RFP ATT 002-PAST PERFORMANCE INTERVIEW FORM.doc

DOC document 44 KB Posted

Attached to
Reconfigurable Transportable Consolidated Automated Support System (RTCASS) Contractor Logistics Support (CLS)
Solicitation number
N68335-12-R-0112
Issued by

About this file

ATT 002 Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
RFP ATT 009 Scheduled GFE 03JUL12 RevA.docx DOCX document
RTCASS CLS Q A responses-20aug12.doc DOC document
RFP_ATT_007-RTCASS_Class_II_ECPs_01JAN11 RevA.xls XLS spreadsheet
RFP ATT 001-CLS STATEMENT OF WORK(08162012)Track Changes.doc DOC document
RFP ATT 008-RTCASS FRACAS Report-06AUG12 revA.xls XLS spreadsheet
RFP ATT 003 - Parts List.doc DOC document
RFP ATT 01 APPENDIX D-Product Quality Deficiency Reports.doc DOC document
RFP ATT 001-APPENDIX A-WEBCAV STATEMENT OF WORK.doc DOC document
RFP ATT 004-CPARS_UPDATE_QUESTIONNAIRE.doc DOC document
RFP ATT 001-APPENDIX C- LRCR.doc DOC document
Exhibit A - CDRLs revD.doc DOC document
RFP ATT 001-CLS STATEMENT OF WORK.doc DOC document
N68335-12-R-0112.doc DOC document
RFP ATT 001-APPENDIX B- TMSDR.doc DOC document
RFP ATT 008- RTCASS FRACAS Report 03 JUL 12.xls XLS spreadsheet
RFP ATT 010- Requisitioned GFP 03JUL12.docx DOCX document
RFP ATT 009- Scheduled GFP 03JUL12.docx DOCX document
RFP ATT 007-RTCASS Class II ECPs 01JAN11.xls XLS spreadsheet
RFP ATT 006 - RTCASS Fielding Profile revC.doc DOC document
RFP ATT 005 - Repair Demand Data revB.doc DOC document
Show all 20

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

N68335-12-R-0112 Attachment 002

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION-SEE FAR 2.101 and 3.104

PAST PERFORMANCE INTERVIEW FORM

1.Contractor:

2.Customer:

3.Contract Number:

Period of Performance:

4.Contract Type:

Negotiated

FORMCHECKBOX

Sealed Bid

FORMCHECKBOX

Fixed Price

Cost Reimbursement

IDIQ

Other

5.Complexity of Work:

Difficult:

FORMCHECKBOX

Routine:

FORMCHECKBOX

Ratings: Summarize contractor performance and circle the appropriate rating for each category.

Customer Satisfaction: Rating:

Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory

Highly Satisfactory Outstanding

(Satisfaction of customer with contractor’s responsiveness to inquiries and services and/or products provided and actions taken to resolve problems)

Quality of Product and Processes: Rating:

Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory

Highly Satisfactory Outstanding

(Compliance with contract requirements, accuracy of reports, appropriateness of personnel, and technical excellence)

Comments:

Timeliness of Performance: Rating: Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory

Highly Satisfactory Outstanding

(Met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical direction, and completed on time) Comments:

Quality Of Awards Rating: Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory

Highly Satisfactory Outstanding

(Quality Awards or certtifications that indicate the offeror possesses a high quality process for developing and producing the product) Comments:

Small Business Representation: Rating:

Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory

Highly Satisfactory Outstanding

(what extent offeror plans to subcontract to Small Business (SB), Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB), Veteran Owned Business, Small Businesses and successes in meeting these goals in the past. ) Comments:

Ability to Manage Cost/Control Costs Rating: Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory

Highly Satisfactory Outstanding

Comments:

Would you select this firm again? Please explain.

Interviewee Name:

FORMTEXT

FORMTEXT

FORMTEXT

Signature:

FORMTEXT

FORMTEXT

Phone Number:

FORMTEXT

FORMTEXT

FORMTEXT

Fax Number: Date:

Interviewer Name:

FORMTEXT

FORMTEXT

Signature:

Phone Number:

FORMTEXT

FORMTEXT

FORMTEXT

Fax Number:

Date:

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION-SEE FAR 2.101 and 3.104

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .