AMENDMENT 0002 - SECURE SPACES MACC.pdf

N6247320R1011

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

INDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY (IDIQ) UNRESTRICTIVE MULTIPLE AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT (MACC) FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION, RENOVATION, AND REPAIR OF GENERAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION WITH SECURE SPACES AT VARIOUS GOVERNMENT INSTALLATIONS LOCATED IN CALIFORNIA, ARIZONA, NEVADA, UTAH, COLORADO, AND NEW MEXICO

This amendment is issued to revise the RFP.

See page 2 of this amendment for revisions to the RFP.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 4

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 14-Apr-2021

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N6247321R1011

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

23-Mar-2021

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

14-Apr-2021

CODE

NAVFAC SOUTHWEST

POINT LOMA FEAD/CODE ROPML

NAVAL BASE POINT LOMA

4635 PACIFIC HWY

SAN DIEGO CA 92110-2756

N62473 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N6247321R1011

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0002

MACC RFP:

Date and time for receipt of proposal remain unchanged.

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

PART 1 – SECTION 00210 BASIS OF AWARD– SUMMARY OF CHANGES

2. DEFINITIONS:

The following definitions are revised as follow:

Offeror’s Team definition:

FROM:

OFFEROR’S TEAM: Refers to the Offeror (see definition), the Offeror's outside Lead Design Firm, and/or in-house Lead Designer(s) only; does not include subcontractors or consultants

TO:

OFFEROR’S TEAM: Refers to the Offeror (see definition), the Offeror's outside Lead Design Firm, and/or in-house Lead Designer(s) only; A small business Offeror may utilize the experience of a small business first tier subcontractor that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement to demonstrate construction experience under Factor 2 Experience factor if that small business Offeror cannot independently demonstrate its own experience. Otherwise, Offeror’s team does not include subcontractors or consultants.

100% complete definition:

100% COMPLETE: The Facility is completely constructed and ready for the intended use.

REPLACE WITH:

100% COMPLETE FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS: The facility is completely constructed and ready for the intended use.

100% COMPLETE FOR DESIGN PROJECTS: 100% plans and specifications signed off by an Architect-Engineer and ready for construction with final cost estimate. Does not include any Post Construction Award Support (PCAS).

PART 1 – FACTOR 2: EXPERIENCE – SUMMARY OF CHANGES

a. Proposal Submission Requirements:

The following statement is added to this section:

ADD: The Large Business Offerors may not utilize experience of a subcontractor to demonstrate construction experience under this evaluation factor.

(2) Design Experience:

The following section is revised to replace Offeror for Design Team and include statement in regards a project including both construction and design:

Additional minimum submission requirements:

• Submit at least one (1) relevant design project with a construction cost of $5,000,000 or above.

• Submit at least one (1) relevant design project demonstrating experience with primarily new Construction (see definition).

• Submit at least one (1) relevant design project demonstrating experience with primarily renovation/repair (see definition).

• Submit at least one (1) relevant design project that demonstrate experience in design-build construction (see definition).

Note: A single project may satisfy more than one of the above minimum requirements.

Exhibit “B” must clearly address how the project meets the above requirements.

Projects submitted for the Offeror shall be 100% complete (see definition) within the past seven (7) years (see definition) of the date of issuance of this RFP.

TO:

Additional minimum submission requirements:

• Submit at least one (1) relevant design project with a construction cost of $5,000,000 or above.

• Submit at least one (1) relevant design project demonstrating experience with primarily new construction (see definition). If the project includes both new construction and repair/renovation, Offerors shall clearly demonstrate that the project is primarily new construction by providing the square footage of both the new construction portion and the repair/renovation portion.

• Submit at least one (1) relevant design project demonstrating experience with primarily renovation/repair (see definition).

• Submit at least one (1) relevant design project that demonstrate experience in design-build construction (see definition).

Note: A single project may satisfy more than one of the above minimum requirements.

Exhibit “B” must clearly address how the project meets the above requirements.

Projects submitted for the Design Team shall be 100% complete (see definition) within the past seven (7) years (see definition) of the date of issuance of this RFP.

PART 1 – FACTOR 2: EXPERIENCE – SUMMARY OF CHANGES

The first paragraph from basis of evaluation is revised as follow:

b. Basis of Evaluation:

The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The Government will only review five (5) projects for construction and five (5) for design. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) for Construction Experience and five (5) for Design Experience will not be considered.

TO:

b. Basis of Evaluation:

The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s Team demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction and design projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The Government will only review five (5) projects for construction and five (5) for design. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) for Construction Experience and five (5) for Design Experience will not be considered.

(End of Summary of Changes)