PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE CHECK FORM.docx

28 KB Posted

Attached to
Replacement of Roof at DT Building and SAF Barracks
Solicitation number
19RP3825R0001
Issued by

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI ·

The document is a Past Performance Reference Check Form used to evaluate a contractor's performance across five key areas: quality of services, compliance with contract terms, management effectiveness, cooperation, and business integrity. The form requires a reference to rate the contractor's performance as either "Acceptable" or "Unacceptable" in each category, with space for specific supporting examples.

The associated federal contract opportunity is a solicitation (19RP3825R0001) issued by the Department of State for roof replacement at the DT Building and SAF Barracks, located in the Philippines. The solicitation requires electronic proposal submission by July 21, 2025, at 4:00 p.m. local time, with a mandatory pre-proposal conference and site visit scheduled for June 26, 2025. Offerors must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM), submit proposals in specific file formats (MS-Word, MS-Excel, or PDF), and include required documents such as SF-1442, pricing section, representations and certifications, and additional information specified in Section J.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
AMENDMENT 002_19RP3825R0001.pdf PDF
AMENDMENT 001_19RP3825R0001.pdf PDF
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS_ 19RP3825R0001.pdf PDF
MINUTES OF THE PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE AND SITE VISIT_19RP3825R0001.pdf PDF
19RP3825R0001.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE CHECK

Offeror Name:

Person(s) performing reference check
Date
Client/Company/Office name
Person contacted
Phone number

Questions and Responses:

1. Describe the services provided under your contract.

2. How would you rate the Contractor's performance in the areas listed below using the following rating guidelines:

Acceptable - Performance met or exceeded minimum requirements/standards

Unacceptable - Performance was poor (less than acceptable; did not meet contract requirements)

a.Quality of services provided under the contract.
|_| Acceptable|_| Unacceptable
Provide specific examples to support the rating assigned:
b.Compliance with contract terms and conditions.
|_| Acceptable|_| Unacceptable
Provide specific examples to support the rating assigned:
c.Effectiveness of management.
|_| Acceptable|_| Unacceptable
Provide specific examples to support the rating assigned:

d. Willingness to cooperate with, and assist, the customer in routine matters and when confronted by unexpected difficulties.

|_| Acceptable |_| Unacceptable

Provide specific examples to support the rating assigned:
e.Business integrity/business conduct.
|_| Acceptable|_| Unacceptable
Provide specific examples to support the rating assigned:

3. Describe any major problems that occurred and whether/how they were resolved.

4. Would you do business with this company again?

|_| YES |_| NO

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .