FINAL Exhibit B_QASP.pdf

PDF 84 KB Posted

Attached to
Engineering and Operational Support for Aviation and Polar Programs Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
N65236-16-R-0006
Issued by
Department of the Navy Information Warfare Systems Command

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Engineering and Operational Support for Aviation and Polar Programs, newest first.
File Type Posted
FINAL Attachment 8_DD Form 254.pdf PDF
CDRL A003_MET Support.pdf PDF
CDRL A006_Training Documentation.pdf PDF
N65236-16-R-0001-0001.pdf PDF
CDRL A010_Cost and Schedule Milestone Plan.pdf PDF
Amend 2 - QAs for Posting.pdf PDF
CDRL A012_Quality Assurance Plan.pdf PDF
CDRL A009_QSR.pdf PDF
CDRL A011_Utilize Specified Software Configurations.pdf PDF
N65236-16-R-0006-0003.pdf PDF
FINAL Attachment 9_Wage Determination.pdf PDF
Amend 2 - Attachment 2_Resume Format.docx DOCX document
Amend 4 - QAs for Posting.docx DOCX document
CDRL A016_Quality Control Inspections.pdf PDF
CDRL A002_ATC Operational Support.pdf PDF
CDRL A019 Physical Inventory Listing.pdf PDF
CDRL A018_Labor Rate_ODC Trip Wires.pdf PDF
CDRL A017_Invoice Documentation.pdf PDF
CDRL A004_SAM Reports.pdf PDF
N65236-16-R-0006-0002.pdf PDF
CDRL A020_CSWF.pdf PDF
Amend 2 - Attachment 5_Small Business Participation Data.docx DOCX document
CDRL A007_Task Order Status Report.pdf PDF
FINAL N65236-16-R-0006.pdf PDF
CDRL A015_CDAD.pdf PDF
FINAL Attachment 1B_Reference Information Sheet - Contract Specific Data.docx DOCX document
ATTVD9CC.pdf PDF
FINAL Attachment 1A_Reference Information Sheet - Summary Data.docx DOCX document
CDRL A014_IPMR.pdf PDF
CDRL A008_ TO Close Out Report.pdf PDF
CDRL A001_Program Management Reports.pdf PDF
CDRL A013_Work Breakdown Structure.pdf PDF
Show all 32

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Please wait...

If this message is not eventually replaced by the proper contents of the document, your PDF viewer may not be able to display this type of document.

You can upgrade to the latest version of Adobe Reader for Windows®, Mac, or Linux® by visiting http://www.adobe.com/go/reader_download.

For more assistance with Adobe Reader visit http://www.adobe.com/go/acrreader.

Windows is either a registered trademark or a trademark of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries. Mac is a trademark of Apple Inc., registered in the United States and other countries. Linux is the registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the U.S. and other countries.

SPAWARSYSCENLANT 4335/1 (Rev. 03/14) Page of

FORM WILL NOT WORK CORRECTLY WITHOUT JAVASCRIPT

** PLEASE ENABLE JAVASCRIPT **

SPAWARSYSCEN ATLANTIC STANDARD QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN (QASP)

QUALITY OF PRODUCT #1/CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST (CDRL) DOCUMENTS

CDRL documents (data deliverables) weights vary depending on the value to the government. If CPARS Draft Approval Document (CDAD) CDRL exists in the basic contract, it must be included in the task order and in the QASP. Note: Total weight points must equal 100 per page.

OBJECTIVES - ACCEPTABLE QUALITY LEVEL (AQL)

CDRL documents that are complete; have no flawed information, analyses, assumptions or conclusions; and have a minimum number of minor grammatical errors (i.e., errors in less than 10% of the pages).

Total weight of Documents that comply with AQL is less than 75%

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.

Contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

100% Review by COR

COR will review within 15 working days of receipt and log results of all reviews (i.e. CDRL Documents accepted and if rejected, reason for rejection).

Quality of Product #1 Total weight of Documents that comply with AQL is

76 -89%

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements

Contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective action.

Total weight of Documents that comply with AQL is

90-100%

Performance meets contractual requirements.

To justify a Satisfactory rating, only minor problems should exist, or major problems the contractor recovered from without a negative effect on the contract. Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.

Total weight of Documents that comply with AQL is

100%

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit

To justify a Very Good rating, identify a significant event and state how it was a benefit to the government. Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.

Total weight of Documents that comply with AQL is

100%

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many, to the government's benefit

To justify an Exceptional rating, identify significant events

CPARS

GROUP

CDRL #

DESCRIPTION

FREQUENCY

WEIGHT

METHOD OF

SURVEILLANCE

UNSATISFACTORY

MARGINAL

SATISFACTORY

VERY GOOD

EXCEPTIONAL

QUALITY OF PRODUCT #2/HARDWARE GOODS

(e.g., Fabricated items, Repairs, Refurbishment, etc.). Hardware goods weights vary depending on the value to the government. Hardware goods of most value are those which affect cost, schedule, and critical path.

Note: Total weight points must equal 100 per page.

OBJECTIVES - ACCEPTABLE QUALITY LEVEL (AQL)

All items meet applicable requirements for standards of workmanship as indicated in the SOO and/or PWS.

100% inspection by the COR.

COR will log results of all inspections (i.e., hardware goods accepted and if rejected, reason for rejection).

Total weight of Hardware Goods that comply with AQL is less than 75%

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.

Contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Total weight of Hardware Goods that comply with AQL is

76 -89%

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.

Contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified a corrective action.

Total weight of Hardware Goods that comply with AQL is

90-100%

Performance meets contractual requirements.

To justify a Satisfactory rating, only minor problems should exist, or major problems the contractor recovered from without a negative effect on the contract. Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.

Total weight of Hardware Goods that comply with AQL is

100%

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit.

To justify a Very Good rating, identify a significant event and state how it was a benefit to the government.

Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.

Total weight of Hardware Goods that comply with AQL is

100%

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many, to the government's benefit.

To justify an Exceptional rating, identify significant events.

CPARS

GROUP

NUMBER

DESCRIPTION

FREQUENCY

WEIGHT

METHOD OF

SURVEILLANCE

UNSATISFACTORY

MARGINAL

SATISFACTORY

VERY GOOD

EXCEPTIONAL

Quality of Product #2 8.2.1.4029.1.523496.503679

OBJECTIVES - ACCEPTABLE QUALITY LEVEL (AQL)

All aspects of installation and equipment removal conform to the following work standard. Aspects to be inspected include: grounding and bonding methods, space, hull and equipment penetration, welds, cable routing and supports, connectorization, bracing, equipment accessibility, shock mounts, and applicable TEMPEST equipment and classification requirements.

QUALITY OF PRODUCT #3/INSTALLATION AND EQUIPMENT REMOVAL

Installations and equipment removal weights vary depending on the value to the government.

Note: Total weight points must equal 100 per page.

CPARS

GROUP

NUMBER

DESCRIPTION

FREQUENCY

WEIGHT

METHOD OF

SURVEILLANCE

UNSATISFACTORY

MARGINAL

SATISFACTORY

VERY GOOD

EXCEPTIONAL

Quality of Product #3 Total weight of Installations / Equipment Removals that comply with AQL is

100%

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many, to the government's benefit

To justify an Exceptional rating, identify significant events.

Total weight of Installations / Equipment Removals that comply with AQL is

100%

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit

To justify a Very Good rating, identify a significant event and state how it was a benefit to the government. Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.

Total weight of Installations / Equipment Removals that comply with AQL is

90-100%

Performance meets contractual requirements

To justify a Satisfactory rating, only minor problems should exist, or major problems the contractor recovered from without a negative effect on the contract. Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.

Total weight of Installations / Equipment Removals that comply with AQL is

76 -89%

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.

Contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified a corrective action.

Total weight of Installations / Equipment Removals that comply with AQL is less than 75%

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.

Contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

100% inspection by the COR.

COR will log results of all inspections (i.e., installations/equipment removals accepted and if rejected, reason for rejection).

QUALITY OF PRODUCT #4/SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT

Software Development task weights vary depending on the value to the government. Note: Total weight points must equal 100 per page.

OBJECTIVES - ACCEPTABLE QUALITY LEVEL (AQL)

All functionality of the "Product/Program", works as designed with a maximum of 5% minor problems (i.e., problems which do not affect results (each product)). Product relates to coding during development, modeling, simulation, etc.)

CPARS

GROUP

NUMBER

DESCRIPTION

FREQUENCY

WEIGHT

METHOD OF

SURVEILLANCE

UNSATISFACTORY

MARGINAL

SATISFACTORY

VERY GOOD

EXCEPTIONAL

Quality of Product #4 Total weight of Software Development tasks that comply with AQL is

100%

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many, to the government's benefit

To justify an Exceptional rating, identify significant events.

Total weight of Software Development tasks that comply with AQL is

100%

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit

To justify a Very Good rating, identify a significant event and state how it was a benefit to the government. Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.

Total weight of Software Development tasks that comply with AQL is

90-99%

Performance meets contractual requirements

To justify a Satisfactory rating, only minor problems should exist, or major problems the contractor recovered from without a negative effect on the contract. Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.

Total weight of Software Development tasks that comply with AQL is

76 -89%

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.

Contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified a corrective action.

Total weight of Software Development tasks that comply with AQL is less than 75%

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.

Contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

100% inspection by COR.

COR will log results of all inspections (i.e., software development tasks accepted and if rejected, reason for rejection).

OBJECTIVES - ACCEPTABLE QUALITY LEVEL (AQL)

Documents are delivered "on time" in accordance with official schedules and milestones (not counting excusable delays).

SCHEDULE #1/DOCUMENTS

CDRL document weights vary depending on the value to the government. Note: Total weight points must equal 100 per page.

CPARS

GROUP

CDRL #

DESCRIPTION

FREQUENCY

WEIGHT

METHOD OF

SURVEILLANCE

UNSATISFACTORY

MARGINAL

SATISFACTORY

VERY GOOD

EXCEPTIONAL

Schedule #1 Total weight of Document deliveries that comply with AQL is

100%

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many, to the government's benefit

To justify an Exceptional rating, identify significant events.

Total weight of Document deliveries that comply with AQL is

100%

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit.

To justify a Very Good rating, identify a significant event and state how it was a benefit to the government. Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.

Total weight of Document deliveries that comply with AQL is

90-99%

Performance meets contractual requirements.

To justify a Satisfactory rating, only minor problems should exist, or major problems the contractor recovered from without a negative effect on the contract. Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.

Total weight of Document deliveries that comply with AQL is

76 -89%

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.

Contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified a corrective action.

Total weight of Document deliveries that comply with AQL is less than 75%

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.

Contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

100% inspection by COR.

COR will log results of all CDRL document deliveries (i.e., schedules met and if not met, identify reason and effect to overall schedule).

SCHEDULE #2/DELIVERY OF SCHEDULED MILESTONES

(e.g., Installations, Equipment Removal, Program Reviews, Testing, Deliver, etc.). Milestone schedule weights vary depending on the value to the government.

Note: Weight of values must equal 100 per page.

OBJECTIVES - ACCEPTABLE QUALITY LEVEL (AQL)

On time scheduled delivery is defined as meeting the task order scheduled delivery dates (not counting excusable delays).

CPARS

GROUP

NUMBER

DESCRIPTION

FREQUENCY

WEIGHT

METHOD OF

SURVEILLANCE

UNSATISFACTORY

MARGINAL

SATISFACTORY

VERY GOOD

EXCEPTIONAL

Schedule #2 Total weight of meeting Milestone Schedule that comply with AQL is

100%

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many, to the government's benefit.

To justify an Exceptional rating, identify significant events.

Total weight of meeting Milestone Schedule that comply with AQL is

100%

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit.

To justify a Very Good rating, identify a significant event and state how it was a benefit to the government. Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.

Total weight of meeting Milestone Schedule that comply with AQL is

90-99%

Performance meets contractual requirements.

To justify a Satisfactory rating, only minor problems should exist, or major problems the contractor recovered from without a negative effect on the contract. Also, no significant weaknesses should have been identified.

Total weight of meeting Milestone Schedule that comply with AQL is

76 -89%

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.

Contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified a corrective action.

Total weight of meeting Milestone Schedule that comply with AQL is less than 75%

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.

Contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

100% inspection by COR.

COR will log results of all milestone schedule events (i.e., schedules met and if not met, identify reason and effect to overall schedule).

EXCEPTIONAL

VERY GOOD

SATISFACTORY

MARGINAL

UNSATISFACTORY

METHOD OF

SURVEILLANCE

APPLICABLE

OBJECTIVES - ACCEPTABLE

QUALITY LEVEL (AQL)

TASK

CPARS

GROUP

Percent of qualified key personnel on contract/DO/TO throughout the contract period is less than 80%.

Turnover of identified (named) key personnel is more than five.

Percent of qualified key personnel on contract/DO/TO throughout the contract period is between 80% and 99%, round to closest %.

Turnover of identified (named) key personnel is between four and five.

Percent of qualified key personnel on contract/DO/TO throughout the contract period is 100%.

Turnover of identified (named) key personnel is three.

Turnover of identified (named) key personnel is between two and one.

Turnover of identified (named) key personnel is zero.

Percent of qualified key personnel on contract/DO/TO throughout the contract period is 100%.

Some key personnel have exceptional qualifications that benefit tasking.

Percent of qualified key personnel on contract/DO/TO throughout the contract period is 100%.

Many key personnel have exceptional qualifications that benefit tasking.

100% review by COR.

COR will review and maintain log of all key positions and instances of vacancies throughout task order period.

100% review by COR

COR will review and maintain log of all identified (named) key personnel and identify turnover throughout task order period.

Percent (%) of qualified key personnel required by the task order throughout the task order period. Vacancies for vacation or daily sickness will not be included, extended sickness and absences will be included.

Retention of identified (named) key personnel throughout the period of the task order.

RETENTION OF KEY PERSONNEL

PERCENT OF KEY PERSONNEL

Management of Key Personnel

CPARS

GROUP

TASK

OBJECTIVES ACCEPTABLE

QUALITY LEVEL (AQL)

APPLICABLE

UNSATISFACTORY

MARGINAL

SATISFACTORY

VERY GOOD

EXCEPTIONAL

Cost Control Any increase in negotiated labor rates greater than 15%.

Identifies an annual fully burdened per person labor charge in any labor category in excess of $

SIGNATURE DIRECTIONS:

The COR is required to sign the Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) once a final bid and/or a formal contractor submission (PWS, Proposal, QASP) has been accepted and is ready to be funded. The Ordering Officer will enter in the task order/contract number (as applicable) and sign the QASP, which will lock it. The QASP will be used as a reference by the contractor when completing the monthly CDAD and by the COR when reviewing the monthly CDAD and entering the final CPARS. Any changes to the QASP after award require a modification.

If the cumulative amount of Other Direct Costs (ODCs) will exceed 10% of the original ODC total (for any given period of performance).

Any Instances/Overruns require a Post Award ODC Tripwire Memorandum signed by COR and forwarded to Contracting Officer (KO).

Any instances/Overruns must be documented in the CDAD/Monthly Status Report and submitted to the COR. COR will forward to the KO.

Any instances/Overruns must be documented in the CDAD/Monthly Status Report and submitted to the COR. COR will forward to the KO.

Post Award Trip Wire Monitoring Cost Variance Cost overrun of more than 10%

Round to closest %.

Cost overrun of 2 - 10%

Round to closest % Plus or minus 1% of estimated cost

Round to closest % Savings to the government of 2 - 10%

Round to closest % Savings to the government of more than 10%

Round to closest % Accurate forecasting, managing and controlling cost.

Business Relations Customer Satisfaction External customer (O-6 or civilian equivalent) submits written complaint (including email) Verbal concerns expressed by external customers (O-6 or civilian equivalent) No external customer (O-6 or civilian equivalent) complaints received verbal compliments received from external customers (O-6 or civilian equivalent) External customer (O-6 or civilian equivalent) submits written compliments (including email) Customer satisfaction is based on the number of positive or negative responses COR receives from customers.

Note: Does not include "policy" comments.

SPAWARSYSCEN ATLANTIC STANDARD MONTHLY CPARS DRAFT APPROVAL DOCUMENT (CDAD)

CPARS

GROUP

TASK

MONTHLY CONTRACTOR INPUT

CONTRACTOR INPUT

COR INPUT

CALCULATED

RATING

RATIONALE

COMMENTS

Quality of Product or Service Documents Installations and Equipment Removal

(I/ER)

Hardware Goods Software Development (SW Dev) *KO Adjudication only necessary if any proposed score is 2 or less.

Important: CDADs are to be submitted on a monthly basis. "N/A" should be entered in the Proposed Rating section if not applicable. However, Cost Variance in the Cost Control Group must always have a rating (1-5) related to actual versus planned.

Schedule Documents Milestone Schedule Cost Control Percent of Key Personnel Retention of Key Personnel Mgmt of Key Personnel Customer Satisfaction Business Relations Cost Variance

CPARS

GROUP

TASK

MONTHLY CONTRACTOR INPUT

CONTRACTOR INPUT

COR INPUT

CALCULATED

RATING

RATIONALE

COMMENTS

*KO Adjudication only necessary if any proposed score is 2 or less.

Important: CDADs are to be submitted on a monthly basis. "N/A" should be entered in the Proposed Rating section if not applicable. However, Cost Variance in the Cost Control Group must always have a rating (1-5) related to actual versus planned.

CurrentPage:
PageCount:
Button1:
contNum: N65236-16-R-0006
doToNum:
contName: TBD
date: 2017-04-24
sooPWS: Aviation and Polar Programs Support
corName: Warder, Robert, M.
hwareRemedy: (CPFF DO/TO) REMEDY FOR AQL PROBLEMS Rework until corrected with no additional fee
cdrl2: A001
cdrl3: A002
cdrl4: A003
cdrl5: A004
cdrl6: See PWS
cdrl7:
cdrl8:
cdrl9:
cdrl10:
cdrl11:
cdrl12:
cdrl13:
cdrl14:
cdrl15:
wt16:
freq16:
desc16:
cdrl16:
desc2: Program Management Report, General
desc3: ATC Support, Reports, and Misc
desc4: MET Support, Reports and Misc
desc5: SAM support, reports and Misc
desc6: See PWS
desc7:
desc8:
desc9:
desc10:
desc11:
desc12:
desc13:
desc14:
desc15:
descTot: Total
freq2: As needed
freq3: As needed
freq4: As needed
freq5: As needed
freq6: As needed
freq7:
freq8:
freq9:
freq10:
freq11:
freq12:
freq13:
freq14:
freq15:
wt2: 10
wt2: 10.00000000
wt3: 20
wt3: 25.00000000
wt4: 30.00000000
wt4: 30.00000000
wt5: 30
wt5: 25.00000000
wt6: 10.00000000
wt6: 10.00000000
wt7:
wt8:
wt9:
wt10:
wt11:
wt12:
wt13:
wt14:
wt15:
totWt1: 100
totWt1: 100.00000000
notAppHard: 1
num1:
num2:
num3:
num4:
num5:
num6:
num7:
num8:
num9:
num10:
num11:
num12:
num13:
num14:
num15:
num16:
num17:
num18:
hardwt19:
frequ18:
descr18:
num19:
descr1:
descr2:
descr3:
descr4:
descr5:
descr6:
descr7:
descr8:
descr9:
descr10:
descr11:
descr12:
descr13:
descr14:
descr15:
descr16:
descr17:
frequ1:
frequ2:
frequ3:
frequ4:
frequ5:
frequ6:
frequ7:
frequ8:
frequ9:
frequ10:
frequ11:
frequ12:
frequ13:
frequ14:
frequ15:
frequ16:
frequ17:
hardwt1:
hardwt2:
hardwt3:
hardwt4:
hardwt5:
hardwt6:
hardwt7:
hardwt8:
hardwt9:
hardwt10:
hardwt11:
hardwt12:
hardwt13:
hardwt14:
hardwt15:
hardwt16:
hardwt17:
hardwt18:
totWt2:
notAppInstall: 1
notAppInstall: 1
notAppInstall: 0
notAppInstall: 1
notAppInstall: 0
notAppInstall: 0
descrTot: Total
descrTot: Total
descrTot: Total
cdrl1:
sched1Remedy: (CPFF DO/TO) REMEDY FOR AQL PROBLEMS PCO to negotiate "consideration" to reduce adverse impact to mission
DropDownList1: Yes
DropDownList1: Yes
DropDownList1: Yes
DropDownList1: Yes
DropDownList1: Yes
ApprovalSign:
orderOffSig:
costVarApp: Yes
bizRelApp: Yes
preAwardTrip: 150.00
forMonth:
docB:
docC:
Weight:
docA:
ierB:
ierC:
ierA:
swB:
swC:
swA:
hardB:
hardC:
hardA:
KOAdjudication:
docB2:
docA2:
docC2:
mileB:
mileA:
mileC:
perB:
retenA:
retenC:
retenB:
perC:
perA:
costA:
costC:
costB:

File details come from the government source that posted it.