Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ).pdf
PDF 384 KB Posted
- Attached to
- ATLANTA (ZTL) NADIN BLDG , LED Lighting System Upgrade - IIJA JCN: 24003995 - AMENDED 3/11/2025
- Solicitation number
- 6973GH-25-R-00102
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) template designed to evaluate contractor performance in support of a source selection for an FAA contract opportunity. The questionnaire is to be submitted to Contracting Officer Raymond Lena (raymond.a.lena@faa.gov) and consists of two main sections: one to be completed by the offeror with basic contract information, and another by the evaluating organization's representative.
The evaluation portion uses a six-point rating scale (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, Not Observed) to assess seven key performance areas: Quality of Products and Services, Performance as General Contractor/Architect/Engineer, Technical Requirements, Schedule adherence, Cost Control, Customer Satisfaction, and Overall Assessment. The questionnaire evaluates the contractor's conformance to requirements, technical capabilities, schedule management, cost control, and responsiveness to customer concerns. This template is associated with a small business set-aside solicitation for an LED Lighting System Upgrade at the Atlanta (ZTL) NADIN Building, with an estimated project magnitude between $25,000 and $50,000.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection
Please complete this Questionnaire and email Contracting Officer at:
raymond.a.lena@faa.gov
TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR
1. CONTRACTOR NAME & ADDRESS: 2. CONTRACT NO:
3. CONTRACT INITIATION DATE:
4. COMPLETION DATE:
5. TOTAL CONTRACT VALUE:
6. TYPE OF CONTRACT: (Fixed
Price, GMP, FPI, etc.)
7. DESCRIPTION OF CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS:
TO BE COMPLETED BY EVALUATING ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVE
8. EVALUATION: a. EVALUATOR'S NAME, POSITION (Project Manager/ COR/ Other) AND ORGANIZATION:
b. EVALUATOR'S PHONE NUMBER: c. MONTHS PERFORMANCE MONITORED BY EVALUATOR:
Please circle the response code for each topic (A – G) that best reflects your experience with this contractor.
EX = Exceptional S = Satisfactory US = Unsatisfactory VG = Very Good MG = Marginal N/O = Not Observed
A. Quality of Products and Services - Assess the contractor’s conformance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g., technical, professional, environmental, or safety and health standards).
EX VG S MG US N/O
B. Performance – Assess the contractor’s performance as the General Contractor or Architect/Engineer (as appropriate) for the project.
EX VG S MG US N/O
C. Technical Requirements – Assess the contractor’s ability to fulfill the technical requirements of the contract.
EX VG S MG US N/O
D. Schedule – Assess the timeliness of contractor against the schedule of activities.
EX VG S MG US N/O
E. Cost Control – Assess the contractor’s ability to manage the contract budget and control costs.
EX VG S MG US N/O
F. Customer Satisfaction – Assess the contractor’s responsiveness to customer concerns and “user friendliness”
EX VG S MG US N/O
G. Overall Assessment.
EX VG S MG US N/O
Comments:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .