ATTACHMENT_2_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_and_Cover_Letter.docx
DOCX document 34 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Architect-Engineering Services (AES) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- NNJ16571636R
About this file
Attachment 2 Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment_3_Page_2.pdf | ||
| SF_30-Amendment_3.pdf | ||
| SF_30_-_A E_Amendment_2.pdf | ||
| Amendment_2_A E_Page_2.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_3_-_SF_330.pdf | ||
| SF_30_-_Amendment_1.pdf | ||
| Amendment_1_Pages_2_-_5.pdf | ||
| Request_for_Qualifications-Amendment_1.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT_1_-_NPR_8820.2G.pdf | ||
| A-E_Request_for_Qualifications.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
NNJ16571636R
ATTACHMENT 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE AND COVER LETTER
ATTACHMENT 2 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE AND COVER LETTER
Complete one set of letters and forms for each project identified in the respondent’s SF 330 Section F, Example Projects Which Best Illustrate Proposed Team’s Qualifications for This Contract. Additional space or blank sheets may be added to answer any question.
Transmittal Letter to Accompany Past Performance Questionnaire
FROM: [Insert Company Official Name, Title, and Company Name]
SUBJECT: Past Performance Questionnaire for Contract(s):
[Insert Company Name] is currently responding to NASA Johnson Space Center’s (JSC’s) Request for SF 330, Architect-Engineer Qualifications for the “Architect-Engineering Services”. This Request for SF 330’s requires respondents to identify customers and solicit their response regarding [Insert Company Name] performance.
[Insert Company Name] is providing past performance data to NASA/JSC relating to our performance on contract [Insert contract name/number] and have identified [Insert name of reference] as the point of contact for this contract.
The request for SF 330 instructs that respondents provide customers with the attached questionnaire. Please complete the questionnaire and submit it by no later than 2:00 p.m. Central Standard Time on March 23, 2016,directly to the JSC Contracting Officer. The requested data shall be submitted by email to the Contracting Officer identified below and must cite the following: “Subject: Architect-Engineer Services Solicitation No. NNJ16571636R Past Performance Questionnaire.”
Contracting Officer: Diana DeNardo Email: diana.denardo-1@nasa.gov
The information contained in the completed Past Performance Questionnaire is considered sensitive and cannot be released to [Insert Company Name]. Please direct any questions about the acquisition or the attached questionnaire to the JSC point of contact identified above.
Thank you, [Insert Company Official Name and Title]
A. GENERAL INFORMATION
A-E FIRM TO BE EVALUATED:
Firm Name: ________________________ Telephone: ___________________________ Address: __________________________ Email address: ________________________ __________________________ Point of Contact: ______________________
| __________________________ |
| __________________________ |
Firm Cage Code: ____________________ Firm Tax ID Number: ________________ Firm DUNS Number: ________________
Project Title: _____________________________________
Complexity of Work: High Medium Routine
Description of Project: __________________________________________________________
Description of A-E Firms’ Responsibilities:_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract Number: __________________ Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):
Contract/Task Order Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please Specify):
Award Date (mm/dd/yy):
Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Explain Differences:
Original Contract and/or Task Order Price (Award Amount):
Final Contract and/or Task Order Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):
Explain Differences:
The A-E Firm performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor/Consultant/Team Member
Percent of work performed by A-E Firm: Other (Please describe) __________________
B. EVALUATOR INFORMATION:
Evaluator’s Company or Agency Name: ____________________________ Evaluator’s Name: _____________________ Address: __________________________ Title of Evaluator: _____________________ __________________________ Telephone: __________________________
| __________________________ E-mail: ______________________________ |
| __________________________ |
C. SEND COMPLETED QUESTIONAIRE (SECTIONS B through D) TO:
Contracting Officer: Diana DeNardo Email: diana.denardo-1@nasa.gov Subject: Architect-Engineer Services Solicitation No. NNJ16571636R Past Performance Questionnaire
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate rating that most accurately describes the A/E’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ALL RATINGS OF Marginal or Unsatisfactory on page 8 under Narrative Summary.
