Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 210 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 140G0125Q0221
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a Request for Quote (RFQ) related to Storm Water Retention Pond Rehabilitation at the USGS National Center. The form is designed to evaluate a contractor's performance across five key areas: Quality of Product or Service, Schedule, Cost Control, Business Relations, and Key Personnel. The evaluation uses a rating scale from Outstanding (O) to Unsatisfactory (UN), with categories for assessing the contractor's adherence to contract requirements, timeliness, cost management, communication, personnel quality, and overall project execution. The document is marked as "Competition Sensitive – For Official Use Only" and includes a section for narrative explanations of exceptional or poor performance ratings.
View the file
Other files
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Source Selection Information-See FAR 2.101 and 3.104.
RFQ – Storm Water Retention Pond Rehabilitation – USGS National Center Past
Performance Questionnaire
Competition Sensitive – For Official Use Only
Contractor:
Evaluation Period:
Contract Number:
Government Technical Representative (Name and Phone #):
Please indicate your relative level of agreement in the box provided:
(O = outstanding; VG = very good; A = acceptable; M = marginal; UN = unsatisfactory; or N/A)
1. Quality of Product or Service:
Contractor provided a product or service that conformed to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship.
Contractor submitted accurate reports.
Contractor utilized personnel that were appropriate to the effort performed.
2. Schedule:
Tasks required under this effort were performed in a timely manner and in accordance with the period of performance of the contract.
Contractor was responsive to technical and/or contractual direction.
3. Cost Control:
Contractor performed the effort within the estimated cost/price.
Contractor submitted accurate invoices on a timely basis.
Contractor demonstrated cost efficiencies in performing the required effort.
4. Business Relations:
Contractor demonstrated effective management over the effort performed.
Contractor maintained an open line of communication so that the COR and/or technical point of contact were apprised of technical, cost, and schedule issues.
Contractor presented information and correspondence in a clear, concise, and businesslike manner.
Contractor promptly notified the COR, technical POC, and/or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent issues.
Contractor cooperated with the Government in providing flexible, proactive, and effective recommended solutions to critical program issues.
Contractor made timely award to, and demonstrated effective management of, its subcontractors.
5. Key Personnel:
The labor turnover in key personnel labor categories was minimal and did not adversely affect performance.
Contractor did not frequently propose personnel to fulfill the requirements of the contract that were clearly unqualified.
For statements indicating “outstanding” or “unacceptable”, please provide a brief explanation on the attached page. Please include any other comments you may have.
Source Selection Information-See FAR 2.101 and 3.104.
RFQ – Storm Water Retention Pond Rehabilitation – USGS National Center
Past Performance Questionnaire
Competition Sensitive – For Official Use Only
Contractor:
Contract Number:
NARRATIVE EXPLANATION (attach extra pages, if needed):
| Contractor provided a product or service that conformed to contract requirements specifications and standards of good workmanship: |
| Contractor submitted accurate reports: |
| Contractor utilized personnel that were appropriate to the effort performed: |
| Tasks required under this effort were performed in a timely manner and in accordance with the period of performance of the contract: |
| Contractor was responsive to technical andor contractual direction: |
| Contractor performed the effort within the estimated costprice: |
| Contractor submitted accurate invoices on a timely basis: |
| Contractor demonstrated cost efficiencies in performing the required effort: |
| Contractor demonstrated effective management over the effort performed: |
| Contractor maintained an open line of communication so that the COR andor technical point of contact were apprised of technical cost and schedule issues: |
| Contractor presented information and correspondence in a clear concise and businesslike manner: |
| Contractor promptly notified the COR technical POC andor Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent issues: |
| Contractor cooperated with the Government in providing flexible proactive and effective recommended solutions to critical program issues: |
| Contractor made timely award to and demonstrated effective management of its subcontractors: |
| The labor turnover in key personnel labor categories was minimal and did not adversely affect performance: |
| Contractor did not frequently propose personnel to fulfill the requirements of the contract that were clearly unqualified: |
| Text1: |
| Text2: |
| Text3: |
| Text4: |
| Text5: |
| Text6: |
| Text7: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .