_1_Amendment_0002_PPI_Log_.pdf

SOLICITATION NO. N69450-14-R-1261

PROJECT TITLE/LOCATION:

NAS JACKSONVILLE AIRFIELD AND LIGHTING REPAIRS at NAS Jacksonville

GOVERNMENT PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRY LOG

DATED 27 APRIL 2014

July 2011 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

1 4/10/2014

32 11 24/66 Of the 3 (three) gradations listed for crushed aggregate which is going to be the specification for this job, 1 2 or

Any of the three gradations provided in the specification are acceptable for use on this project. The intent of providing three (3) gradations is to provide more options for local material procurement.

N

2 4/10/2014

SECTION 01 35 26.00

25 Page 10

Will the US Government provide historical asbestos containing material (ACM) handling workload data for all applicable facilities and areas?

This requirement is only required as part of your Accident Pervention Plan (APP) if asbestos abatement is needed for this project.

N

3 4/10/2014

SECTION 01 35 26.00

25 Page 10

Will the US Government provide the most recent ACM survey for all applicable facilities and areas?

This will be added per amendment for Vaults 854, 766 and 114. URS Hazardous Building Materials Assessment will be incorporated by amendment to Specification Vol 2 of 3 as an attachment to Section 02 41.00.

Y

4 4/10/2014

SECTION 01 35 26.00

25 Page 10

Will the US Government provide projected ACM handling workload data for all applicable facilities and areas?

This requirement is only required as part of your Accident Pervention Plan (APP) if asbestos abatement is needed for this project.

N

5 4/10/2014

SECTION 01 35 26.00

25 Page 10

If encountered, will the US Government remain the generator and owner of the ACM?

Refer to Vol 1, Specification Section 01 57 19.00 25,

3.13.2 Hazardous Waste/Debris Management -

"Hazardous waste generated within the confines of the Government facilities will be identified as being generated by the Government."

N

6 4/10/2014

SECTION 01 35 26.00

25 Page 10

If suspected and/or encountered, what entity will be responsible for managing the ACM (conducting the ACM survey, issuing the ACM results, abatement, removal, handling, transportation and/or proper disposal)?

Refer to Vol 1, Specification Section 01 57 19.00 25,

3.13.2.3 Asbestos Certification.

N

RFP Change (Y/N)

Reference (Section Paragraph/Page)Date

Received

Amend No.

No.

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

NAS JACKSONVILLE AIRFIELD AND LIGHTING REPAIRS at NAS Jacksonville

GOVERNMENT PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRY LOG

DATED 27 APRIL 2014

July 2011 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

RFP Change (Y/N)

Reference (Section Paragraph/Page)Date

Received

Amend No.

No.

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

7 4/10/2014

SECTION 01 35 26.00

25 Page 15, (Part 3 Execution -

3.1.3 Unforeseen

Hazardous Material)

In regards to ACM, will the US Government consider removing the modification pursuant to "FAR 52.243-4, Changes" and "FAR 52.236-2, Differing Site Conditions" from the RFP and contract out the ACM scope separately?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

8 4/10/2014 Section 00600 - Representations & Certifications

Is certification from the Joint Certification Commission required for this solicitation?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

9 4/11/2014

Drawings ED-010 & ED-

The drawings (ED-010 & ED-011) indicate that some of the electrical equipment contains oil that will be considered hazardous waste.

How does NAVFAC want this hazardous waste disposed of? Please furnish documentation (oil samples) for the equipment that the drawings list as “Non PCB."

Drawing ED010 states “non PCB containing equipment to be removed”. Drawing ED011 states “low PCB containing equipment to be removed”, and states to “dispose of in accordance with 40

CFR 761.20.”

N

10 4/11/2014

General How should inclement weather days be handled in the proposed schedule and the Network Analysis Schedule, and how will time extensions be handled for inclement weather?

Paragraph for Inclement Weather was missing from Spec Section 01 32 17.00 25. Please see revised Spec 01 32 17.00 25 paragraph 1.6.2.4 incorporated amendment.

Y

NAS JACKSONVILLE AIRFIELD AND LIGHTING REPAIRS at NAS Jacksonville

GOVERNMENT PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRY LOG

DATED 27 APRIL 2014

July 2011 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

RFP Change (Y/N)

Reference (Section Paragraph/Page)Date

Received

Amend No.

No.

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

11 4/11/2014

SECTION 01 14 00.00

25 WORK

RESTRICTIONS 12/11

NAVFAC SE VERSION,

PART 1 GENERAL &

SECTION 01 32 17.00

25 NETWORK

ANALYSIS SCHEDULES

(NAS) 03/13 NAVFAC

SE VERSION, Part 1

SECTION 01 14 00.00 25 WORK RESTRICTIONS 12/11

NAVFAC SE VERSION, PART 1 GENERAL, includes the following:

1.3.2 Working Hours

Regular working hours shall consist of 24 hours per day, 7 days a week.

SECTION 01 32 17.00 25 NETWORK ANALYSIS

SCHEDULES (NAS) 03/13 NAVFAC SE VERSION, Part 1 has the following statements in the noted sections:

1.6.2 …Contractor activities shall be driven by calendars that reflect Saturdays, Sundays and all Federal Holidays as non-work days.

1.6.2.1 Activity Categories

d. … Contractor activities will be driven by calendars that reflect Saturdays, Sundays and all Federal Holidays as non-work days, unless otherwise defined in this contract

1.6.3 Schedule Software Settings and Restrictions

4. Project Level, Default Tab:

The work hours defined in Spec Section 01 14 00.00 25,

1.3.2 defining work hours as 24 hours per day for, 7 days a week. Section 01 32 17.00 25 has been corrected to allow the construction schedule to meet the allowed work hours.

Y Amendment forthcoming

NAS JACKSONVILLE AIRFIELD AND LIGHTING REPAIRS at NAS Jacksonville

GOVERNMENT PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRY LOG

DATED 27 APRIL 2014

July 2011 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

RFP Change (Y/N)

Reference (Section Paragraph/Page)Date

Received

Amend No.

No.

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

d) Calendar: Set to "Standard 5 Day Workweek".

Calendar shall reflect Saturday, Sunday and all Federal holidays as non-work days. Alternative calendars may be used with Contracting Officer approval.

These seem to be mutually exclusive, how should this be handled in the proposed schedule and ultimately in the Network Analysis Schedule?

12 4/11/2014

SECTION 01 14 00.00

25 WORK

RESTRICTIONS 12/11

NAVFAC SE VERSION,

PART 1 GENERAL

3) SECTION 01 14 00.00 25 WORK RESTRICTIONS 12/11

NAVFAC SE VERSION, PART 1 GENERAL, includes the following:

PART 1 GENERAL 1.3.4 Exclusionary Period

“No work shall be performed during the period 20 October 2013 to 27 October 2014, inclusive, without prior written approval of the Contracting Officer. This period has not been considered in computing the time allowed for the performance of this contract.”

Please clarify these dates.

The correct dates are 20 October 2014 to 27 October 14.

Y 0002

NAS JACKSONVILLE AIRFIELD AND LIGHTING REPAIRS at NAS Jacksonville

GOVERNMENT PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRY LOG

DATED 27 APRIL 2014

July 2011 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

RFP Change (Y/N)

Reference (Section Paragraph/Page)Date

Received

Amend No.

No.

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

13 4/11/2014

RFP Page 12 - Factor 1 Experience

The first paragraph states:

"Submit Construction Experience Data Sheets for a minimum of (2) two to a maximum of (5) five construction projects that the offeror completed and served as the prime construction contractor that best demonstrates experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP."

On most large commercial airport projects, the prime contractor is the overall construction manager for the terminal project; and the airfield construction and paving scope of the project are subcontracted to a prime subcontractor to perform. Can projects in which the Offeror was the prime subcontractor, and controlled the total scope of the airfield work, be submitted as a relevant project?

Can that subcontractors experience be from a different project as long as it meets or exceeds the $5million criteria?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

NAS JACKSONVILLE AIRFIELD AND LIGHTING REPAIRS at NAS Jacksonville

GOVERNMENT PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRY LOG

DATED 27 APRIL 2014

July 2011 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

RFP Change (Y/N)

Reference (Section Paragraph/Page)Date

Received

Amend No.

No.

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

14 4/11/2014

RFP Page 12 - Factor 1 Experience

A relevant project is defined as: "Relevant projects include those that demonstrate construction capability on combined airfield paving and airfield lighting projects with a construction value of $30M or greater.

The airfield paving portion of a project must utilize slip form paving and be valued at $10M or greater and the airfield lighting portion of the project must be valued at $5M or greater."

We have several projects that exceed $30 million in airfield slip form paving, but do not meet the $5 million airfield lighting criteria. Can this criteria be met by a qualified subcontractor?

All solicitation requirements must be met to be considered a relevant project. A relevant project must be a single project "with a construction value of $30M or greater. The airfield paving portion of the project must utilize slip form paving and be valued at $10M or greater and the airfield lighting portion of the project must be valued at $5M or greater." The offeror is required to have functioned as the Prime contractor for the submitted relevant projects but may have used subcontractors to perform the work.

N

15 4/11/2014

RFP Page 18 - Factor 5 Past Performance

Can the Offeror utilize PPQ’s previously submitted for other NAVFAC/USACE solicitations in Factor 5: Past Performance as long as they are on form PPQ -0 dated 7 December 2011 and are for the same projects submitted under Factor 1 of this solicitation? This prevents contractors from having to bother their clients with multiple requests for evaluations.

In response to Factor 5, Past Performance on Recent, Relevant Projects an Offeror can submit PPQ's previously submitted for other RFPs. As stated in Factor 5, "Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs or CPARS previously submitted for other RFPs.

As stated in Section 00202 F.3.(b), "The Past Performance on Recent, Relevant Projects must be for the same construction projects that the Offeror submits for Experience in Factor 1.

N

NAS JACKSONVILLE AIRFIELD AND LIGHTING REPAIRS at NAS Jacksonville

GOVERNMENT PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRY LOG

DATED 27 APRIL 2014

July 2011 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

RFP Change (Y/N)

Reference (Section Paragraph/Page)Date

Received

Amend No.

No.

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

16 4/11/2014

RFP pages 16-17;

Factor 4 - Small Business Participation

At the site visit, it was stated that the small business subcontracting goals were to be applied against the percentage of work that is to be subcontracted by the prime contractor. Are construction materials purchases not considered as a part of the subcontracting goals?

For example, are concrete purchases for the paving not considered in the calculation of small business goal dollars?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

N

17 4/11/2014 01 45 00.00 25 Quality Control / Page 5

Reference is made on Page 5, etc. to CA. What is CA? CA is the Commissioning Authority N

18 4/11/2014

01 50 00.00 25 Temporary Construction Facilities and Controls / Sub- Article 2.2.3 Fencing

Paragraph a. requires the contractor to "provide fencing along the construction site at all open excavations and tunnels to control access by unauthorized people." Please clarify the planned limits of this fence.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

19 4/11/2014

01 50 00.00 25 Temporary Construction Facilities and Controls / Sub- Article 2.2.3 Fencing

Paragraph b. requires that the contractor "enclose the project work area and Contractor lay-down area with a 8 ft high chain link fence and gates with brown, UV light resistant, plastic fabric mesh netting." Please clarify the limits of this fence.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

20 4/11/2014

01 50 00.00 25 Temporary Construction Facilities and Controls / Sub- Article 2.2.3 Fencing

Paragraph c. requires that the contractor "enclose those areas at the construction site which are not within the construction fence with a temporary safety fence, including gates and warning signs." Please clarify the limits of this fence.

NAS JACKSONVILLE AIRFIELD AND LIGHTING REPAIRS at NAS Jacksonville

GOVERNMENT PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRY LOG

DATED 27 APRIL 2014

July 2011 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

RFP Change (Y/N)

Reference (Section Paragraph/Page)Date

Received

Amend No.

No.

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

21 4/11/2014

01 50 00.00 25 Temporary Construction Facilities and Controls / Sub- Article 3.2 Availability and Use of Utility Services

Please provide information on the type and capacity of electric services available at the Temporary PCC and/or ACC Batch Plant Area and at the Contractor Storage & Field Office Area.

The Available Transformers are as follows: Batch Plant

- 150KVA (Plenty of capacity, approx. 140KVA available) Crushing Area - 225KVA (Plenty of capacity, approx.

200KVA available) Office Area - 45 KVA (Approx. 40KVA of capacity available)

N

22 4/11/2014

01 50 00.00 25 Temporary Construction Facilities and Controls / Sub- Article 3.2 Availability and Use of Utility Services

Please provide locations for existing hydrants that could be used to provide water service for the Temporary PCC and/or ACC Batch Plant Area and at the Contractor Storage & Field Office Area.

The approximate location of hydrants on the airfield are noted with PDF yellow sticky notes on a copy of the PH100 drawing. These locations are approximate and must be confirmed by the construction contractor.

Annotated drawing PH100 will be incorporated by amendment.

Y

23 4/11/2014

01 50 00.00 25 Temporary Construction Facilities and Controls / Sub- Article 3.4.3 Storage Area

This paragraph requires the contractor to install a temporary 6 foot high chain link fence around trailers and materials. "Include plastic strip inserts, colored green, so that visibility through the fence is obstructed." Is this fence in addition to the 8 ft chain link fence referenced in Sub-Article 2.2.3 Fencing paragraphs a. and b.?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

24 4/11/2014

01 50 00.00 25 Temporary Construction Facilities and Controls / Sub- Article 3.4.6 Maintenance of Storage Area

Paragraph a. requires that the contractor "mow and maintain grass located within the boundaries of the construction site for the duration of the project."

Please clarify the area described as the "construction site" that would be maintained by the contractor.

NAS JACKSONVILLE AIRFIELD AND LIGHTING REPAIRS at NAS Jacksonville

GOVERNMENT PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRY LOG

DATED 27 APRIL 2014

July 2011 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

RFP Change (Y/N)

Reference (Section Paragraph/Page)Date

Received

Amend No.

No.

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

25 4/11/2014

01 50 00.00 25 Temporary Construction Facilities and Controls / Sub- Article 3.6 Temporary Project Safety Fence

This paragraph requires that 42” orange safety fence be installed "at the work site." Is this safety fence in addition to the safety fence referenced in Sub-Article

2.2.3 paragraph c.?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

26 4/11/2014

01 57 17.00 25 Temporary Environmental Controls / Sub-Article

3.10 Petroleum

Products and Refueling

Paragraph 3.10 states "limit the storage of all fuels, lubricants, solvents, paints and hazardous substances to a total of less than 55 gallons on site." Please explain how the work can be performed with this restriction.

Fuel, lubricants, curing compound, epoxies and other materials will be required to complete this work. These will be required on a regular basis at the on-site batch plants, on the service equipment, at the work areas for paving, and so on.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

27 4/11/2014

01 57 17.00 25 Temporary Environmental Controls / Sub-Article

3.11 Fuel Tanks

This paragraph states that "total storage of all fuels and all solvents is 55 gallons without approval by the Government." If we build secondary containment as described in paragraph 3.10.1 and 3.11, can we assume that the Government will approve storage of more than 55 gallons of the listed substances on site?

Will the contractor will be able to stage equipment service vehicles, lubricants, curing compound, epoxy, and other substances on site as long as they are kept in an approved staging or storage area?

NAS JACKSONVILLE AIRFIELD AND LIGHTING REPAIRS at NAS Jacksonville

GOVERNMENT PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRY LOG

DATED 27 APRIL 2014

July 2011 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

RFP Change (Y/N)

Reference (Section Paragraph/Page)Date

Received

Amend No.

No.

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

28 4/11/2014

01 57 19.01 25 Supplemental Temporary Environmental Controls / Sub-Article

1.1.1.1 a.5 Control and Disposal of Hazardous Wastes

This paragraph states that "the Contractor is responsible for paying all disposal costs in accordance with PWC Jacksonville’s published rates." Can you please clarify the reference to PWC Jacksonville published rates?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

29 4/11/2014 General Please provide the list of site visit attendees. The Pre-Proposal Conference and Site Visit Agenda, Minutes, and Attendee Roster were provided by Amendment No. 0001 posted 16 APR 2014 on FBO.

Y

30 4/11/2014

General Will 11x17 pages be considered 1 or 2 pages in page limited sections? Please consider counting them as only one page so we are better able to demonstrate our capabilities within the page limitations.

Offerors may utilize 11" x 17" pages for submission of schedules and drawings only. All other submittal requirements are to be submitted on 8 1/2" x 11" paper. The 8 1/2" x 11" paper can be submitted as one

(1) double-sided page (counts as two (2) pages) or two

(2) single-sided pages (counts as two (2) pages).

N

31 4/11/2014

Page 14 of the RFP II.

Schedule

Factor 2 Technical Solution has a page limitation of 2 single sided pages with 3 additional conceptual drawings not included in the page limit. Please clarify whether the schedule is page limited and whether 11x17 conceptual drawings and schedule pages are considered 1 or 2 pages.

Page limit referenced in the question is for Factor 2, Technical Solution I. Technical Narrative. The schedule is required as part of Factor 2. II. Schedule and no page limitation was identified.

N

32 4/11/2014 General Will NAVFAC allow graphics and text in tables with font that is less than the 11pt overall Arial font requirement as long as they are easily readable?

The Government will allow for smaller font on drawings and schedules (must be legible in order to evaluate). N

NAS JACKSONVILLE AIRFIELD AND LIGHTING REPAIRS at NAS Jacksonville

GOVERNMENT PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRY LOG

DATED 27 APRIL 2014

July 2011 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

RFP Change (Y/N)

Reference (Section Paragraph/Page)Date

Received

Amend No.

No.

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

33 4/11/2014

Page 73 of RFP Volume 1 of 3, Section 1.4 QC Program Requirements

Most other NAVFAC solicitations require the QC Manager to be employed by the Prime Contractor. For this solicitation, must the Offeror utilize a 3rd party QC Manager or is it allowable to utilize the Offeror's own in-house Quality Manager?

Refer to Vol 1, Specification Section 01 45 00.00 25, paragraph 1.4 -"The QC Manager, Assistant QC Manager and any QC Specialists shall be third party consultants.." These individuals shall NOT be employees of the Offeror or in-house personnel.

N

34 4/11/2014

Page 75 of RFP Volume 1 of 3, Section 1.5.3 Alternate QC Manager Duties and Qualifications

Section 1.5.3 states that the Alternate QC Manager may be employed by the Prime Contractor. This appears to be in conflict with Section 1.4, QC Program requirements. Please clarify.

Refer to Vol 1, Specification Section 01 45 00.00 25, paragraph 1.4 -"The QC Manager, Assistant QC Manager and any QC Specialists shall be third party consultants.." From 1.5.3 The Alternate QC Manager can be employed by the Prime Contractor. This is correct and is not a conflict.

N

35 4/11/2014

Page 14 of the Division00 RFP, (3) Factor 3 Safety

Subsection (3) Technical Approach for Safety states that "the Safety Narrative shall be limited to one (1) double-sided page or two (2) single-sided pages." Does this page limitation also include Subsection (1) Experience Modfication Rate, and Subsection (2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) sections?

The page limitation applies to Factor (3)(i)(3) Technical Approach for Safety.

NAS JACKSONVILLE AIRFIELD AND LIGHTING REPAIRS at NAS Jacksonville

GOVERNMENT PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRY LOG

DATED 27 APRIL 2014

July 2011 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

RFP Change (Y/N)

Reference (Section Paragraph/Page)Date

Received

Amend No.

No.

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

36 4/15/2014

RFP Section 00 Proposal Forms & Docs/page 16/Factor 4, Small Business Utilization

Part A of Factor 4, Small Business Utilization -requirement d. states, " Provide information on past use of CRP organizations under the Ability One Program. . . "

It is our understanding that the DOD contracts directly with CRP/Ability One for supplies and products for particular projects.

How is the Contractor to know the information requested in this paragraph. We are unfamiliar with this requirement - please provide further guidance.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

37 4/15/2014

RFP Section 00 Proposal Forms & Docs please clarify whether Factor 4, Small Business Utilization should be included in the price proposal, non-price proposal, or both

The submission for Factor 4, Small Business Utilization, should be included in the submission of the price proposal only. Solicitation will be amended to clarify.

Y

38 4/15/2014

RFP, p. 90 of 112, FAC 5252.236-9301, Special Working Conditions and Entry to Work Area

Will the US Government include an exclusable delays provision/clause allowing for cost and/or schedule relief when events out of the Contractor's control (i.e.

significant weather, force majeure, restricted base/site access by the USG beyond the five (5) calendar day factor in the RFP,) occur?

Refer to Solicitation Division 00 Section 00700 Contract Clauses Clause 52.249-10 Default (Fixed-Price Construction).

N

39 4/15/2014

RFP, p. 17 of 112, Factor 5, Past Performance on Recent, Relevant

Can past performance examples of teaming partners and/or named subcontractors qualify for Factor 5 requirements?

NAS JACKSONVILLE AIRFIELD AND LIGHTING REPAIRS at NAS Jacksonville

GOVERNMENT PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRY LOG

DATED 27 APRIL 2014

July 2011 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

RFP Change (Y/N)

Reference (Section Paragraph/Page)Date

Received

Amend No.

No.

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

40 4/15/2014

RFP drawing sheet PH100 Phase 1 of 3, note 3

RFP drawing sheet PH100 Phase 1 of 3, note 3, states that the contractor shall coordinate movement of equipment and the preparation of the PCC Crushing Area, Temporary Batch Plant Area and the Contractor Storage Area.

Please confirm if the PCC Crushing and Batch Plant equipment can be erected and ready for operation during the Phase I period, or the equipment just moved into place during that time.

Yes, the equipment can be erected and ready for operation during Phase 1.

N

41 4/15/2014

SECTION 01 45 00.00

25 Page 3

Please confirm The QC Manager, Assistant QC Manager and any QC Specialists must be third party consultants contracted by the General Contractor.

Refer to PPI Response #33.

N

42 4/16/2014

Section 00700, FAR 52.211-12, page 48

FAR 11.501(b) requires liquidated damages be "a reasonable forecast of just compensation for the harm that is caused by late delivery or untimely performances of the particular contract." Would the government provide the basis for $29,750/day for Phase 2b as a reasonable compensation for delay?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

43 4/16/2014

REF: SF 1442; 11 & 13 /

Section 00202 I. 4

The SF1442 provides a bid date of 15 May 2014, a Government Acceptance period of 90 days and a performance period of 570 days from award which allows a completion date of approximately 5 March 2016. Section 00202 1.4 Phase 3 provides a completion date of 01 May 2016.

The contract completion dates are as specified in Section 00700 Clause FAC 5252.211-9301, Phased Construction Schedule. The solicitation will be amended to clarify. Y

NAS JACKSONVILLE AIRFIELD AND LIGHTING REPAIRS at NAS Jacksonville

GOVERNMENT PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRY LOG

DATED 27 APRIL 2014

July 2011 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

RFP Change (Y/N)

Reference (Section Paragraph/Page)Date

Received

Amend No.

No.

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

44 4/17/2014

Volume 1 of 3; 01 14

00.00 25 Work Restrictions; Sub- Article 1.3.1.4 Flight-line Training and Access Requirements.

Contractor Access Controls and Parking: This paragraph states that "This gate will serve as the primary route for the contractor’s workforce to gain access to the airfield.

When this gate is not being positively controlled by the contractor, it will be locked’.

1. Is there any requirement on who can man the gate while it is open?

2. Will all delivery trucks use this gate or just our workforce?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

45 4/17/2014

SS 32 11 16, Sheet C900-C901 (Volume 3)

PCC Section details in Volume 3 of the drawings show the base under PCC to be in compliance with SS 32 11

16. SS 32 11 16 does not appear to allow the use of crushed concrete for base. All other PCC sections refer to SS 32 11 20 as the base under PCC.

Please clarify if SS 32 11 20 can be used for the base under PCC for Volume 3 pavements.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

46 4/17/2014

RFP Section 00/Proposal Forms & Docs/page 11/ regarding the information that must be included with the price proposal, (iv) states "offeror shall ensure FAPPIIS certification as required by FAR 52.209-7 . . ."

Please clarify what should be submitted in the proposal for this requirement. It is our understanding that if you are registered in SAM you are registered in FAPIIS.

You are correct. Offeror shall ensure FAPIIS Certification as required by FAR 52.209-7, Information Regarding Respopnsibility Matters (July 2013) is current through mainitaining an active registration in System for Award Management (SAM). The solicitation will be amended to clarify.

y

NAS JACKSONVILLE AIRFIELD AND LIGHTING REPAIRS at NAS Jacksonville

GOVERNMENT PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRY LOG

DATED 27 APRIL 2014

July 2011 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

RFP Change (Y/N)

Reference (Section Paragraph/Page)Date

Received

Amend No.

No.

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

47 4/17/2014

Drwg ED014 General Note #1 on Drwg ED014 begins as follows:

"The Intent of this project is to demolish the four existing airfield lighting vaults…" This contradicts Drwg ED013 that states there is No Structural Demolition Required for Vault 114 and Drwg ED106 that states Building 881 Electrical Vault No. 4 to Remain. Does the Government plan to correct the contradictory notes?

General Note No. 1 on Dwg. ED014 will be revised to read as follows: “This project includes: The complete demolition of two electrical vaults designated as Vault #1 (Building 854) and Vault #2 (Building 766); the removal of electrical equipment from Vault #2 (Building 114); and construction of a new airfield lighting vault.

Existing electrical equipment, lighting fixtures, wiring devices, and associated electrical components located inside these vaults shall be removed.” General Note No.

2 on Dwg. ED014 will be revised to read as follows:

“The Contractor shall legally dispose of all existing electrical equipment, including the generators and service pad mounted transformers, at a site off of Government property. Any salvage value shall accrue to the Contractor.”

Y

Amendment forthcoming

48 4/17/2014

Drwg ED014 Drwg ED014 shows a plan view of the equipment in Vault #4 (Building 881). Will the Government provide pictures of the equipment to be removed and note if any of them contain hazardous materials similar to the three plan sheets that were provided for Vaults #1 thru #3 (Bldgs 854, 114 & 766)?

The Vault #4 (Building 881) plan view will be deleted.

Y

Amendment forthcoming

49 4/17/2014

Drwg C602 Demolition Legend #5 on Drwg C602 states, "Demolish Concrete Block Storage Building #856 to Grade." This is the only detail provided for the removal of this building.

Will the Government provide pictures and plan details and note if Building #856 contains any hazardous materials?

To date the only identified ACM is 9x9 floor tile mastic.

This facility was visited during the site visit, however, a few pictures of this faciltiy will be provided.

Y

Amendment forthcoming

NAS JACKSONVILLE AIRFIELD AND LIGHTING REPAIRS at NAS Jacksonville

GOVERNMENT PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRY LOG

DATED 27 APRIL 2014

July 2011 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

RFP Change (Y/N)

Reference (Section Paragraph/Page)Date

Received

Amend No.

No.

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

50 4/21/2014

Drwgs C602, C604, C605 & C906 of Vol 3

The referenced plan sheets C602, C604, C605 & C906 of Volume 3 generally details the layout of a lined channel. Will the Government provide a detail for the anchor trench on the lined channel?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

51 4/21/2014

Drwgs C602, C604, C605 & C906 of Vol 3

The referenced plan sheets C602, C604, C605 & C906 of Volume 3 generally details the layout of a lined channel. Does the Government require a geotextile under the Fabriform? If so, is the geotextile non-woven and what is the weight of the fabric?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

52 4/21/2014

Drwgs C602, C604, C605 & C906 of Vol 3

The referenced plan sheets C602, C604, C605 & C906 of Volume 3 generally details the layout of a lined channel. Does the Government have any specifications for the existing fabriform? What is the thickness of the existing matt?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

53 4/22/2014 Volume-1 of 3- Section 01 33 00

What is timeframe for normal submittal review period? Refer to Specifications Vol 1, Section 01 33 00 paragraph e.

N

54 4/22/2014

EA185 & EA508 What minimum separation is required between system conduits? Drawing EA185 calls for 12" with each system being divided. Drawing EA508 calls for 6" if over 600V and 3" if under 600V and appears to allow combining of communications conduits in same ductbank.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

55 4/22/2014

ES502 & EA508 Theae Drawings indicate Encasement details for concrete encased ductbank. However the details on ES502 call for rebar reinforcement and the details on EA508 do not appear to call for reinforcement. Which is correct? Is this only required on the 15kV (ce) ductbank?

NAS JACKSONVILLE AIRFIELD AND LIGHTING REPAIRS at NAS Jacksonville

GOVERNMENT PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRY LOG

DATED 27 APRIL 2014

July 2011 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

RFP Change (Y/N)

Reference (Section Paragraph/Page)Date

Received

Amend No.

No.

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

56 4/22/2014

EA103, EA172 &

(DS50/EA189)

Ductbank crossing at TW "A2" (Section DS-50) on EA172 calls for 2W4" 5kv (ce) but the Detail DS-50/EA189 call for HDD. What is required? What should contractor do if CLIN-0002 is not awarded?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

57 4/22/2014

EA112, EA172 &

(DS51/EA189)

Ductbank crossing at TW "E" (Section DS-51) on EA172 calls for 1W4" 5kv (HDD) as well as on all other references. If CLIN-0002 is awarded could this be 1W4" 5kv (ce)?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

58 4/22/2014

EA103, EA172 &

(DS52/EA189)

Ductbank crossing at TW "A" (Section DS-52) on EA172 calls for 1W4" 5kv (ce) as well as on all other references. If CLIN-0002 is not awarded should this be 1W4" 5kv (HDD)?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

59 4/22/2014

EA104, EA172 &

(DS55/EA189)

Ductbank crossing at TW "A3" (Section DS-55) on EA172 / EA104 calls for 2W4" 5kv (ce) but the Detail DS- 55/EA189 call for HDD. What is required?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

60 4/22/2014

EA105, EA173 &

(DS38/EA188)

Ductbank crossing at RW "10-28" (Section DS-38) on EA173 / EA105 calls for 4W4" 5kv (ce) but this part of the RW is only being milled and paved. Should this not be HDD?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

61 4/22/2014

EA105/EA106, EA173 &

(DS07/EA186)

Ductbank crossing at TW "C" (Section DS-07) on EA173 / EA105 calls for 4W4" 5kv (ce), 2W4" P (ce), & 1W4"C

(ce) but this part of the TW is only being reworked.

Should this not be HDD the same as Section DS76/EA190 which is shown adjacent to these runs?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

62 4/22/2014

EA105, EA173 &

(DS59/EA189)

Ductbank crossing at TW "C" (Section DS-59) on EA173 / EA105 calls for 2W4" 5kv (ce) but the Detail DS- 59/EA189 call for HDD. What is required?

NAS JACKSONVILLE AIRFIELD AND LIGHTING REPAIRS at NAS Jacksonville

GOVERNMENT PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRY LOG

DATED 27 APRIL 2014

July 2011 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

RFP Change (Y/N)

Reference (Section Paragraph/Page)Date

Received

Amend No.

No.

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

63 4/22/2014

EA105, EA173 &

(DS63/EA189)

Ductbank crossing at TW "A4" (Section DS-63) on EA173 / EA105 calls for 2W4" 5kv (ce) but the Detail DS- 63/EA189 call for HDD. What is required?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

64 4/22/2014

EA108, EA174 &

(DS35/EA188)

Ductbank crossing at RW "10-28" (Section DS-35) on EA174 / EA108 calls for 4W4" 5kv (ce) but this part of the RW is only being milled and paved. Should this not be HDD?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

65 4/22/2014

EA107, EA174 &

(DS65/EA189)

Ductbank crossing at TW "A5" (Section DS-65) on EA174 / EA107 calls for 2W4" 5kv (ce) but the Detail DS- 65/EA189 call for HDD. What is required?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

66 4/22/2014

EA107, EA174 &

(DS67/EA189)

Ductbank crossing at TW "A6" (Section DS-67) on EA174 / EA107 calls for 2W4" 5kv (ce) but the Detail DS- 67/EA189 call for HDD. What is required?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

67 4/22/2014

EA108, EA174 &

(DS70/EA189)

Ductbank crossing at TW "A7" (Section DS-70) on EA174 / EA108 calls for 2W4" 5kv (ce) but the Detail DS- 70/EA189 call for HDD. What is required?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

68 4/22/2014

EA109, EA175 &

(DS71/EA189)

Ductbank crossing at TW "A" (Section DS-71) on EA175 calls for 2W4" 5kv (ce) but the Detail DS-71/EA189 call for HDD. What is required? What should contractor do if CLIN-0002 is not awarded?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

69 4/22/2014

EA109, EA175 &

(DS73/EA189)

Ductbank crossing at TW "A" (Section DS-73) on EA175 calls for 2W4" 5kv (ce) but the Detail DS-73/EA189 call for HDD. What is required? What should contractor do if CLIN-0002 is not awarded?

NAS JACKSONVILLE AIRFIELD AND LIGHTING REPAIRS at NAS Jacksonville

GOVERNMENT PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRY LOG

DATED 27 APRIL 2014

July 2011 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

RFP Change (Y/N)

Reference (Section Paragraph/Page)Date

Received

Amend No.

No.

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

70 4/22/2014

EA109, EA175 &

(DS72/EA189)

Ductbank crossing at TW "B" (Section DS-72) on EA175 calls for 2W4" 5kv (ce) but the Detail DS-72/EA189 call for HDD. What is required? What should contractor do if CLIN-0002 is not awarded?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

71 4/22/2014

Drawing EA009 and Section 34 43 00.00 20 (2.20.3) / Details Drawing EA534

Drawing EA009 calls for a L-859 Style 3 R.E.I.L whereas the Specification Section calls for a L-849 Style E LED R.E.I.L.. Which one is correct? Drawing EA009 also references EA533 but may should have referenced

EA534?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

72 4/22/2014 Drawing EA534 Although Note 1 calls for the L-849E to be Voltage-

Driven detail A2 indicates an L-830 Isolation Transfomer as if Current-Driven.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

73 4/22/2014

Drawing EA109 &

EA431

Indicates the R.E.I.L circuit to be R2-RIL but we cannot find this circuit in MDP, Panel A or either CCR switchgear. Please provide source and size of conductors.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

74 4/22/2014

RFP, p. 14 of 112, Factor 2 Technical Solution, Subfactor II.

Schedule (ii) Basis of Evaluation

The section states: "The Government will evaluate the narrative and schedule considering the extent to which the Offeror demonstrates a clear understanding of the requirements of the project...."

Does the word "narrative" in the referenced sentence refer to the Factor 2 Technical Narrative Subfactor I requirement, or is a separate narrative required for the Schedule Subfactor? If the latter, are there page limits or other parameters?

NAS JACKSONVILLE AIRFIELD AND LIGHTING REPAIRS at NAS Jacksonville

GOVERNMENT PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRY LOG

DATED 27 APRIL 2014

July 2011 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

RFP Change (Y/N)

Reference (Section Paragraph/Page)Date

Received

Amend No.

No.

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

75 4/18/2014

RFP section 006600/pg. 40/ para.

52.203-1 Cost Accounting Standard Notices and

Is a Disclosure Statement as reference in 52.230-1 Part l(b) required to be submitted by offerors with the proposal?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

76 4/23/2014

SS 01 14 00.00 25 Paragraph 1.3.1 references a gate that is to be managed for access control by the contractor. Can personnel that are controlling this gate be contractor employees or must they be provided by a third party security company?

This can be a contractor employee.

N

77 4/23/2014

SS 01 50 00.00 25 Paragraph 2.2.3 (b) states to enclose the project work area and contractor lay-down area with chain link fence. Typically a construction site on an airfield does not get enclosed with fence. Please clarify what areas should be enclosed within the chain link fence and safety fence as described in this paragraph.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

78 4/23/2014

Sheet PH101 Can the contractor have the option to use the area directly west of the contractor storage and field office area as a temporary batch plant area?

The area you are referring to is not available, therefore, the only are available for use as the temporary batch plant(s) is the area currently designated on sheet PH 100.

N

79 4/23/2014

SS 32 11 20 Paragraph 3.3.3 states to perform one density test for each 500 square feet of each layer of base course. This seems to be excessive. Typically, base courses densities are taken at a frequency of one per 500 square yards.

Please clarify the frequency of density testing for base course.

NAS JACKSONVILLE AIRFIELD AND LIGHTING REPAIRS at NAS Jacksonville

GOVERNMENT PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRY LOG

DATED 27 APRIL 2014

July 2011 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

RFP Change (Y/N)

Reference (Section Paragraph/Page)Date

Received

Amend No.

No.

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

80 4/23/2014

SS 31 00 00 Various details throughout the plans refer to stabilized subgrade IAW SS 31 00 00 and/or SS 31 23 00. SS 31 00 00 does not include any reference to stabilized subgrade, and there is no SS 31 23 00 included with the bid documents. Please clarify what is intended for the stabilized subgrade shown on these details.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

81 4/23/2014

Sheet C702, Volume 2 This sheet references Detail A1/C400 for ACC Runway 32 Pavement. Sheet C400 only shows pavement marking layout. Please provide detail for Runway 32 ACC Pavement.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

82 4/23/2014 Page 12, Paragraph 3/6, Page 13, Paragraph 5

As airfield projects of this size and configuration are limited, will projects of comparable size and complexity suffice to meet the qualifications?

Any submitted projects must meet the requirements outlined in the relevancy definition to be considered relevant.

N

83 4/25/2014

RFP, p. 18 of 112, Factor 5, Past Performance on Recent, Relevant

The RFP states that Offerors can submit a CPARS instead of Attachment G, PPQ. May the Offeror also submit a CCASS instead of Attachment G, PPQ?

A completed CCASS can be submitted. CCASS is one of four modules within the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS).

NAS JACKSONVILLE AIRFIELD AND LIGHTING REPAIRS at NAS Jacksonville

GOVERNMENT PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRY LOG

DATED 27 APRIL 2014

July 2011 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

RFP Change (Y/N)

Reference (Section Paragraph/Page)Date

Received

Amend No.

No.

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

84 4/25/2014

34 43 00.00 20 Page 13, Spec 2.19.1

Regarding the FAA-E-982 PAR56 Approach fixtures, the specification does not call for the fixtures to be equipped with special transceiver devices, but the plans (EA 703, 716, 719, 723, etc.) and fixture details (EA 704,

724) indicate a trasceiver/shorting device in the fixture.

The shorting device is common and appropriate when multiple fixtures being powered by a single transformer. However, the transceiver is not typically used on military installations and we are not aware of this requirement in the NAVAIR or UFC specification.

In addition, we are not aware of any approach system on a military installation that uses this option. The transceiver device is used at FAA supported/maintained facilities and is specific and exclusive to one manufacturer and would require additional hardware and software that is not shown. Please advise if this requirement is really intended for this project.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

85 4/25/2014

34 43 00.00 20 Page 13, Spec 2.19

Same issue as item 1. Regarding the inset approach lights, the specification does not call for the fixtures to have transceiver and shorting devices, but the plan sheet EA740, Detail A2 indicates this requirement and calls for New Bedford Panoramex Corp device specifically. Is this intentional or should the requirement/reference be deleted for all references.

NAS JACKSONVILLE AIRFIELD AND LIGHTING REPAIRS at NAS Jacksonville

GOVERNMENT PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRY LOG

DATED 27 APRIL 2014

July 2011 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

RFP Change (Y/N)

Reference (Section Paragraph/Page)Date

Received

Amend No.

No.

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

86 4/25/2014

34 43 00.00 20 Page 15, Spec 2.21

Specification calls for standard L-823 connector kits and Sheet EA506 depicts the same with the use of heat shrink. Sheet EA008 General Airfield Lighting Note 9.

indicates the use of "Super Kits". The use of "Super Kits" replace the need of heatshink over a standard L-

823. It is typical for one or the other, Super kits or Standard Connector kit with heatshrink. Please indicate which is required. We would recommend Super kits.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

87 4/25/2014

34 43 00.00 20 Page 10, Spec 2.9.1.1

Specification states that Transformer have a 20 amp primary and 6.6 amp secondary. The lamp schedule on Sheet EA724 show the PAR 56 lamps as being 20A. This is not consistent with the transformer description.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

4/25/2014 Sheet EA702 & E722 A L-841 Auxiliary Relay Assembly and Remote Control Panel is shown. Please explain the functionality for these items and provide a schematic diagram for these items.

NAS JACKSONVILLE AIRFIELD AND LIGHTING REPAIRS at NAS Jacksonville

GOVERNMENT PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRY LOG

DATED 27 APRIL 2014

July 2011 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

RFP Change (Y/N)

Reference (Section Paragraph/Page)Date

Received

Amend No.

No.

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

89 4/25/2014

Section 26 23 00 page 6, section 1.6.3

1.6.3 a. Two (2) SGRS control PCB does not match Drawing E-602 Note 6 item #1 Qty 6 each type of CCR control board.

1.6.3 b. Five (5) SGRS fuses each type does not match Drawing E-602 Note 6 item #4 Qty 6 each type of control fuse and Drawing E-602 Note 6 item #5 Qty 2 each type of power fuse.

1.6.3 c. Two (2) SGRS monitor boards does not match Drawing E-602 Note 6 item #6 Qty 2 L829 monitoring modules.

1.6.3 d. Four (4) S1 Series Circuit cutout are not shown on Drawing E-602.

Drawing E-602 Note 6 item #2 Qty 2 - 3 step selector switch and item #3 Qty 2 - 5 step selector switch are not shown in Specification section 1.6.3 Spare Parts Please verify the quantities required.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

90 4/25/2014

Section 26 23 00 page 7,section 2.2.1 e, and Drawing E-602

Drawing E-602 lists the powerpack (CCR) names and sizes but does not designate whether each powerpack output is to be 6.6A or 20.0A. Please clarify the output requirement of each powerpack.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

91 4/25/2014

Section 26 23 00 page 10, section 2.2.2.4 e

States One (1) cutout shall be provided for each circuit including all spare Regulators this does not match Drawing E-201 Note 2 the drawing shows 18 S1 cutouts in each S1 bay will all 18 cutouts need to be provided in each S1 bay?

NAS JACKSONVILLE AIRFIELD AND LIGHTING REPAIRS at NAS Jacksonville

GOVERNMENT PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRY LOG

DATED 27 APRIL 2014

July 2011 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

RFP Change (Y/N)

Reference (Section Paragraph/Page)Date

Received

Amend No.

No.

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

92 4/25/2014

Section 26 23 00 page 13, section 2.5.2. and section 2.5.3

States “IEE C37.20.1 U.L. 1158”. Drawing E-104 Note 1 states “The completed installation shall meet “Installation requirements for lightning protection systems, UL96A” of Underwriters Laboratories. The U.L.

Master Label shall be furnished to the Contracting Officer upon completion. Drawing E-602 Note 1 states “The CCR Switchgear shall be deadfront switchboard, U.L. 891. The CCR and switchgear equipment are designed and test to meet FAA AC1505345-10. An FAA certificate of conformance will be provided from and independent test lab. The CCR Switchgear is not tested to meet any of the U.L. requirements specified as a final assembly.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

93 4/25/2014 Drawing E-602 Note 1 States that the switchgear lineups be rated “Seismic

Zone 4”, is this a requirement or can they be rated Seismic zone 1?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

94 4/25/2014

Section 34 43 00.00 20 page 12, Section 2.12

States “Type L-828, without monitoring system” and Specification section 2.2.3 (Section 26 23 00 page 11) state L-829 Regulator Type. Is full monitoring required for each powepack (CCR)? If so will the digital display boards need to be provided in each door of the empty “Future” powerpack (CCR) positions shown on drawing E-602. Will local IRMS monitoring need to be provided at each powerpack (CCR)?

NAS JACKSONVILLE AIRFIELD AND LIGHTING REPAIRS at NAS Jacksonville

GOVERNMENT PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRY LOG

DATED 27 APRIL 2014

July 2011 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

RFP Change (Y/N)

Reference (Section Paragraph/Page)Date

Received

Amend No.

No.

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

95 4/25/2014

E-201 Note 3 Will the SPAWAR equipment supplier be providing the required PT/CT equipment for their system to monitor the output current and voltage of each powerpack (CCR)? If the SGRS supplier is required to provide the proper PT/CT equipment for the powerpack (CCR’s) to interface with the SPAWAR equipment will termination blocks need be installed in the in the Auxiliary Bay of the SGRS shown on drawing E-201 Note 3?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

96 4/25/2014 Section 01 57 19.01

25/Page 1

Paragraph 1. on Page 1 of Section 01 57 19.01 25 defines Petroleum Contaminated Wastes as being Surface Water, Groundwater, Soil or Sediment that has the presence of petroleum or petroleum products.

Paragraph 2. on this same page says, "Specific restoration sites have been identified in the Federal Facilities Agreement (FFA)." It further states, "Information concerning this agreement or specific site information may be obtained from the Facilities Department, NAS Jacksonville." Will the Government provide the site specific information by defining any and all exact locations of any petroleum contaminated water or soil within the boundaries of the project limits? Or will the Government provide contact information for the Facilities Department, NAS Jacksonville?

NAS JACKSONVILLE AIRFIELD AND LIGHTING REPAIRS at NAS Jacksonville

GOVERNMENT PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRY LOG

DATED 27 APRIL 2014

July 2011 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

RFP Change (Y/N)

Reference (Section Paragraph/Page)Date

Received

Amend No.

No.

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

97 4/25/2014 Section 01 57 19.01

25/Page 1

Petroleum Contaminated Wastes has been defined as being Surface Water, Groundwater, Soil or Sediment that has the presence of petroleum or petroleum products. Does the Government also define concrete or asphalt pavement being in contact with petroleum contaminated soil as being a petroleum contaminated waste; therefore, causing it to be disposed at a permitted facility?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

98 4/25/2014 Section 01 57 19.01

25/Page 1 & 2

Paragraph 5. beginning on Page 1 and ending on Page 2 of Section 01 57 19.01 25 states, "The Contractor is responsible for paying all disposal costs in accordance with PWC Jacksonville's published rates." Will the government provide the published disposal rates? Or will the Government provide contact information for PWC Jacksonville?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

99 4/25/2014 Section 01 57 19.01

25/Page 3

Paragraph 9. on Page 3 of Section 01 57 19.01 25 states general requirements for Disposal of petroleum contaminated wastes. Does the Government have a specific permitted facility that petroleum contaminated wastes are to be disposed? If so, will the Government provide the specific location? These particular wastes by specification are also to be transported by a permitted, licensed or registered transporter; Does the Government have a specific transporter to be used for the disposal of petroleum contaminated wastes? If so, will the Government provide their contact information?

NAS JACKSONVILLE AIRFIELD AND LIGHTING REPAIRS at NAS Jacksonville

GOVERNMENT PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRY LOG

DATED 27 APRIL 2014

July 2011 SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

RFP Change (Y/N)

Reference (Section Paragraph/Page)Date

Received

Amend No.

No.

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

100 4/25/2014 Section 01 57 19.00

25/Page 21

Paragraph 3.10.2 on Page 21 of Section 01 57 19.00 25 states, "If petroleum contaminated soil or suspected hazardous waste is found during construction that was not identified in the contract documents, the contractor shall immediately notify the contracting officer. The contractor shall not disturb this material until authorized by the contracting officer." The Contract Plans have not identified any locations where petroleum contaminated wastes might exist and Section 01 57 19.01 25 makes the Contractor responsible for the costs to dispose of petroleum contaminated wastes. Will the Government provide the plan locations or a quantity of petroleum contaminated wastes to be disposed by the Contractor at a permitted site?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE PENDING

101 4/25/2014 Section 01 35 26.00

25/Page 10

Paragraph i. Page 10 of Section 01 35 26.00 25 states, "The safety and health aspects prepared in accordance with Section 01 35 29.13 25 HEALTH,…