Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 1024 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Modernize Elevator System at ROC ATCT in Rochester, NY Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 697DCK-24-R-00146
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire to be completed by an evaluating organization representative for a federal contract opportunity. The questionnaire requests the evaluator to assess the contractor's performance across several criteria including quality of products/services, technical requirements, schedule, cost control, and customer satisfaction. The evaluator is asked to provide an overall assessment rating ranging from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory. This Past Performance Questionnaire is associated with Solicitation Number 697DCK-24-R-00146 for a project to modernize the elevator system at the Frederick Douglass Greater Rochester Air Traffic Control Tower in Rochester, NY. The solicitation is set aside for small businesses under NAICS code 238290, with an estimated price range of $400,000 to $600,000. The RFP, Performance Work Statement, and other relevant documents are attached to the solicitation. Key dates include a site visit on April 17, 2024 and proposal due date of May 3, 2024.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 21 SIR Amendment 1.pdf | ||
| RFI Responses.pdf | ||
| 3f Performance Work Statement.pdf | ||
| 3f Elevator Information Sheet.pdf | ||
| 16 Screening Information Request.pdf | ||
| 9 Wage Determination.pdf | ||
| Standardized Proposal Breakdown.xls | XLS spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection
Please complete this Questionnaire and email Contracting Officer at:
Tony.W.Bryant@faa.gov
TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR
1. CONTRACTOR NAME & ADDRESS: 2. CONTRACT NO:
3. CONTRACT INITIATION DATE:
4. COMPLETION DATE:
5. TOTAL CONTRACT VALUE:
6. TYPE OF CONTRACT: (Fixed
Price, GMP, FPI, etc.)
7. DESCRIPTION OF CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS:
TO BE COMPLETED BY EVALUATING ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVE
8. EVALUATION: a. EVALUATOR'S NAME, POSITION (Project Manager/ COR/ Other) AND ORGANIZATION:
b. EVALUATOR'S PHONE NUMBER: c. MONTHS PERFORMANCE MONITORED BY EVALUATOR:
Please circle the response code for each topic (A – G) that best reflects your experience with this contractor.
EX = Exceptional S = Satisfactory US = Unsatisfactory VG = Very Good MG = Marginal N/O = Not Observed
A. Quality of Products and Services - Assess the contractor’s conformance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g., technical, professional, environmental, or safety and health standards).
EX VG S MG US N/O
B. Performance – Assess the contractor’s performance as the General Contractor or Architect/Engineer (as appropriate) for the project.
EX VG S MG US N/O
C. Technical Requirements – Assess the contractor’s ability to fulfill the technical requirements of the contract.
EX VG S MG US N/O
D. Schedule – Assess the timeliness of contractor against the schedule of activities.
EX VG S MG US N/O
E. Cost Control – Assess the contractor’s ability to manage the contract budget and control costs.
EX VG S MG US N/O
F. Customer Satisfaction – Assess the contractor’s responsiveness to customer concerns and “user friendliness”
EX VG S MG US N/O
697DCK-24-R-00144
G. Overall Assessment.
EX VG S MG US N/O
Comments:
697DCK-23-R-00232
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .