Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 273 KB Posted

Attached to
Y1DA--Project # 596-18-107 Construction to Upgrade Chiller Plant
Solicitation number
36C24922R0094
Issued by

About this file

This past performance questionnaire is for a contractor bidding on Project #596-18-107 to upgrade the chiller plant at a Veterans Affairs medical center. The solicitation number is 36C24922R0094 and responses are due by September 23, 2022. The work includes construction services to upgrade the chiller plant. The project is valued between the initial and final contract amounts. The period of performance is also specified. Previous customers are requested to provide ratings on quality, schedule, cost controls, business relations and whether they would award another contract to the contractor using the acceptance definitions in the rating scale. General comments are also solicited.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Site Visit Sign In.pdf PDF
Solicitation Questions and Answers.pdf PDF
36C24922R0094 0001.docx DOCX document
36C24922R0094_1.docx DOCX document
Statement of Work.pdf PDF
Project Specifications.pdf PDF
Pricing Schedule.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Wage Determination KY20220090 08-05-2022.pdf PDF
Project Drawings.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 2: PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SUBJECT: Past Performance Questionnaire for Project # 596-18-107, Upgrade Chiller Plant at the Lexington Health Care System, Sousley Campus.

PAST PERFORMANCE INSTRUCTIONS

The NCO 9 Network Contracting Activity has issued a solicitation for Project 596-18-107, Upgrade Chiller Plant.

Past performance information will be used to evaluate proposals received. Section A is to be completed by the Offeror. Section A of the enclosed questionnaire lists the contractor who has identified your office as a source to evaluate their past performance. Section A also authorizes release of this information to NCO 9 Network Contracting Activity.

The Offeror must provide this entire document to each of its assessors. The Assessor shall only submit past performance questionnaires directly to the Contracting Officer-Matthew Whisman by way of email at matthew.whisman@va.gov.

Section B in its entirety is to be completed by the assessor(s). An individual assessor knowledgeable of the contractor’s quality of supplies and services rendered is requested to verify, complete the questionnaire, and submit to the Contracting Office. If evaluating more than one contract for the same contractor, use a separate questionnaire for each contract being evaluated.

Because this information is critical to the evaluation process, your time and effort in providing your assessment is greatly appreciated. The questionnaire should be completed as soon as possible but not later than September 23, 2022, at 4:00 PM EST. Assessor is requested to send electronically to (matthew.whisman@va.gov). Assessor: Please do not send this information to the Offeror being evaluated.

Thank you in advance for your cooperation and expeditious response to this request.

Procurement Sensitive Do Not Disclose --- See FAR Subparts 2.101 and 3.104-4 FOR

OFFICIAL USE ONLY

OFFICIAL USE ONLY

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SECTION A: Contractor Information (to be completed by the contractor for who past performance information is being collected, prior to forwarding to assessors)

Solicitation Number 36C24922R0094 Project/Requirement Project 596-18-107 Customer/Agency Lexington VA Healthcare System

1. Prospective Government Contractor’s __________________________________________________ Name and Address __________________________________________________

2. Contractor Point of Contact: __________________________________________________

3. Phone Number (with area code): __________________________________________________

4. Assessor Contract Award Number: __________________________________________________

5. Description of Services: __________________________________________________

6. Contract Award Date: _______________ Contract Amount: Initial ___________ Final___________

7. Period of Performance: __________________________________________________

ASSESSOR INFORMATION:

Assessor Name Title Phone Number/Email Address

8. Authorization is hereby granted to provide the information requested in this questionnaire to NCO 9 Network Contracting Activity, Murfreesboro, Tennessee.

Signature

Name and Title of Authorizing Official Date

OFFICIAL USE ONLY

SECTION B: Assessors Information (to be completed by assessors).

RATING SCALE Definitions

Past performance Evaluation Ratings Rating Description ACCEPTABLE Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the

Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the Offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below.)

UNACCEPTABLE Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

The questions on the survey (see below) shall be rated in accordance with the definitions provided in the Rating Scale. Any unsatisfactory or marginal rating shall be supplemented with an explanation in the space provided.

QUALITY OF SERVICE

1. Rate the contractor’s compliance with contractual requirements.

ACCEPTABLE_______ UNACCEPTABLE_______

2. Overall rating of contractor quality of service.

ACCEPTABLE_______ UNACCEPTABLE_______

PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:

OFFICIAL USE ONLY

SCHEDULE

3. Delivery of service was within required time period specified by contract requirements.

ACCEPTABLE_______ UNACCEPTABLE_______

4. Rate the contractor’s ability to control cost and submit invoices.

Are invoices complete, accurate, and timely?

ACCEPTABLE_______ UNACCEPTABLE_______

PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:

BUSINESS RELATIONS

5. Overall rating of contractor’s business practices (e.g. maintaining a positive working relationship, business ethics, timely and effectively resolution of any problems, etc.)

ACCEPTABLE_______ UNACCEPTABLE_______

6. Rate the working relationship between contractor’s management, and your company (i.e. contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, commitment of customer satisfaction; concern for the interest of the customer).

ACCEPTABLE_______ UNACCEPTABLE_______

7. Rate the contractor’s ability to submit required reports and/or invoices in a timely manner.

ACCEPTABLE_______ UNACCEPTABLE_______

OFFICIAL USE ONLY

8. Rate the contractor’s responsiveness to customer complaint resolution.

ACCEPTABLE_______ UNACCEPTABLE_______

9. Overall rating of contractor’s business relations.

ACCEPTABLE_______ UNACCEPTABLE_______

PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:

How would you feel about awarding another contract to this contractor?

__________ Would not hesitate to award another contract to this contractor.

__________ Would most likely award another contract to this contractor.

__________ Would think twice about awarding another contract to this contractor but would do so if no better alternative existed.

__________ Do not wish to award another contact to this contractor.

__________ Would not award another contract to this contractor.

PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:

OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Overall rating of contractor’s performance (quality, schedule, business relations,) on contract being assessed.

ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE

VII. General Comments:

ASSESSOR:

Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.

ROLE PERIOD OF INVOLVEMENT

Contract Specialist/Contracting Officer Technical Project Lead/Project Officer

OTHERS

(Signature) (Date)

(Typed or Printed Name) (Organization Name)

(Phone Number)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .