OBS past performance.docx
DOCX document 25 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 24-0423 KLE
- Issued by
- Adams County, Asotin County, Benton County, Chelan County, Clallam County, Clark County, Columbia County, Cowlitz County, Douglas County, Ferry County, Franklin County, Garfield County, Grant County, Grays Harbor County, Island County, Jefferson County, King County, Kitsap County, Kittitas County, Klickitat County, Lewis County, Lincoln County, Mason County, Okanogan County, Pacific County, Pend Oreille County, Pierce County, San Juan County, Skagit County, Skamania County, Snohomish County, Spokane County, Stevens County, Thurston County, Wahkiakum County, Walla Walla County, Whatcom County, Whitman County, Yakima County, Asotin City, Clarkston City, Clarkston Heights-Vineland CDP, West Clarkston-Highland CDP, Benton City, Chelan City, Chelan Falls CDP, Clallam Bay CDP, Lewisville CDP, Rock Island City, Pacific Beach CDP, Whidbey Island Station CDP, Mercer Island City, Pacific City, Bainbridge Island City, Kingston CDP, Kitsap Lake CDP, Kittitas City, Klickitat CDP, Okanogan City, Anderson Island CDP, Fort Lewis CDP, Fox Island CDP, Herron Island CDP, Ketron Island CDP, North Fort Lewis CDP, Raft Island CDP, Stevenson City, Hat Island CDP, Lake Stevens City, Snohomish City, Spokane City, Spokane Valley City, Puget Island CDP, Garfield Town, Yakima City, Washington
About this file
The document is an Exhibit 2 Past Performance Form related to a state and local contract opportunity issued by the University of Washington for Ocean Bottom Seismometers and Low Frequency Hydrophones as part of the Regional Cable Assembly project. The Offeror is required to provide past performance information on up to three relevant contracts, including the effort name, contract name, period of performance, contract value, customer information, description of deployment, problems encountered, and relevance to the current acquisition. The contract opportunity covers multiple jurisdictions within the state of Washington, including counties, cities, and census-designated places.
The document does not provide details on pricing terms, set asides, incumbents, funding requirements, or other salient information beyond the past performance requirements. The focus is on demonstrating the Offeror's ability to deliver on contracts of similar size and technical complexity as detailed in the RFQQ document.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| UPDATED RFQQ 0423 OBS 4.23.24.pdf | ||
| COSZO_OBSTech_Spec_1-00.docx.pdf | ||
| OBS tech compliance.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFQQ 24-0423 OBS 4.23.24.pdf | ||
| RFQQ 04-0423 Addendum 1.pdf | ||
| RFQQ 04-0423 Addendum 2.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Exhibit 2 Past Performance Form
The Offeror shall submit Past Performance information on up to three contracts/deployments that the Offeror considers most relevant to demonstrate their ability to perform the proposed effort. The Offeror’s past performance should include examples relevant to the Offeror’s ability to deliver on contracts of similar size and technical complexity as detailed in the RFQQ document. For each Past Performance example, the Offeror shall fill in a Past Performance Table below.
The Offeror is advised to verify all contact information provided, and the willingness and ability of customer contacts to respond to inquiries by the UW regarding the contract and the Offeror/Team-member’s performance on the contract.
Effort name
| Company Performing the Effort |
| Click or tap here to enter text. |
| Contract name |
| Click or tap here to enter text. |
| Period of performance |
| From Click or tap to enter a date. |
To Click or tap to enter a date.
| Contract value in $ |
| $Click or tap here to enter text. |
| Customer name, address, and point of contact |
| Click or tap here to enter text. |
| Description of deployment |
| Click or tap here to enter text. |
| Problems encountered/ Resolutions |
| Click or tap here to enter text. |
| Relevance to current acquisition |
| Click or tap here to enter text. |
Past Performance Table – Contract 1
Effort name
| Company Performing the Effort |
| Click or tap here to enter text. |
| Contract name |
| Click or tap here to enter text. |
| Period of performance |
| From Click or tap to enter a date. |
To Click or tap to enter a date.
| Contract value in $ |
| $Click or tap here to enter text. |
| Customer name, address and point of contact |
| Click or tap here to enter text. |
| Description of deployment |
| Click or tap here to enter text. |
| Problems encountered/ Resolutions |
| Click or tap here to enter text. |
| Relevance to current acquisition |
| Click or tap here to enter text. |
Past Performance Table – Contract 2
Effort name
| Company Performing the Effort |
| Click or tap here to enter text. |
| Contract name |
| Click or tap here to enter text. |
| Period of performance |
| From Click or tap to enter a date. |
To Click or tap to enter a date.
| Contract value in $ |
| $Click or tap here to enter text. |
| Customer name, address and point of contact |
| Click or tap here to enter text. |
| Description of deployment |
| Click or tap here to enter text. |
| Problems encountered/ Resolutions |
| Click or tap here to enter text. |
| Relevance to current acquisition |
| Click or tap here to enter text. |
Past Performance Table – Contract 3
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .