SOO (Updated) - Oracle Consolidated Project -DRAFT_1April2024.docx
DOCX document 807 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- Not on record
About this file
This document is a Statement of Objectives (SOO) for the Air Force Services Financial Management System (AFSFMS) Oracle Consolidation project at the Air Force Services Center (AFSVC) in Port San Antonio, TX. The SOO outlines the objectives and deliverables for the contractor, which include analyzing the current AFSFMS system, reconfiguring the line of accounting, developing and implementing Treasury Management, Cash Management, Project Costing, Contracting Lifecycle Management, and Procurement modules. Key requirements are experience with Oracle E-Business Suite R12, Oracle Cloud development, Non-Appropriated Funds accounting, and integrating various financial management modules. The contractor must provide a detailed project plan, resource calendar, and weekly/monthly status reporting. The work is expected to be performed over a 12-month base period with up to 5 option years. The related federal contract opportunity is a pre-solicitation for an Oracle Integrator to support this AFSFMS consolidation effort.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Instructions to Vendor (Updated)_16May2024.docx | DOCX document | |
| 5_AFSVC Basic Line of Accounting Structure_dated_7Feb24.pdf | ||
| 4_CLM-Process_dated_7Feb24.pdf | ||
| 3_AFSVC_EBS_Modules_dated_7Feb24.pdf | ||
| 1_IBPS Active Records_dated_7Feb24.pdf | ||
| Instructions to Vendor (Updated).docx | DOCX document | |
| AFSVC RFI_QA_Responses_1-141_5April24.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 2_AFSFMS RICE Inventory List_dated_7Feb24.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Instructions to potential sources.pdf | ||
| SOO - Oracle Consolidated Project -DRAFT 09282023 v2.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 1
FA5000‐XX-X-XXXX
STATEMENT OF OBJECTIVES (SOO)
FOR
Air Force Services Financial Management System (AFSFMS) Oracle Consolidated Project
AT
Air Force Services Center (AFSVC), Port San Antonio, TX
Table of Contents
| SECTION I | 4 | |
| 1.0 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES | 4 | |
| 1.1. General. | 4 | |
| 1.2. Background. | 4 | |
| 1.3. Scope | 5 | |
| SECTION II | 5 | |
| 2.0 PROBLEM STATEMENT | 5 | |
| 2.1. Objective(s) | 5 | |
| 2.2 Final Outcome | 6 | |
| SECTION III | 6 | |
| 3.0 DELIVERABLES AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA | 6 | |
| 3.1. Deliverables | 6 | |
| 3.1.4. Deliverable four (4): | 7 | |
| 3.2. Acceptance Criteria | 7 | |
| SECTION IV | 8 | |
| 4.0 TERMS OF THE CONTRACT, STAKEHOLDER (collaborating offices) | 8 | |
| 4.1. Timeline | 8 | |
| 4.2. Contractor Qualifications. | 8 | |
| 4.3. Stakeholders (Collaborating Offices). | 9 | |
| SECTION V | 9 | |
| 5.0. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION | 9 | |
| 5.1. Reporting. | 9 | |
| 5.2. Schedule | 10 | |
| 5.3. Resource Calendar | 10 | |
| 5.4. Meetings | 10 | |
| 5.5. Weekly Status Meetings | 10 | |
| 5.6. Documentation. | 11 | |
| SECTION VI | 11 | |
| 6.0 GENERAL INFORMATION | 11 | |
| 6.1. Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) Responsibilities. | 11 | |
| 6.2. Place of Performance | 12 | |
| 6.3. Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) & Personnel | 12 | |
| 6.4. Travel | 12 | |
| 6.5. Identify Known or Possible Conflicts of Interest | 12 | |
| 6.6. Security and Training Requirements | 12 | |
| 6.7. Security Clearances | 13 | |
| 6.8. Privacy Act | 14 | |
| 6.9. Cyber Security | 15 | |
| 6.10. Security Education, Training and Awareness (SETA) | 15 | |
| 6.11. Section 508: Data Stewardship and Governance | 15 | |
| SECTION VII | 16 | |
| 7.0 APPENDIX | 16 | |
| 7.1. | DEFINITIONS & ABBREVIATIONS | 16 |
| 7.3. | AFSFMS Change Management Process | 18 |
| 7.4. | Sample Weekly Status Reports or as agreed upon by COR | 19 |
| 7.5. | Sample Contract Progress Report | 20 |
| 7.6. | NAFI Observed Holidays | 21 |
SECTION I
1.0 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES
1.1. General. The Air Force Services Center (AFSVC), headquartered at Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland, Texas, delivers Services programs and activities to build and sustain ready and resilient Airmen, Guardians and families. AFSVC supports the bases, major commands and air staff by providing technical assistance, new initiatives, developing programs and procedures and managing central support functions. AFSVC ensures successful operation of essential food, fitness, childcare, lodging and recreation opportunities for military members and their families. The Center’s responsibilities include preparing responses to high-level inquiries, providing technical assistance to the field and developing new programs that support major command and installation activities. The Installations Systems Branch (VTEI) manages the Oracle E-Business Suite (EBS) Air Force Services Financial Management System (AFSFMS). AFSFMS supports a worldwide mission providing payroll, human resources, benefits and financial information to customers.
1.2. Background.
1.2.1. AFSVC needs to enrich their investment in EBS, and to future-proof that continued investment by providing agile and responsive tooling, infrastructure, and platforms to accomplish the mission.
1.2.2. Volumetrics:
· 24x7 System
· Oracle E-Business Suite R12 (12.2.9) on Red Hat Enterprise Linux release 8.8 (Ootpa) & Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.9 (Maipo)
· Oracle Database 19c
· Current Modules:
· Fixed Assets
· Accounts Payables
· Purchasing
· Accounts Receivables
· Benefits
· Cash Reconciliation
· Treasury
· General Ledger
· Payroll
· Total of 28,448 Users: 1,445 APF; 19,875 NAF; 7,128 Retirees-Beneficiaries
· 150+ OAS Reports
· 10,000+ Oracle 6i Base Reports (Monthly)
· Transactions processed in AFSFMS
· 11 M transactions per day
· 330 M transactions per month
· 4 Billion transactions per year
· 4TB of data for a database tier - executables + DB (Production)
· Six (6) instances in Sustainment
· Production Environments: PROD, DR
· Testing Environments: DEV, TEST, GOLD, TRAIN,
1.3. Scope.
1.3.1. AFSVC requires an Oracle E-Business Suite (EBS) (R12.2.X) contractor/s with strong knowledge of Oracle EBS modules to replace legacy systems and provide development, configuration, implementation, and DBA support, with a concentration on Treasury Management, Cash Management, Project Costing, iSupplier (or other similar system recommended by contractor), Payables, CLM, Procurement and associated modules to fully utilize and leverage the capabilities of the Oracle EBS.
SECTION II
2.0 PROBLEM STATEMENT
AFSVC needs to make significant investments to deliver the rock-solid Oracle E-Business Suite necessary to meet the demands of AFSVC. The purpose of this SOO, utilizing industry best practices, is to:
· Review and analyze the current legal entity set-up and determine the best legal entity mapping following R12 recommended functionality.
· Reconfigure the AFSVC current line of accounting (LOA) to allow the full capability of the inter/intra accounting segments.
· Develop, configure, integrate and implement Oracle’s Projects Costing, Cash Management, and Treasury Management modules into the current AFSFMS for the Financial Management & Comptroller Directorate.
· Develop, configure, integrate and implement Contracting LifeCycle Management (CLM), Procurement and, iSupplier (or other system as recommended by contractor) replacing the current customized legacy Internet Based Purchasing System (IBPS).
· Contractors must provide the below for each of the deliverables for the bid process:
a. Experience on implementation of each deliverable with Points of Contact (POC)
b. Number, type and time period of FTE to implement of each deliverable
c. Labor Rates of each person assigned to each deliverable
d. Time period to implement, if concurrent with another deliverable, please annotate
e. Full implementation timeline of all deliverables combined w/ Total cost of project The Contractor shall provide all services, travel, and project supervision, as required in connection with this Statement of Objective (SOO).
2.1. Objective(s).
2.1.1. AFSVC requires an analysis of existing processes, source document submission and data exchanges; and a recommendation on implementation and sequencing of all objectives.
2.1.2. Review and analyze the current legal entity set-up and determine the best legal entity mapping and recommended functionality.
2.1.3. Reconfigure the AFSVC current line of accounting (LOA) to allow the full capability of the inter/intra accounting segments.
2.1.4. Develop, configure, integrate and implement Oracle’s Projects Costing, Cash Management, and Treasury Management modules
2.1.5. Migrate all legacy data from AFSVC/VF 525 database into AFSFMS.
2.1.6. Develop, configure, integrate and implement Contracting LifeCycle Management (CLM) Procurement and iSupplier (or other system as recommended by contractor)
2.1.7. Develop, configure, integrate and implement the Procurement and Procurement Contracts module integrated with CLM.
2.1.8. Prepare the environment for System Integration Testing (SIT)/ User Acceptance Testing (UAT) environments
2.1.9. Complete retrofitting, break/fix troubleshooting, SIT/UAT, and update implementation plan with any defect resolution(s) and timings
2.1.10. Contractor conducts initial Smoke test of SIT/UAT and release instance to users for final acceptance testing.
2.2 Final Outcome.
2.2.1. At the end of the contract performance, AFSVC AFSFMS environments will have Objectives 2.1.2. thru 2.1.7 fully tested and operational in the Production environment.
2.2.2. Post support and sustainment in place for each module, for up to five (5) Option years.
SECTION III
3.0 DELIVERABLES AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
The Contractor shall provide deliverable(s) in a format mutually agreed upon by the Government and the Contractor. The following deliverables are not expected to change. Due Date intervals are not expected to change but actual dates may need to be revised depending on actual contract start date. The Contractor shall provide its list of deliverables based on its proposed technical solution. This section will be updated based on the proposed technical solution selected by the Government.
3.1. Deliverables
3.1.1. Deliverable one (1): Analysis of existing processes, source document submission and data exchanges; and a recommendation on implementation of all objectives stated above. Estimated at 30 days per-objective from Award of Contract.
3.1.1.1. Contractor shall provide an analysis (matrix) of AFSVC’s current ERP (Oracle E-Business Suites). Analyze benefits received from the integration and provide maximum optimization. If something cannot be fully integrated, an analysis of why. Estimated at 30 days from paragraph 3.1.1.
3.1.2. Deliverable two (2): A Project Plan and RASCI matrix will be created by the Contractor, with AFSVC input, to identify all the roles and responsibilities of each stakeholder on the project. Estimated at 30 days after deliverable one (1) for each objective.
3.1.3. Deliverable three (3): Create an implementation plan for entire project.3.1.4.
3.1.4. Deliverable four (4): Analysis of the current legal entity set-up, determine legal entity mapping and recommendation of functionality.
3.1.5. Deliverable five (5): Reconfigure the current line of accounting (LOA) to allow the full capability of the inter/intra accounting segments.
3.1.6. Deliverable six (6): Develop, configure, integrate and implement Oracle’s Treasury Management
3.1.7. Deliverable seven (7): Develop, configure, integrate and implement Oracle’s Cash Management
3.1.8. Deliverable eight (8): Develop, configure, integrate and implement Oracle’s Projects Costing
3.1.9. Deliverable nine (9): Migrate all legacy data from AFSVC/VF 525 database into AFSFMS.
3.1.10. Deliverable ten (10): Develop, configure, integrate and implement Contracting LifeCycle Management (CLM), Procurement and Procurement Contracts modules.
3.1.11. Deliverable eleven (11): Develop, configure, integrate and implement Oracle iSupplier or other system as recommended by contractor.
3.1.11.1. If different system recommended, need Total Cost, Implementation and Training costs, Yearly Maintenance License Fees.
3.1.12. Deliverable twelve (12): Provide MD50/70/120 documentation for deliverables six (6) thru eleven (11).
3.1.13. Deliverable thirteen (13): Post implementation support for all modules available for five (5) option years which will be costed separately, by module, by each option year.
3.2. Acceptance Criteria.
3.2.1. All deliverables, technical services and products shall be function tested to operate on Air Force systems and approved by the COR and designated representatives from AFSVC prior to acceptance and be able to obtain a viable assessment and authorization.
3.2.1.1. Weekly/Monthly status reports/meetings to the government with the following information:
3.2.1.1.1. Contract funds expended during the reporting period (monthly).
3.2.1.1.2. Description of the activities of the past week/month.
3.2.1.1.3. Any issues or problems affecting project progress along with proposed resolution (weekly/monthly).
3.2.1.1.4. Schedule of activities planned for next reporting period (weekly/monthly).
3.2.1.1.5. Acceptance criteria for metrics, trip reports, and technical presentation requirements are as specified in section Deliverables section.
3.2.1.1.6. Quarterly Quality TIMs.
3.2.1.1.7. Documented recommendations, system configurations/set-up and guidance identified/discussed in meetings or collaborative sessions.
3.2.2. All data or work products generated in the support and development effort shall be property of AFSVC.
3.2.3. Acceptance or rejection of named deliverables will occur within 14 business days after receipt by the COR.
SECTION IV
4.0 TERMS OF THE CONTRACT, STAKEHOLDER (collaborating offices)
4.1. Timeline. (Contractor proposed) The customer intends to award based on deliverables. The Contractor shall support all implementation, any modifications necessary, to ensure all processes are without errors or downtime for a base period of 12 months after the contract award, followed by aaaa (X) possible option years.
Period of Performance: Shall not exceed aaaa (X) years.
Each optional CLIN separates recommendations. Ensure each recommendation has a timeline and deliverables.
Example:
CLIN 0001 - program deliverables 1 thru 3 CLIN 0002 - program deliverable 4 CLIN 0003 - program deliverable 5 CLIN 0004 - program deliverable 6 CLIN 0005 - program deliverable 7 CLIN 0006 - program deliverable 8 CLIN 0007 - program deliverable 9 CLIN 0008 - program deliverable 10 CLIN 0009 - program deliverable 11 CLIN 0010 - program deliverable 12 CLIN 0011 - Travel
4.2. Contractor Qualifications.
The Contractor shall provide the experience necessary to complete the task outlined in the SOO. The Contractor shall utilize established policies, standards, and sound management principles in the performance of the SOO requirements and deliverables.
4.2.1. The Contractor’s personnel, at a minimum, shall have the following experience as required per module:
4.2.1.1. Must have Oracle Cloud development and Oracle APEX experience.
4.2.1.2. Must have Oracle E-Business Suite R12 experience.
4.2.1.3. Must have Office of the Security of Defense (OSD) Non-Appropriated Funds Standard General Ledger (NAFSGL) line of accounting implementation experience. Must have line of accounting (LOA) implementation experience.
4.2.1.4. Must have Oracle’s Projects Costing, Cash Management, and Treasury Management modules experience.
4.2.1.5. Must have Contracting LifeCycle Management (CLM), Procurement, iSupplier (or similar product), and Purchasing modules experience.
4.3. Stakeholders (Collaborating Offices).
4.3.1 Lead organization for this effort: AFSVC/XXX
4.3.2 Collaborating organizations: AFSVC/CC, AFSVC/VI, AFSVC/VPE, AFSVC/VIS, AFSVC/VT, AFSVC/VTOI, AFSVC/VTEI and others as needed (i.e., impacted Major Commands/Field Commands)
4.3.3 Risks created by multiple stakeholders:
4.3.3.1 Decentralized management/oversight of AFSVC and AFSVC/VTEI portfolio
4.3.3.2 Multiple process owners or co-process owners (which could be conflicting); lack of structure and business rules governing/guiding the recent re-assignment of roles/responsibilities
4.3.3.3 Multiple requirement owners/generators; no mechanism or process implemented to accurately capture, validate, and prioritize requirements across the Enterprise
SECTION V
5.0. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
5.1. Reporting.
5.1.1. The Contractor shall provide weekly status reports (See 8.4. Weekly Status Report) and/or other updates as needed to provide the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) with the current status of the tasks completed for the week. The status report must identify action and/or items completed by individual contract resources, planned task/activities, risks and status updates.
5.1.2. Provide a list of planned task/activities for the week in the status report. Subsequent status reports shall include completed percentage of completion of the previous week’s planned task/activities and a new list of planned activities for the following week.
5.1.3. The Contractor shall provide a monthly contract progress report, with their monthly invoice, that shall be consistent with the submitted and COR approved weekly status reports. (See 8.5. Contract Progress Report)
5.2. Schedule.
5.2.1. A detailed contract plan that shall outline major tasks such as discovery/ramp up time, and environment configuration, validation/review, development and required support activities. The Contractor shall deliver in accordance with (IAW) the approved schedule.
5.2.1.1. The Contractor shall provide, at the scheduled kick-off meeting, a detailed contract plan (i.e. Gantt Chart) outlining major tasks such as discovery/ramp up time, environment configuration, validation/review, development and required support activities.
5.2.1.2. The Contractor shall provide, thirty (30) days, after the kick-off meeting, a realistic detailed project plan outlining the tasks and subtasks for both the AF and the Contractor based on the deliverables and requirements listed in the SOO. Once the submitted plan/schedule is approved by the COR, the Contractor shall deliver IAW the approved schedule.
5.2.1.3. All forecasted or unexpected delays to the schedule must be reported to the COR within one (1) business day of discovery. The Contractor shall provide reason for delay and proposed resolutions to the COR no later than 1600 CST the same day.
5.2.1.4. If a delay occurs and is the result of Contractor error, the Contractor shall submit a revised schedule to the COR for review and approval within two workdays of recognition of delay.
5.3. Resource Calendar.
5.3.1. At a minimum of 21 business days in advance, the Contractor shall provide the COR, in writing, the projected days the Contractor’s resources will be unavailable. This information is necessary to help plan for critical support task/activities like patching, system upgrades but not limited to these activities. This will allow AFSVC to coordinate and plan for resource availability.
5.4. Meetings.
5.4.1. Kick-Off Meeting. A kick-off meeting will be held after contract award on a date and time agreeable by both parties. The meeting will be held at the Place of Performance. The Contractor shall designate a primary Point of Contact (POC) for the contract for the kick-off meeting.
5.5. Weekly Status Meetings.
5.5.1. The day and time of the weekly status meeting shall be determined by the COR and the Contractor after contract award. Meetings will be held virtually unless otherwise coordinated between COR & Contractor.
5.5.2. Recommendations identified or discussed in meetings or collaborative sessions shall be provided in writing within two (2) business days of initial recommendations. Contractor shall provide any recommendations, alternate options, scenarios or configurations in writing in MS Word format or COR approved format.
5.6. Documentation. All recommendations, configurations, and guidance must be provided in writing in MS Word format or COR approved format.
5.6.1. Provide guidance and instruction for existing documentation provided such as setup and configuration documents.
5.6.2. Provide guidance and instruction to develop system documentation provided such as setup and configuration documents.
SECTION VI
6.0 GENERAL INFORMATION
6.1. Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) Responsibilities.
6.1.1. The Contracting Officer (CO) will designate an individual as the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR).
6.1.2. The COR is responsible for monitoring the performance of work under this contract. In no event, shall any understanding, agreement, modification, change order, or other matter deviating from the terms of this contract be effective or binding upon the contracting customer unless formalized by proper contractual documents executed by the CO prior to the completion of the contract.
6.1.3. This designation shall remain in effect throughout the life of the contract, unless terminated sooner in writing by the CO or due to reassignment. Primary responsibilities of the COR may include, but are not limited to, the following:
6.1.3.1. The COR is responsible for performing post award administrative functions necessary to ensure performance of services required by this contract. If the COR believes performance by the Contractor has not met the level required by the contract, the problem shall be referred to the CO for resolution.
6.1.3.2. The COR shall maintain and approve the list of all products required to be delivered by the Contractor as well as when the product is delivered and its acceptability status, this includes the project schedule.
6.1.3.3. The COR will maintain a record of all contract deliverables and a copy of the email message or cover letter used to deliver the deliverables.
6.1.3.4. The COR will work with CO to ensure the following responsibilities are adhered to:
6.1.3.4.1. Verify that the Contractor performs the technical requirements of the contract in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications therein. Specific emphasis shall be placed on the quality provisions, for both adherences to the contract provisions and to the Contractor's own quality control program.
6.1.3.4.2. Perform acceptance for the customer of services performed under this contract.
6.1.3.4.3. Communication will be the key to success of this effort. Maintain liaison and direct communications with the Contractor and the CO. Written communications with the Contractor and other documents pertaining to the contract shall be signed by the COR and a copy shall be furnished to the CO.
6.3.4.4. Monitor the Contractor's performance, notify the Contractor of deficiencies observed and direct appropriate action to effect correction. Record and report to the CO incidents of faulty or non-conforming work, delays, or problems.
6.2. Place of Performance
3515 South General McMullen Bldg. 1, San Antonio, TX 78236-9854. Remote work is authorized for a majority of the contract, however in office work may be required as recommended by COR & Contractor.
6.3. Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) & Personnel
6.3.1. AFSVC will provide all software currently approved by the Air Force to develop and sustain the current AFSFMS environment and required on the PCs. The software will be installed on the GFE-owned PCs and will be operational at the start of this contract.
6.3.2. If the GFE malfunctions, the Contractor shall notify the COR immediately.
6.3.3. GFE Updates. Any updates or additional required software, security patches, or maintenance will be accomplished by AFSVC. If required, AFSVC will provide other GFE as resources permit during this timeframe.
6.3.4. AFSVC will provide GFE-owned PCs to do the required work and to access the applications.
6.4. Travel
Contractor shall include in their price for the assigned team to travel to San Antonio, TX for the kick-off meeting, to pick-up & turn-in Government Furnished Laptops (turn-in will include a Contract Closeout Meeting). All other travel must be mutually coordinated & reimbursed by AFSVC in accordance with the Federal Travel Regulations (FTR see Clause 29 of the SEC I – NAF Standard Clauses).
6.5. Identify Known or Possible Conflicts of Interest
Contractor will have access to the Department of Air Force execution data from financial systems, contracts, and pricing data at the CLIN level. Contractor shall identify any known or possible conflicts of interests to the COR.
6.6. Security and Training Requirements
Highest level: UNCLASSIFIED. The preponderance of work will be at the unclassified level.
6.6.1. Building Access. Unescorted access to the AFSVC/Building 1 is approved and shall be coordinated through the COR and AFSVC’s Security Manager. Any other locations shall be approved on a case-by-case basis.
6.6.2 Training. Cyber Awareness Challenge Training, Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) Training (one-time) and Privileged User Cybersecurity Responsibilities (if server access required). All Government required training shall be provided at no cost by the Government.
6.7. Security Clearances
6.7.1. The Contractor shall ensure that personnel requiring access to AFSVC information systems, or its data have the proper and current cybersecurity certifications as determined by AFSVC cybersecurity teams to perform cybersecurity functions in accordance with DoDM 8140.03, Cyberspace Workforce Qualification And Management Program located at https://dodcio.defense.gov/Portals/0/Documents/Library/DoDM-8140-03.pdf.
6.7.2. The Contractor shall meet the following contract/security clearance requirements, including:
6.7.2.1. The Contractor shall safeguard and comply with the rules and regulations issued under DoDI 5200.02, DoD Personnel Security Program (PSP), 21 Mar 2014; AFMAN 16-1405, Air Force Personnel Security Program; AFM 33-152, User Responsibilities and Guidance For Information Systems; DoDD 8500.01 security, 14 Mar 2014; AFI 17-130, Air Force Cybersecurity Program Management; and DoDM 8140.03, Information Assurance Workforce Improvement Program requirements and respective updates to the listed rules and regulations. The Contractor shall follow the DoD Privacy Office guidelines for submittal of Information Assurance Technical (IAT) security clearances and ensure all personnel are designated as IAT-II, or IAT-III where duties meet the criteria of the position sensitivity designations as stated in the DoDM 8140.03.
6.7.2.2. Contractor personnel assigned to perform duties within IAT-II or IAT-III, and or requiring “Limited Privileged Access” such as system or database administration rights, to the application or network are subject to investigation to determine whether they are and will remain reliable, trustworthy, of good conduct and character, and loyal to the United States and whether granting or continuing national security eligibility is clearly consistent with the national interest (Ref. DoDI 5200.02, DoD Personnel Security Program (PSP), 21 Mar 2014; AFMAN 16-1405, Personnel Security Program, Para 3.1). Documentation for a Tier 1 or Tier 3 investigation must be submitted to the Unit Security Manager within 10 business days after award.
6.7.3. Tier 1 requests are initiated using the Standard Form (SF) 85. Tier 3 requests are initiated using the Standard Form (SF) 86 and are submitted to the installation Information Protection Office through the Unit Security Manager. The initiation of the Tier 1 or Tier 3 shall include the submission of all required information and verified through the Department of Defense (DoD) Defense Information System for Security (DISS) database. The Contractor shall comply with the rules and regulations under DMDC Trusted Associate Sponsor System Overview Guide, Version 5.7, Sept 2018 and associated updates; all CAC holders must, at minimum, have an initiated a favorable completion of an FBI fingerprint check, or a DoD determined equivalent investigation. The NAFI may grant a waiver to allow the Contractor to start work after submitting all required information, passes a successful FBI fingerprint check and DISS.
6.7.4. All Contractor personnel requiring system access must be adjudicated with a Favorable determination in DISS.
6.7.5. The Contractor shall ensure all FISMA, NIST, Department of Defense (DoD), Air Force certification, accreditation/assessment and authorization, data protection and security standards are met and renewed on a continuing basis throughout the contract period.
6.7.6. Information Systems (IS)/Networks Physical Security. The Contractor shall employ physical security safeguards for IS/Networks and applications involved in processing or storage of U.S. customer data to prevent the unauthorized access, disclosure, modification, destruction, use, etc. at any time, and to otherwise protect the confidentiality and ensure use conforms with DoD regulations. In addition, the Contractor shall support a physical security audit performed by the U.S. customer of the Contractor's internal information management infrastructure that is used in development. The Contractor shall correct any deficiencies identified by the customer of the Contractor's physical security posture. The Contractor shall be required to follow all requirements in applicable DoD Information Assurance directives and policies.
6.7.7. All Contractor personnel requiring system access must respond to the AFSVC Security Manager’s inquiries within three business days (excluding federal holidays), not to exceed 72 hours. If Contractor personnel does not respond to the AFSVC Security Manager’s inquires within three business days, their non-action on this matter provides grounds for termination.
6.8. Privacy Act
The Contractor shall safeguard and comply with the agency rules and regulations issued under Public Law 110-53 (42 U.S.C. § 2000ee-1) Section 803; Air Force Policy Directive (AFPD) 33-3, Information Management; Department of Defense Directive (DoDD) 5400.11, Department of Defense Privacy Program; Department of Defense Regulation (DoDR) 5400.11-R, Department of Defense Privacy Program; Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 5400.16, DoD Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) Guidance; DoDI 1000.30, Reduction of SOC2al Security Number (SSN) Use Within DoD; and DoDI 1000.29, and DoD Civil Liberties Program, Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, E-Government Act of 2002, 44 U.S.C. §3601, Safeguarding and Responding to Personally Identifiable Information (PII) breaches, Reduction of SOC2al Security Number (SSN) and AFI 33-332, AF Privacy and Civil Liberties Program and associated updates to the agency rules and regulations. Penalties are applied for the misuse or unauthorized disclosure of PII. The Act (5 U.S.C. 552a) provides for civil remedies for injured parties, including actual damages, attorney fees, and litigation costs.
6.9. Cyber Security
6.9.1. The Contractor shall comply with Risk Management Framework requirements and cybersecurity policies and instructions outlined in Department of Defense Instructions (DODI): 10113.16, 52013.13, 8520.02, 8551.01, DAFI 34-101; 2019 National Defense Authorization Act Sections 881, 1631-1657; current versions of National Institutes of Standards and Technology (NIST) publications 800-53, 800-37, 800-161, 800-34, 800-60 Vol 1 and 2, 800-122, 800-171; 800-172, 800-128; 800-63A; current DOD CIO policies located at https://dodcio.defense.gov/Library/; and current version of PCI-DSS.
6.9.1.1. The Contractor shall comply with applicable Security Technical Implementation Guide (STIG) and Security Requirements Guides (SRG) under purview of the NAFI. Applicable Correlating Control Indicators (CCI) are available on the DoD Cyber Exchange (https://public.cyber.mil/stigs/cci/).
6.9.1.2. The Contractor shall provide pertinent administrative, technical documentation support, data, topologies, hardware, software, firmware listings and inventory to the NAFI for review and acceptance to support a successful identify management, cloud access/internet access point, cybersecurity service provider, and Payment Card Industry Data Security Standards.
6.10. Security Education, Training and Awareness (SETA) and Operations Security (OPSEC) Training
6.10.1. Contractor employees will complete initial and annual refresher SETA and OPSEC training within five days of on-boarding for initial, and annually as dictated by the unit security manager.
6.11. Section 508: Data Stewardship and Governance
6.11.1. All electronic and information technology (EIT) procured through this contract must meet the applicable accessibility standards at 36 CFR 1194. 36 CFR 1194 implements Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended. Further information on section 508 is available via the internet at http://www.section508.gov
6.11.2. The NAFI will have unlimited rights to all technical data unless the Contractor takes specific actions and includes prescribed legends in the proposal, contract, and/or data products to limit or restrict such NAFI rights for particular identified items. “Technical data” refers to recorded information and includes (but is not limited to) research and engineering data and drawings, specifications, standards, process sheets, manuals, technical reports and computer software documentation. It does not include computer software or financial, cost/pricing or other contract and grant administrative data but does include any developed intellectual property not specific to the data.
6.11.3. Data and information generated during this agreement is owned by the NAFI. Data must be physically separated from the data of other users, on separate drives or computers, and appropriate firewalls be established to prevent other users from accessing NAFI data.
6.11.4. Should the NAFI elect to not execute option years or at the end of the contract period, whichever is sooner, data must at all times be promptly accessible until converted to the new system with no additional separation fee.
SECTION VII
7.0 APPENDIX
7.1. DEFINITIONS & ABBREVIATIONS
Contracting Officer (CO). The duly appointed Government agent authorized to award or administer contracts. The contracting officer is the only person authorized to contractually obligate the Government.
Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR). The COR is responsible for monitoring the performance of work under this contract. In no event, shall any understanding, agreement, modification, change order, or other matter deviating from the terms of this contract be effective or binding upon the contracting customer unless formalized by proper contractual documents executed by the CO prior to the completion of the contract.
Statement of Objective (SOO). A formal contracting document used to describe the goals and objectives expected from soliciting Contractor work.
AFSFMS environments. AFSFMS has fourteen environments: (10) Oracle EBS Environments and four (4) Oracle APEX environments.
7.2. ACRONYMS
AFSFMS - Air Force Services Financial Management System AFSVC - Air Force Services Center APEX – Application Express ATO - Authorization to Operate BAN - Business Area Network CC – Commander ConOps – Continuity of Operations, see DR CO – Contracting Officer COR – Contracting Officer Representative DBCS - Oracle Database Cloud Service DISS - Defense Information System for Security (legacy JPAS) DNS - Domain Name Server DOD - Department of Defense DR - Disaster Recovery EBS - Oracle E-Business Suite GAT - General Acceptance Testing GFE – Government Furnished Equipment NAFI - Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentality OAC – Oracle Analytics Cloud OAS - Oracle Analytics Server OBDS – Oracle Base Database Service (formerly known as DBCS) OCI – Oracle Cloud Infrastructure OC2 - Government Oracle Cloud Infrastructure ODA - Oracle Database Appliance POV - Point of Contact RASCI - Responsible, Accountable, Supporting, Consulted and Informed SI - System Integrator SIT - System Integration Testing UAT - User Acceptance Testing VI- Installation Support Division VIS - Shared Service Center VM - Virtual Machine VPE - Contracting VT - Technology Division VTEI - Installation Systems Branch VTOI - IT Infrastructure Operations Branch
7.3. AFSFMS Change Management Process
7.4. Sample Weekly Status Reports or as agreed upon by COR
7.5. Sample Contract Progress Report
7.6. NAFI Observed Holidays
Holiday
New Year’s Day
Birthday of Martin Luther King, Jr.
Washington’s Birthday
Memorial Day
Juneteenth National Independence Day
Independence Day
Labor Day
Columbus Day
Veterans Day
Thanksgiving Day
Christmas Day
Statement of Objectives 1 April 2024 image1.png image2.png image3.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .