EXHIBIT A-D.pdf
PDF 230 KB Posted
- Attached to
- D/B Construct Finger Pier, Lami, Fiji
- Solicitation number
- N6274224R6723
About this file
This document contains several exhibits related to a federal contract opportunity for the design-build construction of a finger pier in Lami, Fiji.
Exhibit A is a pre-proposal inquiry form that allows offerors to submit questions about the solicitation, which will be responded to by the government. Exhibit B is a project data sheet for offerors to provide information on their past relevant experience. Exhibit C is the Past Performance Questionnaire that offerors must submit, either completed by their clients or with the first page filled out. Exhibit D is a blank bill of quantity template for the project. The related federal contract opportunity is solicitation N6274224R6723 issued by the Department of the Navy Naval Facilities Engineering Command for the design-build construction of a finger pier in Lami, Fiji. A pre-solicitation site visit is scheduled for July 31, 2024, and offerors must submit their list of attendees by July 25, 2024.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| N6274224R6723_0003 CNX the RFP.pdf | ||
| N6274224R6723_0002 released.pdf | ||
| N6274224R6723_0001 released.pdf | ||
| Exhibit D - BoQ.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| N6274224R6723 released.pdf | ||
| BAR_Base Access Request_Form_FIJI.docx | DOCX document | |
| Exhibit A Pre Proposal Inquiry Form.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PRE PROPOSAL INQUIRY FORM N62742224R6723
Exhibit A.
DATE:
Question No. Reference (Sect/Para/Page)
QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE
EMAIL:
OFFEROR NAME:
ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104
PRE PROPOSAL INQUIRY FORM N62742224R6723
Exhibit A.
DATE:
Question No. Reference (Sect/Para/Page)
QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE
EMAIL:
OFFEROR NAME:
ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104
D/B Construct Finger Pier, Lami, Fiji N6274224R6723
EXHIBIT B - OFFEROR EXPERIENCE PROJECT DATA SHEET
Provide the following information on projects to demonstrate past experience on recent, relevant construction projects. Use continuation sheets, if needed.
PLACE PHOTO HERE
Offeror Name: ______________________________
Contract Number: ___________________________ Project Title/Location: ________________________ Short Project Description: ________________________
Effort involved Design Build:
___Yes, self-performed as the Prime contractor ___Yes, subcontracted and managed by the Prime contractor ___No, did not include DB
Contract Amount: __________________
Original Contract Completion Date: __________________ Final Contract Completion Date: __________________ Date Completed: __________________
Percentage of Work Performed: __________________
Prime or Subcontract Work: __________________
Customer/Client: __________________
Customer/Client Contact Information: (include for each POC: NAME, PHONE NUMBER, EMAIL
ADDRESS, AND MAILING ADDRESS)
D/B Construct Finger Pier, Lami, Fiji N6274224R6723 Exhibit C
EXHIBIT C – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
1. The NAVFAC Form PPQ shall be utilized for all evaluations that require a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ).
2. Offerors should submit the PPQ with their offer. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Artitar Udit via email at artitar@state.gov prior to proposal closing date.
3. Offerors should provide PPQs with their proposal as required by RFP. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation."
EXHIBIT C
NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)
CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)
1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:
Address: DUNs Number:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:
2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:
If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):
3. Contract Information Contract Number:
Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):
Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):
Contract Title:
Contract Location:
Award Date (mm/dd/yy):
Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Explain Differences:
Original Contract Price (Award Amount):
Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):
Explain Differences:
4. Project Description:
Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)
CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)
5. Client Information Name:
Title:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
6. Describe the client’s role in the project:
7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):
8. Client’s Signature:
NOTE: NAVFAC REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO NAVFAC WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON NAVFAC SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO NAVFAC. PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR NAVFAC POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY
AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.
ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT
YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE
RATING DEFINITION NOTE
(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.
An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating.
Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.
(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.
(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract.
There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.
(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.
(U) Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.
(N) Not Applicable No information or did not apply to your contract
Rating will be neither positive nor negative.
Contractor Information (Firm Name): ________________________________________________ Client Information (Name): ________________________________________________________
TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT
PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS
YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.
1. QUALITY:
a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N
b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG S M U N
c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance
E VG S M U N
d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)
E VG S M U N
2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:
a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)
E VG S M U N
b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract
E VG S M U N
3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:
a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N
b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes;
responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)
E VG S M U N
c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?
E VG S M U N
d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N
4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR
a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?
E VG S M U N
b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N
c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N
d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N
e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N
f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines E VG S M U N
g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes
E VG S M U N
h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)
E VG S M U N
5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?
E VG S M U N
Contractor Information (Firm Name): ________________________________________________ Client Information (Name): ________________________________________________________
b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client
E VG S M U N
c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)
E VG S M U N
d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.
Yes No
e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.
Yes No
f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.
Yes No
6. SAFETY/SECURITY
a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues?
(Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)
E VG S M U N
b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.
E VG S M U N
7. GENERAL
a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).
E VG S M U N
b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) E VG S M U N
c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes No
d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.
E VG S M U N
Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):
ACTIVITY AND LOCATION: CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT NO. ID NO.
ESTIMATED BY CATEGORY CODE
PROJECT TITLE: NO
JOB ORDER NO.
NUMBER UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL ($) UNIT COST TOTAL ($) UNIT COST TOTAL ($)
A10 FOUNDATIONS
A1010 Driven precast concrete piles (22 meter) unit
Soil compaction sq.m
B10 SUPERSTRUCTURE
Aluminium deck, rail, and its accessories unit Gangway unit
D20 PLUMBING
D2020 Clean water distribution lines ls
Water pump and other accessories ls
D50 ELECTRICAL
D5010 Electrical Service and Distribution ls D5020 Lighting & Branch Wiring ls
E10 EQUIPMENTS
Marine power and water pedestals unit
F10 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION
Name sign and project plaque unit
X FIELD REQUIREMENTS, OFFICE OVERHEAD & PROFIT
X10 Field Requirements X20 Office Overhead X30 Profit
Total
Table 2: SITEWORK
NUMBER UNIT UNIT COST TOTAL ($) UNIT COST TOTAL ($) UNIT COST TOTAL ($)
G10 SITE PREPARATION
G1010 Site Clearing ls G1030 Mobilization ls
De-mobilization ls Soil Test ls Design and drawing ls Construction of temporary facilities ls
G30 SITE CIVIL/ MECHANICAL UTILITIES
Water supply connection Electricity connection
X FIELD REQUIREMENTS, OFFICE OVERHEAD & PROFIT
X20 Office Overhead
X30 Profit
Total
Total CLIN 001
D/B Construction of Finger Pier STATUS OF DESIGN
CLIN 001 Construction of Finger Pier
CLIN 001 Construction of Finger Pier
QUANTITY MATERIAL COST LABOR COST ENGINEERING ESTIMATE
QUANTITY MATERIAL COST LABOR COST ENGINEERING ESTIMATE
BILL OF QUANTITY DATE PREPARED
Lami, Fiji N6274224R6723
#SBU - CONTRACTING AND ACQUISITIONS
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .