Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ).docx

DOCX document 36 KB Posted

Attached to
AIR FORCE RESERVE OFFICER TRAINING CORPS SUPPORT SERVICES (AFRSS) - AMENDMENT 0002 Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA330022R0004
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Education and Training Command

About this file

This document contains a solicitation for Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corps (AFROTC) support services. The contractor shall provide all personnel, equipment, supplies, transportation, tools, materials, supervision, and other non-personal services necessary to support 145 AFROTC Detachments across the country. This is a firm-fixed-price contract with some cost reimbursement elements set aside 100% for small businesses with a NAICS code of 611699 and size standard of $12 million. The Air Force intends to award without discussions using lowest price technically acceptable procedures. The contractor must perform to standards in the performance work statement except for government furnished property and services.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to AIR FORCE RESERVE OFFICER TRAINING CORPS SUPPORT SERVICES (AFRSS) - AMENDMENT 0002, newest first.
File Type Posted
Amendment 0002_Performance Work Statement_AFRSS_rev. 27 Apr 2022.pdf PDF
Questions and Answers_FA330022R0004 .xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amendment 0002_Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)_AFRSS.pdf PDF
Amendment 0002_Section L - Instructions Conditions and Notices to Bidders docx.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment FA330022R00040002 SF 30.pdf PDF
Amendment 0002_Attachment 3_Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment FA330022R00040001 SF 30.pdf PDF
Technical Exhibit (TE) 5 - Contractor Travel Expense Report.pdf PDF
Solicitation - FA330022R0004.pdf PDF
AFRSS Technical Exhibit (TE) 9 - AFROTC Curriculum.pdf PDF
Section L - Instructions Conditions and Notice to Bidders.pdf PDF
Past Performance Information (PPI).docx DOCX document
Subcontractor Consent Letter.pdf PDF
Performance Work Statement_AFRSS.pdf PDF
Technical Exhibit (TE) 4 - Contractor Official Travel Authorization.pdf PDF
Technical Exhibit (TE) 7 - AFROTC Institution Academic Requirements.pdf PDF
Technical Exhibit (TE) 8 - AFROTC Instruction 36-2011.pdf PDF
Technical Exhibit (TE) 10 - AFROTC Locations.pdf PDF
Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award.pdf PDF
Show all 19

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FA330022R0004

Attachment 11

PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

A. GENERAL INFORMATION:

Offerors shall forward this attachment for completion to each contract reference the offeror wants the government to consider. Offerors shall ensure each respondent submits a completed questionnaire directly to Monica Philpot, Contract Administrator (CA), monica.philpot@us.af.mil and Mark Restad, Contracting Officer (CO), mark.restad.1@us.af.mil by the closing date of the RFP. Offerors are encouraged to have respondents submit the information prior to the closing date x:00PM CT, xx Apr 2022.

Contractor’s Name:Project Title:Contract Number Assigned to the Contractor:
Contract Award Amount: $Contract Final Amount: $

* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

B. AGENCY INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent: Title:

Address: Telephone Number:

Email Address:

C. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION:

Respondent shall include information below regarding the work performed. Use the Confident Rating table to complete this section.

Were you the prime contractor? Subcontractor? Joint Venture?

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, VG, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.

E

VG

S

M

U

N

Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Neutral/Not Applicable

Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

Technical Expertise and Project Supervision
E
VG
S
M
U
NA
1
Contractor provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
2
Contractor hired and retained field workers with appropriate technical skills and training commensurate with those required for successful project completion.
3
Contractor delegated authority to contract managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements. Contract manager’s role was clear.
4
Provided on-site contract manager/supervisor at all times, or as otherwise required by the specific contract.

Home Office/On-Site/Government Interaction

5
Identified risks/problems as they occurred and offered constructive and/or viable solution/alternatives.
6
Contractor was responsive and reasonable to contract changes from the standpoint of timeliness, suggested solutions, and price.
7
Contractor displayed a cooperative attitude with company/government personnel before and after award.
8
Contractor’s on-site contract manager/supervisor displayed initiative to resolve problems on-site.

Service Quality

9
Contractor provided and followed effective quality control plan and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
10
Contractor’s emphasis on delivering a quality service was apparent in day-to-day operations.
11
Contractor corrected deficiencies in a timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
12
Contractor maintained a quality workforce and subcontractors through project completion.

Schedule

13
Developed realistic progress schedules and met established project milestones.
14
Contractor provided the required Reports/Documentation as required in the contract.

Other

Were there any claims by subcontractors/suppliers for non- payment. If yes, please explain outcome in “Remarks”

YES
NO

Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in "Remarks."

YES
NO

Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in "Remarks."

YES
NO

OVERALL ASSESSMENT

Overall, on the scale of 1 – 6, how would you rate the contractor being surveyed
1
2
3
4
5
6

Remarks____________________________________________________________________________

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .