Summary_of_Changes_Between_Draft_RFP_Documents_and_Final_RFP_Documents.pdf

Matrix of Changes Between Draft RFP Documents and Final RFP Documents

Reference (In Order) Change Reason for Change

Solicitation, Offer and Award

Form

Entered issued date in block 5; entered proposal due date in block 9;

revised page counts in block 11;

Revisions in accordance with finalizing the RFP

F.5 Design Performance

Periods

Revised from:

The Design Performance Period Schedule below sets forth the maximum number of calendar days the Contractor has to complete a design from issuance of a task order to completion of design. In its task plan the Contractor may request, on an individual project basis and with sufficient justification, an extension to the Design

Performance Period. The Government retains the unilateral right to approve or disapprove such an extension request.

To: (added bolded text):

The Design Performance Period Schedule below sets forth the maximum number of calendar days the Contractor has to complete a design from issuance of a task order to completion of design.

Proposed design performance periods shall include Government review times in accordance with section 3.a of the SOW. In its task plan the Contractor may request, on an individual project basis and with sufficient justification, an extension to the Design

Performance Period. The Government retains the unilateral right to approve or disapprove such an extension request.

In response to question 1.

I.114 Revised from:

52.204-18 Commercial and Government Entity Code Maintenance

(NOV 2014)

To:

52.204-18 Commercial and Government Entity Code Maintenance

JUL 2016

Updated to reflect current version of clause.

L.3 Revised from:

52.204-16 Commercial And Government Entity Code Reporting

(JUL 2015)

To:

52.204-16 Commercial And Government Entity Code Reporting

(JUL 2016)

Updated to reflect current version of clause.

L.19 GSFC 52.215-210

MISSION SUITABILITY

VOLUME INSTRUCTIONS

(COMPETITIVE) (FEB 2016)

(c) Subfactor A, 2nd paragraph

The offeror shall describe its strategy for using (or not using) subcontractors performing $500,000 or more of any of the following Statement of Work (SOW) sections: 6.0.A, Core

Information Resources (IR) Services; 7.0.A, IDIQ Architect and

Engineering (A-E) Services; 7.0.C, IDIQ Planning Services; or

7.0.D, IDIQ IR Services.

To (added bolded text):

The offeror shall describe its strategy for using (or not using) subcontractors performing $500,000 or more per year of any of the following Statement of Work (SOW) sections: 6.0.A, Core

Information Resources (IR) Services; 7.0.A, IDIQ Architect and

Engineering (A-E) Services; 7.0.C, IDIQ Planning Services; or

7.0.D, IDIQ IR Services.

In response to question 2

M.2 GSFC 52.215-310,

MISSION SUITABILITY

FACTOR (FEB 2016)

Section B (a) Subfactor A

The offeror’s strategy for using (or not using) subcontractors in performing $500,000 or more of any of the following SOW sections: 6.0.A, Core Information Resources (IR) Services; 7.0.A, IDIQ Architect and Engineering (A-E) Services; 7.0.C, IDIQ

Planning Services; or 7.0.D, IDIQ IR Services will be evaluated for effectiveness and efficiency in performing the Statement of Work requirements.

To (added bolded text):

The offeror’s strategy for using (or not using) subcontractors in performing $500,000 or more per year of any of the following

SOW sections: 6.0.A, Core Information Resources (IR) Services;

7.0.A, IDIQ Architect and Engineering (A-E) Services; 7.0.C, IDIQ

Planning Services; or 7.0.D, IDIQ IR Services will be evaluated for effectiveness and efficiency in performing the Statement of Work requirements.

In response to question 2

Statement of Work 2.0

General Requirements

The Contractor is strongly encouraged to use non-gasoline/diesel

(incl. non-E-85) alternate fuel vehicles on GSFC, to the maximum extent practical, to carry out the on-site contract requirements. Electrical power through standard convenience outlets will be available for this requirement. No other form of alternate fuel is currently available on-site. With this in mind, the

Contractor shall propose a plan that would increase/convert their total fleet of vehicles to alternative fuels by the below percentages over the life of the contract:

Contract Year 1: Convert 2% of the total fleet

Contract Year 2: Convert an additional 4% of the total fleet

Contract Year 3: Convert an additional 4% of the total fleet

Contract Year 4: Convert an additional 5% of the total fleet

Contract Year 5: Convert an additional 5% of the total fleet

Total Vehicle percentage conversion to non-gasoline/E-85 alternative fuel vehicles by the end of the contract: 20%

To: (added bolded text)

The Contractor is strongly encouraged, to the maximum extent practical, to use non-gasoline/diesel (incl. non-E-85) alternate fuel vehicles on GSFC, in the performance of on-site contract requirements. Electrical power through standard convenience outlets will be available for this requirement. No other form of alternate fuel is currently available on-site. With this in mind, the

Contractor shall provide a plan outlining measures to increase/convert the onsite vehicle fleet to alternative fuels by the percentages below, over the life of the contract:

Contract Year 1: Convert 2% of the total fleet

Contract Year 2: Convert an additional 4% of the total fleet

Contract Year 3: Convert an additional 4% of the total fleet

Contract Year 4: Convert an additional 5% of the total fleet

Contract Year 5: Convert an additional 5% of the total fleet

Total Vehicle percentage conversion to non-gasoline/E-85 alternative fuel vehicles by the end of the contract: 20%

No vehicles will be provided by the government for use in the performance of this contract.

In response to question 3

In response to