RFP N64498-24-R-4016 Amend 5 MOD Copy.pdf
PDF 546 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N6449824R4016
About this file
This document is Amendment 5 to Request for Proposals (RFP) N64498-24-R-4016 issued by the Naval Surface Warfare Center Philadelphia Division (NSWCPD) for Repair Station Console (RSC) equipment.
The purpose of this amendment is to remove the requirement for the Proposal Adequacy Checklist (DFARS 252.205-7009) from Section L.2.1 Page Numbers and Limits, as it is not necessary for submission under this RFP. Previous amendments extended the solicitation closing date, provided answers to questions, updated the Statement of Work, and revised Section L and M requirements. The RFP is for an Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite-Quantity, Firm-Fixed-Price contract to provide RSC equipment. The guaranteed minimum is $1,000 and the contract maximum is $35,985,428.20. Technical, past performance, corporate experience, price, quality management system, and small business participation are the evaluation factors. Proposal submission is via the DoD SAFE system.
View the file
Other files
Show all 21
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30
APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84
STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
The purpose of this amendment is the removal of Proposal Adequacy Checklist (DFARS 252.205-7009) from Section L.2.1 PAGE NUMBERS AND LIMITS. This Checklist is not necessary for submission w ith this RFP.
1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES
J 1 15
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
16C. DATE SIGNED
BY 20-Aug-2024
16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X N6449824R4016
X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
01-Jul-2024
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.
Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;
or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN
REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE
CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)
6. ISSUED BY
3. EFFECTIVE DATE
20-Aug-2024
CODE
NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER PHILA
CODE 0241, EMILY-REBECCA SIMPSON
EMILY-REBECCA.SIMPSON.CIV@US.NAVY.MIL
5001 SOUTH BROAD STREET
PHILADELPHIA PA 19112
N64498 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)
4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.
CODE
See Item 6
FACILITY CODECODE
EMAIL:TEL:
N6449824R4016
SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
The following have been modified:
SOLICITATION INFORMAITON
Amendment 5:
The purpose of this amendment is the removal of Proposal Adequacy Checklist (DFARS 252.205-7009) from Section L.2.1 PAGE NUMBERS AND LIMITS. This Checklist is not necessary for submission with this RFP.
End of Amendment 5.
Amendment 4:
The purpose of this amendment is:
1) Extend the Solicitation closing date from Monday 12:00 PM EST 12 August 2024 to Monday 3:00 PM EST 26 August 2024.
2) Provide compiled list of answers to questions received regarding the Solicitation package.
All 43 questions have been provided with Government responses. See Attachment 3_RSC 24R4016 Questions and Answers.
3) Removal of Clause M-209-H001 WAIVER OF FIRST ARTICLE REQUIREMENTS
(CONTRACTOR TESTING) – BASIC (NAVSEA) (OCT 2018)
4) Revisions provided to Statement of Work in reply to Questions 22, 24, 31, 42, and 43:
a. Q22: The reference to 1st Training Set is incorrect in the SOW 3.1.7.16.24. The
SOW 3.1.7.16.24 has been revised to state SHIPSET instead of 1st training set.
b. Q24: The language in SOW 3.1.7.1.3 has hereby been updated in accordance with
Clauses L-227-H002 and L-227-H001 to “The Contract shall be appraised at a CMMI maturity level three (3) or equivalent.”
c. Q29: SOW section 3.1.6.10.4 has been updated to state “3.1.6.10.4 The Contractor has two options regarding holding of the material line items. 1) The Contractor must agree with holding the material line item and NOT invoicing for it until availability is identified to ship the material to a Govt. facility/location. (at this point the Contractor still owns the item); or, 2) The Contractor invoices the material line item and it is then converted to GFP and is stored at the Contractor's facility.
The GFP must be tracked in accordance with the GFP clauses.”
d. Q31: Please see updated Amendment 4 with updated SOW sections 2.1.36, 3.1.7.16.19, 3.1.7.16.20, 3.1.7.16.21, 3.1.7.16.22, and 3.1.7.16.23 to reference MIL- STD-1399-300-1. Reference to MIL-STD-1399 section 300B is removed.
e. Q42: SOW 3.1.7.23.7 has been updated to correct references of 3.1.7.23.5 and 3.1.7.23.6, please see revised SOW provided in Amendment 4.
f. Q43: The SOW number of subsections have been updated for Section 10 Counterfeit Material Prevention. Please reference Amendment 4 Conformed Copy updates.
5) Revisions Provided to Section L in reply to Questions 8, 15, and 18:
g. Q8 and 15: Revision to Section L.1 General Instructions “Font text shall be 12-point Times New Roman, except for: Graphs, graphics, tables, or charts used to supplement the proposal text shall use Times New Roman that is no smaller than 9-point font size.”
h. Q18: Revision to L.3. The total page limit for Volume II Factor 1 Technical Approach has been increased from 35 pages to 41 pages to account for the 6 pages allowed under Element 1D Software Development Plan.
6) Revised Attachment A SOW Performance Spec_Updated has been provided in response of revisions to questions 12, 13, 34, and 41.
End of Amendment 4.
Amendment 3:
1) Update to Section M, FACTOR 6 - SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION COMMITTMENT, Section 1. SBPCD baseline small business Minimum Quantitative Requirement (MQR) for small business has been updated from 40% to 10% of the total proposed contract value (not subcontracting dollars).
2) Update of Attachment 1 - NSWCPD SBPCD RFP 24R4016 A3 with update to 10%.
End of Amendment 3.
Amendment 2:
1) Provided updates to Section C Statement of Work. Section 3.16.13 update to Quality Assurance reference ASQ/ANSI/ISO 9001:2015.
2) Fill in of clause 52.246-11 HIGHER-LEVEL-CONTRACT QUALITY REQUIREMENT
(DEC 2014).
3) Update of C-209-H001 (CONTRACTOR TESTING) to APR 2024 version.
4) Update of Section L Element 1 D Softw are Development Plan to include Clause references.
5) Update of Section M Element 1D Softw are Devleopment Plan to icnlude Clause reference.
6) Update of Section M.2 RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF EVALUATION FACTORS.
End of Amendment 2.
Amendment 1:
Update of Section B, inclusion of Join Certification Program.
End of Amendment 1.
Solicitation Information:
1. CONTRACT TYPE:
The Naval Surface Warfare Center Philadelphia Division (NSWCPD) proposes to award an Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ), Firm-Fixed-Price contract for Repair Station Console’s as describe in Section C, Statement of Work.
2. BASIS OF COMPETITION:
A single FFP, IDIQ contract shall result from this solicitation. This requirement is being solicited on a basis of full and open competition.
3. MINIMUM & MAXIMUM:
The guaranteed minimum is $1,000.00. The contract maximum shall be $35,985,428.20
4. DEFINITIONS:
For purposes of this solicitation, the term “Business days” means Monday thru Friday, except the legal public holidays specified in 5 U.S.C. §6103.
5. QUESTIONS:
All questions in regards to the subject RFP shall be submitted in writing to Emily Simpson, Emily-Rebecca.Simpson.civ@us.navy.mil, no later than 17 July 2024 by
3:00PM EST.
6. Joint Certification Program for Attachment B SOW – ILS Specification. In order to view Attachment B SOW – ILS Specification, please provide the following:
TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION OR DRAWINGS SHALL BE PROVIDED
SEPARATELY FROM THE SOLICITATION. OFFERORS MUST BE JOINT
CERTIFICATION PROGRAM (JCP) REGISTERED TO OBTAIN THE TECHNICAL
DOCUMENTS OR DRAWINGS. THE JOINT CERTIFICATION PROGRAM
ESTABLISHED THE ELIGIBILITY OF A U.S. OR CANADIAN CONTRACTOR TO
RECEIVE TECHNICAL PROCEDURES AND RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THE
WITHHOLDING OF UNCLASSIFIED TECHNICAL DOCUMENTS. THE JCO IS
LOCATED AT DEFENSE LOGISTICS INFORMATION SERVICE (DLIS), 74
WASHINGTON AVENUE NORTH, BATTLE CREEK, MI 49017-3084, TELEPHONE
800-352-3572 AND ONLINE AT www.dlis.dla.mil/jcp/. TO BECOME CERTIFIED, U.S. CONTRACTORS MUST SUBMIT A COMPLETED DD FORM 2345 TO THE
JCO.
OFFERORS CAN OBTAIN COPIES OF DRAWINGS BY PROVIDING THE
FOLLOWING INFORMATION TO THE CONTRACT SPECIALIST, MS. EMILY
SIMPSON AT THE FOLLOWING E-MAIL ADDRESS:
emily-rebecca.simpson.civ@us.navy.mil
1. Company Name
2. Company complete mailing address
3. Point of Contact
4. Telephone Number
5. JCP Number
SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS
The following have been modified:
SECTION L
CONTENT OF PROPOSALS
L.1 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
The Offeror shall submit all information required by this RFP and in the same format as outlined herein. Failure to comply with the requirements of the RFP may result in the Offeror being removed from consideration for award. The Government does not assume the duty to search for data to cure problems it finds in proposals. Proposals shall be sufficiently detailed to enable Government evaluation board members to make a thorough evaluation and to arrive at a sound determination as to whether or not the prospective Offeror has a thorough understanding of the requirements and associated risks and is able, willing, and competent to devote the resources necessary to meet the requirements.
Cost/pricing information should only be present in the Cost Volume (and the Small Business Commitment Participation Document(SBPCD) if applicable).
No classified information shall be provided in any volume.
A “subcontractor” includes any person or entity other than the prime contractor (e.g., consultants, temporary purchased labor, or divisions, subsidiaries, and affiliates of a contractor or subcontractor) who will furnish or furnishes any effort in connection with this prospective contract.
A “major subcontractor” is considered to be any entity proposed to perform 30% or more of the total proposed contract value for the purposes of this solicitation.
Offerors shall propose base year escalation for the time period between the direct labor rate support (payroll date) and the estimated award date provided in F-211-H021 Delivery or Performance (NAVSEA) (MAR 2019).
L.1.2 SOLICITATION CHANGES
Any changes or additional information (responses to questions, amendments, etc.) related to the solicitation will be made available only through the following website: https://beta.sam.gov/. If this solicitation is amended, all terms and conditions that are not amended remain unchanged. Offerors shall provide proposals in response to any and all amendments to this solicitation by the date and time specified in the amendment(s). The cover letter /transmittal letter shall acknowledge receipt/response to the amendment version).
L.2. PROPOSAL FORMAT
Proposals shall be prepared on standard 8-1/2” by 11’ paper, set at single-spaced with 1” width spacing, 0” left and right indent and a single blank line before and after each paragraph.
The font shall be Times New Roman with a font size of 12 throughout the document, except for:
Graphs, graphics, tables, or charts used to supplement the proposal text shall use Times New Roman that is no smaller than 9-point font size. Microsoft Office Excel spreadsheets shall use Times New Roman that is no smaller than 9-point font size.
The Offeror’s company name, the solicitation number and the date of the proposal shall appear at the top of each page. Each page shall contain a footer that includes, at a minimum, the volume number, page number and, if applicable, restrictive legend (see FAR 52.215-1(e) (2)).
The Non-Cost/Price Volumes of a Proposal shall not contain any reference to cost. They shall be written so that Government personnel evaluating the proposal can arrive at a sound determination as to whether the proposal meets the requirements of this solicitation. To this end, the proposal shall be specific, detailed and complete as to clearly and fully demonstrate that the prospective Contractor has a clear understanding of the technical requirements contained in Section C of this solicitation. Statements such as "the Offeror understands", "will comply with the Performance Work Statement," "standard procedures will be employed"; "well known techniques will be used" and general paraphrasing of the Performance Work Statement are considered inadequate.
L.2.1. PAGE NUMBERS AND LIMITS
A page is defined as one sheet of paper with typing on one side when printed. When information is contained on both sides of a single sheet of paper it will be counted as two pages and shall be numbered accordingly. Partial pages count as a full page.
Specific page limitations are provided below in Table L.3. Pages that exceed the page count limit will not be evaluated by the Government. If the proposal exceeds the identified page limit, the Government will remove all pages exceeding the specified page count. Blank pages must contain only material pertinent to the page heading and marked "Intentionally Left Blank." All pages within a page limited volume shall be consecutively numbered, starting at page one, and shall not exceed the page limitation.
The following are not included in the page limitations:
Title/Cover pages Tables of Contents Glossaries of abbreviations and acronyms Subcontracting/Teaming/Consulting Agreements Past Performance References and subcontractor commitment letters Resumes OCI Mitigation Plan Quality Assurance Plan Section J Attachments Small Business Subcontracting Plans & Small Business Participation Commitment
Document Proposal Adequacy Checklist (DFARS 252.205-7009) Quality Management System Level 1 and Level 2 Procedures
L.2.2 PROPOSAL ELECTRONIC FORMAT AND SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
Electronic Delivery of Proposals via DoD SAFE Utilization of DoD SAFE at https://safe.apps.mil/ is required for electronic proposal submissions. DoD SAFE supports individual file sizes up to 8GB. Browsers recommended are: Firefox, Chrome and, Edge. Internet Explorer is not recommended. Please note that Internet Explorer limits uploads to 2GB.When offers are submitted via DoD SAFE, the Government will receive an automated message stating that a file has been “Dropped-Off.” An offer uploaded (“Dropped-Off”) to DoD SAFE is considered to be timely when this automatic system-generated notification email is received by the designated Contracting Officer prior to the due date/time set for receipt of offers.
Late submissions will be treated IAW FAR 52.212-1(f) or 52.215-1(c)(3)(ii)(A).
In order to submit a proposal via DoD SAFE:
(1) The Contractor shall send a request to the following email addresses emily-rebecca.simpson.civ@us.navy.mil and heather.l.rhoads2.civ@us.navy.mil stating their intent to submit a proposal and shall include in that request a valid email address(es).
(2) Within 2 business days from the date of the request, the Contractor will receive a link via email allowing them to upload/“Drop-Off” a proposal in DoD SAFE. The Contractor has 14 days from receipt of the email to “Drop-Off” their proposal in DoD SAFE. Offerors are reminded to be mindful of the due date/time set for receipt of offers.
(3) It is recommended that each offeror keep a screen shot of the DoD SAFE page showing that the “Drop-Off” has been completed for their records.
The DoD SAFE site is located here: https://safe.apps.mil Additional information on DoD SAFE from the DON CIO: https://www.doncio.navy.mil/ContentView.aspx?ID=12719
L.3. PROPOSAL CONTENT AND ORGANIZATION
The proposal shall contain Seven (7) separate volumes with page limits identified as follows:
Volume Contents Electronic /Soft
Copies
Page Limits
I. PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS _ None
II. FACTOR 1 TECHNICAL APPROACH 1 41
Element 1A – Design Conformance to
Requirements
Element 1B – Supportability Analysis and Logistics
Element 1C – Program and Engineering Management
Element 1 D – Software Development Plan _ 6* III. FACTOR 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE 1 None
IV. FACTOR 3 – CORPORATE EXPERIENCE 1 10
V. FACTOR 4 – TOTAL EVALUATED
PRICE
1 None
VI. FACTOR 5 – QUALITY MANAGEMENT
SYSTEM
1 None
VII. FACTOR 6 – SMALL BUISNESS
PARTICIPATION COMMITMENT
1 None
*The Software Development Plan allotted 6 page limit is included in the complete Factor 1 – Technical Approach page limit of 41.
L.3.1. VOLUME I: PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS
This volume is the Offeror’s contractual commitment, complete in every respect and ready for acceptance by the Government.
L.3.1.1 TRANSMITTAL/COVER LETTER
The Offeror’s proposal shall include a transmittal letter on the Offeror’s letterhead signed by an executive of the company who possesses authority to contractually bind the Offeror. The letter shall provide the name, title, phone number and e-mail address of the Offeror’s principal point of contact for the solicitation and identify those individuals authorized to negotiate with the Government and contractually bind the Offeror. The letter shall include the following information:
1. Reference the RFP number and acknowledge that it transmits an offer in response to the requirements as stated in the solicitation,
2. Identify all attachments and enclosures being transmitted as part of the response to the
RFP,
3. List all subcontractors identified in the Offeror’s proposal
4. A statement that the proposal is made without qualification or exception to any terms and conditions appearing in the solicitation; or if the Offeror takes any exceptions to solicitation, provide a full explanation. Each exception shall be referenced to the applicable paragraph or contract line item number. Any exceptions made, and not clearly delineated here will not be considered or accepted. Any material exceptions to the RFP may render the proposal unacceptable and ineligible for award.
5. A statement that the proposal is valid for at least 180 calendar days after the date established for receipt of offers.
6. If the proposal contains a “contractor team arrangement” as defined in FAR 9.601, provide information that describes the contractor team arrangement to include any information that will help the Government understand the contractor team arrangement purpose and benefit.
7. List any subcontractor commitment letters provided with the Past Performance Proposal
8. Provide the following information pertaining to the Offeror:
a. Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) number
b. Unique Entity Identifier, (UEI) Number (assigned by SAM.gov)
c. Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN)
d. Address(es) of the location(s) at which the Offeror intends to perform the proposed effort
e. Name, address and telephone number of the cognizant Defense Contract Audit Agency
(DCAA), audit office
f. Name, address and telephone number of the cognizant Defense Contract Management
Agency (DCMA) office
g. The Offeror shall reference the most recent date on which the Offeror’s cognizant
Defense Contract Management Agency has determined the adequacy of the Offeror’s property management system and attach a copy of the determination to the cover letter.
h. If no Organizational Conflict of Interest exists, then the Offeror shall clearly state this in its cover letter
i. Identify any beneficial interests to include: The names of the subcontractors included in its proposal in which the Offeror or Offeror's owners/management share a beneficial interest. If a beneficial financial, management, or controlling interest exists between the prime offeror or subcontractor, the prime offeror must explicitly state the manner of the shared interest and state how it will assure that transactions between the related parties will remain at arms-length.
j. Provide the names of the other offerors who submitted proposals to the solicitation from whom the prime offeror shares a beneficial interest. The prime offeror shall include a statement in its proposal if there are no beneficial interests. Note: A beneficial interest is defined as the prime offeror, owners/management of prime offeror, or family members of owners/management having a beneficial financial, management, or controlling interest in another contractor either directly, or indirectly.
k. The names, titles, phone numbers and email addresses of persons authorized to negotiate on the Offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation.
L.3.2 VOLUME II: FACTOR 1 – TECHNICAL APPROACH
The Performance Specifications in Attachment A detail the overall technical requirements for the RSC Panel PC equipment. The Statement of Work in Section C of this contract details the Offeror’s responsibilities. The Offeror shall demonstrate and describe the ability of their design to meet all the requirements outlined in the Performance Specification and Statement of Work, as well as indicate areas of high risk.
L.3.2.1 ELEMENT 1A – Design Conformance to Requirements
The Offeror shall provide a detailed description of the RSC design, features and characteristics in accordance with the solicitations SOW and Attachment A specifications. .
The Offeror shall demonstrate an understanding and conformance to the technical requirements of the solicitation’s SOW and Attachment A specifications.
The basis for conformance shall be identified.
The Offeror shall identify any areas of complexity and technical risks in Environmental Qualification Testing (EQT) and describe the plan to address them.
The Offeror shall provide analysis on how the proposed design meets requirements.The section shall include but is not limited to;
• Equipment Dimensions
• Weight
• Locations for cable entrances
• Locations for air exhaust and intake interfaces
• Equipment (and location in RSC Panel PC) requiring removal or disassembly for repair or maintenance
• Estimated Maintenance envelope
• Estimated Shock envelope
• Mounting requirements
If the design deviates from the specification, the Offeror shall explain why this deviation occurred and what impact it will have on equipment capability.
L.3.2.2 ELEMENT 1B – Supportability Analysis and Logistics
The Offeror shall provide a Supportability Plan with a preliminary analysis of components or technologies to be implemented for the design. The analysis shall include components/ technologies selection factors to be employed, expected end of life dates for components, and risks to supportability over a ten (10) year span.
The Offeror shall propose an approach for addressing obsolescence of contractor supplied parts and components.
The Offeror shall describe their approach to providing the training, equipment, drawings, associated lists, technical manual, and provisioning data to support the RSC Panel PC system as well as Navy organizational level maintenance in accordance with Solicitation Attachment B.
L.3.2.3 ELEMENT 1C – Program and Engineering Management
The Offeror shall proposal a Program Plan that includes an event based Work Breakdown Structure (WBS), reflecting how the effort shall be executed. The WBS Shall be developed by the Offeror in a manner that reflects the Offeror’s customary way of organizing commercial projects and the need to have a direct relationship between project events and WBS.
The WBS shall include a person-hour and labor category allocation for the entire project. The Program Plan shall include an Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) that reflects the event based
WBS.
L3.2.4 ELEMENT 1D – Software Development Plan
A Software Development Plan (SDP) shall be generated and implemented in accordance with SOW 3.1.7.1. The SDP shall specify the entire software program and the performance characteristics of each Computer Software Configuration Item (CSCI). The Offeror shall allocate the RSC performance requirements into the CSCIs listed in the SDP. SDP shall include the Software Configuration Management Plan (SCMP) and Software Quality Assurance Plan
(SQAP).
The Offeror should provide an initial SDP and SDP Rationale in accordance with the clause L- 227-H002 SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PLAN (NAVSEA) (OCT 2018). The Offeror also shall provide software development and CMMI or equivalent experience in accordance with the clause L-227-H001 SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND CMMI OR EQUIVALENT
EXPERIENCE (NAVSEA) (OCT 2018).
L.3.3 VOLUME III: FACTOR 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE
List up to four (4) relevant contracts performed within the last three (3) years by the Offeror whether completed or not, including Federal, State and Local Government and private sector contracts. If subcontractor experience is submitted for consideration as part of the proposal, the Offeror should include a commitment signed by Offeror and subcontractor certifying that if a contract is awarded resulting from the proposal, the parties commit to joint performance as proposed. If the signed commitment is not fully executed by both parties and provided with the Past Performance Proposal, subcontractor references will not be evaluated or considered.
Affiliate companies, sister companies, teaming arrangements, joint venture agreement, etc., will be considered provided that sufficient documentation is included in the proposal. The primary offering entity must demonstrate that the affiliate will perform significant and critical aspects of the contract if awarded. Documentation includes a copy of the signed arrangement such as documented affiliation, a copy of the teaming agreement, a copy of the joint venture agreement, etc. Per FAR 15.305(a)(2)(vi), If the joint venture does not demonstrate past performance for award, the past performance of each party to the joint venture will be considered.
For evaluation of Past Performance, the Government may use information from any sources available to it including, but not limited to, the Contract Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS.gov)), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), and Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS). The Government may review relevant past performance information from other sources or through the use of questionnaires.
Offerors should provide relevant past performance information for similar or related work that has taken place during the last three years. Each Offeror has the opportunity to provide in its proposal any information regarding its past performance of contracts similar to the Government's requirement that it would like the Government to consider. This includes information that the Offeror considers essential to the Government's evaluation or explanatory information of poor performance.
Offerors should provide the following information:
1. Contract Number (and name of Contract’s Prime Contractor if applicable)
2. Customer/Agency
3. Contracting Officer /Technical Point of Contact/POC (names and telephone numbers)
4. Brief description of the scope of work (as compared to the tasks/requirements of this
SOW)
5. Contract type
6. Award Price
7. Total Labor-Hours of Effort
8. Period of Performance
9. Contract Deliverables
To obtain information, the Government may contact the points of contact listed, however, the Government is not required to do so. The Government may contact references other than those provided by the Offeror to evaluate past performance.
L.3.4 VOLUME IV: FACTOR 3 – CORPORATE EXPERIENCE
Offerors shall submit a maximum of three (3) examples demonstrating their relevant corporate experience in performing work that is the same or similar to the requirements in the Statement of Work. Offerors shall demonstrate performance of work of the same or similar magnitude, complexity and time of performance relative to the services to be furnished under the present solicitation.
Offerors should provide the following information:
- Contract Number
- Customer/Agency
- Contracting Officer and Technical Point of Contact (names and telephone numbers)
- Brief description of the scope of work
- Contract type
- Award Price
- Total Labor-Hours of Effort
- Period of Performance
- Contract Deliverables
L.3.5 VOLUME V. FACTOR 4 – PRICE
COMPLETED STANDARD FORM (SF) 33 SOLICITATION OFFER AND AWARD
DOCUMENT
Offerors shall submit the Standard Form 33, “Solicitation, Offer and Award,” for the solicitation and each amendment, as applicable with blocks 12 through 18 completed/signed by the Offeror and signed by or an authorized party in Block 17. Electronic signatures by responsible parties and electronic, mechanically-applied, or printed dates may be used and shall be considered original signatures and dates.
Please Note: CLINs 0023 and 0024: Offeror shall proposed in accordance with the Not-To- Exceed (NTE) specified in CLINs 0023 Storage (NTE $35,000.00) and 0024 Support Services
(NTE $1,500,000.00).
The NTE amounts are estimates only to establish ceiling amounts, and do not necessarily reflect the total amounts that the Government will actually order. The Government may order less than the total amount or may order up to the maximum amount listed in Section B. The Firm Fixed Price (FFP) for CLINs 0023 and 0024 will be negotiated at each Task Order Level.
L.3.5.1 RFP FILL-INS
The document shall not be embellished with any cover or binding. If the Offeror makes any qualifications to any provisions in the RFP, all such qualifications shall be listed in the transmittal letter to the proposal.
Offerors must fill in all areas of the RFP that contain Offeror fill-ins, including proposed costs including unit price and fees for each CLIN/SLIN in Section B. In accordance with 52.252-1 Solicitation Provisions Incorporated by Reference, in lieu of submitting the full text, the Offeror may identify the provision by paragraph identifier and provide the appropriate information with its quotation or offer or they may elect to submit a completed RFP document in its entirety.
(Note - This information is exempt from the font and spacing requirements identified under Paragraph L.2.1). Special attention should be taken to accurately enter the prices required in Section B.
Offerors shall submit signed Section K signed Representations, Certifications and Acknowledgements and System for Award Management (SAM). Offerors shall ensure that Representations and Certifications in SAM are current in the Online Representations and Certifications (ORCA) database at www.SAM.gov.
Each Offeror is required to submit a Cost/Price Volume for all priced CLINs. Electronic copies, shall be submitted on separate media, using MS Word/MS Excel as applicable and shall be in accordance with Section L.2.2, Proposal Electronic Format and Submission Requirements.
Total quantities and ODC amounts are estimates only to establish ceiling amounts, and do not necessarily reflect the total amount of ODCs that the Government will actually order. The Government may order less than the total quantities or may order up to the maximum quantities listed in Section B.
Ground Rules and Assumptions:
a. As this is a competitive acquisition with adequate competition anticipated, any price documentation requested shall not be certified cost or pricing data in accordance with FAR 15.406-2. However, in the event that adequate price competition does not exist after receipt of proposals, the Government reserves the right to request additional cost or pricing data as necessary from both the Offeror and subcontractors and may conduct negotiations with the Offeror, pursuant to FAR Part 15.403-4, in order to ensure a reasonable and realistic price. Further, the Offeror may be required to provide a Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data prior to award, pursuant to FAR 15.406-2.
Offeror shall acknowledge the requirement to provide additional cost or pricing information and certify the data prior to award if/when requested by the Government.
b. The Offeror shall provide sufficient information to support its price as well as an explanation of all ground rules and assumptions that affect the price estimates. Any apparent imbalances in the pricing, high or low proposed prices as compared to historical data, or any other anomalies should be fully explained. Topics to be addressed include, but are not limited to, investments, programmatic variables (e.g., inflation/escalation, location, make/buy decisions, prime/subcontractor relationships, and business base concerns), etc.
L.3.6 VOLUME VI: FACTOR 5 – QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
The Prime Contractor shall provide its Quality Management System (QMS) Level 1 and Level 2 Procedures meeting the ASQ/ANSI/ISO 9001:2015.
L.3.7 VOLUME VII: FACTOR 6 - SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION
COMMITMENT DOCUMENT (SBPCD)
All Offerors (both other than small businesses and small businesses) shall comply with the requirements of this factor. In preparation of the Small Business Participating Document (SBPCD), please note the Minimum Quantitative Requirement (MQR) specified in Section M.
Offerors shall submit the SBPCD in the format provided under Attachment 1.
Attachment 1 shall include the following information:
The names of small business subcontractors to be utilized proposed under the Labor CLINs
(no subcontractor names are required under ODCs, but general descriptions of the products/specialized service shall be provided)
A description of the products/services that the small business subcontractors shall provide;
and
The socio-economic category of each proposed subcontractor and/or product (if available)/service.
In addition to the completion of Attachment 1, the Offeror shall also provide the following as part of the SBPCD:
A narrative on its plan to meet or exceed the baseline MQR for small business participation equal to or greater than the specified percentage of the Total Contract Value (TCV).
Signed letters of commitment/intent for each proposed small business subcontractor, performing labor hours, listed on the SBPCD. The letter of commitment/intent shall detail the teaming agreement between the prime contractor and each proposed small business subcontractor. If no letters of commitment are established, Offerors shall provide a narrative discussing the reason why one was not established (letters are not required for subcontractors providing ODCs).
The successful Offeror’s proposed Small Business Participation Commitment Document will be incorporated into the resultant contract award. Awardees shall report progress in accordance with CDRL A005, “Small Business Participation Commitment Report”.
The SBPCD and its attachments are excluded from the page count. The submission of the SBPCD and supporting documentation is separate from the subcontracting plan submitted pursuant to the clause at FAR 52.219-9 as required by DFARS 215.304(c)(i)(B).
L.3.6.1 SMALL BUSINESS COMMITMENT PAST PERFORMANCE
Offerors shall also provide a narrative describing their use of small business concerns over the past three years on relevant contracts. The Offeror’s narrative shall discuss its use of small businesses as subcontractors or teaming partners and demonstrate the extent of compliance with the Offeror’s small business subcontracting plans and any related contract incentives. The description must include small business goals and the extent to which the goals were achieved in relevant contracts that required subcontracting plans. DoD Comprehensive Subcontracting Plan Test Program participant’s narrative descriptions shall provide the Government with sufficient details of small business utilization performance on relevant contracts for the Government to assess the relevant contract’s small business utilization contributions to achieving comprehensive subcontracting plan goals and enhancing opportunities for small business concerns.
The Government will use the submitted Small Business Participation Commitment Document to assess the Contractor’s commitment to small business participation for this sub-factor (or Factor).
For large businesses, Offerors shall provide Individual Subcontracting Reports (ISRs) submitted within the last three years for up to three relevant contracts. Subcontracting Reports will not count against the page limitations for the Technical Proposal.
NOTE: SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN (For Large Businesses Only):
Large business Offerors shall also submit a Small Business Individual Subcontracting Plan IAW FAR 52.219-9 (Alt II) inclusive of the information required in Paragraphs (d) (1) through (d) (15) of the referenced clause. The small business Individual Subcontracting Plan must be determined to be acceptable by the Contracting Officer in order for the large business Offeror to be eligible for contract award. The successful Offeror’s small business subcontracting plan shall be included in and become a part of the resultant contract award. DoD Comprehensive Subcontracting Plan Test Program participants comply with DFARS 252.219-7004 and may submit the most current Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) approved Comprehensive Subcontracting Plan.
If submitting a comprehensive plan, DoD Comprehensive Subcontracting Plan Test Program participants shall also submit a Small Business Participation and Commitment Plan. Small Business Subcontracting Plans will also not count against the page limitations for the Technical Proposal. Subcontracting plans submitted in response to this solicitation are excluded from the overall page count.
L.3.8 ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST (OCI) MITIGATION PLAN
The Offeror’s OCI Mitigation Plan shall be provided in Volume I.
In accordance with Section C, the OCI provision of this section, Offerors shall identify any and all conflicts of interest or potential conflicts of interest related to this solicitation. Offerors shall follow the below described two-step process for identifying known or potential OCI issues to the Government for this solicitation.
Offerors shall submit a statement in affirmation or negation whether they have an OCI conflict regarding this solicitation. If OCI issues are present or anticipated, Offerors shall provide details and submit an OCI mitigation plan and its corporate policy for resolving as part of their proposal submission. If it is believed that no conflicts of interest exist, then the
Offeror shall clearly state this in their offer cover letter, in addition to providing their corporate policy for resolving OCIs. Organizational charts and/or corporate policy are authorized to be submitted in addition to the OCI Mitigation Plan and do not count toward any page limitation.
(End of Summary of Changes)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .