P-2026-000096 ADD 1 Attachment 2.pdf

CLEAR ARMOR

PERFORMANCE

TEST REPORT

SCOPE OF WORK

ASTM F1233 FORCED-ENTRY TESTING OF A 5/8 IN LAMINATED GLAZING PRODUCT

REPORT NUMBER

T5621.01-119-12 R0

TEST DATE

03/06/26

ISSUE DATE

03/24/26

RECORD RETENTION END DATE

03/06/30

PAGES

DOCUMENT CONTROL NUMBER

RT-R-AMER-Test-2787 (05/05/22)

© 2017 INTERTEK

130 Derry Court York, Pennsylvania 17406

Telephone: 717-764-7700

Facsimile: 717-764-4129 www.intertek.com/building

TEST REPORT FOR CLEAR ARMOR

Report No.: T5621.01-119-12 R0 Date: 03/24/26

This report is for the exclusive use of Intertek's Client and is provided pursuant to the agreement between Intertek and its Client.

Intertek's responsibility and liability are limited to the terms and conditions of the agreement. Intertek assumes no liability to any party, other than to the Client in accordance with the agreement, for any loss, expense or damage occasioned by the use of this report. Only the Client is authorized to permit copying or distribution of this report and then only in its entirety. Any use of the Intertek name or one of its marks for the sale or advertisement of the tested material, product or service must first be approved in writing by Intertek. The observations and test results in this report are relevant only to the sample(s) tested. This report by itself does not imply that the material, product, or service is or has ever been under an Intertek certification program.

Version: 05/05/22 Page 2 of 7 RT-R-AMER-Test-2787

REPORT ISSUED TO

CLEAR ARMOR

32991 North Thorn Apple Grayslake, IL 60046

SECTION 1

SCOPE

Architectural Testing, Inc. (an Intertek company) dba Intertek Building & Construction (B&C) was contracted by Clear Armor to perform forced entry resistance testing in accordance with ASTM F1233 on a 5/8 in laminated glazing product. Results obtained are tested values and were secured by using the designated test method. Testing was conducted at the Intertek B&C test facility in York, Pennsylvania.

This report does not constitute certification of this product nor an opinion or endorsement by this laboratory. Unless differently required, Intertek reports apply the "Simple Acceptance" rule, also called "Shared Risk approach," of ILAC-G8:09/2019, Guidelines on Decision Rules and Statements of Conformity.

SECTION 2

SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS

PRODUCT NAME FORCED ENTRY-PHYSICAL ATTACK

CLASS ACHIEVED

5/8 in Laminated Glazing Product Class 1.2 (Contraband) Class 1.3 (Body Passage)

For INTERTEK B&C:

COMPLETED BY: Scott T. Gladfelter, P.E. REVIEWED BY: V. Thomas Mickley, Jr., P.E.

TITLE: Senior Project Engineer TITLE: Senior Staff Engineer

SIGNATURE:

SIGNATURE:

DATE: 03/24/26 DATE: 03/24/26

STG:vtm/aas http://www.intertek.com/building www.intertek.com/building

TEST REPORT FOR CLEAR ARMOR

Version: 05/05/22 Page 3 of 7 RT-R-AMER-Test-2787

SECTION 3

TEST METHOD

The test specimen was evaluated for Forced Entry-Physical Attack only in accordance with the following:

ASTM F1233-21, Standard Test Method for Security Glazing Materials and Systems

SECTION 4

MATERIAL SOURCE/INSTALLATION

Test sample was provided by the client.

Installation: Sample was installed into a test frame fabricated in accordance with Section 8.2 of

ASTM F1233.

SECTION 5

LIST OF OFFICIAL OBSERVERS

NAME COMPANY

Eric J. Beaudoin Intertek B&C Jeffrey C. Jones Intertek B&C Tyler Bard Intertek B&C

SECTION 6

TEST PROCEDURES

The sample was rigidly mounted for forced entry resistance testing. The resources (tools) for forced entry testing were provided to test personnel, in addition to a 1/8 in diameter rod (representing contraband) and an 8 in x 8 in x 5 in solid uncompressible rectangular object (representing body passage). Blunt impact, sharp impact, and thermal stress tools were utilized.

The surface temperature of the test specimen was recorded following each attack sequence.

Concentrated assault team members are listed in the following table.

Forced Entry Resistance Test Personnel

NAME AGE (yrs) WEIGHT (lbs) Jeffrey C. Jones 23 180 Tyler Bard 22 183 www.intertek.com/building

TEST REPORT FOR CLEAR ARMOR

Version: 05/05/22 Page 4 of 7 RT-R-AMER-Test-2787

SECTION 7

TEST SPECIMEN DESCRIPTION

PRODUCT NAME 5/8 in Laminated Glazing Product PRODUCT TYPE Laminated Glazing OVERALL SIZE 24 in wide by 24 in high by 0.616 in thick

SECTION 8

TEST RESULTS

SEQUENCE CLASS

ACHIEVED

DESCRIPTION OF

ATTACK

TEMP.

(°F)

ACTUAL TIME

(min:sec)

NOTE

1 1.0 Ball Peen Hammer 75 00:14 -- 2 1.1 Ball Peen Hammer 72 00:16 -- 3 1.2 1-1/2" Pipe/Sledge 69 00:43 -- 4 1.3 Extinguisher -24 01:08 Note #1 5 1.4 Sledge Hammer -29 00:50 Note #2

Note #1: After one fire extinguisher and 4 impacts of the sledge hammer, the 1/8 in diameter rod was able to pass freely through the specimen.

Note #2: After 20 impacts of the sledge hammer, the 8 in x 8 in x 5 in solid uncompressible rectangular object (representing body passage) was able to pass freely through the specimen.

SECTION 9

CONCLUSION

The test specimen achieved a Forced Entry-Physical Attack Class of 1.2 (Contraband) and 1.3 (Body Passage).

www.intertek.com/building

TEST REPORT FOR CLEAR ARMOR

Version: 05/05/22 Page 5 of 7 RT-R-AMER-Test-2787

SECTION 10

PHOTOGRAPHS

Photo No. 1

Specimen at the Beginning of Testing

Photo No. 2

Forced Entry Tools www.intertek.com/building

TEST REPORT FOR CLEAR ARMOR

Version: 05/05/22 Page 6 of 7 RT-R-AMER-Test-2787

Photo No. 3

Contraband Passage (During Class 1.3)

Photo No. 4

Body Passage (During Class 1.4), Exterior www.intertek.com/building

TEST REPORT FOR CLEAR ARMOR

Version: 05/05/22 Page 7 of 7 RT-R-AMER-Test-2787

Photo No. 5

Body Passage (During Class 1.4), Interior

SECTION 11

REVISION LOG

REVISION # DATE PAGES REVISION

0 03/24/26 N/A Original Report Issue

For INTERTEK B&C: