Att__3_PRS_30Jan18.pdf

1300336895

Performance Requirements Summary Table

Attachment A PRS - 1

Requirement Performance Objective Performance Standard Acceptable Quality

Level (AQL)

Quality Surveillance Plan Typical Monitoring

Methods

4.1 Project Administration and Management

4.1.1 – Project Management

Drafting and maintaining the MEP and EMP2 program project management plans, manuals, operating procedures, and Plans of Action and Milestones (POA&M) for Government review and approval.

Review regulations and directives, and shall review plans, manuals and operating procedures.

Plans, manuals and other documents require no more than two (2) review/comment /approval cycles to meet acceptance.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government oversight of review/comment/approval process.

4.1.2 – Compliance and Risk Assessment

Prepare and maintain draft compliance and project scheduling using Program Evaluation Review Techniques (PERT).

Prepare risk assessments, evaluate technical and scientific data for completeness and validity and conduct analyses for risk assessment.

Assessments, minutes and schedules require no more than one review/ comment/approval cycle to meet acceptance.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government oversight of review/comment/approval process.

4.1.3 – Department Data Management

Data entry and updates are accurate and completed on schedule. Feasibility studies reflect all data parameters and are compiled in a clearly understood format.

Database versions are documented and current.

Web page revisions are timely and accurate.

Data formats, entries and web pages require no more than two (2) review/comment /approval cycles to meet acceptance.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government review and oversight for compliance with regulations.

Government review of databases and web pages for currency.

4.1.4- Presentation Meeting Materials

Prepare meeting materials for regulatory and environmental compliance documentation, questionnaires and briefing material. Schedule conference room use, record meeting minutes, record action items and develop tracking sheets of participants, distribute meeting actions, prepare post- meeting environmental compliance documentation and maintain a record of files and datasets required at project meetings.

Attendance is on-time and materials are prepared to support meetings as subject matter experts.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government oversight of review/comment/approval process.

Attachment A PRS - 2

Acceptable Quality

Level (AQL)

Quality Surveillance Plan Typical Monitoring

Methods

4.1.5 – Program Highlights

Consolidate MEP and EMP2 Program highlights for command and sponsor submittal, provide draft consolidated highlights to Government POC for review, and adjudicate comments received.

Highlight consolidation is accurate, comments are adequately adjudicated, and submittals are professional. Consistent format is present.

Highlights are provided in accordance with agreed upon schedules.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback from expert counsel and review.

4.1.6 – Datacall Preparations

Collect information and prepare draft responses, for Government approval, to data calls received from NUWCDIVNPT or external customers.

Responses are accurate, clear, and concise.

Consistent format is present. Data call responses are provided in accordance with agreed upon schedules.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback from expert counsel and review of data call responses.

4.1.7 – Department Web Presence

Update the MEP and EMP2 Program internal and external NUWCDIVNPT internet presence.

Updates are accurate, clear, and concise. Consistent format is present.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback from expert counsel and review of studies.

4.1.8 – Outreach Activities

Support NUWCDIVNPT and the Environmental Branch outreach activities through planning and providing technical expertise

Plans and technical information are provided in accordance with agreed upon schedules.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government oversight of outreach/activity and review.

4.1.9 – Compliance Documentation

Update MEP and EMP2 Program documents for compliance with changes to federal, state, local, DoD, and DoN regulations related to natural resources, pollution prevention and environmental planning

Plans, manuals and other documents require no more than two (2) review/comment /approval cycles to meet acceptance.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback from expert counsel and review of documents.

4.1.10 – Central Filing

Maintain the Environmental Branch “Central Files” system of records, including filing of memoranda and references for the Branch library.

Central Files are up-to-date, all documents can be located, and all references are entered into the MEP Program Library.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback from expert counsel and review.

4.2 Presentation, Training and Multimedia Material

4.2.1 – Technical Presentations

Develop presentation materials and other communication tools in support of Code 1023 meetings and conferences including posters, displays, technical illustrations, or digital multi-media content for technical presentations or for command displays.

Products include adequate depth and breadth to clearly identify, quality, and quantify issues.

Conclusions and recommendations are sound, clear, and actionable. Consistent format is present throughout.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback from expert counsel and review of studies.

Attachment A PRS - 3

Acceptable Quality

Level (AQL)

Quality Surveillance Plan Typical Monitoring

Methods

4.2.2 - Training Requirements

Develop and identify training needs assessments and personnel training courses that fulfill the training identified in environmental training requirements manuals.

Products include adequate depth and breadth to clearly identify and quantify issues.

Conclusions and recommendations are sound, clear, and actionable. Consistent format is present throughout.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback from expert counsel and review of studies.

4.2.3 – Training Tools

Identify and provide training tools and communication tools such as web-based, social media, digital multi-media, or printed media, to enhance environmental awareness and regulatory compliance.

Products include adequate depth and breadth to clearly identify and quantify issues.

Conclusions and recommendations are sound, clear, and actionable. Consistent format is present throughout.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback from expert counsel and review of studies.

4.2.4 - Visual Communication and Multimedia

Produce visual communication, multimedia, interactive, and data visualization assets for the Environmental Branch for incorporation into larger multimedia projects and social media.

Products include adequate depth and breadth to clearly identify and quantify issues.

Conclusions and recommendations are sound, clear, and actionable. Consistent format is present throughout.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback from expert counsel and review of studies.

4.2.5 – Pre- Production Products

Produce pre-production products, including linear storytelling, such as scripts and storyboards for documentaries or technical films, high-resolution sensor data, camera data, image analysis, and scientific data visualization.

Products include adequate depth and breadth to clearly identify and quantify issues.

Conclusions and recommendations are sound, clear, and actionable. Consistent format is present throughout.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback

Attachment A PRS - 4

Acceptable Quality

Level (AQL)

Quality Surveillance Plan Typical Monitoring

Methods

4.2.6 – Post Productions Products

Produce post-production products, including web-based, mobile, or kiosk applications, live action, computer generated imaging and composites for future concepts, automated storyboards, simulation, training, visual concept of operations, posters, brochures, audio/visual elements for multimedia integration within a linear story format.

Products include adequate depth and breadth to clearly identify and quantify issues.

Conclusions and recommendations are sound, clear, and actionable. Consistent format is present throughout.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback from expert counsel and review of studies.

4.3 Environmental Planning Documentation

4.3.1 – Analysis of Proposed Government Actions

Analyze proposed Government actions, identify and outline all potential adverse environmental effects of the proposed actions, and recommend alternative plans and mitigation measures to reduce or eliminate impacts.

Studies include adequate depth and breadth to clearly identify and quantify issues.

Conclusions and recommendations are sound, clear, and actionable. Consistent format is present throughout documentation.

Documents are provided in accordance with agreed upon schedules.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback from expert counsel and review of studies.

4.3.2 – Identification of Regulations

Identify all applicable federal, state, and local regulations prior to conducting the analyses for a particular activity and develop comprehensive risk mitigation plans that minimize the potential environmental effects associated with federal actions.

All applicable regulations are identified and risk analyses include adequate depth and breadth to minimize potential environmental effects.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback from expert counsel and review of studies.

4.3.3 – Draft Documents

Develop draft and final environmental planning documents (e.g., Categorical Exclusions, Memoranda for the Record, Environmental Assessments, Environmental Impact Statements, Overseas Environmental Assessments, or Overseas Environmental Impact Statements) for Government review and approval.

Documents include adequate depth and breadth to clearly identify and quantify issues.

Conclusions and recommendations are sound, clear, and actionable. Consistent format is present throughout documentation.

Documents are provided in accordance with agreed upon schedules.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback

Attachment A PRS - 5

Acceptable Quality

Level (AQL)

Quality Surveillance Plan Typical Monitoring

Methods

4.3.4 – Meeting Attendance

Attend, as subject matter expert, project meetings, briefings, telephone and video conferences, and public meetings in support of environmental planning projects

Attendance is on-time and materials are prepared to support meetings as subject matter experts.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback from expert counsel.

4.3.5 – Presentation Materials

Prepare presentation materials and distribute to personnel for topic presentation associated with NUWCDIVNPT’s Environmental Review Board.

Presentation material is adequate in depth and breadth to clearly identify the proposed action.

Materials are distributed to personnel in accordance with agreed upon schedules and for review prior to Environmental Review Board meetings.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback from expert counsel.

4.3.6 – Training and Training Material

Develop and provide training and training material to enhance MEP Program awareness and regulatory compliance for non-MEP personnel.

Training materials include adequate depth and breadth to clearly identify, qualify, and quantify training requirements. Consistent format is present throughout training materials

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback from expert counsel and review of studies.

4.3.7 – Technical Reviews

Review NUWCDIVNPT and other agency reports for technical accuracy and logic and provide comments.

Comments are technically accurate, clear, and concise, and include adequate depth and breadth of the subject matter.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback from expert counsel and review of studies.

4.3.8 – External SMEs

Identify external subject matter experts for the Navy’s comprehensive at-sea planning program documents and provide technical reports to the Government.

List of subject matter experts includes adequate depth and breadth for resources to be analyzed.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback from expert counsel and review of studies.

4.3.9 – Third party reviews

Conduct third party reviews of the Navy’s comprehensive environmental planning to include services for study and technical reporting of program documents to determine technical accuracy and provide comments.

Comments are technically accurate, clear, and concise, and include adequate depth and breadth of the subject matter.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback

Attachment A PRS - 6

Acceptable Quality

Level (AQL)

Quality Surveillance Plan Typical Monitoring

Methods

4.3.10 – Administrative Record

Maintain, at the Government site, an administrative record and project files consisting of all correspondence, information, and decisions made throughout the course of each planning project.

Administrative record is complete and accessible.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback from expert counsel and review of studies.

4.4 Research and Field Activities

4.4.1 – Data Collection and Entry

Conduct data collection, data entry, statistical analysis, and provide results to Government lead for biological, oceanographic, ecological, physical, chemical, socioeconomic, renewable energy, and geo-physical research.

Data collection, entry, and analysis are technically accurate, clear, and concise. Results include adequate depth and breadth to clearly qualify or quantify results.

Consistent format is present throughout, and data are provided in accordance with agreed upon schedules.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback from expert counsel and review of studies.

4.4.2 – Data Evaluation

Evaluate environmental data for completeness and scientific validity.

Data evaluation includes adequate depth and breadth to clearly identify and quantify issues.

Conclusions and recommendations are sound, clear, and actionable. Consistent format is present throughout documentation.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback from expert counsel and review of studies.

4.4.3 – Literature Searches

Conduct literature searches for peer-reviewed and gray literature on available literature in the field related to each project and provide summaries of published literature.

Literature search is adequate in depth and breadth to clearly identify applicable references.

Summaries are accurate, clear, and concise, and provided in accordance with agreed upon schedules.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback from expert counsel and review of studies.

4.5 Geospatial Data Development, Data Management, and Spatial Planning

4.5.1 – Geospatial Data for Environmental Analyses

Develop, collect, verify, and validate all geospatial data for NUWCDIVNPT environmental analyses and assessments to provide recommendations for Government review and approval.

Products include adequate depth and breadth to clearly identify and quantify issues. Products are technical reports provided in accordance with agreed upon schedules. Consistent format is present throughout.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback

Attachment A PRS - 7

Acceptable Quality

Level (AQL)

Quality Surveillance Plan Typical Monitoring

Methods

4.5.2 – Develop, Manage, Analysis, and Display GIS information

Develop, manage, analyze, and display geographic information using static maps, interactive maps, web-based mapping tools, workflow models, or database-driven data models using GIS.

Products include adequate depth and breadth to clearly identify and quantify issues. Products are provided in accordance with agreed upon schedules. Consistent format is present throughout.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback from expert counsel and review of studies.

4.5.3 – Data Integration into NUWCDIVNPT’s Enterprise GIS System

Collect and edit feature data, raster data, remotely sensed data, live feed data, and crowd source data and integrate data into NUWCDIVNPT’s enterprise GIS.

Data collection and integration is technically accurate, clear, and concise. Consistent format is present throughout, and data is provided in accordance with agreed upon schedules.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback from expert counsel and review of studies.

4.5.4– Manual Preparation

Prepare manuals, technical reports, and metadata on GIS deliverables.

Documents include adequate depth and breadth to clearly identify and quantify issues.

Documents are provided in accordance with agreed upon schedules.

Consistent format is present throughout documentation.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback from expert counsel and review of studies.

4.5.5 – GIS

Functions

Provide GIS functions associated with geospatial database administration, relational database schema design, tabular dataset updates, and maintain user accessibility permissions and information technology integration.

GIS functions are technically accurate, insightful, includes operational considerations and are provided in accordance with agreed upon schedules.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback from expert counsel and review of studies.

4.5.6 – GIS

NMSDD

Update and prepare for distribution the Navy Marine Species Density Database (NMSDD) and generate new species population and density estimates for Navy areas of operation.

NMSDD data are technically accurate and are provided in accordance with agreed upon schedules.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback

Attachment A PRS - 8

Acceptable Quality

Level (AQL)

Quality Surveillance Plan Typical Monitoring

Methods

4.6 Library Information Science

4.6.1 - MARLIN Manage the Marine

Acoustic Research Library Information Network (MARLIN) Repository and Best Available Science Portal by sending a report of references to MARLIN administrators, maintain the literature collection of hard-copy materials in the Code 1023 office space, communicate MEP program technical requirements to MARLIN administrators, and develop trainings and briefs on the MARLIN’s functionality as applicable to MEP program needs.

MARLIN maintenance is completed in accordance with agreed upon schedule.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback from expert counsel and review of studies.

4.6.2 – Bibliographic Management Software Testing

Coordinate the functional testing of bibliographic management software within the Navy information system and the computer systems used by the Environmental Branch so that end users have a fully operational system to automate the collection of bibliographic resources.

Functional testing provides improvements and ensure existing levels of access are not degraded.

Functional tests are completed in accordance with agreed upon schedule.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback from expert counsel and review of studies.

4.6.3– Best Available Science Subscriptions

Monitor best available science usage and provide recommendations to the Government on best available science subscriptions.

Recommendations are clear, concise, and are actionable. Updates are provided in accordance with agreed upon schedule.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback from expert counsel and review of studies.

4.6.4 – User Requests

Submit article and document requests for MEP projects via email for publications via interlibrary loans of hardcopy publications or through digital document delivery via email.

User requests are responded to within two working days, either with the document or with a timeline for providing it (e.g., through interlibrary loan).

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback

Attachment A PRS - 9

Acceptable Quality

Level (AQL)

Quality Surveillance Plan Typical Monitoring

Methods 4.6.5– Marine Resources Support Group Updates

Provide updates to the Environmental Branch on best available science literature and services, and support Government distribution of the information via conference calls and meetings.

Updates are clear and concise. Participation at MRSG conference calls and meetings are in accordance with agreed upon schedule.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback from expert counsel and review of studies.

4.7 Acoustic Analysis and Modeling

4.7.1 – NAEMO

Analyses

Provide analyses of acoustic and explosive events by:

extract and distribute marine species data within the given area define operational scenarios extract environmental parameters generate acoustic propagation fields execute simulations summarize outputs.

Results are accurate and clearly defined, and are provided in accordance with agreed upon schedules.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback from expert counsel and review of studies.

4.7.2 – Technical Recommendations

Provide technical recommendations on improving the efficiency and flexibility of the NAEMO software for integration of NAEMO modules and GIS.

Simulator performance with new model is improved or enhanced in accordance with agreed upon instruction

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback from expert counsel and review of studies.

4.7.3 – Technical Reports

Prepare and review technical reports of acoustic and explosive event simulations.

Documents include adequate depth and breadth to clearly identify and quantify issues.

Conclusions and recommendations are sound, clear, and actionable. Consistent format is present throughout documentation.

Documents are provided in accordance with agreed upon schedules.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback from expert counsel and review of studies.

4.8 Information Management and Technology

4.8.1 – Equipment Usage and Tracking

Identify shall identify and track equipment, within the MEP Program, including computer assets, and camera equipment.

Equipment can be located at all times, either within C1023 space or via log of checked-out equipment.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback

Attachment A PRS - 10

Acceptable Quality

Level (AQL)

Quality Surveillance Plan Typical Monitoring

Methods 4.8.2– Network Usage/Latency

Track network usage/latency issues, as related to the Environmental Planning Laboratory (EPL)

GIS.

Database is updated as usage issues are identified.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback from expert counsel and review of studies.

4.8.3 – Datacall Responses

Develop draft responses to data calls issued by Navy, DoD, NUWCDIVNPT Chief Information Officer, Information Assurance Officer, and Information Technology staffs regarding DoN-approved operating systems, software packages, and technology refresh used within the MEP Program and EPL.

Responses are accurate, clear, and concise.

Consistent format is present.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback from expert counsel and review of studies.

4.8.4 – RDT&E

Network

Provide technical reporting to the Government regarding Navy network usage related to the Research Development Test and Evaluation (RDT&E), Defense Information Systems Agency, and Defense Research and Engineering Network (DREN) processes associated with the MEP Program EPL, including the RDT&E Certification and Accreditation plans, Risk Management Framework and compliance with DoN information assurance and information technology policies.

Recommendations are technically accurate, clear, and concise.

Recommended modifications and upgrades provide improvement;

existing levels of performance are not degraded.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback

Attachment A PRS - 11

Acceptable Quality

Level (AQL)

Quality Surveillance Plan Typical Monitoring

Methods

4.8.5 – Information Assurance Workforce Actions

Provide Cyber Security Workforce computer remediation to vulnerabilities to RDT&E Lab assets as detailed in the EPL’s Certification and Accreditation Plan or future information assurance compliance plans as directed by Navy.

Modifications and upgrades provide improvement and cyber security compliance and existing levels of performance are not degraded. The contractors performing this task must be certified to meet the qualification requirements of Cyberspace Workforce (CSWF) Specialty Code 46

– Systems Security Management/Analysis as Intermediate/Journeyman or Advanced/Master in accordance with

SECNAVINST M-5239.2.

Standard is met 100% of the time.

Government feedback from expert counsel and review of studies.

4.9 Energy Planning Documentation

4.9.1 – Proposed Action Analyses

Analyze and assess proposed actions and mitigation measures associated with maritime and shore base energy projects to ascertain Navy operational compatibility and produce information in a technical report.

Documents include adequate depth and breadth to clearly identify, qualify, and quantify issues.

Conclusions and recommendations are sound, clear, and actionable. Consistent format is present throughout documentation.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback from expert counsel and review of studies.

4.9.2 – Energy Consumption

Analyze Navy energy consumption associated with maritime and shore base activities to summarize energy security and efficiencies goals set by the Secretary of the Navy and EO 13423 and produce information in a technical report.

Documents include adequate depth and breadth to clearly identify, qualify, and quantify issues.

Conclusions and recommendations are sound, clear, and actionable. Consistent format is present throughout documentation.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback from expert counsel and review of studies.

4.9.3 – Navy Energy Strategy

Develop analysis and documentation of Navy Energy Strategy implementation within Naval System Commands.

Documents include adequate depth and breadth to clearly identify and quantify issues.

Conclusions and recommendations are sound, clear, and actionable. Consistent format is present throughout documentation.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback

Attachment A PRS - 12

Acceptable Quality

Level (AQL)

Quality Surveillance Plan Typical Monitoring

Methods

4.9.4 –Develop Datacalls

Develop draft data calls to collect information on energy consumption, renewable energy projects, and energy efficiencies.

Draft datacalls are accurate, clear, and concise. Consistent format is present. Datacall fields are accurate and clearly defined, and are developed in accordance with agreed upon schedules.

Standard is met 95% of the time.

Government feedback from expert counsel and review of studies.

4.10 EMP2 Program, Environmental Management System

4.10 - Environmental Management System

Audit and surveillance resource identification and assessments are reasonable and accurate.

EMS supporting documentation is maintained current and complete.

EMS documents and assessments require no more than two (2) review/comment /approval cycles to meet acceptance.

Standard met 95% of the time

Government review and oversight for compliance with manual.

Government review of EMS information for currency.

4.11 - Environmental Quality and Compliance Evaluations

Compliance areas are identified correctly.

Recommended corrective and preventive action is appropriate to the compliance area.

Performance Metrics are input correctly.

Compliance areas and recommended corrective and preventive actions require no more than two

(2) review/comment / approval cycles to meet acceptance.

Standard met 95% of the time

Government review and oversight of the review/ comment/approval

4.12 - Environmental Site Inspections/ Assessments

Site inspections are thorough and conducted in a logical fashion. Findings are accurate and properly documented. Technical Reports are comprehensive.

Associated data are updated.

Reports and assessment documentation require no more than one review/comment/approval cycle to meet acceptance.

Data collected reflect the most current findings.

Standard met 95% of the time

Government oversight of review/comment/approval process. Government review of data for correctness and accuracy.

4.13 - Solid Waste Management

Material is collected into correct waste streams.

Material is collected and transferred correctly to meet acceptance

Standard met 95% of the time

Government oversight of waste streams.

Attachment A PRS - 13

Acceptable Quality

Level (AQL)

Quality Surveillance Plan Typical Monitoring

Methods

4.14 - Hazardous Waste Collection, Characterization and Manifesting and Spill Response

HAZWASTE

management and spill response IAW regulatory drivers and plans.

HAZWASTE and Spill Response activities comply with all applicable local, state federal and DON regulations. All tasks completed IAW requisite times of regulations and manifests are accurate.

Program documentation and spill response inventories are maintained and HAZWASTE handling schedules met.

Standard met 100% of the time

Government review and oversight for compliance with regulations.

4.15 - Environmental Engineering Field Work

Samples are correctly collected and in accordance with provided procedures, and associated documentation is maintained accurately and correctly.

Associated documentation is maintained correctly and in accordance with provided procedures.

Samples collected correctly and in accordance with provided procedures.

Standard met 100% of the time

Government review and oversight for environmental sampling.

4.16 - Hazardous Waste, Waste Water, Drinking Water and Air Permits

Permits are reviewed for compliance and correctness and in accordance with provided procedures. Permits are initiated or renewed in a timely fashion. Reports required by various permits are submitted in a timely fashion and are complete and accurate.

Permit compliance is maintained and required permits are applied for or renewed prior to activity or current permit expiration.

Standard met 100% of the time

Government oversight of review/comment/approv al process. Government review of data for correctness and accuracy.

Attachment A PRS - 14

Acceptable Quality

Level (AQL)

Quality Surveillance Plan Typical Monitoring

Methods

4.17 - Hazardous Material, Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste, Air Emissions and Waste Water Reporting.

Reporting is in compliance with regulatory and policy requirements.

Reports are prepared for Government review in accordance with agreed upon schedules, and are accurate and complete.

Reports require no more than one review/comment/ approval cycle to meet acceptance.

Standard met 100% of the time

Government oversight of review/comment/approv al process. Government review of data for correctness and accuracy.

4.18 - Pollution Prevention and Hazardous Material Management

Life cycle impacts related to hazardous material are avoided with no mission impact and in accordance with provided tolerance.

P2 opportunities are identified and documented.

Opportunities are well defined and include pay back or other metric such as amount of pollutant decreased per year.

Standard met 95% of the time as to definition. Payback potential when analyzed allowed to be deemed negligible.

Government review of data for reasonability and accuracy.

4.19.1 - Environmental Data Management

Data entry and updates are accurate and completed on schedule. Database versions are documented and current.

Library records are timely and accurate. Schedules and costs are current and feasible.

Data formats, entries and web pages require no more than two (2) review/comment /approval cycles to meet acceptance.

Standard met 95% of the time.

Government review of data for reasonability and accuracy.

4.19.2 - Environmental Programs Schedule Development/Main tenance

Compliance areas are identified correctly.

Recommended corrective and preventive action is appropriate to the compliance area.

Compliance areas and recommended corrective and preventive actions require no more than two

(2) review/comment / approval cycles to meet acceptance.

Standard met 95% of the time

Government review and oversight of the review/ comment/approval