Attachment_C_-_Human_Rating_and_Habitability_Criteria_for_FF.docx
DOCX document 43 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- NNH16ZCQ001K-CDFF
About this file
Attachment C-Draft FF Criteria
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| FF DRFP q&a 1-28-20.docx | DOCX document | |
| FF DRFP q&a 1-13-20.docx | DOCX document | |
| FF DRFP q&a 1-8-20.docx | DOCX document | |
| FF DRFP q&a 1-7-20.docx | DOCX document | |
| FF DRFP q&a 12-10-19.docx | DOCX document | |
| FF DRFP q&a 11-25-19.docx | DOCX document | |
| GCN_Industry_Forum_Charts_Rev_A_-_free_flyer.pptx | PPTX presentation | |
| Free_Flyer_Industry_Day_One_on_one.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_G_-_FF_Business_Case_Analysis_Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_A_-_Statement_of_Work_for_FF.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_B_-_FF_Model_Contract-9-26-19.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_I_-_FF_Request_for_Government_Support_Instructions.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_H_-_FF_Pricing_Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| NextSTEP-2_BAA_Appendix_K-10-3-19.pdf | ||
| Attachment_E_-_Technical_Library_Contents.pdf | ||
| Attachment_D_-_FF_Data_Requirements_List-9-24.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_F_-_FF_Requested_Government_Property_Services.docx | DOCX document | |
| FF_q&a.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
NextSTEP-2 BAA, Appendix K: Commercial Destination Development in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) Free Flyer – Attachment C
| Human Rating and Habitability Criteria | |
| National Aeronautics and | September 23, 2019 |
Space Administration
Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas
Next Space Technologies for Exploration Partnerships-2 (NextSTEP-2)
Broad Agency Announcement NNH16ZCQ001K-CDFF Appendix K: Commercial Destination Development in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) Free Flyer
Attachment C Human Rating and Habitability Criteria
Human Rating and Habitability Criteria The technical checklists contained in this document encompass the applicable Human Rating criteria pertaining to a crewed space system. The Human Rating and Habitability criteria checklists prescribe that a human-rated system accommodates human needs, effectively utilizes human capabilities, controls hazards with sufficient certainty to be considered safe for human operations, and provides, to the maximum extent practical, the capability for the crew and vehicle to safely recover from hazardous situations.
Human Rating and Habitability Plan The FF Contractor will develop a Human Rating and Habitability Plan (DRD 019) that includes products listed in the tables below. The plan is not intended to duplicate or repackage existing FF contractor documentation but rather to provide a summarization of information, with pointers to applicable sections of referenced documents, links, or data sources. The plan collectively illustrates, with supporting evidence and rationale, that the system is safe to carry NASA crewmembers.
Table 1: Human Rating Criteria Checklist
Develop a plan detailing how the vehicle systems will maintain the human rating with respect to the following parameters:
Process and Standards
| 1 |
| A summary and access to all requested waivers, deviations, and exceptions to the Contractor requirements, with justification and disposition, as well as any exemptions to the failure tolerance requirement. |
| 2 |
| A completed Safety And Mission Assurance Plan (DRD-014). |
| 3 |
| A list of applicable standards with any exceptions, deviations, waivers, and significant issues in work. |
Designing the System
| 4 |
| A description of the crew-related subsystems. |
| 5 |
| A description of the approach to crew survival for each mission phase derived from hazard analyses; the system capabilities or the trade studies/analysis to determine implementation; and a matrix that traces the capabilities to the FF Contractor requirements (highest level where the capability is implemented). |
| 6 |
| A description of the design philosophy as it relates to utilization of the crew's capabilities to execute the mission and prevent catastrophic events. |
| 7 |
| Specify the FF Loss of Crew (LOC) requirements as derived from the Contractor’s safety goals and safety reporting thresholds, including any allocations to mission phases as applicable. For example, ref: CCT-REQ-1130, Section 3.2. |
| 8 |
| A summary of the human-in-the-loop usability evaluations for human-systems interfaces, and integrated human-system performance testing to date and how the results influenced the system design. |
| 9 |
| A summary of the results of the integrated design and safety analyses, including current understanding of risks and uncertainties and related decisions regarding the system design and application of testing to include: |
a. A list of the significant risk contributors to loss of crew
b. The appropriate hazard controls and mitigations to reduce the risk to the crew, including the level and implementation of failure tolerance to catastrophic events for the FF
c. Specific rationale for dynamic flight phases where dissimilar redundancy, backup systems, are not available to limit the likelihood of a catastrophic event
d. The effectiveness of crew survival capabilities under conditions and time constraints to be encountered during high-risk accident conditions and their impact on the risk to the crew
| 10 |
| A description of how the crew and ground control workload for the mission will be evaluated. |
| 11 |
| A summary of the human error analysis performed and how the results influenced the system design. |
Verifying and Validating the System Capabilities and Performance
| 12 |
| A plan, with rationale, for verification and validation of Contractor requirements identified for crew survivability (per DRD-013) and a summary of the verification and validation results (with links to the detailed results). |
| 14 |
| A description of the crew and ground control workload evaluation and implementation of any mitigations to significant findings. |
| 15 |
| A description of: |
a. Any updates to the safety analyses based on the results of validation and verification testing,
b. Validation and verification of the design in circumstances where testing was not accomplished.
Table 2: Crew Health Maintenance Criteria Checklist
Develop a plan detailing how the vehicle systems will maintain the crew health with respect to the following parameters:
| 1 |
| Whole body resistive and cardiopulmonary exercise (Ref.; JSC 29558, Resistive Exercise Description Document) |
| 2 |
| Hygiene |
| 3 |
| Waste Management |
| 4 |
| Crew privacy and sleep accommodations |
| 5 |
| Food and drink storage and preparation |
| 6 |
| Personal communications and recreation |
Table 3: Habitable Environment Criteria Checklist
Develop a plan detailing how the FF systems will maintain the crew environment with respect to the following parameters:
| Parameter |
| Nominal Minimum |
| Nominal Maximum |
| Notes |
| 1 |
| Cabin Pressure |
| 96.5 kPa (14.0 psia) |
| 102.7 kPa (14.9 psia) |
| The intent is for the FF to be designed to operate nominally within the specified cabin pressure range to ensure crew health and performance during the mission. For reference, the crew cabin pressure of 101.3 kPa (14.7 psi) is a standard operating pressure for ISS to provide optimal cooling for air cooled avionics, payloads, and other equipment in addition to meeting crew life support needs. |
| 2 |
| Cabin ppO2 |
| 19.4 kPa (2.82 psia) |
| 22.7 kPa |
(3.3 psia) The ranges/limits provided are nominal physiological values for indefinite human exposure without measurable impairments to health or performance and is within the range that ISS operates. For reference, the nominal ppO2 pressure for the ISS is between 20.3 kPa (2.95 psi) and 23.7 kPa (3.45 psi) for a cabin pressure of 101.35 kPa (14.7 psi).
| 3 |
| Cabin Depress/ Repress Rates |
| No Minimum |
| Depress: 890 pa/sec |
(7.75 psi/min) Repress: 800 Pa/sec (6.96 psi/min) These rates are derived from ISS cargo limits and are well within the physiological limits of the crew, however, it is expected that pressure changes will be effected more slowly than this where possible. The intent is to limit exposure of the crew and cargo to the specified rate of change in order to prevent injury to the crew's ears and lungs and to avoid damage to cargo during depressurization and re-pressurization.
| 4 |
| Cabin ppCO2 |
| No Minimum |
| 4.0 mmHg (0.077 psia) |
| The ranges/limits provided are nominal physiological values for indefinite human exposure without measurable impairments to health or performance. CO2 sensors may report values lower than the inhaled atmosphere, so precautions to ensure that local (relevant to crewmember's face) CO2 does not exceed the limit may be necessary. For reference, the ISS strives to maintain Cabin ppCO2 below 3.0 mmHg. |
| 5 |
| Cabin Temperature |
| 18.3 °C |
(65 °F)
26.7 °C (80 °F) These temperature limits protect for human comfort (and thus performance of routine activities) without the use of thermal protective garments resulting in this narrow temperature range. Thermal comfort is affected by the work rate, clothing, and state of acclimatization.
| 6 |
| Cabin Relative Humidity |
| 25% |
| 75% |
| The intent is to maintain average humidity above the lower limits stated to ensure that the environment is not too dry for the nominal functioning of mucous membranes. The intent is to maintain average humidity below the upper limits for crew comfort, to allow for effective evaporation, and to limit the formation of condensation. Also, a humidity level below 25% relative humidity increases the risk of charge build up on equipment in the cabin and there is an increased electrostatic discharge (ESD) concern. |
| 7 |
| Cabin Air Velocities for Mixing |
(66% of bulk time-average velocity/ minimum velocity)
4.6 m/min (15 ft/min) [bulk]
2.1 m/min (7 ft/min) [Min]
36.6 m/min (120 ft/min) [bulk]
60.9 m/min (200 ft/min)[Max] Crew and equipment give off heat, moisture, and CO2 that will lead to parameters outside the bounds of environmental requirements if adequate ventilation is not provided. Maintaining proper ventilation within the internal atmosphere is necessary to ensure that stagnant pockets do not form, and the temperature, humidity, and atmospheric constituents are maintained within their appropriate ranges. For example, see ref: JSC 65993, Commercial Human-Systems Integration Requirements, CH6008 for rationale pertaining to values.
Note: The measurements exclude any area that is 15.2 cm (6 in) or less from the walls of the crew habitable cabin. It also excludes any area that is 7.6 cm (3 in) or less from avionics/secondary structure permanently in the crew habitable cabin.
image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it.