PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE CHECK FORM.docx

DOCX document 28 KB Posted

Attached to
Refurbishment of Rooms, NOX 3 Building
Solicitation number
19RP3825Q0112
Issued by

About this file

The Past Performance Reference Check Form is a document related to a U.S. Department of State solicitation (19RP3825Q0112) for refurbishment of rooms at the NOX 3 Building in Manila, Philippines. The solicitation requires interested contractors to submit electronic quotations by August 6, 2025, at 4:00 pm local time, with a mandatory site inspection scheduled for July 24, 2025, at 9:00 am. Key submission requirements include registering in the System for Award Management (SAM), completing specific forms such as SF-1442, providing pricing information, and submitting representations and certifications.

Potential offerors must contact ManilaContracting@state.gov to arrange site access, with a limit of two representatives per company and a pre-clearance deadline of July 21, 2025. The government intends to award the contract to the responsible company offering the lowest price, potentially without further discussions. Quotations must be submitted electronically in MS-Word, MS-Excel, or PDF format, with a maximum file size of 10MB. Failure to attend the mandatory site visit or meet registration requirements will result in proposal rejection.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE CHECK

Offeror Name:

Person(s) performing reference check
Date
Client/Company/Office name
Person contacted
Phone number

Questions and Responses:

1. Describe the services provided under your contract.

2. How would you rate the Contractor's performance in the areas listed below using the following rating guidelines:

Acceptable - Performance met or exceeded minimum requirements/standards

Unacceptable - Performance was poor (less than acceptable; did not meet contract requirements)

a.Quality of services provided under the contract.
|_| Acceptable|_| Unacceptable
Provide specific examples to support the rating assigned:
b.Compliance with contract terms and conditions.
|_| Acceptable|_| Unacceptable
Provide specific examples to support the rating assigned:
c.Effectiveness of management.
|_| Acceptable|_| Unacceptable
Provide specific examples to support the rating assigned:

d. Willingness to cooperate with, and assist, the customer in routine matters and when confronted by unexpected difficulties.

|_| Acceptable |_| Unacceptable

Provide specific examples to support the rating assigned:
e.Business integrity/business conduct.
|_| Acceptable|_| Unacceptable
Provide specific examples to support the rating assigned:

3. Describe any major problems that occurred and whether/how they were resolved.

4. Would you do business with this company again?

|_| YES |_| NO

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .