Dry Utilities V MACC RFIs Updated 12-3-2021.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 21 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N6247321R1216
View the file
Other files
Show all 24
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFI (pre-award) Form_For KTR
SOLICITATION: N62473-21-R-1216
INDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY MULTIPLE AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT SMALL BUSINESS SET-ASIDE FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION, RENOVATION, AND REPAIR OF DRY UTILITIES CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AT VARIOUS GOVERNMENT INSTALLATIONS LOCATED IN CALIFORNIA, ARIZONA, NEVADA, UTAH, COLORADO, AND NEW MEXICO
DOCUMENT DATE: 3 DECEMBER 2021
| TO BE FILLED OUT BY THE BIDDING KTR | TO BE FILLED OUT BY THE GOV'T | ||||||||||
| RFI # | RFP Part # | Chapter or Section | Sub-Section # | CLARIFICATION REQUEST | RFI reason from KTR's Perspective | Comment [fill out if "Other" was chosen, specify reason(s)] | RFI Topic most closely relevant to: | Government Response | DATE RECEIVED | DATE TO KTR | Amendment Number |
| 1 | Part 1 | if Others include info under Column E | Financial Questionnaire Form - Do we include with our proposal, or does the form need to be sent directly to Michelle Sanders? The form has both listed on it and is missing a due by date. | Conflicting Information | Other/Unsure | The Financial Questionnaire should be completed by the Financial Institution and submitted directly to Michelle Sanders. Please see the revised Financial Questionnaire form dated 11/18/2021, which removes the statement, "(To be completed by Financial Institution and submitted by Offeror)" from the top of the form. |
| The due date on the form is not missing. It is highlighted/editable so that the Offeror can fill in the date that they want their Financial Institution to submit the form to the Government. | 11/16/21 | 11/18/21 | ||||||||||
| 2 | Part 1 | Chapter-1 | Proposal Tab 2 - Factor 2, Experience | Will you consider reducing the (1) self-perfomred relevant construction project from $2,000,000 to $1,500,000 or more? | Other; Please specify in the next column | If the majority of the task orders will be less than this amount, past performance projects will more acurately reflect pertinent experience. | Other/Unsure | The Government does not intend to change the minimum dollar thresholds for the relevant project construction costs specified in the RFP under Factor 2 (Experience). The minimum experience requirements are based on the preponderance of work for the projects planned to be awarded under this MACC, which has an estimated task order range of $300,000 to $20,000,000. | 11/18/21 | 11/18/21 | ||
| 3 | Part 1 | if Others include info under Column E | Our Financial institution can not legally forward financial information. Are we able to provide this email statement from them and forward our financial information ourselves? | Other; Please specify in the next column | Financial Information | Other/Unsure | See Amendment 0002, which provides instructions for Offerors to submit their completed Financial Questionnaire if their financial institution declines to submit the questionnaire directly to the Navy. | 11/19/21 | 12/3/21 | 2 | ||
| 4 | Part 1 | if Others include info under Column E | Factor 3: Past Performance | Due to the Thanksgiving holiday, would it be possible to extend the proposal due date by one week to December 13th? | Other; Please specify in the next column | To allow additional time to process PPQs | Contracting | See Amendment 0001, which extends the proposal due date to December 9, 2021. | 11/22/21 | 11/29/21 | 1 | |
| 5 | Part 4 | Chapter-1 | RFP pages 11-12 of 114, Factor 1: Technical Approach requires that the proposed Lead Design Firm must be exclusive to the Offeror and that all Offerors proposing the same LDF(s) will be rated Unacceptable. We intend to propose two Design Firms, with one being the primary Lead Design Firm and one serving as a secondary Design resource. Please confirm that only the primary Lead Design Firm is required to be exclusive to the Offeror. | Intent needs clarification | Contracting | Each proposed Lead Design Firm is required to be exclusive to the Offeror. As stated in the RFP under Factor 1 (page 11 of 114), emphasis added: | ||||||
| "The agreement submitted for each proposed Lead Design Firm (LDF) shall state that the LDF will exclusively partner with the Offeror on this procurement and will not participate with any other Offeror in competing for or performing on a contract to be awarded under this solicitation. The Offeror and LDF shall both sign the agreement." | 11/23/21 | 11/29/21 | ||||||||||
| 6 | Part 4 | Chapter-1 | RFP page 16 of 114, Factor 3: Past Performance instructs the Offerors to submit a completed CCASS or CPARS for each project included in Factor 2. Please confirm that an interim CPARS is acceptable to satisfy this requirement. | Intent needs clarification | Contracting | As stated in the RFP under Factor 2 (pages 12 and 14 of 114), submitted projects must be 100% complete (see definition) within the past five (5) years of the date of issuance of this RFP. Projects which are not 100% complete as of the date of issuance of this RFP shall not be considered. |
| Interim CPARS evaluations are typically completed before a project is 100% complete. If a final CPARS evaluation has been completed, Offerors should submit the final CPARS evaluation. If the project is 100% complete, but a final CPARS evaluation has not been completed, Offerors may submit a completed PPQ. | 11/23/21 | 11/29/21 | |||||||||
| 7 | If "Others" - include info under Column E Clarification Request | if Others include info under Column E | We respectfully request the Government to extend the proposal due date by 3 business days to account for Veterans Day and Thanksgiving Holiday. | Other; Please specify in the next column | There are 3 Holiday non-working days in Phase 1. also the proposal is currently due on a Monday which historically is a difficult day to finalize proposals. | See Amendment 0001, which extends the proposal due date to December 9, 2021. | 11/23/21 | 11/29/21 | 1 | ||
| 8 | Part 1 | if Others include info under Column E | RFP Page 5 of 114 instructs the Offerors to submit the proposal via PIEE. We have attempted to log in and found the solicitation, but there is no button or option to click on and submit the proposal. From previous experience, we usually get a notification or invitation to submit required information to a particular inquiry. Please advise if this is something that the contracting office needs to make available for offerors. | Contracting | In order to submit an offer via the PIEE Solicitation Module, you must be logged into PIEE under the "Proposal Manager" role for your firm. Once you are logged in and have located the solicitation in the Solicitation Module, you must click on the "Offer" tab at the top of the solicitation page to add your firm's offer/proposal. Please see the additional attachment titled "PIEE Solicitation Module - Submitting a Proposal" for additional instructions. | 11/23/21 | 11/29/21 | ||||
| 9 | Part 1 | if Others include info under Column E | Please provide instructions on how to submit the proposal response to this solicitation in PIEE. | Contracting | The following two attachments have been uploaded to the solicitation: |
1. PIEE Solicitation Module - Vendor Registration Guide
| 2. PIEE Solicitation Module - Submitting a Proposal | 11/23/21 | 11/29/21 | ||||||
| 10 | Part 1 | if Others include info under Column E | In the event the PIEE system does not open the upload feature to offerors by the due date, we respectfully request the Government to accept email submission as a back-up method, while complying with email file size restriction to ensure delivery. | Contracting | Offerors should ensure that they are able to log into the PIEE Solicitation Module, locate the solicitation, and access the "Offer" tab within the solicitation before the proposal due date. If you are unable to access the "Offer" tab at the top of the solicitation page in the PIEE Solicitation Module, please contact the Contract Specialist for this procurement (Michelle Sanders at michelle.sanders@navy.mil and michelle.e.sanders6.civ@us.navy.mil) before the proposal due date. | 11/23/21 | 11/29/21 | |
| 11 | ||||||||
| 12 | ||||||||
| 13 | ||||||||
| 14 | ||||||||
| 15 | ||||||||
| 16 | ||||||||
| 17 | ||||||||
| 18 | ||||||||
| 19 | ||||||||
| 20 | ||||||||
| 21 | ||||||||
| 22 | ||||||||
| 23 | ||||||||
| 24 | ||||||||
| 25 | ||||||||
| 26 | ||||||||
| 27 | ||||||||
| 28 | ||||||||
| 29 | ||||||||
| 30 | ||||||||
| 31 | ||||||||
| 32 | ||||||||
| 33 | ||||||||
| 34 | ||||||||
| 35 | ||||||||
| 36 | ||||||||
| 37 | ||||||||
| 38 | ||||||||
| 39 | ||||||||
| 40 | ||||||||
| 41 | ||||||||
| 42 | ||||||||
| 43 | ||||||||
| 44 | ||||||||
| 45 | ||||||||
| 46 | ||||||||
| 47 | ||||||||
| 48 | ||||||||
| 49 | ||||||||
| 50 | ||||||||
| 51 | ||||||||
| 52 | ||||||||
| 53 | ||||||||
| 54 | ||||||||
| 55 | ||||||||
| 56 | ||||||||
| 57 | ||||||||
| 58 | ||||||||
| 59 | ||||||||
| 60 | ||||||||
| 61 | ||||||||
| 62 | ||||||||
| 63 | ||||||||
| 64 | ||||||||
| 65 | ||||||||
| 66 | ||||||||
| 67 | ||||||||
| 68 | ||||||||
| 69 | ||||||||
| 70 | ||||||||
| 71 | ||||||||
| 72 | ||||||||
| 73 | ||||||||
| 74 | ||||||||
| 75 | ||||||||
| 76 | ||||||||
| 77 | ||||||||
| 78 | ||||||||
| 79 | ||||||||
| 80 | ||||||||
| 81 | ||||||||
| 82 | ||||||||
| 83 | ||||||||
| 84 | ||||||||
| 85 | ||||||||
| 86 | ||||||||
| 87 | ||||||||
| 88 | ||||||||
| 89 | ||||||||
| 90 | ||||||||
| 91 | ||||||||
| 92 | ||||||||
| 93 | ||||||||
| 94 | ||||||||
| 95 | ||||||||
| 96 | ||||||||
| 97 | ||||||||
| 98 | ||||||||
| 99 | ||||||||
| 100 |
Drop Down List
| RFI Topic Relevant to: | RFP Part # | RFI Reason (for QA) - from KTR perspecrive |
| Architectural-related | Part 1 | Outdated Reference |
| Civil Engineering | Part 2 | Conflicting Information |
| Contracting | Part 3 | Attachments are referenced but missing/not provided |
| Electrical Engineering | Part 4 | Intent needs clarification |
| Environmental | Part 5 | Typo |
| Fire Protection | Part 6 | Other; Please specify in the next column |
| Geotechnical Engineering | If "Others" - include info under Column E Clarification Request | |
| Interior Design | ||
| Landscape | ||
| Mechanical Engineering | ||
| Structural Engineering | ||
| Other/Unsure | ||
| SCIF/SAPF | ||
| Crane | ||
| Elevators | ||
| ATFP |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .