RFP N62478-20-R-4041 Amendment 0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

RFP No. N62478-20-R-4041, Design-Bid-Build Paving and Airfield Paving Multiple Aw ard Construction Contract (DBB PAVING MACC), Various Locations, State of Haw aii.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 2

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 05-Oct-2020

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N6247820R4041

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10-Sep-2020

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

05-Oct-2020

CODE

NAVFAC HAWAII

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS BRANCH (ACQ31)

400 MARSHALL ROAD

JBPHH HI

N62478 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N6247820R4041

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following items are applicable to this modification:

SUMMARY OF CHANGES (REVISED)

Revise Document 00100 Instructions to Offerors

Revise Document 00110 Evaluation Factors for Award

Revise Wage Decision Number HI20200001 Modification No. 9 dated 08/28/2020 to Wage Decision Number HI20200001 Modification No. 12 dated 10/02/2020

Add Proposal Schedule (Seed Project)

Add Requests for Information (RFIs) and Responses.

Revise proposal receipt date to 20 October 2020 at 10:00AM Hawaii Standard Time (H.S.T.).

(End of Summary of Changes)

DOCUMENT 00100

Amendment 0001

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.1 NUMBER OF COPIES/TIME OF RECEIPT

1.2 INQUIRIES/REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI)

1.3 AMENDMENTS

1.4 PREAWARD SURVEY/RESPONSIBILITY DETERMINATION

1.5 JOINT VENTURES (JV), LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES (LLC), LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS (LTD), ETC.

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

See the prescription for the following provisions/clauses in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) for each individual task order. The prescription in effect at the time the task order proposals are due will be binding. The websites for FAR and DFARS are https://www.acquisition.gov/far/ and https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/dfarspgi/current/index.html, respectively.

1.1 NUMBER OF COPIES/TIME OF RECEIPT

Electronic proposal submissions will be required and shall be submitted utilizing DoD SAFE: https://safe.apps.mil/ Electronic submissions sent via email or facsimile are not authorized and will not be accepted. Hard copy proposal submissions that are mailed, couriered, or hand delivered, etc. are not authorized and will not be accepted.

Electronic proposal must be submitted in Adobe PDF format, and the file size of the price and technical proposals together must not exceed 8GB. Submit all pages of the PRICE PROPOSAL as one complete file and all pages of the TECHNICAL PROPOSAL as another complete file. Multiple files of the PRICE PROPOSAL and multiple files of the TECHNICAL PROPOSAL will not be accepted. See Document 00900.

(A) PRICE PROPOSAL: The PRICE PROPOSAL shall include the following:

(1) Signed and completed Standard Form 1442 (Solicitation, Offer, and Award)

(2) Price Proposal Schedule for the Seed Project

(3) Bid guarantee for the Seed Project – The original hard copy bid guarantee shall be forwarded to the contracting office (address shown in block 7 of the SF1442) following the electronic proposal submission

(4) Representations and Certifications (Document 00600)

(5) FAR 52.204-8, Annual Representations and Certifications, which requires the offeror to complete the annual representations and certifications electronically via SAM. Ensure you also complete the DFARS provisions

(6) Any teaming agreements, Joint Venture agreements, LLC Operating Agreements, see Document 00100, paragraph 1.5 JOINT VENTURES (JV), LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES (LLC), LIMITED

PARTNERSHIPS (LTD), ETC.

(7) Evidence of submission of VETS-4212 Report, entitled “Federal Contractor Veterans’ Employment Report (VETS-4212 Report),” as required by FAR 52.222-37, Employment Reports on Special Disabled Veterans, Veterans of the Vietnam Era, and Other Eligible Veterans. (If not applicable, provide statement that Offeror has not had contracts subject to this requirement.)

(8) Current company balance sheets for the past three years (2017, 2018, and 2019) which will be used for responsibility determination, see Document 00100, paragraph 1.4, PREAWARD

SURVEY/RESPONSIBILITY DETERMINATION

(9) Small Business Subcontracting Plan per FAR 52.219-9 Alt. II (Large Businesses only)

(B) TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (FACTORS 1, 2, 3, and 4): The TECHNICAL PROPOSAL shall include the following:

(1) All information required by FAR 52.215-1

(2) All information required by Factor 1, Experience

(3) All information required by Factor 2, Safety

(4) All information required by Factor 3, Past Performance

(5) All information required by Factor 4, Small Business Utilization

Note: A large business offeror selected for award shall be required to submit an acceptable Small Business Subcontracting Plan per FAR 52.219-9 Alt. II.

Contractors shall also follow instructions in Document 00110.

1.2 INQUIRIES/REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI)

Contractors shall email all their inquiries and RFIs for this RFP to Mr. Robert Wong, robert.l.wong1@navy.mil.

Questions shall reference the drawing/detail and/or the specification section including paragraph number. Verbal queries will not be entertained. The Government may not respond to questions submitted less than 10 days before the proposal receipt due date.

1.3 AMENDMENTS

Amendments will normally be posted to the web site https://beta.sam.gov. It is the Offeror's responsibility to check the web site periodically for any amendments to the solicitation.

1.4 PREAWARD SURVEY/RESPONSIBILITY DETERMINATION

FAR 9.104 requires prospective contractors to demonstrate, among other things, that they have adequate financial resources to perform the contract, or ability to obtain them, capability to comply with the required performance schedule, a satisfactory performance record, and be otherwise eligible to receive an award under applicable laws and regulations. The pre-award survey is not a part of the technical evaluation. Please include, at a minimum, the following information as a part of your price proposal under a separate tab, entitled “Pre-Award Survey Information.” Other information may be requested as directed by the Contracting Officer and the information shall be submitted within three working days of the request.

(A) Company financial statements (balance sheets) for the past three years (2017, 2018, and 2019).

(B) Financial resources available to perform the contract. Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital that will be used for the performance of the contract. If the Offeror plans to rely on financial support from other sources, identify the maximum lines of credit that will be available to include documentation to support the amounts. The maximum lines of credit should be based upon the inclusion of this contract effort. For joint ventures discuss the financial responsibilities among companies and provide same information for each partner.

(C) Newly-formed entities (e.g. limited liability companies (“LLC’s”), limited partnerships (“LTD’s”) and newly created corporate subsidiaries) that is the entity liable on the contract ordinarily have no record–or an insufficient record–of relevant experience, past performance, and financial capability to support a responsibility determination. In such cases, the Offeror may rely on the resources of the LLC member, parent, limited partner, or other entities related to the Offeror for responsibility purposes where the Offeror submits a guaranty from the entity providing the resources.

(D) Positive proof of your company’s maximum bonding capacity per year in the form of a letter from your surety.

1.5 JOINT VENTURES (JV), LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES (LLC), LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS (LTD), ETC.

Joint Ventures and Limited Liability Companies and Limited Partnerships shall submit the following additional documentation regarding their business entities:

(A) A copy of the JV, LLC or LTD agreement.

(B) A detailed statement outlining the following in terms of percentages where appropriate:

(1) The relationship of the team/partners/parties in terms of business ownership, capital contribution, profit distribution or loss sharing.

(2) The management approach in terms of who will conduct, direct, supervise, and control.

(3) The structure and decision-making responsibilities of the partners/parties in terms of who will control the manner and method of performance of work.

(4) Identify (by name and title) the personnel having the authority to legally bind the partners/parties (including authority to execute the contract documents and bonds).

(C) A list of partners/parties, to include company name, DUNS and CAGE Numbers, Address, Point of Contact, Email address, phone number and facsimile number.

DOCUMENT 00110

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I. GENERAL

1.1 CONTRACT SCOPE

1.2 PREFERENCE FOR MAKING MULTIPLE AWARDS

1.3 MAGNITUDE OF THE ACQUISITION

1.4 PROPOSAL EVALUATION

1.5 ENFORCEABILITY OF THE PROPOSAL

PART II. EVALUATION CRITERIA

2.1 BASIS OF AWARD

2.2 EVALUATION FACTORS

ATTACHMENTS

C1 – CONSTRCUTION EXPERIENCE PROJECT DATA SHEET

C2 – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

C3 – SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION AND COMMITMENT STRATEGY

C4 – SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN – DO NOT SUBMIT WITH YOUR PROPOSAL.

TO BE SUBMITTED UPON REQUEST BY THE CONTRACTING OFFICER.

EVALUATION FACTORS

PART I – GENERAL

1.1 CONTRACT SCOPE

The work includes labor, supervision, tools, materials, and equipment necessary to perform asphaltic concrete pavement, airfield asphalt concrete pavement, roadway or parking lot asphaltic concrete pavement, airfield, roadway or parking lot concrete pavement, and other incidental related work to include but not be limited to sidewalks and curbs, marking and striping of pavement, area lighting, drainage systems, grading, and miscellaneous drainage improvements within the State of Hawaii. The areas of consideration will include, but not be limited to, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, and miscellaneous Federal and other facilities.

1.2 PREFERENCE FOR MAKING MULTIPLE AWARDS

This acquisition is being advertised on an unrestricted basis as an indefinite delivery indefinite quantity (IDIQ), multiple award construction contract (MACC) with no pre-established fixed contract prices and is a source selection procurement requiring non-cost/price, past performance and price proposals. This procurement consists of one solicitation with the intent to award a minimum of three (3) IDIQ contracts.

1.3 MAGNITUDE OF THE ACQUISITION

The total dollar value of this acquisition is $48,000,000 over the life of the contract or 60 months, whichever occurs first. The Government may or may not award a Seed Project in place of a minimum guarantee to the lowest price technically acceptable offeror and a minimum guarantee of $5,000 to the other successful offerors for the base period only. The minimum guarantee for the other successful offerors may be met by the issuance of a task order during the base period or option period(s). Contractors are not guaranteed work in excess of the minimum guarantee. The task order minimum and maximum will be stated as $50,000 to $15,000,000, respectively.

1.4 PROPOSAL EVALUATION

a. The Government intends to award a minimum of three contracts resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offerors with the lowest price technically acceptable proposal based on the evaluation factors in the solicitation.

b. Proposals are evaluated for technical acceptability but not ranked using the non-cost/price factors.

Tradeoffs are not permitted.

c. The number of proposals to be evaluated for technical acceptability may be limited to the five lowest priced offers. Technical proposals shall be provided to the evaluator(s) without any identification of prices or any rank order of prices. The process described will be conducted as many times as necessary, until such time as the Government identifies an acceptable amount of technically acceptable proposals. If the contracting officer later determines that discussions are necessary, the procedures in FAR 15.306 shall be followed.

d. The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contracts.

1.5 ENFORCEABILITY OF THE PROPOSAL

The proposals must set forth full, accurate and complete information as required by this solicitation. The Government will rely on such information in the award of the contracts. By submission of the offer, the Offeror agrees that all items proposed (e.g., key personnel, subcontractors, etc.) will be utilized for the duration of the contract and any substitutions will be equal or better than as proposed and accepted for contract award and shall require prior Contracting Officer's approval.

PART II – EVALUATION CRITERIA

2.1 BASIS OF AWARD

a. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a minimum of three contracts without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary.

b. The number of proposals to be evaluated for technical acceptability may be limited to the five lowest priced offers at the discretion of the Contracting Officer.

c. An overall non-price factors rating must be at least “ACCEPTABLE” in order to be eligible for award. An “UNACCEPTABLE” rating in any factor results in the overall non-price factors proposal being rated “UNACCEPTABLE” unless corrected through discussions. An overall non-price factors rating of “UNACCEPTABLE” makes a proposal ineligible for award.

2.2 EVALUATION FACTORS

The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-cost/price factors:

Factor 1 – Experience

Factor 2 – Safety

Factor 3 – Past Performance

Factor 4 – Small Business Utilization

The distinction between experience and past performance is experience pertains to the types of work and volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work covered by this requirement, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

a. Price Evaluation:

1. Price.

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements.

(1) Signed and completed Standard Form 1442 (Solicitation, Offer, and Award);

(2) Price Proposal Schedule for the Seed Project;

(3) Bid guarantee for the Seed Project – The original hard copy bid guarantee shall be forwarded to the contracting office (address shown in block 7 of the SF1442) following the electronic proposal submission;

(4) Representations and Certifications (Document 00600);

(5) FAR 52.204-8, Annual Representations and Certifications, which requires the offeror to complete the annual representations and certifications electronically via SAM. Ensure you also complete the DFARS provisions;

(6) Any teaming agreements, Joint Venture agreements, LLC Operating Agreements, see Document 00100, paragraph 1.5 JOINT VENTURES (JV), LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES (LLC), LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS (LTD), ETC.;

(7) Evidence of submission of VETS-4212 Report, entitled “Federal Contractor Veterans’ Employment Report (VETS-4212 Report),” as required by FAR 52.222-37, Employment Reports on Special Disabled Veterans, Veterans of the Vietnam Era, and Other Eligible Veterans. (If not applicable, provide statement that Offeror has not had contracts subject to this requirement.);

(8) Current company balance sheets for the past three years (2017, 2018, and 2019) which will be used for responsibility determination, see Document 00100, paragraph 1.4, PREAWARD

SURVEY/RESPONSIBILITY DETERMINATION;

(9) and Small Business Subcontracting Plan per FAR 52.219-9 Alt. II (Large Businesses only)

(b) Basis of Evaluation: The Government will utilize the seed project as the basis of evaluation for price. Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(1) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(2) Comparison of proposed prices with the Independent Government Estimate.

(3) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(4) Comparison of information reports obtained from Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) or other outside agencies as required.

b. Non-Cost/Price Evaluation Factors:

1. Factor 1 – Experience

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

(1) Construction Experience.

i. Submit a maximum of five (5) construction projects in which the Offeror was the Prime Contractor that best demonstrates the Offeror's experience on recent and relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP, using the Construction Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment C1). For purposes of this evaluation, a recent and relevant project is defined as new construction and/or repair/resurfacing of

1) airfield asphaltic concrete pavement; 2) airfield concrete pavement; 3) roadway or parking lot asphaltic concrete pavement; 4) roadway or parking lot concrete pavement; or 5) improvements such as street or parking lot lighting, grading and drainage, utilities, and landscaping, valued at $300,000 or more, and completed within five (5) years of the date of issuance of this RFP. Contracts listed may include those entered into with Federal, State, or local governmental agencies, as well as contracts with commercial entities.

ii. A project is defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and IDIQ type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project;

rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

iii. The attached Construction Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment C1) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Do not alter the Construction Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment C1) with the exception of expanding the individual blocks on this form;

however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided 8.5” x 11” page (or two (2) single-sided 8.5” x 11” pages) and shall be size 11 font (minimum). Arial font is recommended but others may be used so long as it is legible.

iv. For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e.: unique features, complexities, construction means & methods). The description shall identify which type of paving work each submitted project represents.

v. If the Offeror is a JV or a participant of the Small Business Administration (SBA) Mentor-Protégé Program, relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the JV entity or SBA Mentor-Protégé as the prime contractor. If the JV or SBA Mentor-Protégé does not have shared experience, relevant projects shall be submitted for each JV partner or for the Mentor and for the Protégé for which they were prime contractors. At least one (1) project from each JV partner, or at least one (1) project from the Mentor and one

(1) project from the Protégé, shall be submitted. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.

vi. If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442) for this evaluation factor, the proposal shall clearly demonstrate the extent of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm involvement in the performance of the contract; and shall only be for those projects for which the affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies were prime contractors. In demonstrating construction experience for this factor, no more than two (2) projects shall be submitted from affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies.

vii. The Offeror may utilize experience of a subcontractor that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement to demonstrate construction experience under this evaluation factor. The Offeror must provide a letter of commitment and an explanation of the involvement the subcontractor will have in performance of this contract. In demonstrating construction experience for this factor, no more than two (2) projects shall be submitted from subcontractors. Projects utilizing experience of subcontractors shall only be for those projects for which the subcontractor was the prime contractor.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

(1) The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The Government will only review five (5) projects, in the order they were submitted in the proposal. Any projects submitted in excess of the first five (5) will not be considered.

(2) Proposals that do not contain any projects that demonstrate experience for the Offeror will not be considered.

2. Factor 2 – Safety

(a) Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit the following information: (For a partnership or joint venture, the following submittal requirements are required for each Contractor who is part of the partnership or joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. TRC and DART Rates shall not be submitted for subcontractors.)

(1) OSHA Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rate:

For the five (5) [January 2015 through December 2019] previous complete calendar years, submit your OSHA Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rate, as defined by the U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. If you cannot submit an OSHA TRC Rate, affirmatively state so, and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA TRC Rate data should be addressed as part of this element.

OSHA TRC rates above 4.0, in any of the previous five years, will be considered UNACCEPTABLE, unless an adequate explanation is provided to address the extenuating circumstances that affected the rate.

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate:

For the five (5) [January 2015 through December 2019] previous complete calendar years, submit your OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate, as defined by the U.S.

Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. If you cannot submit an OSHA DART Rate, affirmatively state so, and explain why. Any extenuating circumstances that affected the OSHA DART Rate data should be addressed as part of this element. OSHA DART rates above 3.0, in any of the previous five years, will be considered UNACCEPTABLE, unless an adequate explanation is provided to address the extenuating circumstances that affected the rate.

(3) Technical Approach for Safety:

Describe the plan that the Offeror will implement to qualify, evaluate, select and oversee its potential subcontractors. Offerors must submit both (1) a plan to include the safety performance of subcontractors in the selection process for all levels of subcontractors and (2) a plan to monitor the safety of those subcontractors during contract performance, highlighting what specific management practices will be in place for providing deliberate safety program management and mishap prevention support to those subcontractors whose EMR is greater than 1.0, whose TRC is greater than 4.0 and whose DART rate is greater than 3.0. Offerors who fail to submit either of these will be rated UNACCEPTABLE. The technical approach to safety narrative shall not exceed one (1) double-sided 8.5” x 11” page (or two (2) single-sided 8.5” x 11” pages) and shall be size 11 font (minimum).

Arial font is recommended but others may be used so long as it is legible.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government is seeking to determine whether the Offeror has an acceptable safety record. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s overall safety record as evidenced by the TRC and DART rates, if the Offeror’s plan includes safety in the evaluation and selection of subcontractors, and if the narrative includes a plan to monitor the safety performance of subcontractors during performance. The evaluation will collectively consider the following:

- OSHA Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rate

- OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate

- Offeror Technical Approach to Safety

(1) OSHA Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rate:

The Government will evaluate the OSHA TRC Rate to determine if the Offeror’s OSHA TRC rate is above 4.0 and extenuating circumstances that impact the rates. OSHA TRC rates above 4.0, in any of the previous five years, will be considered UNACCEPTABLE, unless an adequate explanation is provided to address the extenuating circumstances that affected the rate.

(2) OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate:

The Government will evaluate the OSHA DART Rate to determine if the Offeror’s OSHA DART rate is above 3.0 and extenuating circumstances that impact the rates. OSHA DART rates above 3.0, in any of the previous five years, will be considered UNACCEPTABLE, unless an adequate explanation is provided to address the extenuating circumstances that affected the rate.

(3) Technical Approach for Safety:

The Government will evaluate the narrative to determine if subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the qualification, evaluation, selection, of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project, and both the plan to monitor the safety of those subcontractors during contract performance, highlighting what specific management practices will be in place for providing deliberate safety program management and mishap prevention support to those sub-contractors whose EMR is greater than 1.0, whose TRC is greater than 4.0 and whose DART rate is greater than 3.0. Offerors who fail to address either of these items (i.e. whether the safety performance of subcontractors will be evaluated in the selection process for all levels of subcontractors and whether the safety of those subcontractors will be monitored during contract performance) will be rated UNACCEPTABLE.

3. Factor 3 – Past Performance

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

(1) If a completed Construction Contractor Appraisal Support System (CCASS)/Contractor Performance Assessment Report (CPAR) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 1 for construction experience. If a completed CCASS, ACASS, or CPAR evaluation is not available for a project that was submitted under Factor 1, the Offeror shall submit Past Performance Questionnaires (Attachment C2) for that project. Evidence of customer satisfaction shall be from the owner and/or their representative responsible for the construction contract administration of construction projects. It shall not be from a prime construction contractor for a subcontractor. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. All PPQs shall be complete, contain client’s signature, and include all information requested in Attachment C2, NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire (Form PPQ-0) located the end of Document 00110. This does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to help ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Mr. Robert Wong, Robert.L.Wong1@navy.mil.

(2) Offerors shall provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 1 – Experience. Offerors shall also address any adverse past performance issues. Explanations shall not exceed two (2) double-sided 8.5” x 11” page (or four (4) single-sided 8.5” x 11” pages) and shall be size 11 font (minimum). Arial font is recommended but others may be used so long as it is legible.

(3) The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the Offeror’s references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.

(4) Performance award or additional information submitted will not be considered.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

(1) This evaluation focuses on how well the Offeror’s team performed on the relevant projects submitted under Factor 1 – Experience and may also consider past and/or current performance on other projects, interim and/or final, documented in known sources. In addition to the above, the Government reserves the right to obtain information for use in the evaluation of past performance from any and all sources including sources outside of the Government. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past and/or current performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of Contractors who are part of a partnership or JV identified in the Offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the Offeror.

(2) The Government may consider the currency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends, interim and/or final, in the Contractor’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination. The assessment of the Offeror’s past and/or current performance will be used as a means of evaluating the Offeror’s probability to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

(3) Offerors lacking relevant past performance history will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably in past performance and will receive an unknown (or “neutral”) past performance rating. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability a neutral rating shall be considered “acceptable”.

4. Factor 4 – Small Business Utilization

It is the policy of the Government to provide maximum practicable opportunities in its acquisitions to small business (SB) concerns, including veteran-owned small business (VOSB), service-disabled veteran-owned small business (SDVOSB), historically underutilized business zone (HUBZone) small business, small disadvantaged business (SDB), and women-owned small business (WOSB) and other small business concerns. Further, it is the policy of the Government that such concerns will have the maximum practicable opportunity to participate in contract performance consistent with its efficient performance.

(a) All Offerors (both large and small businesses) shall use Attachment C3, Small Business Participation and Commitment Strategy to submit the following requested information for evaluation of this factor:

- To demonstrate commitment to use small business concerns in the performance of this contract, identify all planned subcontractors by name that will be used to support each specific small business category (i.e., SB, HUBZone SB, WOSB, SDB, VOSB, and SDVOSB). Identify the type of product/service to be subcontracted, the estimated subcontract value, and the type of commitment (i.e., teaming agreement, letter of commitment, etc.) to each subcontractor.

- To demonstrate maximum practicable participation of small businesses, identify (in terms of dollar value and percentage of the total contract value) the offeror’s total proposed small business participation (i.e. work to be performed by small business as the prime contractor and/or work to be performed by small business subcontractors). All offerors who are not able to meet the minimum total small business participation rate (20% of the total contract value) shall provide a detailed explanation why the minimum total small business participation rate cannot be achieved.

If the offeror does not intend to subcontract, provide a detailed explanation why subcontracting would not result in efficient contract performance.

Note: A large business offeror selected for award shall be required to submit an acceptable Small Business Subcontracting Plan (Attachment C4) incorporating the proposed subcontract values and small business concerns that are specifically identified in the offeror’s Small Business Participation Plan. The Small Business Subcontracting Plan shall aspire to meet the NAVFAC small business subcontracting goals stated below.

Note: The NAVFAC subcontracting targets for FY20 are as follows:

Small Business 40% Historically Underutilized Business Zone 3% Small Disadvantaged Business 5% Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business 3% Woman Owned Small Business 9%

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

This factor will be rated on an Acceptable or Unacceptable basis. The Government will evaluate the offeror’s Small Business Participation Plan to determine that the offeror has identified and demonstrated a commitment to use small business concerns in one or more small business categories (i.e., SB, HUBZone SB, WOSB, SDB, VOSB, and SDVOSB) in the performance of this contract.

- Proposals that fail to identify and commit to use small business concerns in the performance of this contract may be rated Unacceptable; however, the Government may take into account reasonable explanations why subcontracting would not result in efficient contract performance.

The Government will also evaluate the small business participation plan to determine that the offeror has demonstrated the maximum practicable participation of small businesses by meeting or exceeding the solicitation’s minimum total small business participate rate (i.e. work to be performed by small business as the prime contractor and/or work to be performed by small business subcontractors). The minimum total small business participation rate for this acquisition is 20% of the total contract value.

- Large business offerors may achieve the minimum total small business participation rate through subcontracting to small businesses.

- Small business offerors may achieve the minimum total small business participation rate through their own performance/participation as a prime and also through a joint venture, teaming arrangement, and/or subcontracting to other small businesses.

- Proposals that fail to demonstrate a total small business participation rate of at least 20% may be rated

Unacceptable; however, the Government may take into account reasonable explanations why the minimum total small business participation rate cannot be achieved.

hi1 "General Decision Number: HI20200001 10/02/2020

Superseded General Decision Number: HI20190001

State: Hawaii

Construction Types: Building, Heavy (Heavy and Dredging), Highway and Residential

Counties: Hawaii Statewide.

BUILDING CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS; RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION

PROJECTS (consisting of single family homes and apartments up to and including 4 stories); HEAVY AND HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION

PROJECTS AND DREDGING

Note: Under Executive Order (EO) 13658, an hourly minimum wage of $10.80 for calendar year 2020 applies to all contracts subject to the Davis‐Bacon Act for which the contract is awarded (and any solicitation was issued) on or after January 1, 2015. If this contract is covered by the EO, the contractor must pay all workers in any classification listed on this wage determination at least $10.80 per hour (or the applicable wage rate listed on this wage determination, if it is higher) for all hours spent performing on the contract in calendar year 2020. If this contract is covered by the EO and a classification considered necessary for performance of work on the contract does not appear on this wage determination, the contractor must pay workers in that classification at least the wage rate determined through the conformance process set forth in 29 CFR 5.5(a)(1)(ii) (or the EO minimum wage rate,if it is higher than the conformed wage rate). The EO minimum wage rate will be adjusted annually. Please note that this EO applies to the above‐mentioned types of contracts entered into by the federal government that are subject to the Davis‐Bacon Act itself, but it does not apply to contracts subject only to the Davis‐Bacon Related Acts, including those set forth at 29 CFR 5.1(a)(2)‐(60). Additional information on contractor requirements and worker protections under the EO is available at www.dol.gov/whd/govcontracts.

Modification Number Publication Date 0 01/03/2020 1 01/31/2020 2 02/07/2020 3 02/21/2020

4 03/06/2020 5 03/20/2020 6 04/03/2020 7 07/24/2020 8 08/21/2020 9 08/28/2020 10 09/18/2020 11 09/25/2020 12 10/02/2020

ASBE0132‐001 08/31/2015

Rates Fringes

Asbestos Workers/Insulator Includes application of all insulating materials, protective coverings, coatings and finishes to all types of mechanical systems. Also the application of firestopping material for wall openings and penetrations in walls, floors, ceilings and curtain walls...............$ 39.65 23.50

BOIL0627‐005 01/01/2013

Rates Fringes

BOILERMAKER......................$ 35.20 27.35

BRHI0001‐001 08/31/2020

Rates Fringes

BRICKLAYER

Bricklayers and Stonemasons.$ 45.95 29.59 Pointers, Caulkers and Weatherproofers.............$ 43.60 29.59

BRHI0001‐002 08/31/2020

Rates Fringes

Tile, Marble & Terrazzo Worker

Terrazzo Base Grinders......$ 41.69 28.11 Terrazzo Floor Grinders and Tenders.................$ 40.14 28.11 Tile, Marble and Terrazzo Workers.....................$ 43.50 28.11

CARP0745‐001 09/02/2019

Rates Fringes

Carpenters:

Carpenters; Hardwood Floor Layers; Patent Scaffold Erectors (14 ft. and over); Piledrivers;

Pneumatic Nailers; Wood Shinglers and Transit and/or Layout Man...........$ 49.95 22.40 Millwrights and Machine Erectors....................$ 50.20 22.40 Power Saw Operators (2 h.p. and over)..............$ 50.10 22.40

CARP0745‐002 09/02/2019

Rates Fringes

Drywall and Acoustical Workers and Lathers..............$ 50.20 22.40

ELEC1186‐001 08/23/2020

Rates Fringes

Electricians:

Cable Splicers..............$ 56.71 31.16 Electricians................$ 51.55 29.58 Telecommunication worker....$ 32.69 12.96

ELEC1186‐002 08/23/2020

Rates Fringes

Line Construction:

Cable Splicers..............$ 56.71 31.16 Groundmen/Truck Drivers.....$ 38.66 25.63 Heavy Equipment Operators...$ 46.40 28.00 Linemen.....................$ 51.55 29.58

Telecommunication worker....$ 32.69 12.96

ELEV0126‐001 01/01/2020

Rates Fringes

ELEVATOR MECHANIC................$ 61.14 34.765

a. VACATION: Employer contributes 8% of basic hourly rate for 5 years service and 6% of basic hourly rate for 6 months to 5 years service as vacation pay credit.

b. PAID HOLIDAYS: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Veterans' Day, Thanksgiving Day, the Friday after Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day.

ENGI0003‐002 09/03/2018

Rates Fringes

Diver (Aqua Lung) (Scuba)) Diver (Aqua Lung) (Scuba) (over a depth of 30 feet)...$ 66.00 31.26 Diver (Aqua Lung) (Scuba) (up to a depth of 30 feet)..$ 56.63 31.26 Stand‐by Diver (Aqua Lung) (Scuba)....................$ 47.25 31.26 Diver (Other than Aqua Lung) Diver (Other than Aqua Lung).......................$ 66.00 31.26 Diver Tender (Other than Aqua Lung)..................$ 44.22 31.26 Stand‐by Diver (Other than Aqua Lung)..................$ 47.25 31.26 Helicopter Work Airborne Hoist Operator for Helicopter..............$ 45.80 31.26 Co‐Pilot of Helicopter......$ 45.98 31.26 Pilot of Helicopter.........$ 46.11 31.26 Power equipment operator ‐ tunnel work

GROUP 1....................$ 42.24 31.26

GROUP 2....................$ 42.35 31.26

GROUP 3....................$ 42.52 31.26

GROUP 4....................$ 42.79 31.26

GROUP 5....................$ 43.10 31.26

GROUP 6....................$ 43.75 31.26

GROUP 7....................$ 44.07 31.26

GROUP 8....................$ 44.18 31.26

GROUP 9....................$ 44.29 31.26

GROUP 9A...................$ 44.52 31.26

GROUP 10....................$ 44.58 31.26

GROUP 10A...................$ 44.73 31.26

GROUP 11....................$ 44.88 31.26

GROUP 12....................$ 45.24 31.26

GROUP 12A...................$ 45.60 31.26

Power equipment operators:

GROUP 1....................$ 41.94 31.26

GROUP 2....................$ 42.05 31.26

GROUP 3....................$ 42.22 31.26

GROUP 4....................$ 42.49 31.26

GROUP 5....................$ 42.80 31.26

GROUP 6....................$ 43.45 31.26

GROUP 7....................$ 43.77 31.26

GROUP 8....................$ 43.88 31.26

GROUP 9....................$ 43.99 31.26

GROUP 9A...................$ 44.22 31.26

GROUP 10....................$ 44.28 31.26

GROUP 10A...................$ 44.43 31.26

GROUP 11....................$ 44.58 31.26

GROUP 12....................$ 44.94 31.26

GROUP 12A...................$ 45.30 31.26

GROUP 13....................$ 42.22 31.26

GROUP 13A...................$ 42.49 31.26

GROUP 13B...................$ 42.80 31.26

GROUP 13C...................$ 43.45 31.26

GROUP 13D...................$ 43.77 31.26

GROUP 13E...................$ 43.88 31.26

POWER EQUIPMENT OPERATORS CLASSIFICATIONS

GROUP 1: Fork Lift (up to and including 10 tons); Partsman (heavy duty repair shop parts room when needed).

GROUP 2: Conveyor Operator (Handling building material);

Hydraulic Monitor; Mixer Box Operator (Concrete Plant).

GROUP 3: Brakeman; Deckhand; Fireman; Oiler;

Oiler/Gradechecker; Signalman; Switchman; Highline Cableway Signalman; Bargeman; Bunkerman; Concrete Curing Machine (self‐propelled, automatically applied unit on streets, highways, airports and canals); Leveeman; Roller (5 tons and under); Tugger Hoist.

GROUP 4: Boom Truck or dual purpose ""A"" Frame Truck (5 tons or less); Concrete Placing Boom (Building Construction);

Dinky Operator; Elevator Operator; Hoist and/or Winch (one drum); Straddle Truck (Ross Carrier, Hyster and similar).

GROUP 5: Asphalt Plant Fireman; Compressors, Pumps, Generators and Welding Machines (""Bank"" of 9 or more, individually or collectively); Concrete Pumps or Pumpcrete Guns; Lubrication and Service Engineer (Grease Rack);

Screedman.

GROUP 6: Boom Truck or Dual Purpose ""A""Frame Truck (over 5 tons); Combination Loader/Backhoe (up to and including 3/4

cu. yd.); Concrete Batch Plants (wet or dry); Concrete Cutter, Groover and/or Grinder (self‐propelled unit on streets, highways, airports, and canals); Conveyor or Concrete Pump (Truck or Equipment Mounted); Drilling Machinery (not to apply to waterliners, wagon drills or jack hammers); Fork Lift (over 10 tons); Loader (up to and including 3 and 1/2 cu. yds); Lull High Lift (under 40 feet); Lubrication and Service Engineer (Mobile); Maginnis Internal Full Slab Vibrator (on airports, highways, canals and warehouses); Man or Material Hoist; Mechanical Concrete Finisher (Large Clary, Johnson Bidwell, Bridge Deck and similar); Mobile Truck Crane Driver; Portable Shotblast Concrete Cleaning Machine; Portable Boring Machine (under streets, highways, etc.); Portable Crusher; Power Jumbo Operator (setting slip forms, etc., in tunnels); Rollers (over 5 tons); Self‐propelled Compactor (single engine);

Self‐propelled Pavement Breaker; Skidsteer Loader with attachments; Slip Form Pumps (Power driven by hydraulic, electric, air, gas, etc., lifting device for concrete forms); Small Rubber Tired Tractors; Trencher (up to and including 6 feet); Underbridge Personnel Aerial Platform (50 feet of platform or less).

GROUP 7: Crusher Plant Engineer, Dozer (D‐4, Case 450, John Deere 450, and similar); Dual Drum Mixer, Extend Lift;

Hoist and/or Winch (2 drums); Loader (over 3 and 1/2 cu.

yds. up to and including 6 yards.); Mechanical Finisher or Spreader Machine (asphalt), (Barber Greene and similar) (Screedman required); Mine or Shaft Hoist; Mobile Concrete Mixer (over 5 tons); Pipe Bending Machine (pipelines only);

Pipe Cleaning Machine (tractor propelled and supported);

Pipe Wrapping Machine (tractor propelled and supported);

Roller Operator (Asphalt); Self‐Propelled Elevating Grade Plane; Slusher Operator; Tractor (with boom) (D‐6, or similar); Trencher (over 6 feet and less than 200 h.p.);

Water Tanker (pulled by Euclids, T‐Pulls, DW‐10, 20 or 21, or similar); Winchman (Stern Winch on Dredge).

GROUP 8: Asphalt Plant Operator; Barge Mate (Seagoing);

Cast‐in‐Place Pipe Laying Machine; Concrete Batch Plant (multiple units); Conveyor Operator (tunnel); Deckmate;

Dozer (D‐6 and similar); Finishing Machine Operator (airports and highways); Gradesetter; Kolman Loader (and similar); Mucking Machine (Crawler‐type); Mucking Machine (Conveyor‐type); No‐Joint Pipe Laying Machine; Portable Crushing and Screening Plant; Power Blade Operator (under 12); Saurman Type Dragline (up to and including 5 yds.);

Stationary Pipe Wrapping, Cleaning and Bending Machine;

Surface Heater and Planer Operator, Tractor (D‐6 and similar); Tri‐Batch Paver; Tunnel Badger; Tunnel Mole and/or Boring Machine Operator Underbridge Personnel Aerial Platform (over 50 feet of platform).

GROUP 9: Combination Mixer and Compressor (gunite); Do‐Mor Loaderand Adams Elegrader; Dozer (D‐7 or equal); Wheel and/or Ladder Trencher (over 6 feet and 200 to 749 h.p.).

GROUP 9A: Dozer (D‐8 and similar); Gradesetter (when required by the Contractor to work from drawings, plans or specifications without the direct supervision of a foreman or superintendent); Push Cat; Scrapers (up to and including 20 cu. yds); Self‐propelled Compactor with Dozer;

Self‐Propelled, Rubber‐Tired Earthmoving Equipment (up to and including 20 cu. yds) (621 Band and similar); Sheep's Foot; Tractor (D‐8 and similar); Tractors with boom (larger than D‐6, and similar).

GROUP 10: Chicago Boom; Cold Planers; Heavy Duty Repairman or Welder; Hoist and/or Winch (3 drums); Hydraulic Skooper (Koehring and similar); Loader (over 6 cu. yds. up to and including 12 cu. yds.); Saurman type Dragline (over 5 cu.

yds.); Self‐propelled, rubber‐tired Earthmoving Equipment (over 20 cu. yds. up to and including 31 cu. yds.) (637D and similar); Soil Stabilizer (P & H or equal); Sub‐Grader (Gurries or other automatic type); Tractors (D‐9 or equivalent, all attachments); Tractor (Tandem Scraper);

Watch Engineer.

GROUP 10A: Boat Operator; Cable‐operated Crawler Crane (up to and including 25 tons); Cable‐operated Power Shovel, Clamshell, Dragline and Backhoe (up to and including 1 cu.

yd.); Dozer D9‐L; Dozer (D‐10, HD41 and similar) (all attachments); Gradall (up to and including 1 cu. yd.);

Hydraulic Backhoe (over 3/4 cu. yds. up to and including 2

cu. yds.); Mobile Truck Crane Operator (up to and including 25 tons) (Mobile Truck Crane Driver Required);

Self‐propelled Boom Type Lifting Device (Center Mount) (up to and including 25 tons) (Grove, Drott, P&H, Pettibone and similar; Trencher (over 6 feet and 750 h.p. or more); Watch Engineer (steam or electric).

GROUP 11: Automatic Slip Form Paver (concrete or asphalt);

Band Wagon (in conjunction with Wheel Excavator);

Cable‐operated Crawler Cranes (over 25 tons but less than 50 tons); Cable‐operated Power Shovel, Clamshell, Dragline and Backhoe (over 1 cu. yd. up to 7 cu. yds.); Gradall (over 1 cu. yds. up to 7 cu. yds.); DW‐10, 20, etc.

(Tandem); Earthmoving Machines (multiple propulsion power…