AMENDMENT 0001_ N62473-23-R-1011.pdf

AMENDMENT 0001 – DATED JULY 19, 2022

Synopsis: N62473-23-R-1011

Synopsis Issuance Date: June 22, 2022

CS/Email: Britney Potestio-Collins, britney.l.potestio-collins.civ@us.navy.mil

Subject: INDEFINITE DELIVERY/INDEFINITE QUANTITY CONTRACT FOR

ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERVICES FOR CIVIL ENGINEERING AT VARIOUS

NAVY AND MARINE CORPS FACILITIES AND OTHER MILITARY

INSTALLATIONS LOCATED IN THE NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING

SYSTEMS COMMAND SOUTHWEST AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY (AOR):

CALIFORNIA, ARIZONA, NEVADA, COLORADO, NEW MEXICO AND UTAH.

The purpose of this Amendment is to:

1. Replace the original Synopsis with a conformed Synopsis, via the following attachment:

N62473-23-R-1011 Synopsis_Conformed 7.19.2022

2. Provide RFI responses as follows:

RFI 1: Would the CO consider a due date extension on this procurement? We are working on putting our team together and obtaining all necessary PPQs.

Response 1: Yes. The Offeror’s SF-330 submission package due date has been extended to 2:00 P.M

Pacific Daylight Time on Tuesday, August 24, 2022. See revised synopsis.

RFI 2: The RFP requires times new roman at 11 pt, however the fillable SF330 form uses Arial 10 pt. We ask for allowance to use the Arial 10pt or 11pt as an acceptable font type.

Response 2: Yes. The SF-330 shall be typed, one-sided, at least 10 point Arial font or larger. See revised synopsis.

RFI 3: Given this a set-aside contract and the project types being specific, it is difficult for 8(a) firms to show multiple relevant projects that meet the solicitation criteria. Would the government consider projects completed in the last seven years in lieu of five?

Response 3: Yes. The Government will allow submission of projects completed within seven (7) years vice five (5) years. See revised synopsis.

3. Provide Answers to Questions as follows:

Question 1: Can you please share with me the Sources Sought Solicitation number that informed Current

Solicitation N6247323R1011?

Answer 1: No Sources Sought was completed/required for this solicitation.

mailto:britney.l.potestio-collins.civ@us.navy.mil

Question 2: Could the Government please confirm that related experience evaluated under criterion 6 can include work performed as a subcontractor?

Answer 2: Firms do not submit data for this criterion.

Question 3: I am inquiring if the Navy can share the names of the firms that submitted on the Sources

Sought for the subject solicitation? Also, through SAM.gov or other means, is there a mechanism for seeing who the prospective bidders are – those that downloaded the solicitation documents as was available through FBO?

Answer 3: No Sources Sought was conducted in respect to this synopsis. Firms are invited to utilized the interested vendor list located in the solicitation on SAM.gov

Question 4: Is an incumbent contract or contractor associated to the requirement. If any, please provide the contractor's name and contract number.

Answer 4: Yes, the incumbent is Premier Stanley JV LLC. The contract number is N62473-19-D-2422.