| Exceptional (5) |
| Very Good (4) |
| Satisfactory (3) |
| Marginal (2) |
| Unsatisfactory (1) |
| N/A |
| Performance meets or met contractual requirements and exceeds or exceeded many of your company’s expectations. The contractual performance reflects or reflected few minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be highly effective or corrective actions taken were effective. |
| Performance meets or met contractual requirements and exceeds or exceeded some of your company’s expectations. The contractual performance reflects or reflected some minor problems and corrective actions being taken by the contractor appear to be effective or Corrective actions taken were effective. |
| Performance meets or met contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects or reflected some minor problems. Corrective actions being taken by the contractor appear to be effective or Corrective actions taken were effective. |
| Performance does or did not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects or reflected serious problems(s) for which the contractor has not yet identified acceptable corrective actions or did not provide acceptable corrective actions. |
| Performance does or did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely or did not occur. The contractual performance contains or contained serious problem (s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear ineffective or were ineffective. |
| Not applicable or rater has not observed performance in this area. |
A-E FIRM’S NAME: _______________ PROJECT NAME: _______________
Contract Period of Performance: _______________________
Note: Include this information on each page of the questionnaire form to ensure there is no mix up in information among contracts surveyed for respective primes/subs, etc.
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix on page 5.
Item
FACTORS TO BE RATED
| Exceptional (5) |
| Very Good (4) |
| Satisfactory (3) |
| Marginal (2) |
| Unsatisfactory (1) |
| N/A |
Design Services:
| 1. |
| Overall skill level and technical competence of A/E’s personnel. |
| 2. |
| A/E’s ability to identify and resolve design issues expeditiously. |
| 3. |
| A/E’s responsiveness to design review questions. |
| 4. |
| A/E’s ability to effectively coordinate, integrate and manage their consultants/subcontractors/team |
| 5. |
| A/E’s effectiveness and responsiveness in interfacing with the Client’s staff |
| 6. |
| Overall accuracy, completeness and coordination of final design documents. (Quality) |
| 7. |
| A/E’s ability to provide detailed, accurate cost estimates. |
| 8. |
| A/E’s ability to meet contract schedule. |
Follow-On Construction Support Services:
| 9. |
| Thoroughness and timely review of construction submittals. |
| 10. |
| Timely resolution of construction design issues. |
| 11. |
| Overall quality, responsiveness and timeliness of A/E follow-on construction support services. |
LEED (If Applicable):
| 12. |
| Overall accuracy, completeness, timeliness and coordination of LEED documentation. |
| 13. |
| A/E’s ability and understanding of the overall LEED process. |
BIM (If Applicable):
| 14. |
| Overall accuracy, completeness, timeliness and coordination of BIM documentation. |
| 15. |
| A/E’s ability and understanding of the overall BIM process. |
GIS (If Applicable):
| 16. |
| Overall accuracy, completeness, timeliness and coordination of GIS documentation. |
| 17. |
| A/E’s ability and understanding of the overall GIS process. |
Owner’s Representative on Design/Build Projects (If Applicable):
| 18. |
| Overall accuracy, completeness, timeliness and coordination of requirements documents and bridging documents. |
| 19. |
| A/E’s ability, thoroughness, timeliness and support as Owner’s Representative throughout the project. |
Safety / Security
| 20. |
| How would you rate the contractor’s ability to maintain the environment relative to safety, adherence to its approved safety plan, and response to safety issues? |
| 21. |
| How well did the contractor comply with security requirements for the project? |
Overall:
| 22. |
| How would you rate the A/E’s ability to control cost? |
| 23. |
| How would you rate the A/E’s overall management performance on this contract? |
| 24. |
| How would you rate the A/E’s overall technical/quality performance on this contract? |
| 25. |
| Would you use this A/E again? (If “No”, please comment in the Narrative Summary) |
YES
NO
Number of A/E Design Errors & Omissions on Project: _______________
Increased Project Cost Due to A/E Design Errors & Omissions: _______________
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: ___________________ PROJECT NAME __________
Contract Period of Performance: _______________________
Note: Include this information on each page of the questionnaire form to ensure there is no mix up in information among contracts surveyed for respective primes/subs, etc.
NARRATIVE SUMMARY (Use this section to explain any rating from the previous page)
| Item |
| COMMENTS |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .