Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 80 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Architect & Engineering Services CFAC FY26 QA1
- Solicitation number
- CAFC26-0013
- Issued by
-
Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) template used by the U.S. Government Publishing Office Acquisition Services to evaluate contractor performance during source selection processes.
The form is divided into two main sections: contractor-completed information and evaluating organization representative-completed information. The contractor section requires documentation of contract details including contractor name and address, project name, contract number, contract date, period of performance, place of performance, completion date, contract value, contract type, and a description of the project's key characteristics. The evaluating organization section requires the evaluator's name, position during project execution (Project Manager, Contracting Officer's Representative, or other), phone number, and the number of months the evaluator monitored performance. The questionnaire uses a standardized rating scale (EX=Exceptional, VG=Very Good, S=Satisfactory, MG=Marginal, US=Unsatisfactory, N/O=Not Observed) to assess nine performance categories: Quality of Products and Services, Overall Performance, Schedule, Technical Requirements, Cost Control, Subcontracting, Customer Satisfaction in routine matters, Customer Satisfaction in unexpected difficulties, and Repeat Business likelihood. Additional narrative sections request identification of contractor weak points and strong points, a list of other projects completed for the evaluator, and the average award fee percentage earned if applicable. The completed form is designated as source selection sensitive information under 41 U.S.C. 423 and must be included by offerors as part of their quotes rather than submitted directly to the contracting office.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Response to Questions Submitted for Architect Engineering RFQ.docx | DOCX document | |
| SF330-21a.pdf | ||
| SOW A E Services.pdf | ||
| NCB Contractor Access Requirements.pdf | ||
| RFQ info A E Services 9.2.2026.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment Past Performance Questionnaire
Past Performance Questionnaire
ORGANIZATION’S PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection.
PPQs shall not be sent directly to the Contracting Office soliciting this requirement; it is the responsibility of the Offeror to include the completed CPAR and/or PPQ as part of its quote.
U.S. Government Publishing Office Acquisition Services 732 North Capitol Street, NW Room A530, Stop: AS Washington, DC 20401
When complete, the information on this form is SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION (41 U.S.C. 423) and shall be protected accordingly.
TO BE COMPLETED BY CONTRACTOR
1.
CONTRACTOR
3. CONTRACT NO.:
CONTRACT DATE:
4. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE:
4. P ACE OF PERFORMANCE:
5. COMPLETION DATE:
6. CONTRACT VALUE $
2. PROJECT NAME: 7. TYPE OF CONTRACT:
8. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT’S KEY CHARACTERISTICS:
Please add a continuation page if additional space is necessary.
TO BE COMPLETED BY EVALUATING ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVE
9. NAME AND ADDRESS OF EVALUATING ORGANIZATION:
EVALUATOR’S NAME, POSITION DURING PROJECT EXECUTION (Project Manager/COR/Other)
Pamela Patrick Rectangle
Attachment Past Performance Questionnaire
EVALUATOR’S PHONE NUMBER MONTHS PERFORMANCE MONITORED BY
EVALUATOR:
Please check the response code for each topic that best reflects your experience with this Contractor:
EX = Exceptional VG = Very Good S = Satisfactory MG = Marginal US = Unsatisfactory N/O = Not Observed Quality of Products and Services- Assess the Contractor’s conformance to contract requirements.
EX VG S MG US N/O
Overall Performance- Assess the Contractor’s overall performance for the project.
EX VG S MG US N/O
Schedule- Assess the timeliness of the Contractor against the schedule of activities (as appropriate).
EX VG S MG US N/O
Technical Requirements- Assess the Contractor’s ability and capacity to fulfill the technical requirements of the contract.
EX VG S MG US N/O
Cost Control- Assess the Contractor’s willingness and ability to manage the contract budget and control costs.
EX VG S MG US N/O
Subcontracting- Assess the Contractor’s success at complying with subcontracting goals.
EX VG S MG US N/O
Customer Satisfaction- Assess the Contractor’s responsiveness to customer concerns and “user friendliness” in ROUTINE matters.
EX VG S MG US N/O
Customer Satisfaction- Assess the Contractor’s responsiveness to customer concerns and “user friendliness” in UNEXPECTED DIFFICULTIES.
EX VG S MG US N/O
Repeat Business- Assess the likelihood that you would want this Contractor to perform another contract for you in the near future.
EX VG S MG US N/O
List Contractor’s Weak Points:
List Contractor’s Strong Points:
List any other projects this Contractor has completed for you:
If an award fee contract, what was the average award fee % earned?
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .