Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 162 KB Posted
- Attached to
- CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLISH COOPERTOWN RESTAURANT AT EV Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 140P5426R0003
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire for National Park Service Solicitation Number 140P5426R0003 regarding the demolition of Coopertown Restaurant at Everglades National Park. The questionnaire must be completed and submitted by references to the Contracting Officer, William Vazquez, no later than 1:00 p.m. ET on March 13, 2026, via email to william_vazquez@nps.gov. The submission must originate from a corporate or government email account.
The questionnaire requests information about the contractor's prior contract performance and requires respondents to identify the contract being referenced, including the contract number, value, period of performance, and description of items or services provided. Evaluation criteria include contractor ability to meet requirements, timeliness of product delivery, ability to resolve issues, quality of work, and overall performance rating across requirements, schedule, and price. Responses use a six-point scale: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, and Not Applicable. Respondents must provide the name, company, title, phone number, and email of the person completing the questionnaire, along with explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible to support performance ratings.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_140P5426R0003_Amd_0002.pdf | ||
| Asbestos_Analysis_Report_0001.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P5426R0003_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| Questions_and_Answers_0001.pdf | ||
| Environmental_Site_Assessment_0001.pdf | ||
| Statement_of_Work.pdf | ||
| Sol_140P5426R0003.pdf | ||
| Wage_Determination.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Solicitation# 140P5426R0003
Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail to william_vazquez@nps.gov
Currently, we are preparing our proposal for the National Park Service, ConOps East, South MABO, Solicitation Number: 140P5426R0003 to Demolish Coopertown Restaurant at Everglades National Park. As part of our proposal, we have listed you as a reference on our performance for this type of service with your agency under the contract listed below. Your input on our performance is therefore requested.
Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail to Contracting Officer, e-mail: william_vazquez@nps.gov
Questionnaire is due to William Vazquez no later than 1:00 p.m. ET on March 13, 2026. Questionnaire must be submitted directly to the Contracting Officer from a corporate or government email account.
NAME OF CONTRACTOR:
Phone:
E-Mail:
I. Current or Historical Contract Information
CONTRACT REFERENCED:
1. Contract or Identifying Number: ________________________________________________
2. Contract Value: _____________________________________________________________
3. Period of Performance: ________________________________________________________
4. Brief description of items provided: ______________________________________________
5. Name of Person Completing Questionnaire: _______________________________________
Company: __________________________________________________________
Title: __________________________________ Phone: _________________________________
E-mail: _____________________________________________________________________
II. EVALUATION. Please rate the Contractor using guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.
Evaluation Definitions
The following definitions should be used to assess Contractor performance.
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns.
VERY GOOD
Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
MARGINAL
Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) Performance information is not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation. Unable to provide assessment.
Past Performance Evaluation:
Performance
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet your requirements?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A
Performance
Comments, if any.
Timeliness and Ability to Resolve Issues
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to provide products in a timely manner?
Timeliness
Ability to Resolve Issues
Quality of Work
The Contractor’s ability to meet task requirements and the work’s overall quality.
Quality of Shipments
Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance
What is your overall rating of Contractor’s performance (requirements, schedule, and price) on contract being assessed?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
General Comments:
| Evaluation Definitions |
| The following definitions should be used to assess Contractor performance. |
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| VERY GOOD |
| SATISFACTORY |
| MARGINAL |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) |
| N/A |
| N/A |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .