PAR_SOW-Rev_20150318.docx
DOCX document 83 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N68335-15-R-0002
About this file
COTS PAR DRAFT SOW for industry comment/feedback.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| N68335-15-R-0002-0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| PAR_RFP_VENDOR_QUESTIONS_and_RESPONSES_updated_by_EW.docx | DOCX document | |
| PAR_COTS_CDRL_C003_Revised_111215.docx | DOCX document | |
| PAR_COTS_CDRL_G001Revised_111215.docx | DOCX document | |
| N68335-15-R-0002.docx | DOCX document | |
| 0141_PARCOTS_CDRLs_06Aug15.pdf | ||
| N68335-15-R-0002.docx | DOCX document | |
| COTS_PAR_Exhibit_A001_-_H003.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
AN/FPN-63(V)
COMMERCIAL-OFF-THE-SELF (COTS)
PRECISION APPROACH RADAR (PAR)
STATEMENT OF WORK
| 1. | SCOPE | 1 |
| 1.1 | BACKGROUND | 1 |
| 1.2 | APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS AND ORDER OF PRECEDENCE | 1 |
| 1.2.1 | PRECEDENCE OF DOCUMENTS | 1 |
| 2. | PAR OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS | 2 |
| 2.1 | SYSTEM ALIGNMENT | 3 |
| 2.2 | INPUT POWER REQUIREMENTS | 3 |
| 2.2.1 | PRIMARY COMMERCIAL ELECTRICAL POWER | 3 |
| 2.2.2 | UNINTERRUPTIBLE POWER SUPPLY (UPS) | 3 |
| 2.3 | REMOTE OPERATION | 3 |
| 2.4 | FREQUENCY RANGE | 3 |
| 2.5 | ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS | 4 |
| 2.5.1 | AMBIENT OUTSIDE TEMPERATURE | 4 |
| 2.5.2 | HUMIDITY | 4 |
| 2.5.3 | ALTITUDE | 4 |
| 2.5.4 | MAXIMUM WIND SPEED | 4 |
| 2.5.5 | ELECTROMAGNETIC INTERFERENCE (EMI)/ELECTROMAGNETIC | 4 |
| 2.6 | COTS PAR ACHIEVED AVAILABILITY (Aa) | 5 |
| 2.7 | COTS PAR MAINTENANCE | 5 |
| 2.7.1 | PERIODIC INSPECTION AND PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE | 5 |
| 2.7.2 | MEAN TIME BETWEEN FAILURES (MTBF) | 5 |
| 2.7.3 | MEAN TIME TO REPAIR (MTTR) | 5 |
| 2.7.4 | FAULT DETECTION | 5 |
| 2.7.5 | FAULT ISOLATION | 6 |
| 2.7.6 | FALSE ALARM RATE | 6 |
| 2.7.7 | COTS PAR TRAINING DEVICE | 6 |
| 3. | TRAIN-THE TRAINER EVENT & COTS PAR TRAINING MATERIAL | 6 |
| 3.1 | Train-the-Trainer Event. | 6 |
| 3.2 | COTS PAR Training Material. | 6 |
| 4. | PROVISIONING AND LOGISTIC SUPPORT | 7 |
| 4.1 | Technical Manual | 7 |
| 4.2 | Diminishing Manufacturing Sources of Material Supply (DMSMS) /Parts Obsolescence | 7 |
| 4.3 | Unique Item Identification (UID) | 7 |
| 5. | WORKMANSHIP INSPECTION | 7 |
| 5.1 | QUALITY ASSURANCE (QA) | 7 |
| 5.2 | SAFETY | 8 |
| 6. | SITE SURVEYS AND COTS PAR INSTALLATION | 8 |
| 7. | INSPECTION/ACCEPTANCE TESTING | 9 |
| 7.1 | FIRST ARTICLE TESTING (FAT)/INSPECTION/ACCEPTANCE | 9 |
| 7.2 | PRODUCTION UNIT TESTING/INSPECTION/ACCEPTANCE | 10 |
| 8. | INFORMATION ASSURANCE (IA) | 10 |
| 9. | PROGRAM REVIEWS | 11 |
| 9.1 | POST AWARD CONFERENCE | 11 |
| 9.2 | QUARTERLY PROGRAM REVIEWS | 11 |
| 9.3 | TECHNICAL INTERCHANGE MEETING (TIM) | 11 |
| 10. | PROGRAM MANAGEMENT | 11 |
| 10.1 | PROGRESS STATUS REPORTS | 11 |
| 10.2 | CONFIGURATION AND DATA MANAGEMENT | 12 |
| 10.2.1 | Configuration Management (CM) Program | 12 |
| 11. | PACKAGING, HANDLING, STORAGE AND TRANSPORTATION | 12 |
| 12. | Warranty | 12 |
i
Commercial-Off-The-Shelf (COTS) Precision Approach Radar (PAR) Statement of Work (SOW)
SCOPE
This SOW is to provide the requirements for the purchase of a Commercial-Off-The-Shelf (COTS) Precision Approach Radar (PAR) system to replace the AN/FPN-63(V) PAR at select United States Navy (USN) installations as well as provide PAR capability at select United States Army (USA) and United States Air Force (USAF) installations.
BACKGROUND
The current fielded AN/FPN-63(V) PAR has approached the end of its economic and technological life. Several components in this radar system have been in service more than fifteen (15) years past their estimated product life cycle. Obsolescence issues have been targeted for remedy through a series of engineering changes. The Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) predicts technical system engineering support will be difficult to find within three to six years, and after this time, the system will become completely unsupportable. The system must undergo a replacement to meet USN needs until FY2025 or until all aircraft are Instrument Landing System (ILS) capable. In addition, both the USA and the USAF have a requirement to replace existing PAR systems. A joint approach to this requirement has been established with the Navy leading the procurement action. This SOW provides the requirements for the procurement of up to forty-two (42) COTS PAR systems, Uninterrupted Power Supplies (UPS), Training and Ancillary Installation Support for the COTS PAR systems.
APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS AND ORDER OF PRECEDENCE
The following is a list of known documents that will be needed, used and referred to during the performance of the technical and engineering services required by this SOW.
PRECEDENCE OF DOCUMENTS
In the event a conflict arises between the text of this SOW and the references or drawings cited herein, the text of this SOW shall take precedence. Nothing in this SOW, however, shall supersede applicable laws and regulations unless a specific exemption has been obtained.
Specifications:
| MIL-DTL-5541F | Chemical Conversion Coatings on Aluminum and Aluminum Alloys | ||
| MIL-STD-13231 | Marking of Electronic Items | ||
| MIL-PRF-31032 | Printing Wiring Boards, General Specification for | ||
| MIL-STD-130 | N | Identification of Marking of U.S. Military Property | |
| MIL-STD-461F | Requirements for the Control of Electromagnetic Interference Characteristics of Equipment | ||
| MIL-STD-810G | Test Method Standard for Environmental Engineering Considerations and Laboratory Tests | ||
| MIL-STD-961E(1) | Defense and Program-Unique Specifications Format and Content | ||
| MIL-STD-3001 | Preparation of Digital Technical Information for Multi-Output Presentation of Technical Manuals |
MIL-STD-1472F Human Engineering
Handbooks:
| MIL-HDBK-217 F (2) | Reliability Prediction of Electronic Equipment | |||
| MIL-HDBK-454N | Standard General Requirements for Electronic Equipment | |||
| MIL-HDBK-2036 | General Requirements for Electronic Equipment Specifications | |||
| MIL-HDBK-61A | Configuration Management Guidance | |||
| MIL-HDBK-3001(AS) | Guide to the General Style and Format of U.S. Navy Work Package Technical Manuals |
Reference Documents:
| ANSI/J-STD-001 | Requirements for Soldered Electrical and Electronic Assemblies | ||||
| IPC-A-610 | Acceptability of Electronic Assemblies | ||||
| UFC 4-133-01N | Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC), Design: Navy Air Traffic Control Facilities | ||||
| ISO 9001:2000 | AS9100 Quality Management | ||||
| ICAO Annex 10 | Volume I: Aeronautical Telecommunications | ||||
| NAVAIR 16-1-520 | U.S. Standard Flight Inspection Manual | ||||
| NAVAIRINST 13800.17 | Procedures and Responsibilities for Certification and |
Verification of the Precision Approach and Landing System
| UDI-M-22402 | Publications Package, Field Change | |||
| DoDD 8500.1 | Information Assurance | |||
| DoDI 8500.2 | Information Assurance Implementation | |||
| DoDI 8510.bb | DoD Information Assurance certification and Accreditation Process (DIACAP) | |||
| DoDI 8510.1 | DoD Information Technology Security Certification and Accreditation Process (DITSCAP) | |||
| ANSI/EIA-649B | Configuration Management Standard |
PAR OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS
The COTS PAR shall comply with the unrestricted facility classification commissioning flight inspection tolerances for precision approaches as defined in the U.S. Standard Flight Inspection Manual (NAVAIR 16-1-520).
The COTS PAR shall meet all requirements as defined in International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Annex 10, Volume I, Section 3.2. The COTS PAR shall be capable of servicing a minimum of 8 runway approaches with a maximum time of 5 minutes to reconfigure from one approach to any other available approach. The COTS PAR shall provide for Ground Controlled Approaches for meteorological conditions down to 100ft ceiling and 0.25 Nautical Mile visibility.
In its installed configuration, the COTS PAR shall meet or exceed all requirements in the following paragraphs.
SYSTEM ALIGNMENT
To verify system accuracy after preventive and corrective maintenance or prior to flight operations, the COTS PAR shall provide a method to align the COTS PAR antennas to the designated target (i.e. corner reflector) location and display the alignment data on the display.
INPUT POWER REQUIREMENTS
The COTS PAR shall be compatible and operate with either of the following power sources: primary commercial electrical power or UPS.
PRIMARY COMMERCIAL ELECTRICAL POWER
230 VAC, 60 Hz, 4 wire wye, 3Φ
UNINTERRUPTIBLE POWER SUPPLY (UPS)
The COTS PAR shall be compatible with an UPS which shall provide in-line filtering of commercial power and provide instant protection from a momentary power interruption. The UPS shall have the capacity to power the COTS PAR display and processor for at least 10 minutes and allow for orderly shutdown. The UPS shall be located within the shelter of the COTS PAR.
REMOTE OPERATION
The threshold remote operation capability of the COTS PAR shall be up to 10,000 feet with an objective of up to 16,000 feet.
FREQUENCY RANGE
The COTS PAR shall operate within and be capable of being tuned within the frequency range currently approved for U.S. military radar systems (9000-9160 MHz). The COTS PAR shall operate in accordance with Radar Spectrum Engineering Criteria B (RSEC-B) requirements, as specified in Chapter 5 of the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) Manual of Regulation and Procedures for Federal Radio Frequency Management.
The contractor shall prepare and submit data to reflect that it meets the frequency requirements stated above in accordance with CDRL A001, Frequency Certification Data.
The contractor shall provide Hazards of Electromagnetic Radiation to Ordnance (HERO), Hazard of Electromagnetic Radiation to Personnel (HERP), and Hazard of Electromagnetic Radiation to Fuel (HERF) analysis to the Government in accordance with CDRL A002, HERO/HERP/HERF Analysis Report.
ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS
The COTS PAR shall meet the environmental requirements shown below, as specified in MIL-STD-810G.
AMBIENT OUTSIDE TEMPERATURE
| Operating Temperature: | -40⁰ F to +122⁰ F | |
| Non-Operating Temperature: | -40⁰ F to +160⁰ F |
HUMIDITY
Operating and Non-Operating Relative Humidity: 0 to 95% non-condensing
ALTITUDE
Operating and Non-Operating Altitude: -100 feet to 10,000 feet
MAXIMUM WIND SPEED
The COTS PAR shall be capable of withstanding winds up to 65 knots when operational and wind speeds up to 100 knots when non-operational.
ELECTROMAGNETIC INTERFERENCE (EMI)/ELECTROMAGNETIC
COMPATIBILITY (EMC) REQUIREMENTS
The COTS PAR shall meet the EMI/EMC requirements as specified in MIL-STD-461F as described in Table V for Ground, Navy equipment to include CE102, CS101, CS103, CS104, CS105, CS114, CS115, CS116, RE102, RE103, RS101, RS103 and RS105. The contractor shall provide a verification report documenting the methods used to verify compliance in accordance with CDRL A003, Electromagnetic Environmental Effects Verification Report.
COTS PAR ACHIEVED AVAILABILITY (Aa)
Achieved availability is measured by the following equation:
The COTS PAR Aa shall be greater than or equal to 0.95.
COTS PAR MAINTENANCE
PERIODIC INSPECTION AND PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE
Time to complete all scheduled maintenance tasks shall not exceed 1 hour per week. The contractor shall provide data in accordance with CDRL B001 & CDRL B002 in order for the Government to perform the Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) analysis and for Government inclusion in generating Maintenance Index Pages (MIPs) and Maintenance Requirement Cards (MRCs).
MEAN TIME BETWEEN FAILURES (MTBF)
MTBF is used to measure the system reliability. It is calculated by dividing the total system operating time by the number of failures requiring corrective maintenance actions. The MTBF shall be allocated appropriately to meet the achieved availability requirement specified in SOW paragraph 2.6.
MEAN TIME TO REPAIR (MTTR)
MTTR is calculated by measuring all potential maintenance actions from the time a failure is identified until the system is brought back to a full operational status. As an example, this would include the time to power down the system, troubleshooting time, removal and replacement of the failed item, system power-up and verification of system repair actions. The MTTR shall be allocated appropriately to meet the achieved availability requirement specified in SOW paragraph 2.6.
FAULT DETECTION
The COTS PAR shall have built-in-test capable of detecting greater than 90% of all detectable faults.
FAULT ISOLATION
The COTS PAR built-in-test shall be capable of isolating detected faults to:
1 Line Replaceable Unit (LRU) ≥ 95% 2 LRUs ≥ 97% 3 LRUs ≥ 99%
FALSE ALARM RATE
A false alarm is an indication of a fault where no fault exists. The Mean Operating Hours between False Alarms for the COTS PAR shall be greater 500 hours.
COTS PAR TRAINING DEVICE
The COTS PAR shall have an embedded capability to provide proficiency training for COTS PAR operators (radar final controllers). This training capability shall provide simulated precision approaches, which include simulated target generation, voice response, and simulated weather.
TRAIN-THE TRAINER EVENT & COTS PAR TRAINING MATERIAL
Train-the-Trainer Event The contractor shall conduct a single train-the-trainer event per service for a maximum of eight (8) Government personnel at the contractor’s facility, at a time mutually agreeable with the Government, but not later than 3 months after accepted delivery of the first production unit per service. All material required to conduct the train-the-trainer event shall be provided by the contractor.
COTS PAR Training Material Lesson plans shall be provided to the Government for review/approval that provide specific definition and direction for Government instructors on learning objectives, equipment, instructional media requirements, and the conduct of training for the COTS PAR in accordance with CDRL C001, Training Lesson Plans.
The contractor shall provide a maintenance training summary to identify corrective and preventive maintenance tasks, operations tasks, manpower estimates for each task by maintenance level, personnel skills required to perform the maintenance tasks, and any training required to perform these tasks in accordance with CDRL B003, Maintenance Training Plan.
The contractor shall provide a trainee guide that contains data which enhances the trainee's mastery of that knowledge and skills needed for a given subject in accordance with CDRL C002, Trainee Guide. The contractor shall also provide an On-the-Job-Training (OJT) handbook in accordance with CDRL C003, OJT Handbook.
PROVISIONING AND LOGISTIC SUPPORT
The contractor shall provide logistic support for two years after the first system installation. The contractor shall develop and deliver the documents indicated in the below sub-paragraphs to the Government.
The contractor shall provide provisioning parts data containing the data elements required for the Interactive Computer Aided Provisioning System (ICAPS) data file exchange format. This parts data is acceptable in Microsoft Excel format providing the required ICAPS data elements are identified by column header. The contractor shall provide all Supplementary Provisioning Technical Data to include data sheets and drawings required to support the parts data in accordance with CDRL B004, ICAPS Data Exchange. The COTS PAR system product baseline shall be frozen prior to submission of this data.
Technical Manual
The contractor shall develop and provide Technical Manuals to support an operational level repair philosophy in accordance with CDRL D001, Technical Manuals.
Diminishing Manufacturing Sources of Material Supply (DMSMS) /Parts Obsolescence
The Contractor shall resolve all parts obsolescence and/or diminishing manufacturing issues that arise with respect to the hardware to be delivered throughout the life of this contract. The Supply Support Summary shall include a DMSMS report to address obsolescence concerns in accordance with CDRL B005, Diminishing Manufacturing Sources.
Unique Item Identification (UID)
All UID markings in accordance with DFARS 252.211-7003 are applicable to this contract.
Contractor shall provide a completed nomenclature for the COTS PAR in accordance with CDRL B006, Nomenclature.
WORKMANSHIP INSPECTION
The COTS PAR shall be inspected by government representatives to verify that it is free from workmanship defects. Workmanship shall comply with industry-recognized standards. All workmanship shall be performed in a manner to ensure that the hardware is functionally reliable and shall not jeopardize the safety of its intended users, and achieve the technical requirements of this SOW.
QUALITY ASSURANCE (QA)
The contractor shall have a documented Quality Management System based industry best practices.
SAFETY
The COTS PAR shall not be comprised of toxic chemicals, hazardous materials, or ozone-depleting substances, and shall not be produced using manufacturing processes that have a detrimental impact upon the environment, from the time of design and manufacture through its life-cycle.
SITE SURVEYS AND COTS PAR INSTALLATION
The contractor shall prepare and provide a Facilities Requirement Document (FRD) to detail the requirements and steps necessary to install a COTS PAR in accordance with CDRL D002, FRD.
With the exception of the COTS PAR First Article Unit, the contractor shall conduct a site survey for each of the government selected sites no later than 30 days after receipt of order. The purpose of the site survey will be to find a suitable location for the COTS PAR to ensure proper runway coverage that will minimize Government installation construction costs and airbase downtime from loss of COTS PAR capability during installation. A report for each site survey is to be provided in accordance with CDRL D003, Site Survey Report.
The anticipated Navy installation sites are shown in Table 1.
Table 1 – US Navy COTS PAR Replacement Sites
USN PROPOSED SITES
CONUS
| ISEA SSCPAC San Diego (First Article) |
| NAS Lemoore (2 Systems) |
| NAS Oceana |
| NAS North Island |
| NAS Whidbey Island |
| MCAS Cherry Point |
| NAS Pensacola |
| MCAS Beaufort |
| MCAS Miramar |
| NAS Corpus Christi |
| NAS Fallon |
| NAS Whiting Field |
NATC Pensacola
OCONUS
| MCAS Iwakuni Japan |
| MCAS Futenma Japan |
USA PROPOSED SITES
CONUS
| Ft. Hood |
| Hunter AAF |
| Ft. Campbell |
| Los Alamitos |
| Ft. Drum |
| Ft. Polk |
| Ft. Bragg |
| Ft. Huachuca |
| Ft. Belvoir (2 Systems) |
| Ft. Rucker |
| Ft. Benning |
| Redstone |
| Ft. Lewis |
| Troy |
Ft. Riley
OCONUS
| Ft. Wainwright |
| Camp Humphries |
| Grafenwoehr |
| Ansbach |
Illesheim
USAF PROPOSED SITES
| Elmendorf AFB, AK |
| Tyndall AFB, FL |
| Keesler AFB, MS |
| 2 sites TBD; one site CONUS one site OCONUS |
Upon Government acceptance of the FRD (CDRL D002), the Government will install the COTS PAR system and the contractor shall provide onsite engineering support during installation and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) certification at each site to resolve installation and certification issues immediately.
INSPECTION/ACCEPTANCE TESTING
FIRST ARTICLE TESTING (FAT)/INSPECTION/ACCEPTANCE
The contractor shall conduct a Technology Readiness Review (TRR) no later than 30 days prior to First Article Unit Testing. The purpose of the TRR is to verify that the COTS PAR system is ready for FAT and that the Contractor’s First Article Test Procedures are approved.
The contractor shall conduct and document the results of a Government witnessed, Contractor Conducted FAT at the Contractor’s Facility no later than nine months after contract award The FAT shall be conducted to identify any manufacturing defects and validate that COTS PAR and UPS meet the requirements of the SOW.
The contractor shall develop a First Article Test Procedure/Plan for the COTS PAR and UPS for Government review and approval no later than 60 days prior to TRR in accordance with CDRL E001, Test Plan and Procedures.
The results of the FAT shall be provided to the Government in accordance with CDRL E002, First Article Test Report.
Additionally, the COTS PAR FAT unit must pass an FAA flight certification facilitated by the contractor and witnessed by the Government, no more than 15 days prior to Government acceptance of the First Article.
Upon completion and approval of FAT, contractor shall ship the FAT units to the Space and Naval Warfare Systems (SPAWAR) Center- Pacific for Government acceptance of the FAT units:
SPAWAR Systems Center- Pacific Center; DoDAAC N66001 53560 Hull Street M/F: TBD upon contract award San Diego, California 92152-2001
Acceptance of the FAT units constitutes ability of the Government to enter into Production of the COTS PAR.
PRODUCTION UNIT TESTING/INSPECTION/ACCEPTANCE
The contractor shall provide a Production Unit Acceptance Test Procedure/Plan for Government review/approval no later than 90 days after Government acceptance of the FAT units in accordance with CDRL E003, Production Acceptance Test Plan.
Contractor shall complete Production Acceptance Testing (PAT) to identify manufacturing defects and verify production requirements prior to shipment of each production unit. Results of the PAT test will be documented and delivered to the government for each production unit in accordance with CDRL E004, Production Test Report.
Upon approval of the PAT Report (CDRL H004) for each site, contractor shall deliver the Production units to the site location identified within individual delivery orders.
Final acceptance of each Production units will occur at the completion of successful installation at the designated site, acceptance testing and receipt of FAA Certification.
Delivery of the Production units is required to begin no later than 9 months after date of order award and continue at a rate of no less than one per month.
INFORMATION ASSURANCE (IA)
The COTS PAR system shall meet all applicable IA requirements as defined in DoDD 8500.0IE, DoDI 8500.2, DoDI 8520.2, DODI 5000.02, DODI 8580.1, SECNAVINST 5239.3B, SECNAVINST 5239.3A and OMB A-l30, Appendix III. Applicable controls will be identified during the Post Award Conference with the Government System Security Engineering (SSE) Team or SSE representative and will be based on system assigned Mission Assurance Category and Confidentiality Level of Sensitive.
The technical data required to complete Information Assurance Accreditation documentation shall be provided so the Government may pursue a Program Risk Assessment Approval Package. Data submitted shall include at minimum, system descriptions, system diagrams of all Information Technology (IT) components of the system, IT interface information, and IT ports, protocols and services required for any connectivity external to the system in accordance with CDRL F001, Information Assurance Accreditation Documentation.
The Contractor shall furnish test reports, system scans and/or compliance results to support the accreditation assessments with its submission of the First Article Unit Test Report in accordance with CDRL E002, First Article Unit Test Report.
PROGRAM REVIEWS
POST AWARD CONFERENCE
Contractor shall schedule a Post Award Conference to occur at the Contractor’s facility no later than 30 days after contract award. This meeting will provide the Contractor with the opportunity to address any questions regarding the design and schedule as specified within this SOW. Meeting minutes shall be provided to PMA-213 no later than three (3) days after the Post Award Conference in accordance with CDRL F003, Meeting Minutes.
QUARTERLY PROGRAM REVIEWS
Quarterly Program Reviews shall be conducted by the contractor with Government representatives present, to review and evaluate the status of the contract, and overall condition of the program. Overall schedule and performance of the contract will be reviewed, and shall include progress and milestones since the previous review, to include: systems engineering, Integrated Logistics Support (ILS), program risk management, safety matters, and manufacturing schedule. These reviews shall be conducted at the contractor’s facility, the Naval Air Traffic Control Management offices (PMA213), Video Teleconferencing (VTC), or Web Cast. At a minimum, seventy (70) percent of these reviews shall take place by conference call or VTC. The schedule and location for the next review will be established by the Government at each quarterly program review. Contractor shall provide the agenda for each quarterly review in accordance with CDRL F002, Meeting/Conference Agenda and shall provide meeting minutes in accordance with CDRL F003, Meeting Minutes for all reviews.
TECHNICAL INTERCHANGE MEETING (TIM)
TIMs shall be conducted twice monthly, at a minimum, until delivery of the first article units in order to implement timely resolution of technical risks. The contractor shall provide meeting agenda in accordance with CDRL F002, Meeting/Conference Agenda and meeting minutes and action items in accordance with CDRL F003, Meeting Minutes. TIMs shall be conducted either via video teleconference, teleconference or at a mutually agreeable location. Locations shall be designated at each TIM for the subsequent TIM and shall be conducted via teleconference or VTC a minimum of 70% of the time. Contractor TIM travel will not be exceed three events during the period of performance of this contract.
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
PROGRESS STATUS REPORTS
The contractor shall submit a monthly Progress Status Report in accordance with CDRL G001, Progress Status Report and monthly Project Schedule in accordance with CDRL G002, Project Schedule for review.
CONFIGURATION AND DATA MANAGEMENT
Configuration Management (CM) Program
The contractor shall maintain a CM Program throughout the duration of the contract, which includes an organizational structure with configuration control methods, configuration audits, and configuration status accounting procedures. The CM program strategy shall be documented via a CM plan in accordance with CDRL H001, CM Plan.
As Built Configuration List
An As Built Configuration List shall be delivered with each system in accordance with CDRL H002.
Configuration Control
Designated baseline documents and configuration items may be changed only as the result of an Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) approved by the PMA213 Decentralized Configuration Control Board (DCCB). All ECPs shall be submitted for approval in accordance with CDRL H003, Request for ECP Approval.
The contractor shall maintain records for all Class II ECPs separate from (not incorporated into) the drawing package. Class II ECPs require Defense Contract Management Agency or PMA213 classification concurrence. Engineering changes shall be classified using MIL-HDBK-61A as a guide. To the maximum extent possible all hardware and software changes shall be backward compatible with all existing hardware and software configurations.
Configuration Status Accounting
The contractor shall maintain procedures to track the status of changes to the baseline and to units already produced and to track the implementation of approved changes.
PACKAGING, HANDLING, STORAGE AND TRANSPORTATION
The contractor shall pack and ship the COTS PAR units using best commercial practices and ship by any approved traceable conventional mode of transportation.
Warranty
Warranty period of the COTS PAR and UPS shall commence upon final acceptance of each COTS PAR system.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .