R

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

Section A - Solicitation/Contract Form

The following changes have been made:

INFORMATION FROM TO

Response Due Date 12 Aug 2026 21 Sep 2026

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

GENERAL INFORMATION

Distribution: TBD NUWCDIVNPT Requisition Number: 1301324417 NUWCDIVNPT PID Number: 10-0087 NUWCDIVNPT POC: Amy Prisco (amy.k.prisco.civ@us.navy.mil), Michael Ouellette (michael.n.ouellette.

civ@us.navy.mil) Note: Disregard the reference to retired FAR clause 52.211-10 within Block 11 of the cover page. Block 11 is automatically populated by the contract writing system. Please see Section F for the performance period.

AMENDMENT 0004 - SOLICITATION N6660426R0163

The purpose of this Amendment is to:

1. Withdraw the Small Business Set-Aside and transition the solicitation to Full and Open Competition.

2. Revise the proposal due date.

3. Incorporate a revised Davis-Bacon Wage Determination.

4. Revise the Statement of Work (SOW) to "Revision 1".

5. Update Section L (Instructions to Offerors) and Section M (Evaluation Factors) to permit and evaluate fully prefabricated volumetric modular SCIF systems.

6. Schedule a Government site visit.

1. WITHDRAWAL OF SMALL BUSINESS SET-ASIDE

This acquisition is hereby transitioned to Full and Open Competition (Unrestricted).

Proposals are now accepted from all responsible business concerns (both large and small businesses).

The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code remains 236220.

2. NEW PROPOSAL DUE DATE

TO: 21 September 2026 @ 2:00 The date and time specified for the receipt of proposals is officially revised:

PM EST

3. INCORPORATION OF REVISED WAGE DETERMINATION

Davis-Bacon Wage Determination No. RI20260001, dated 07/30/2026, is hereby incorporated into this solicitation. This updated determination replaces RI20260001, dated 01/30/2026, in its entirety.

4. REVISIONS TO ATTACHMENT 1 - STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW)

The SOW is hereby replaced in its entirety. Prospective offerors must refer to: "Attachment 1 - Statement of Work (Rev 1)", which is attached to this amendment.

N6660426R01630004

5. REVISIONS TO SECTION L & M (INSTRUCTIONS AND EVALUATION)

A. SECTION L REVISIONS:

The following instruction is added to Section L:

"Offerors proposing a volumetric prefabricated modular system shall submit architectural concepts, module transport and erection plans, and a detailed ICD/ICS 705 compliance matrix demonstrating how the pre-manufactured joints and module connections will maintain acoustic (STC), radio frequency (RF) shielding, and physical security boundaries."

Pass/Fail requirement 3.4.3 Small Business Participation has been revised.

B. SECTION M REVISION:

Under the Technical Evaluation Factor, the following text is added: "The Government considers both panelized modular systems (assembled on-site) and volumetric (fully prefabricated) modular systems to be acceptable construction methods. The evaluation will be based on the Offeror's demonstrated ability to meet all ICD/ICS 705 security specifications and the 5,000 square footage requirement, as defined in the Statement of Work and applicable documents."

Pass/Fail requirement 3.4.3 Small Business Participation has been revised.

6. GOVERNMENT SITE VISIT

A site visit has been scheduled for all prospective offerors:

DATE: September 2, 2026

TIME: 10:00 AM EST

Due to the strict security requirements of the facility, advanced registration is mandatory.

Prospective offerors must review and comply with the "Site Visit Instructions" document attached to this amendment for base access and RSVP deadlines.

ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN UNCHANGED AND IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.

Acknowledgment must be made by completing Blocks 8 and 15, and returning a signed copy of the SF-30 with the proposal package.

Section J - List of Attachments

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

Attachment 1 - Statement of Work (REV 1)

Attachment 2 - Wage Determination (REV Dated 07/30/2026)

Attachment 3 - Soil Management Plan

Attachment 4 - DD254 Contract Security Classification Checklist

Attachment 5 - Key Personnel

Attachment 6 - Hazardous Material Usage Log

Attachment 7 - Generator Usage Log

Attachment 8 - Site Visit Instructions (REV)

Attachment 9 - AD 21 Conceptual Layout Plan_(REV)

Attachment 10 - AD 22 Area Site Plan_3 12 2025

Attachment 11 - AD 23 Site Utility Plan_3 12 2025

Attachment 12- AD 1, 2, 3, 25.

Attachment 13- RFI 001

Section K - Representations, Certification, & Other Statements

The following clauses were deleted:

FAR Clauses Incorporated by Full Text

52.219-1 Small Business Program Representations. (Deviation 2026-O0038) (Feb 2026)

SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAM REPRESENTATIONS (FEB 2026) (DEVIATION 2026-O0038)

(a) . As used in this provision-Definitions

Economically disadvantaged women-owned small business (EDWOSB) concern means a small business concern that is at least 51 percent directly and unconditionally owned by, and the management and daily business operations of which are controlled by, one or more women who are citizens of the United States and who are economically disadvantaged in accordance with 13 CFR part 127, and the concern is certified by SBA or an approved third-party certifier in accordance with 13 CFR 127.300. It automatically qualifies as a women-owned small business concern eligible under the WOSB Program.

HUBZone small business concern means a small business concern that meets the requirements described in 13 CFR 126.200, is certified by the Small Business Administration (SBA) and designated by SBA as a HUBZone small business concern in the Small Business Search (SBS) ( 13 CFR 126.103).

Service-disabled veteran-owned small business (SDVOSB) concern eligible under the SDVOSB Program means an SDVOSB concern that is designated in the System for Award Management (SAM) as certified by the Small Business Administration (SBA) in accordance with 13 CFR 128.300.

Small business concern-

(1) Means a concern, including its affiliates, that is independently owned and operated, not dominant in its field of operation, and qualified as a small business under the criteria in 13 CFR part 121 and the size standard in paragraph (b) of this provision.

(2) , as used in this definition, means business concerns, one of whom directly or indirectly controls or has the power to control the others, Affiliates or a third party or parties control or have the power to control the others. In determining whether affiliation exists, consideration is given to all appropriate factors including common ownership, common management, and contractual relationships. SBA determines affiliation based on the factors set forth at 13 CFR 121.103.

Small disadvantaged business concern means a small business concern that-

(1) Is at least 51 percent unconditionally and directly owned (as defined at 13 CFR 124.105) by one or more socially disadvantaged (as defined at 13 CFR 124.103) and economically disadvantaged (as defined at 13 CFR 124.104) individuals who are citizens of the United States, and

(2) The management and daily business operations of which are controlled (as defined at 13 CFR 124.106) by individuals who meet the criteria in paragraph (1) of this definition.

Women-owned small business (WOSB) concern eligible under the WOSB Program (in accordance with 13 CFR part 127) means a small business concern that is at least 51 percent directly and unconditionally owned by, and the management and daily business operations of which are controlled by, one or more women who are citizens of the United States, and the concern is certified by SBA or an approved third-party certifier in accordance with 13 CFR 127.300.

(b)

The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for this acquisition is [insert NAICS code].(1) ____

(2) The small business size standard is [insert size standard].____

(3) The small business size standard for a concern that submits an offer, other than on a construction or service acquisition, but proposes to furnish an end item that it did not itself manufacture, process, or produce ( , nonmanufacturer), is 500 employees, or 150 employees for information i.e.

technology value-added resellers under NAICS code 541519, if the acquisition-

(i) Is set aside for small business and has a value above the simplified acquisition threshold;

(ii) Uses the HUBZone price evaluation preference regardless of dollar value, unless the offeror waives the price evaluation preference; or

(iii) Is an 8(a), HUBZone, service-disabled veteran-owned, economically disadvantaged women-owned, or women-owned small business set-aside or sole-source award regardless of dollar value.

(c) Representations.

The offeror represents as part of its offer that-(1)

(i) it is, is not a small business concern; or

(ii) It is, is not a small business joint venture that complies with the requirements of 13 CFR 121.103(h) and 13 CFR 125.8(a) and (b). [____ The offeror shall enter the name and unique entity identifier of each party to the joint venture: __.]________

(2) [ The offeror represents that it Complete only if the offeror represented itself as a small business concern in paragraph (c)(1) of this provision.] is, is not a women-owned small disadvantage business concern.

(3) The offeror represents as part of its offer that it is, Women-owned small business (WOSB) joint venture eligible under the WOSB Program.

is not a joint venture that complies with the requirements of 13 CFR 127.506(a) through (c). [ The offeror shall enter the name and unique ____ entity identifier of each party to the joint venture: __.]

(4) The offeror represents as part of its offer that it is, Economically disadvantaged women-owned small business (EDWOSB) joint venture.

is not a joint venture that complies with the requirements of 13 CFR 127.506(a) through (c). [ The offeror shall enter the name and unique entity ____ identifier of each party to the joint venture: __.]

(5) . [ ]. The offeror SDVOSB joint venture eligible under the SDVOSB Program Complete only if the offeror is certified as a SDVOSB concern represents as part of its offer that it is, is not a SDVOSB joint venture eligible under the SDVOSB Program that complies with the requirements of 13 CFR 128.402. [ The offeror shall enter the name and unique entity identifier of each party to the joint venture:__.]____

(6) [ ] The HUBZone joint venture eligible under the HUBZone Program. Complete only if the offeror is a HUBZone small business concern.

offeror represents, as part of its offer, that it is, is not a HUBZone joint venture that complies with the requirements of 13 CFR 126.616(a) through (c). [ The offeror shall enter the name and unique entity identifier of each party to the joint venture: __.] Each HUBZone small business ____ concern participating in the HUBZone joint venture must be certified as a HUBZone concern.

(d) Under 15 U.S.C. 645(d), any person who misrepresents a firm's status as a business concern that is small, HUBZone small, small Notice.

disadvantaged, service-disabled veteran-owned small, economically disadvantaged women-owned small, or women-owned small eligible under the WOSB Program in order to obtain a contract to be awarded under the preference programs established pursuant to section 8, 9, 15, 31, and 36 of the Small Business Act or any other provision of Federal law that specifically references section 8(d) for a definition of program eligibility, will be-

(1) Punished by imposition of fine, imprisonment, or both;

(2) Subject to administrative remedies, including suspension and debarment; and

(3) Ineligible for participation in programs conducted under the authority of the Act.

(End of provision)

1.

2.

3.

Section L - Instructions, Conditions, & Notices to Offerors or Quoters

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

1.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

This is a competitive solicitation for a Firm-Fixed-Price Design-Build contract for a new commercial secure facility. The Government intends to award a single contract without negotiations, as permitted by FAR 15.203. Offerors are, therefore, cautioned to submit their best terms in their initial proposal.

Proposals shall be submitted electronically no later than September 21, 2026, 2:00pm Eastern Standard

. Late proposals will not be considered for award. Time Questions regarding this solicitation shall be submitted in writing via email to Amy Prisco (amy.k.prisco.

civ@us.navy.mil) and Michael Ouellette (michael.n.ouellette.civ@us.navy.mil) no later than September

. 7, 2026

2.0 PROPOSAL FORMAT

All Offerors shall submit their proposals in accordance with the format and content specified below. The requirements below apply equally to subcontractors. Proposals that do not meet the below requirements may be deemed unresponsive and may not be eligible for award. The electronic proposal shall be prepared so that if printed, the proposal meets the following format requirements:

8.5 x 11 inch paper Single-spaced typed lines 1 inch margins Font text shall be 12-point Times New Roman, except for:

Graphs, graphics, or charts used to supplement the proposal text shall use Times New Roman that is no smaller than 9-point font size.

Microsoft Office Excel spreadsheets shall use Times New Roman that is no smaller than 9-point font size. These Excel spreadsheets shall be formatted for printing in landscape orientation such that all row and column headings appear on each printed page. All spreadsheets shall include calculations in the cells showing all formulas . Do not enter hard data where formulas were used to calculate the entered value.

No hyperlinks Proposals shall be in English and in U.S. dollars.

Proposals shall be Microsoft Office (Word, Excel, PowerPoint) 2010 and newer versions or Adobe Acrobat (PDF) compatible. PDF files shall be searchable when reviewed electronically.

2.1 Cover Page and Table of Contents

The Offeror shall include a cover page and table of contents for each proposal volume. The cover page shall identify the solicitation number, proposal volume and title, and the Offeror's name. The cover page and table of contents will not count against page limitations.

2.2 Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms

Offer shall include a glossary of abbreviations and acronyms for each proposal volume that provides corresponding definitions. Glossaries will not count against page limitations.

2.3 Page Numbering System

Offeror shall use a standard page numbering system to facilitate proposal references. All pages shall be numbered consecutively for each section within a volume. Charts, graphs, and other inserted materials shall be included in the page numbering system.

2.4 Restriction on Disclosure and Use of Data

Offerors that include in their proposals data that they do not want disclosed to the public for any purpose, or used by the Government except for evaluation purposes, shall mark the title page with the following legend:

"This proposal includes data that shall not be disclosed outside the Government and shall not be duplicated, used, or disclosed in whole or in part for any purpose other than to evaluate this proposal. If, however, a contract is awarded to this Offeror as a result of, or in connection with, the submission of this data, the Government shall have the right to duplicate, use, or disclose the data to the extent provided in the resulting contract. This restriction does not limit the Government's right to use information contained in this data if it is obtained from another source without restriction. The data subject to this restriction are contained in sheets [insert numbers or other identification of sheets]";

Offerors shall also mark each sheet of data it wishes to restrict with the following legend:

"Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal."

2.5 File Naming Convention

All proposal files shall include the Offeror's company name, volume #, document name, and other useful identifying information. For example:

Company_Volume I _Technical Approach Company_Volume I_Key Personnel Resume for Jane Doe Company_Volume II _Past Performance Reference for XX Company_VolumeIII _Cost Proposal Narrative Company_Volume_IV_Cover Letter

3.0 PROPOSAL ORGANIZATION AND CONTENT

Offeror shall organize its proposal and include all proposal content exactly as described herein. Offeror shall organize its proposal into separate volumes and adhere to page limitations as delineated in the Proposal Organization Table below. Page limitations will be treated as maximums. If exceeded, excess pages may not be read or considered in proposal evaluation. When both sides of a sheet display printed material, it shall be counted as two pages.

Proposal Organization Table

Volume Proposal Content Page Limitation

Volume I - Technical (Factor 1)

Subfactor A: Technical Approach

Subfactor B: Personnel Approach

Integrated Design-Build Team Experience Narrative Key Personnel Resumes

20 pages

5 pages for Narrative

2 pages for each Key Personnel resume

Volume II - Past Performance (Factor 2)

Past Performance References 2 pages

Volume III - Price Proposal (Factor 3)

Price Breakdown Schedule No page limit

No page limit

3.

4.

Volume IV - Contract Documentation

Cover Letter

Solicitation, Offer, and Award Form (SF 1442)

Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) Mitigation Plan

Plan for Obtaining Personnel Clearances

Facility and Safeguarding Clearance

Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Unique Identifier(s) (UIDs)

No page limit

5 pages

No page limit

No page limit

No page limit

3.1 Volume I - Technical (Factor 1)

3.1.1 Subfactor A: Technical Approach

The submission of an offer constitutes unconditional acceptance to perform all of the tasks described in the SOW; therefore, Offeror's proposal need not address every single aspect of the SOW. Offeror shall describe its specific understanding, capability, experience, and technical approach with regards to the following requirements:

A preliminary design concept narrative and conceptual drawings (up to 3 sheets) illustrating the proposed approach to meeting the Government requirements, including facility layout and adjacency;

A specific narrative describing the Offeror's approach to achieving Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF)/Special Access Program Facility (SAPF) accreditation, detailing methods for physical security and acoustic separation;

A specific narrative describing the plan for site security during construction, including procedures for controlling access, managing cleared and uncleared workers, and safeguarding materials; and A preliminary draft project schedule demonstrating the ability to complete all work within the identified contract completion date.

The Offeror shall also provide a Construction Security Plan (CSP) addressing the following:

The full address where the modular facility will be manufactured;

A certified Abutters List identifying all property owners of record for parcels located fully or partially within one hundred (100) feet of the property boundaries of the facility designated for modular component manufacturing.

The submitted list shall, at a minimum, contain the following information for each abutting parcel:

Data Field Description

Owner of Record

The full legal name of the property owner as listed in municipal tax records.

Owner Mailing Address

The complete mailing address for the owner of record.

Subject Property Address

The physical address or description of the abutting property itself.

Parcel Identification Number

The official Assessor's Parcel Number (APN), Lot/Block number, or equivalent municipal identifier.

Owner Affiliation / Entity Type

The classification of the property owner. This shall be identified as 'Individual' for private persons or specify the entity type (e.g., 'Corporation,' 'LLC,' 'Trust,' 'Government Agency,' 'Non-Profit'). The legal name of the entity must be provided.

A detailed description of the security measures at the manufacturing facility (i.e. fenced in compound, roving and static guards, 100% ID checks, etc.) and how access to the manufacturing facility is controlled. The description shall include the process by which people and materials gain access to and exit the manufacturing site. It shall also include how security is maintained outside of normal business hours;

A detailed description as to how the manufacturing company will secure all materials while the manufactured structure is constructed;

A detailed summary as to how the modular components of the fabricated facility will be securely transported from the manufacturing location to its permanent location;

A statement acknowledging that the official site security manager (SSM) will be a Government employee who shall be allowed access to the manufacturing facility for visual inspections and progress monitoring of the manufacturing and transportation of the modular component. The SSM will ensure contractor compliance with the CSP; and A detailed explanation as to how all contract documents (including, but not limited to, bids, plans, diagrams, etc.) will be maintained and controlled during the project. The Offeror shall affirm that no contract documents will be released to unauthorized personnel or entities.

Offeror should organize its technical approach by grouping together capability, understanding, experience, and approach by specific SOW requirements. Offeror shall clearly demonstrate its ability to meet the requirements. Offeror shall provide explanatory details assuming that the Government has no prior knowledge of its facilities, capabilities, or experience. Offerors shall identify technical uncertainties and assumptions within the requirements and provide specific courses of action for their resolution. Offerors are encouraged to address any innovative approaches to meeting the requirements. Offeror shall not simply rephrase or restate the Government's requirements in the proposal. Proposals that merely reiterate the Government's own requirements will be deemed unacceptable and thus ineligible for award. Offerors are cautioned that failure to provide the necessary information may result in its adjectival ratings being downgraded accordingly.

Offerors proposing a volumetric prefabricated modular system shall submit architectural concepts, module transport and erection plans, and a detailed ICD/ICS 705 compliance matrix demonstrating how the pre-manufactured joints and module connections will maintain acoustic (STC), radio frequency (RF) shielding, and physical security boundaries.

3.1.2 Subfactor B - Personnel Approach

Integrated Design-Build Team Experience Narrative: The Offeror shall provide a narrative (not to exceed five (5) pages) describing the experience of the integrated Design-Build team (including, at a minimum, the prime contractor and the lead design team) in designing and constructing secure facilities compliant with ICD/ICS 705. The narrative shall describe how the team's collective experience and lessons learned from previous projects will be leveraged to ensure the successful delivery and accreditation of this facility.

Key Personnel. Offeror shall provide one resume (2 pages maximum) for each individual proposed to fulfill the following positions: Project Manager, Superintendent, Lead Designer, Quality Control (QC) Manager.

Qualifications. All key personnel positions shall identify a current employee or contingent hire to fulfil the role. Each resume shall demonstrate the key personnel's qualifications to complete the tasking for which person has been proposed to perform.

Project Manager Qualifications: The resume must demonstrate a minimum of 7 years' experience in managing federal construction projects with at least 5 years managing ICD/ICS 705 compliant facilities.

Superintendent Qualifications: The resume must demonstrate a minimum of ten (10) years' experience in construction, with at least five (5) years serving as a superintendent on projects of similar size and complexity. The individual must be familiar with the requirements of EM 385-1-1, be capable of interpreting a critical path schedule and construction drawings and have experience in hazard identification and safety compliance.

Lead Designer Qualifications: The lead designer must possess an active registered architect or professional engineer license. The resume must demonstrate a minimum of 5 years' experience designing facilities compliant with ICD/ICS 705. The resume must demonstrate successful completion and accreditation of at least 2 secure federal facilities of similar scope within the last 5 years.

Quality Control (QC) Manager Qualifications: The resume must demonstrate experience managing a QC program for construction projects, including the three phases of control, submittal reviews, and quality control for Sound Rated perimeter construction. The QC Manager must have completed the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) course entitled "Construction Quality Management (CQM) for Contractors" within the last five years.

Provide a copy of the QC Manager's training certificate.

Offeror shall submit a current "letter of intent" (with salary information redacted) with all resumes supplied for contingent key personnel hires. The letter of intent does not count against page limitations and must be signed by the contingent hire employee and the Offeror.

Resumes shall not exceed two (2) pages each and must clearly demonstrate how the individual meets the specific qualifications outlined below.

Resumes must also verify that each individual possesses, at a minimum, a Top Secret (TS) security clearance and is eligible for access to Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI), effective the date of proposal submission. Key personnel resumes shall include the following information:

Name Key personnel position Security clearance level Citizenship Summary indicating how personnel qualifications are met (e.g., years of relevant experience) Chronology of education, training, and degrees/certifications held Chronology of work experience with emphasis on SOW related experience

Key personnel are deemed essential to the performance of this effort and cannot be replaced without prior Government approval in accordance with C- 237-H002 SUBSTITUTION OF KEY PERSONNEL (OCT 2018). The qualifications listed in each individual proposed key personnel resume, not the specific individual, are the materially relevant aspects of the proposed key personnel partially forming the basis of award. Therefore, even if a proposed key personnel becomes unavailable to the Offeror between proposal submission and award, the Government will evaluate and make its award decision based on the qualifications listed on the proposed resume(s). The Government will require the awardee to use the qualifications listed on the relevant proposed key personnel resume as the basis for replacing the individual under C-237-H002 SUBSTITUTION OF KEY PERSONNEL (OCT 2018) during contract performance. The Offeror shall make no substitution of key personnel without prior written notification to and concurrence of the Contracting Officer.

3.2 VOLUME II -PAST PERFORMANCE (FACTOR 2)

Offeror shall provide all past performance information in accordance with Attachmen - Past Performance Reference.t X Offeror shall provide up to three (3) past performance references, which shall reflect recent experience performed within the last three (3) years of the solicitation release date and that demonstrates experience relevant to the solicitation's SOW. Offeror shall describe how the past performance references are relevant including details about how each past performance reference is similar in scope and complexity to this solicitation's SOW.

For each project submitted, the Offeror shall provide the following:

- Contract Number and Project Title

- Project Description

- Period of Performance

- Total Contract Value

- A Customer Point of Contact (Name, Title, current Email, and Phone Number)

"Relevant" is defined as a Design-Build contract for the construction of a SCIF, SAPF, or other comparable secure facility with a value greater than $4M."

3.3 VOLUME III - PRICE PROPOSAL (FACTOR 3)

The Offeror shall submit a complete Price Proposal in accordance with the instructions herein. The proposal shall be submitted as a separate volume from any Technical or Past Performance volumes. This volume shall contain two distinct parts:

Price Breakdown Schedule

The Offeror shall provide a Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) for the complete job as identified in the Statement of Work (SOW). The Offeror shall complete the Price Breakdown Schedule provided in Section B of this solicitation.

The proposed prices shall be all-inclusive, covering all labor, materials, equipment, supervision, transportation, quality control, overhead, general and administrative (G&A) expenses, profit, insurance, bonds, permits, and any other costs necessary to fully perform all requirements of the SOW.

3.4 VOLUME IV - CONTRACT DOCUMENTATION

3.4.1. Cover Letter

Offeror and subcontractors shall provide a cover letter with the following information:

Solicitation number;

Company name, Contract Number, CAGE code, Unique Entity Identifier (UEI), address, e-mail address, and telephone number;

A statement confirming agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation and agreement to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item;

A statement that the proposal is valid through 90 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of proposals;

Names, titles, telephone numbers, and e-mail addresses of persons authorized to negotiate on the Offeror's behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation;

Name, title, and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal. Proposals signed by an agent shall be accompanied by evidence of that agent's authority, unless that evidence has been previously furnished to the issuing office. The Offeror's signature on their proposal indicates the company will meet all requirements of the SOW, without exception; and Identify all enclosures being transmitted as part of the Offeror's proposal;

If an Offeror believes no organizational conflict(s) of interest exists, an affirmative statement that no such conflict exists shall be included in the cover letter.

3.4.2 Solicitation, Offer, and Award Form (SF 1442)

The Offeror shall complete Blocks 14 through 20c of the Standard Form (SF) 1442 provided in Section A of this solicitation. The form must be signed in Block 30 by an individual authorized to bind the Offeror to the proposal. An unsigned proposal may be rejected by the Government.

PASS/FAIL REQUIREMENTS

Offerors will be evaluated based on a Pass/Fail rating on the requirements listed below. To be eligible for award, Offerors must receive a Pass rating under each Pass/Fail Requirement. The Pass/Fail rating criteria are as follows:

3.4.3 Small Business Participation.

Offeror shall demonstrate how it will provide at least 10% of the proposed total estimated amount of the task order to small business concerns.

Offeror shall provide sufficient information to demonstrate that the tasks assigned to the selected small business subcontractors are meaningful in the overall success of the program. The approach shall address use of Small Business Concerns, Small Disadvantaged Business Concerns, Women- Commented Owned Small Business Concerns, Hub Zone Small Business Concerns, Veteran-Owned Small Business Concerns, and Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Concerns.

Small Business Subcontracting Plan (Large Businesses Only):

In addition to the Participation Document, all other-than-small business Offerors must submit a formal Small Business Subcontracting Plan in accordance with FAR 52.219-9 and DFARS 252.219-7003. The subcontracting goals and dollar values presented in this formal plan must be mathematically consistent with the commitments made in the Offeror's Small Business Participation proposal. (Note: Small business prime offerors are exempt from the Subcontracting Plan requirement but must still submit the Participation Document).

3.4.4 Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) Mitigation Plan.

Offeror's OCI Mitigation Plan shall be provided in Volume IV in accordance with H-209-H004, RESTRICTIONS RESULTING FROM POTENTIAL ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST (NAVSEA), and L-209-H009 NOTIFICATION OF POTENTIAL ORGANIZATIONAL OR PERSONALCONFLICT(S) OF INTEREST (NAVSEA) (APR 2022) . Offeror shall identify any and all conflicts of interest or potential conflicts of interest related to this solicitation. Offerors shall follow the below described two-step process for identifying known or potential OCI issues to the Government for this solicitation.

Step 1: If it is believed that conflicts of interest are real, possible, or perceived, the contractor shall submit a letter within fourteen (14) days of the release of the solicitation identifying those OCI issues and the strategy that the Offeror intends to use for mitigation. This letter will be for notification purposes only, for the Government to conduct any research, and no determination will be made by the Government at that time. If no OCI issues are present or anticipated, no action is required of the Offeror within this window.

Step 2: Offerors shall submit a statement in affirmation or negation whether they have an OCI conflict regarding this solicitation. If OCI issues are present or anticipated, Offerors shall provide details and submit an OCI mitigation plan and its corporate policy for resolving as part of their proposal submission. If it is believed that no conflicts of interest exist, then the Offeror shall clearly state this, in addition to providing their corporate policy for resolving OCIs. Organizational charts and/or corporate policy are authorized to be submitted in addition to the OCI Mitigation Plan and do not count toward any page limitation.

Award will only be made to an Offeror, including all subcontractors, that has no organizational conflict of interest as defined in FAR 9.5 or that the Government determines has provided a satisfactory mitigation plan in accordance with L-209-H009 herein. Failure by an Offeror to disclose a potential OCI or to submit an OCI mitigation plan with its proposal may render itself no longer being considered for award.

3.4.5 Plan for Obtaining Personnel Clearances

The Offeror shall provide a plan for obtaining personnel clearances within ten (10) days of the start of performance at the required level specified in the DD Form 254, Contract Security Classification Specification attached to this solicitation. The plan shall include confirmation of existing personnel clearances, detail the Offeror's process for obtaining new clearances to perform the full requirement by the time full operational tempo is reached within ten (10) days of the period of performance start date, and outline the schedule for obtaining any required new clearances during the life of the contract.

3.4.6 Facility and Safeguarding Clearance

Performance under this contract requires that the Offeror hold a facility clearance and safeguarding clearance as specified in the DD Form 254 attached to this solicitation, at the time of proposal submission. As such, the Offeror shall provide CAGE codes and addresses for all locations where work will be performed that require classified facilities and safeguarding capabilities as defined in the DD Form 254 and associated references.

3.4.7 Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Unique Identifier(s) (UIDs)

The Offeror shall provide the CMMC UIDs issued by the Supplier Performance Risk system(SPRS), in accordance with DFARS 252.204-7025 'NOTICE OF CYBERSECURITY MATURITY MODEL CERTIFICATION LEVEL REQUIREMENTS (NOV 2025) ' paragraph(d), for each contractor information system that will process, store, or transmit Federal Contract Information (FCI) or Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) during performance of a contract, contract, or delivery order resulting from this solicitation.

Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

1.0 GENERAL

The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award based upon initial offers; therefore, Offeror's initial proposal should contain the best terms from a price and technical standpoint. The Government reserves the right to award without negotiations with perspective Offerors. The Government may conduct negotiations if deemed in its best interest. The Government anticipates a single award resulting from this solicitation.

The following terms and definitions will be used for the technical proposal evaluations:

Deficiency is any part of an offer that does not conform to a material requirement of a RFP. A material requirement is one that affects price, quantity, quality, or delivery, or that the RFP requires to be met at the time of proposal submission.

Risk, as it pertains to source selection, is the potential for unsuccessful contract performance. The consideration of risk assesses the degree to which an Offeror's proposed approach to achieving the technical factor may involve risk of disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance, the need for increased Government oversight, and the likelihood of unsuccessful contract performance.

Strength is an aspect of an Offeror's proposal with merit or will exceed specified performance or capability requirements to the advantage of the Government during contract performance.

Weakness means a flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

Significant Strength is an aspect of the Offeror's proposal with appreciable merit or will exceed specified performance or capability requirements to the considerable advantage of the Government during contract performance.

Significant Weakness in the proposal is a flaw that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

2.0 BASIS FOR AWARD

The award decision will be based on the Government's evaluation of each Offeror's proposal against the evaluation factors identified in this solicitation. Award will be made to the responsible Offeror whose proposal demonstrates the best value to the Government based on the evaluation factors. Best value means the expected outcome of an acquisition that, in the Government's estimation, provides the greatest overall benefit in response to the requirement. A tradeoff analysis will be used when it is in the best interest of the Government to consider award to other than the lowest evaluated price Offeror or other than the highest technically rated Offeror.

The analysis will trade off differences in technical based on the non-price factors and total evaluated price. In order to be eligible for award, a proposal shall, at minimum, meet the requirements of the Solicitation and demonstrate an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements.

Accordingly, an Offeror must receive an adjectival rating of "Acceptable" or higher under Factor I in order to be eligible for award.

3.0 RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF EVALUATION FACTORS

The Government will evaluate each Offeror's proposal in accordance with the evaluation factors to determine the best value.

Factor Subfactor

1. Technical A. Technical Approach

B. Personnel Approach (Integrated Design-Build Team Experience Narrative and Key Personnel Resumes)

2. Past Performance

None

3. Price Proposal None

The relative importance of the evaluation factors is as follows. Factor 1 is more important than Factor 2. Factor 2 is either Acceptable or Unacceptable. Factors 1 and 2, when combined, are significantly more important than Factor 3. The subfactors are not individually rated.

The degree of importance of Factor 3 will increase with the degree of equality of the proposals in relation to the non-price factors or when the price is so significant as to diminish the value of the superiority of the non-price factors.

4.0 DESCRIPTION OF EVALUATION FACTORS

Factor 1: Technical

The Government considers both panelized modular systems (assembled on-site) and volumetric (fully prefabricated) modular systems to be acceptable construction methods.. The evaluation will be based on the Offeror's demonstrated ability to meet all ICD/ICS 705 security specifications and the 5,000 square footage requirement, as defined in the Statement of Work and applicable documents.

Subfactor A -Technical Approach. The Government will evaluate the extent to which the proposal demonstrates specific understanding, capability, and experience to successfully perform the requirements, and the soundness of the proposed technical approach.

Subfactor B- Personnel Approach. The Government will evaluate the Offeror's Personnel Approach to determine the extent to which the integrated Design-Build (DB) team and proposed Key Personnel possess the requisite experience, qualifications, and capabilities to successfully execute, deliver, and accredit a secure facility compliant with ICD/ICS 705.

Adjectival Rating Description. The Government will assign an adjectival rating for Factor 1 in accordance with the below adjectival rating table. Subfactors will not be separately rated.

Adjectiva l Rating

Description

Outstandi ng

Proposal demonstrates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths and/or at least one significant strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength or significant strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Acceptab le

Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Unaccept able

Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation and, thus, contains one or more deficiencies and is unawardable, and/or risk of performance is unacceptably high.

Factor 2: Past Performance (Volume II)

The Past Performance factor will be rated on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis. The Government will use information provided by the Offeror, as well as any other information deemed necessary as noted in Section L 3.2 to assess the Offeror's ability to meet the solicitation requirements. This assessment will be based on a demonstrated record of recent and relevant past performance. The Government may also evaluate the past performance of an Offeror's proposed subcontractors. The Government reserves the right to contact former customers, Government agencies and review other private and public sources of information.

In the case of an Offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can reasonably be assigned, the Offeror will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.202 (C)(1)). In such case, the Offeror will be considered acceptable. The Government reserves the right to not perform a past performance evaluation on any Offeror that is assigned an "Unacceptable" or "Marginal" adjectival rating under Factor 1 - Technical.

Factor 2: Past Performance Ratings

In assessing the Past Performance factor, the Government will apply the following definitions of acceptable or unacceptable:

Acceptable - Based on the Offeror's performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the Offeror's performance record is unknown.

Unacceptable - Based on the Offeror's performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Factor 3: Price Proposal

The Government will evaluate proposed prices by performing a price reasonableness analysis in accordance with FAR 15.404-1

(b) procedures.

5.0 CONTRACT DOCUMENTATION

The Government will evaluate the submitted contract documentation on a pass/fail basis to verify compliance with all requirements. If the Offeror has failed to meet any of the pass/fail requirements, the proposal will be ineligible for award and will be eliminated from further consideration. The Government reserves the right to not evaluate other proposal factors volumes.

Evaluation of Cover Letter

The Government will evaluate the Offeror's Cover Letter to determine compliance with the administrative requirements of the solicitation. To be determined Acceptable, the Cover Letter must be signed by an individual authorized to bind the Offeror and must affirmatively include all information mandated in Section L. The Government will verify the presence of:

The correct solicitation number.

Company name, Contract Number, CAGE code, Unique Entity Identifier (UEI), address, e-mail address, and telephone number.

Explicit confirmation of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions of the solicitation, and agreement to furnish any or all items at the offered prices.

A statement that the proposal remains valid through the calendar days specified in Section L.

Names, titles, telephone numbers, and e-mail addresses of personnel authorized to negotiate.

Name, title, and signature of the person authorized to sign the proposal (indicating the company will meet all SOW requirements without exception).

A comprehensive list identifying all proposal enclosures.

An affirmative statement declaring that no organizational conflict(s) of interest exists (or referencing the mitigation plan).

Evaluation of Solicitation Fill-ins

The Government will review the proposal to ensure the Offeror has completed all required solicitation fill-ins (Blocks 14 through 20c). To be determined Acceptable, the Offeror must have:

Utilized the latest amended version of the solicitation as of the date of proposal submission.

Fully populated all Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) pricing fields in Section B.

Completed all other mandatory fill-ins throughout the solicitation (e.g., in Sections F, G, H, I, and K) without omission.

Provided a complete copy of the solicitation with fill-ins within Volume IV.

PASS/FAIL EVALUATION

Offerors will be evaluated based on a Pass/Fail rating on the requirements listed below. Offerors must receive a Pass rating under each Pass/Fail Requirement to be eligible for award. The Pass/Fail rating criteria are as follows:

Small Business Participation

The Government will evaluate the Offeror's Small Business Participation on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis. To receive an Acceptable rating, the proposal must demonstrate a binding commitment to utilize small businesses for at least 10% of the total proposed task order value, identify the specific subcontractors, prove their assigned SCIF construction tasks are meaningful, and address the utilization of all required socioeconomic categories (SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZone, VOSB, and SDVOSB).