PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE.pdf
PDF 145 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Pontiac ATCT Fire Life Safety Upgrades
- Solicitation number
- 697DCK-22-R-00560
About this file
This solicitation seeks proposals for life-safety upgrades at the Airport Traffic Control Tower and terminal buildings at Oakland County International Airport in Waterford, Michigan. The scope of work includes installing a new fire detection and alarm system and modifying existing fire suppression systems, installing new fire-rated doors and barriers, repairing and painting walls and ceilings, sealing openings to comply with fire codes, applying fireproofing, installing new fire doors and hardware, and training personnel. Proposers must provide all labor, materials, equipment, and services to complete the upgrades within 150 calendar days. The Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Southwestern Region will administer the contract.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment 06.pdf | ||
| Amendment 05.pdf | ||
| Amendment 04.pdf | ||
| Amendment 03.pdf | ||
| Amendment 02.pdf | ||
| Amendment 1.pdf | ||
| PTK ATCT FLS Upgrade 6-21-22Drawings.pdf | ||
| DB-F100199141.pdf | ||
| PTK ATCT Fire Life Safety Upgrade Specs 6_21_2022.pdf | ||
| 697DCK-22-R-00560 (4).pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY
697DCK-22-R-00560: Pontiac ATCT FLS Upgrades
Return the required number of signed and dated Past Performance Surveys with your response.
POC: Darren Odegard Solicitation: 697DCK-22-R-00560
1. Contractor Name:
2. Contract Number:
3. Contractor Address:
4. Contract Type:
___ Firm Fixed Price ___ Cost Reimbursement ___ Other (Please Specify)
5. Your Agency Name:
6. Your Agency POC/email:
7. Completion Date:
8. Dollar Amount of Award:
Total Value with Mods:
9. Title of Contract:
10. Description of Contract Service:
11. Type of Work:
Construction __ Service Support__ Service__ Supply__ Other______
NOTE: 1-Unsatisfactory 2- Marginal 3-Satisfactory 4-Good 5-Outstanding
If Not Applicable, just write in N/A
***Please provide additional comments below for ratings of 4 and below.
1. Did the contractor commit adequate resources in timely fashion to the contract to meet the requirements and to successfully solve problems?
1 2 3 4 5
2. To what extent did the contractor respond positively and promptly to technical direction, contract change orders, etc.?
1 2 3 4 5
3. How reliably did the contractor follow through on commitments?
1 2 3 4 5
4. To what extent did the contractor’s management system provide visibility into problems and risks?
1 2 3 4 5
5. How responsive do you think the contractor was to information requests, issues, or problems during the course of the contract?
1 2 3 4 5
6. How effective has the contractor been in identifying user requirements?
1 2 3 4 5
7. To what extent did the contractor have the ability to administer and manage the contract?
1 2 3 4 5
8. To what extent did the contractor issue professional correspondence?
1 2 3 4 5
9. How well did the contractor adhere to the Statement of Work?
1 2 3 4 5
10. What was your level of satisfaction with the contractor’s management and support staff?
1 2 3 4 5
11. What was your level of satisfaction with the contractor’s Supervisor(s)?
12. To what extent did the contractor submit required reports and documentation in a timely manner?
1 2 3 4 5
13. To what extent were the contractor’s reports and documentation accurate and complete?
14. To what extent was the contractor’s maintenance and problem tracking/reporting documentation timely, accurate and of appropriate content?
1 2 3 4 5
15. To what extent did the contractor comply with safety requirements?
1 2 3 4 5
16. What was your level of satisfaction with the contractor’s overall quality of service?
1 2 3 4 5
17. To what extent was the contractor effective in interfacing with the Government staff?
1 2 3 4 5
18. What was your level of overall customer satisfaction?
1 2 3 4 5
19. To what extent were the contractor’s employees experienced and qualified?
1 2 3 4 5
Respond: Yes or No.
20. Were there any cure notices issued? Yes: ____ No: ____
21. Was contractor pro-active? Yes: ____ No: ____
22. Did contractor suggest cost-saving changes? Yes: ____ No: ___
23. Would you recommend this contractor? Yes: ____ No: ____
If No, please provide reason in Comments.
For Federal contracts:
24. Were there any Labor Department Investigations? Yes:____ No: ____
24a. If yes, please describe reason and final outcome.
25. Were there any safety investigations? Yes: ___ No: ____
25a. If yes, please describe reason and final outcome.
26. Were there any security investigations? Yes: ____ No: ____
26a. If yes, please describe reason and final outcome.
27. Was there a partial or complete termination for default or convenience?
Yes: ____ No: ____
27a. If yes, please describe reason and final outcome.
28. Are there any pending terminations? Yes: ____ No: ____
29. What is/was the duration of the contract? ___________
30. Were there any performance issues regarding the contractor’s work? If yes, please describe.
Comments: (Comments required for any rating of 4 or less)
Signature: ______________________
Date: ____________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .