Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 163 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 140P5425R0013
About this file
The document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a National Park Service contract (Solicitation #140P5425R0013) to replace the Johnson House roof and doors at Fort Matanzas National Monument. The questionnaire is designed to collect performance feedback from a previous contract reference, with the completed form due to Contracting Officer William Vazquez by August 08, 2025 at 1:00 p.m. ET. The form must be submitted directly from a corporate or government email account and includes detailed evaluation sections rating the contractor's performance across multiple criteria such as overall performance, timeliness, ability to resolve issues, and quality of work, using a scale from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory.
The questionnaire provides specific evaluation definitions for each performance rating, ranging from Exceptional (exceeding most contractual requirements with few minor issues) to Unsatisfactory (failing to meet contractual requirements with serious unresolved problems). Evaluators are requested to provide narrative comments alongside their numerical ratings, with space allocated for detailed feedback on the contractor's performance across key areas including meeting requirements, product delivery, issue resolution, and overall contract execution.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Solicitation# 140P5425R0013
Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail to william_vazquez@nps.gov
Currently, we are preparing our proposal for the National Park Service, ConOps East, South MABO, Solicitation Number: 140P5425R0013 to Replace Johnson House Roof & Doors at Fort Matanzas National Monument. As part of our proposal, we have listed you as a reference on our performance for this type of service with your agency under the contract listed below. Your input on our performance is therefore requested.
Please complete this Questionnaire and e-mail to Contracting Officer, e-mail: william_vazquez@nps.gov
Questionnaire is due to William Vazquez no later than August 08, 2025 at 1:00 p.m. ET. Questionnaire must be submitted directly to the Contracting Officer from a corporate or government email account.
NAME OF CONTRACTOR:
Phone:
E-Mail:
I. Current or Historical Contract Information
CONTRACT REFERENCED:
1. Contract or Identifying Number: ________________________________________________
2. Contract Value: _____________________________________________________________
3. Period of Performance: ________________________________________________________
4. Brief description of items provided: ______________________________________________
5. Name of Person Completing Questionnaire: _______________________________________
Company: __________________________________________________________
Title: __________________________________ Phone: _____________________________
E-mail: _____________________________________________________________________
II. EVALUATION. Please rate the Contractor using guide below. Explanatory narratives for as many responses as possible would be appreciated. These narratives need not be lengthy, just detailed. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.
Evaluation Definitions
The following definitions should be used to assess Contractor performance.
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns.
VERY GOOD
Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
MARGINAL
Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation.
Unable to provide assessment.
Past Performance Evaluation
Question 1. Performance
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet your requirements?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory N/A
Performance
Comments, if any.
Questions 2 and 3. Timeliness
What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to provide products in a timely manner?
Timeliness
Ability to Resolve Issues
Question 4. Quality of Work
The Contractor’s ability to meet task requirements and the work’s overall quality.
Quality of Shipments
Question 5. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance
What is your overall rating of Contractor’s performance (requirements, schedule, and price) on contract being assessed?
Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
General Comments:
| Evaluation Definitions |
| The following definitions should be used to assess Contractor performance. |
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| VERY GOOD |
| SATISFACTORY |
| MARGINAL |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) |
| N/A |
| N/A |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .