and commentary on the contractor's performance on areas such as compliance with contract requirements, timeliness, resource allocation, cost control, management, personnel, and integrity. Respondents are asked to provide ratings on a scale of 0-4 for poor to excellent performance in various categories relating to quality, timeliness, cost control, business relations, and customer satisfaction. The completed surveys are due back to the FAA contracting officer by October 25, 2022 to inform the source selection for the multiple award IDIQ effort for electrical construction services at the Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Solicitation 6973GH-23-R-00152 Mod 0001.pdf | ||
| Past Performance Survey.doc | DOC document | |
| Contractors Release.pdf | ||
| SOW Appendix A Submittal form.doc | DOC document | |
| Client Auth. Letter.doc | DOC document | |
| SF25 Performance Bond.pdf | ||
| SOW Appendix F EXCAVATION PERMIT v1.pdf | ||
| SOW Appendix B Substitution form.doc | DOC document | |
| Past Performance Information Form.doc | DOC document | |
| Wage Determination OK20230049 06092023.pdf | ||
| SOW Table of Contents 05312023.doc | DOC document | |
| SOW Appendix D Installed Equipment Data sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| FINAL SOW Electrical CON.pdf | ||
| SOW Appendix C AMKFM-224001 Division 27 Revision 16.pdf | ||
| Solicitation 6973GH-23-R-00152-.pdf | ||
| SOW Appendix E Construction waste management.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| SF25A Payment Bond.pdf |
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PROCUREMENT SENSITIVE WHEN COMPLETED
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
ATTACHMENT 6
SIR/RFO 6973GH-23-R-00152
PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY
PART ONE: INSTRUCTIONS
1. Please complete this questionnaire based on the following guidance:
a. Handwritten responses are acceptable.
b. Indicate, based on the ratings below, the contractor’s performance on the identified program. Assessments should reflect only performance for which contractor is/was responsible. The following is a definition of the rating levels:
RATING
PERFORMANCE LEVEL
4 EXCELLENT: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the benefit of the Government/Customer. The contractual performance of the factors being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
3 GOOD: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the benefit of the Government/Customer. The contractual performance of the factors being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
2 SATISFACTORY: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the factors contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
1 MARGINAL: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the factors being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
0 POOR: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and corrections are not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
c. Please circle a “Number” or “Yes” / “No” corresponding to your rating or “N/A” if you are unable to provide a rating for an area.
d. PLEASE PROVIDE NARRATIVE EXPLANATIONS FOR ANY MARGINAL, POOR OR “YES” RATINGS. SPACE FOR YOUR NARRATIVE REMARKS IS PROVIDED ON THE LAST PAGE OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE. IF MORE SPACE IS NEEDED, USE THE BACK OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE.
e. You are urged to supplement your own knowledge of the contractor’s performance with judgment of others in your organization. In addition to completing the attached questionnaire for the identified program, we solicit your comments on other similar programs for which your activity has contracts with this offeror.
2.
Please return completed questionnaire via e-mail to the following:
Ms. Nia Glover, Contracting Officer, AAQ-730
E-mail: nia.glover@faa.gov
Due Date: October 25, 2022
PART TWO: GENERAL INFORMATION
The company who provided this questionnaire is proposing on a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Multiple Award Mechanical Construction Services contract at the Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center (MMAC), in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Past performance is of considerable importance to this Source Selection. Therefore, input from current or previous customers of the offeror is very important.
A. CONTRACTOR:
POINT OF CONTACT:
TITLE:
TELEPHONE NO.:
E-MAIL:
B. CONTRACT NUMBER:
CONTRACT TYPE:
PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE:
APPROXIMATE DOLLAR VALUE:
CONTRACT DESCRIPTION:
PART THREE: QUESTIONS
The numbers 0 to 4 correspond with the following descriptive values provided on the questionnaire cover page:
Poor Marginal Satisfactory Good Excellent
Quality/Timeliness of Service
| 1. |
| How would you rate the contractor's general overall compliance with contract requirements? |
| 0 1 2 3 4 N/A |
| 2. |
| How would you rate the timeliness of the Contractor's service - delivered submittals on time and adhering to the required schedule? |
| 0 1 2 3 4 N/A |
| 3. |
| How well did the contractor commit adequate resources in timely fashion to meet contract requirements? |
| 0 1 2 3 4 N/A |
| 4. |
| How well did the contractor commit adequate resources in timely fashion to solve problems? |
| 0 1 2 3 4 N/A |
| 5. |
| How would you rate the contractor on the timeliness of its responses to inquiries or other administrative matters? |
| 0 1 2 3 4 N/A |
Cost Control
| 6. |
| If applicable, how well did the contractor meet the proposed cost estimates? |
| 0 1 2 3 4 N/A |
Business Relations – Effective Management
| 7. |
| If applicable, how well did the contractor meet the proposed cost estimates? |
| 0 1 2 3 4 N/A |
| 8. |
| How well did the contractor display initiative in meeting contract requirements? |
| 0 1 2 3 4 N/A |
| 9. |
| How well was the contractor's selection of personnel and how well was it appropriate for the performance of this contract? |
| 0 1 2 3 4 N/A |
| 10. |
| How effective was the contractor in interfacing with the Government's (or other) staff? |
| 0 1 2 3 4 N/A |
| 11. |
| How would you rate the contractor’s overall management of this contract? |
| 0 1 2 3 4 N/A |
| 12. |
| How would you rate the performance of the contractor's key personnel? |
| 0 1 2 3 4 N/A |
Customer Satisfaction
| 13. |
| How well did the contractor provide timely assistance, when responding to problems? |
| 0 1 2 3 4 N/A |
| 14. |
| Has this contract been partially or completely terminated for default, or is a termination pending? |
a. If so, please explain? ___________________________
Yes or No
Integrity
| 15. |
| Did you experience any integrity problems with this Contractor? |
a. If so, please explain? ___________________________
Yes or No
| 16. |
| Did the contractor maintain integrity during contract performance? If not, please provide reason. |
a. If so, please explain? ___________________________
Yes or No
17. Please provide any other comments you may have
PART FOUR: RESPONDENT INFORMATION
The following information will assist in the analysis of the data provided. Information will be kept CONFIDENTIAL:
NAME OF RESPONDENT: _____________________________________
POSITION TITLE: ____________________________________________
ORGANIZATION: _____________________________________________
TELEPHONE NO.: ____________________________________________
LENGTH OF INVOLVEMENT IN PROGRAM/CONTRACT: ______________
DATE QUESTIONNAIRE COMPLETED: ____________________________
THANK YOU!
PAGE
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .