P-2026-000096 ADD 1 Attachment 3.pdf

CLEAR ARMOR

GLASS WEAKENING/

FORCED-ENTRY

RESISTANCE TEST

REPORT

SCOPE OF WORK

ASTM F3561 GLASS WEAKENING AND FORCED-ENTRY TESTING OF FIXED WINDOW

ASSEMBLY

REPORT NUMBER

T5624.01-119-12 R0

TEST DATE

03/04/26

ISSUE DATE

03/24/26

PAGES

DOCUMENT CONTROL NUMBER

RT-R-AMER-TEST-7999 (02/18/25)

© 2017 INTERTEK

130 Derry Court York, Pennsylvania 17406

Telephone: 717-764-7700

Facsimile: 717-764-4129 www.intertek.com/building

TEST REPORT FOR CLEAR ARMOR

Report No.: T5624.01-119-12 R0 Date: 03/24/26

This report is for the exclusive use of Intertek's Client and is provided pursuant to the agreement between Intertek and its Client.

Intertek's responsibility and liability are limited to the terms and conditions of the agreement. Intertek assumes no liability to any party, other than to the Client in accordance with the agreement, for any loss, expense or damage occasioned by the use of this report.

Only the Client is authorized to permit copying or distribution of this report and then only in its entirety. Any use of the Intertek name or one of its marks for the sale or advertisement of the tested material, product or service must first be approved in writing by Intertek.

The observations and test results in this report are relevant only to the sample(s) tested. This report by itself does not imply that the material, product, or service is or has ever been under an Intertek certification program.

Version: 02/18/25 Page 2 of 25 RT-R-AMER-Test-7999

REPORT ISSUED TO

CLEAR ARMOR

32991 North Thorn Apple Grayslake, IL 60046

SECTION 1

SCOPE

Architectural Testing, Inc. (an Intertek company) dba Intertek Building & Construction (B&C) was contracted by Clear Armor to perform forced-entry-resistance after simulated active shooter attack testing in accordance with ASTM F3561 on fixed window assembly. Results obtained are tested values and were secured by using the designated test method. Testing was conducted at Intertek test facility in York, PA.

Intertek B&C in York, PA has demonstrated compliance with ISO/IEC International Standard 17025 and is consequently accredited as a Testing Laboratory (TL-144) by International Accreditation Service, Inc. (IAS). Intertek B&C is accredited to perform all testing reported herein.

This report does not constitute certification of this product nor an opinion or endorsement by this laboratory. Unless differently required, Intertek reports apply the "Simple Acceptance" rule also called "Shared Risk approach," of ILAC-G8:09/2019, Guidelines on Decision Rules and Statements of Conformity.

Intertek B&C will service this report for the entire test record retention period. The test record retention period ends four years after the test date. Test records, such as detailed drawings, datasheets, representative samples of test specimens (where required by Certification or Accreditation bodies), or other pertinent project documentation, will be retained for the entire test record retention period.

For INTERTEK B&C:

COMPLETED BY: Eric J. Beaudoin REVIEWED BY: V. Thomas Mickley, Jr., P.E.

TITLE: Team Lead - Ballistics TITLE: Senior Staff Engineer

SIGNATURE:

SIGNATURE:

DATE: 03/24/26 DATE: 03/24/26

EJB:vtm/aas http://www.intertek.com/building www.intertek.com/building

TEST REPORT FOR CLEAR ARMOR

Version: 02/18/25 Page 3 of 25 RT-R-AMER-Test-7999

SECTION 2

SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS

DESIGNATION FORCED-ENTRY

RATING LEVEL 1

48-1/2 in x 66-1/2 in Fixed Window Assembly 6

1 Lowest rating achieved on the three-sample set.

SECTION 3

TEST METHOD

Each test specimen was evaluated in accordance with the following:

ASTM F3561-25, Standard Test Method for Forced-Entry-Resistance of Fenestration Systems After Simulated Active Shooter Attack

SECTION 4

MATERIAL SOURCE/INSTALLATION

The test specimens were provided by the client in good condition.

Installation: Test specimens were installed into wooden bucks.

SECTION 5

LIST OF OFFICIAL OBSERVERS

NAME COMPANY

Eric J. Beaudoin Intertek B&C Brittian M. Taylor Intertek B&C www.intertek.com/building

TEST REPORT FOR CLEAR ARMOR

Version: 02/18/25 Page 4 of 25 RT-R-AMER-Test-7999

SECTION 6

EQUIPMENT

ASSET NO. DESCRIPTION CAL DUE DATE

65208 H&S Precision Universal Receiver (UR-01) N/A INT02767 Oehler Model 36 Chronograph 05/15/26 64216 Oehler Model 36 Chronograph 05/15/26 INT02233 Mini IR Thermometer 06/16/26 INT03880 Digital Calliper 06/05/26 INT03821 Digital Scale 05/16/26 65081 Lab Temperature and Humidity Reader 03/27/26 INT03779 Laser Measure 06/04/26 INT03949 Force Gauge 07/28/26 INT03020 Tape Measure Verifier N/A

SECTION 7

TEST SPECIMEN DESCRIPTION

PRODUCT TYPE Fixed Window Assembly OVERALL SIZE 66-1/2 in wide by 48-1/2 in high

SPECIMEN

NO.

GLAZING LAYUP 1

1 Attack Side; 15 mil Laminate - 1/4 in Glass - PVB Glue - 1/4 in Glass - 31 mil Laminate; Protected Side 2

1 Glazing layup obtained from Clear Armor.

www.intertek.com/building

TEST REPORT FOR CLEAR ARMOR

Version: 02/18/25 Page 5 of 25 RT-R-AMER-Test-7999

SECTION 8

TEST PROCEDURE

Glass Weakening:

The sample was rigidly mounted for ballistics resistance testing. The muzzle of the test firearm was set at 25 feet from the sample at zero-degree (±3°) obliquity. Ballistic screens were set at 5 feet and at 20 feet from the muzzle of the firearm. Test ammunition was 5.56 mm NATO, 55 grain, copper jacket lead core, which conformed to ASTM F3561, Table 1 requirements. Shot locations were per Figure 4 of ASTM F3561 for glazing and panels.

Forced Entry:

Impacts were delivered to the product using an impact ram as specified in ASTM F3561, Section

6.6. The product was rigidly anchored to a supporting test frame, and the impacts were delivered to the specimen as per ASTM F3561, Section 16. Two impacts were delivered to the center of the specimen for each drop height beginning at a height of 6 in and increasing in increments of 6 in until failure occurred. The potential energy delivered at each drop height is detailed in the following table:

LEVEL POTENTIAL ENERGY, J DROP HEIGHT (H)

(J) (FT-LBF) (mm) (FT)

1 68 50 152 0.50 2 136 100 305 1.00 3 203 150 457 1.50 4 271 200 610 2.00 5 339 250 762 2.50 6 407 300 914 3.00 7 475 350 1067 3.50 8 542 400 1219 4.00 www.intertek.com/building

TEST REPORT FOR CLEAR ARMOR

Version: 02/18/25 Page 6 of 25 RT-R-AMER-Test-7999

SECTION 9

TEST RESULTS

Test Date: 03/04/26 Ambient Temperature: 64.6-68.9 °F

The results are tabulated as follows:

Specimen No. 1 Ballistics

SHOT

NO.

SHOT

LOCATIONS 1

SPECIMEN

TEMP.

(°F)

VELOCITY

(fps)

RESULTS

1 N

65.4

3362 Complete Penetration 2 S 3412 Complete Penetration 3 W 3425 Complete Penetration 4 E 3367 Complete Penetration 5 NW 3441 Complete Penetration 6 SW 3390 Complete Penetration 7 NE 3430 Complete Penetration 8 SE 3410 Complete Penetration 9 C1 3465 Complete Penetration 10 C2 3423 Complete Penetration

1 Reference ASTM F3561, Fig. 4 for firing pattern shot locations.

www.intertek.com/building

TEST REPORT FOR CLEAR ARMOR

Version: 02/18/25 Page 7 of 25 RT-R-AMER-Test-7999

Forced Entry

LEVEL NUMBER

OF

IMPACTS

SPECIMEN

TEMP.

(°F)

DROP

HEIGHT

(ft)

PASS/FAIL RESULTS

1 2

67.2

0.50 Pass 1st Impact: No change

2nd Impact: No change

2 2 1.00 Pass 1st Impact: No change 2nd Impact: No change

3 2 1.50 Pass 1st Impact: No change 2nd Impact: No change

4 2 2.00 Pass 1st Impact: No change 2nd Impact: No change

5 2 2.50 Pass 1st Impact: Tear from shot location C1 to C2, 5 in long 2nd Impact: Tear from shot location C1 to C2, 6 in long

6 2 3.00 Pass 1st Impact: Tear from shot location C1 to C2, 7 in long 2nd Impact: Tear from shot location C1 to C2, 9 in long

7 1 3.50 Fail 1st Impact: The nose cone became lodged in the glazing and the gasket was visible on the protected side www.intertek.com/building

TEST REPORT FOR CLEAR ARMOR

Version: 02/18/25 Page 8 of 25 RT-R-AMER-Test-7999

Specimen No. 2 Ballistics

SHOT

NO.

SHOT

LOCATIONS 1

SPECIMEN

TEMP.

(°F)

VELOCITY

(fps)

RESULTS

1 N

68.2

3399 Complete Penetration 2 S 3440 Complete Penetration 3 W 3401 Complete Penetration 4 E 3375 Complete Penetration 5 NW 3429 Complete Penetration 6 SW 3392 Complete Penetration 7 NE 3440 Complete Penetration 8 SE 3467 Complete Penetration 9 C1 3417 Complete Penetration 10 C2 3420 Complete Penetration www.intertek.com/building

TEST REPORT FOR CLEAR ARMOR

Version: 02/18/25 Page 9 of 25 RT-R-AMER-Test-7999

LEVEL NUMBER

OF

IMPACTS

SPECIMEN

TEMP.

(°F)

DROP

HEIGHT

(ft)

PASS/FAIL RESULTS

1 2

66.8

0.50 Pass 1st Impact: No change

2nd Impact: No change

2 2 1.00 Pass 1st Impact: No change 2nd Impact: No change

3 2 1.50 Pass 1st Impact: No change 2nd Impact: No change

4 2 2.00 Pass 1st Impact: No change 2nd Impact: No change

5 2 2.50 Pass 1st Impact: No change 2nd Impact: No change

6 2 3.00 Pass 1st Impact: Tear on protected side of specimen from shot location C1 to C2 2nd Impact: Tear at shot location C1, 4 in long

7 2 3.50 Pass 1st Impact: Tear at shot location C1, 6 in long 2nd Impact: Tear at shot location C1, 9 in long

8 1 4.00 Fail 1st Impact: The nose cone became lodged in the glazing and the gasket was visible on the protected side www.intertek.com/building

TEST REPORT FOR CLEAR ARMOR

Version: 02/18/25 Page 10 of 25 RT-R-AMER-Test-7999

Specimen No. 3 Ballistics

SHOT

NO.

SHOT

LOCATIONS 1

SPECIMEN

TEMP.

(°F)

VELOCITY

(fps)

RESULTS

1 N

65.6

3418 Complete Penetration 2 S 3411 Complete Penetration 3 W 3436 Complete Penetration 4 E 3382 Complete Penetration 5 NW 3379 Complete Penetration 6 SW 3418 Complete Penetration 7 NE 3437 Complete Penetration 8 SE 3433 Complete Penetration 9 C1 3390 Complete Penetration 10 C2 3396 Complete Penetration www.intertek.com/building

TEST REPORT FOR CLEAR ARMOR

Version: 02/18/25 Page 11 of 25 RT-R-AMER-Test-7999

LEVEL NUMBER

OF

IMPACTS

SPECIMEN

TEMP.

(°F)

DROP

HEIGHT

(ft)

PASS/FAIL RESULTS

1 2

64.8

0.50 Pass 1st Impact: No change

2nd Impact: No change

2 2 1.00 Pass 1st Impact: No change 2nd Impact: No change

3 2 1.50 Pass 1st Impact: No change 2nd Impact: No change

4 2 2.00 Pass 1st Impact: No change 2nd Impact: No change

5 2 2.50 Pass 1st Impact: No change 2nd Impact: Tear at shot location C1, 4 in long, some tearing at shot locations C1 and C2 on protected side of specimen

6 2 3.00 Pass 1st Impact: Tear at shot location C1, 5 in long 2nd Impact: Tear at shot location C1, 6 in long

7 2 3.50 Pass 1st Impact: Continued tearing at shot locations C1 and C2, significant tearing on protected side at shot locations C1 and C2 2nd Impact: No change

8 2 4.00 Pass 1st Impact: No change 2nd Impact: Impactor bounced out of specimen, The 6 in sphere was unable to pass through glazing with less than 4 lbs. of force.

www.intertek.com/building

TEST REPORT FOR CLEAR ARMOR

Version: 02/18/25 Page 12 of 25 RT-R-AMER-Test-7999

SECTION 10

PHOTOGRAPHS

Photo No. 1

Ballistic Range Set-up

Photo No. 2

Specimen No. 1, Ballistic Pre-Test, Attack Side www.intertek.com/building

TEST REPORT FOR CLEAR ARMOR

Version: 02/18/25 Page 13 of 25 RT-R-AMER-Test-7999

Photo No. 3

Specimen No. 1, Ballistic Pre-Test, Protected Side

Photo No. 4

Specimen No. 1, Ballistic Post-Test, Attack Side www.intertek.com/building

TEST REPORT FOR CLEAR ARMOR

Version: 02/18/25 Page 14 of 25 RT-R-AMER-Test-7999

Photo No. 5

Specimen No. 1, Ballistic Post-Test, Protected Side

Photo No. 6

Impactor Test Set-up www.intertek.com/building

TEST REPORT FOR CLEAR ARMOR

Version: 02/18/25 Page 15 of 25 RT-R-AMER-Test-7999

Photo No. 7

Specimen No. 1, Impactor Pre-Test, Attack Side

Photo No. 8

Specimen No. 1, Impactor Pre-Test, Protected Side www.intertek.com/building

TEST REPORT FOR CLEAR ARMOR

Version: 02/18/25 Page 16 of 25 RT-R-AMER-Test-7999

Photo No. 9

Specimen No. 1, Impactor Post-Test, Attack Side (Level 7.1)

Photo No. 10

Specimen No. 1, Impactor Post-Test, Protected Side (Level 7.1) www.intertek.com/building

TEST REPORT FOR CLEAR ARMOR

Version: 02/18/25 Page 17 of 25 RT-R-AMER-Test-7999

Photo No. 11

Specimen No. 2, Ballistic Pre-Test, Attack Side

Photo No. 12

Specimen No. 2, Ballistic Pre-Test, Protected Side www.intertek.com/building

TEST REPORT FOR CLEAR ARMOR

Version: 02/18/25 Page 18 of 25 RT-R-AMER-Test-7999

Photo No. 13

Specimen No. 2, Ballistic Post-Test, Attack Side

Photo No. 14

Specimen No. 2, Ballistic Post-Test, Protected Side www.intertek.com/building

TEST REPORT FOR CLEAR ARMOR

Version: 02/18/25 Page 19 of 25 RT-R-AMER-Test-7999

Photo No. 15

Specimen No. 2, Impactor Pre-Test, Attack Side

Photo No. 16

Specimen No. 2, Impactor Pre-Test, Protected Side www.intertek.com/building

TEST REPORT FOR CLEAR ARMOR

Version: 02/18/25 Page 20 of 25 RT-R-AMER-Test-7999

Photo No. 17

Specimen No. 2, Impactor Post-Test, Attack Side (Level 8.1)

Photo No. 18

Specimen No. 2, Impactor Post-Test, Protected Side (Level 8.1) www.intertek.com/building

TEST REPORT FOR CLEAR ARMOR

Version: 02/18/25 Page 21 of 25 RT-R-AMER-Test-7999

Photo No. 19

Specimen No. 3, Ballistic Pre-Test, Attack Side

Photo No. 20

Specimen No. 3, Ballistic Pre-Test, Protected Side www.intertek.com/building

TEST REPORT FOR CLEAR ARMOR

Version: 02/18/25 Page 22 of 25 RT-R-AMER-Test-7999

Photo No. 21

Specimen No. 3, Ballistic Post-Test, Attack Side

Photo No. 22

Specimen No. 3, Ballistic Post-Test, Protected Side www.intertek.com/building

TEST REPORT FOR CLEAR ARMOR

Version: 02/18/25 Page 23 of 25 RT-R-AMER-Test-7999

Photo No. 23

Specimen No. 3, Impactor Pre-Test, Attack Side

Photo No. 24

Specimen No. 3, Impactor Pre-Test, Protected Side www.intertek.com/building

TEST REPORT FOR CLEAR ARMOR

Version: 02/18/25 Page 24 of 25 RT-R-AMER-Test-7999

Photo No. 25

Specimen No. 3, Impactor Post-Test, Attack Side (Level 8.2)

Photo No. 26

Specimen No. 3, Impactor Post-Test, Protected Side (Level 8.2) www.intertek.com/building

TEST REPORT FOR CLEAR ARMOR

Version: 02/18/25 Page 25 of 25 RT-R-AMER-Test-7999

SECTION 11

REVISION LOG

REVISION # DATE PAGES REVISION

0 03/24/26 N/A Original Report Issue

For INTERTEK B&C: