_P-0888_Attachments.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Design-Bid-Build Project P-0888, Harbor Drive Switching Station, Naval Base San Diego, San Diego, California
- Solicitation number
- N6247319R1209
View the file
Other files
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFI Form, Page 1 of 1 (Rev 12/12)
Note: Form may be expanded.
ATTACHMENT A
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI)
N62473-19-R-1209
The Government does not intend to respond to inquiries submitted less than 10 days before the proposal receipt date shown in the solicitation. Please submit questions to Jody Bester by email at jody.bester@navy.mil.
Firm Name:
POC:
Address:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
QUESTION IS REGARDING:
Section of the RFP:
Paragraph:
Page Number:
QUESTION:
Surety Form, Page 1 of 1
ATTACHMENT B
SURETY FORM
N62473-19-R-1209
(Bonding Capacity) (To be completed by Surety and submitted by Offeror)
Surety Name:
Agent’s Name:
Contractor (Offeror) Name:
How long have you provided bonding for the above Contractor?
How would you rate your relationship with this contractor?
Excellent Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Other:
If Unsatisfactory please explain:
Bonding limit for a single project? $
Aggregate bonding amount? $
Current available bonding? $
Have you ever had to complete a project for the Contractor? YES NO
If yes, explain:
Have there been complaints of non-payment by subcontractors/suppliers? YES NO
If yes, explain:
Has the surety had to pay subcontractors/suppliers? YES NO
If yes, explain:
Note: Form may be expanded.
ATTACHMENT C
CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE PROJECT DATA SHEET
N62473-19-R-1209
Project No. (check one) : CON #1 CON #2 CON #3 CON #4 CON #5
1. Experience for: Offeror Joint-Venture Other (Explain)
Firm Name:
Address:
Phone Number:
DUNS Number:
Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:
2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain)
Percent of project work performed:
If subcontractor, who was prime (Name/Phone #):
3. Contract Number: Delivery/Task Order Number:
Title:
Location:
4. Award Date (mm/dd/yy): Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
5. Type of work:
New Construction Renovation Repair Alteration Other (explain):
6. Type of Contract/Task Order: (Check ALL that apply)
Firm-Fixed Price Cost/Time and Material Other (explain):
Complete Block 7 for Construction Projects.
7. Construction Project:
Award Amount: Final Price:
Type of Contract/Task Order: (Check ALL that apply)
Design-Build Design-Bid-Build Delivery/Task Order (IDIQ) Other (explain):
If Design-Build, identify the Lead Design Firm:______________________________________________
8. Provide a detailed description of the project and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e.: unique features, square footage, construction methods), including any sustainable features or USGBC LEED certifications.
9. Provide a detailed description of what work your firm self-performed on this project:
11. Other Information:
ATTACHMENT D
NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)
N6247319R1209 CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)
1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:
Address: Entity Identifier Number:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:
2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:
If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):
3. Contract Information Contract Number:
Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):
Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):
Contract Title:
Contract Location:
Award Date (mm/dd/yy):
Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Explain Differences:
Original Contract Price (Award Amount):
Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):
Explain Differences:
4. Project Description:
Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)
CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)
5. Client Information Name:
Title:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
6. Describe the client’s role in the project:
7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):
8. Client’s Signature:
NOTE: NAVFAC REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO NAVFAC WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON NAVFAC SOLICITATIONS.
CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO NAVFAC. PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR NAVFAC POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.
ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT
YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE
RATING DEFINITION NOTE
(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.
An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.
(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.
(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.
(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.
(U) Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.
(N) Not Applicable
No information or did not apply to your contract
Rating will be neither positive nor negative.
Contractor Information (Firm Name): ________________________________________________ Client Information (Name): ________________________________________________________
TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT
PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS
YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.
1. QUALITY:
a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N
b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG S M U N
c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance
E VG S M U N
d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)
E VG S M U N
2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:
a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)
E VG S M U N
b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract
E VG S M U N
3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:
a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N
b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes;
responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)
E VG S M U N
c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?
E VG S M U N
d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N
4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR
a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?
E VG S M U N
b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N
c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N
d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N
e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N
f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines E VG S M U N
g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes
E VG S M U N
h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)
E VG S M U N
5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?
E VG S M U N
Contractor Information (Firm Name): ________________________________________________ Client Information (Name): ________________________________________________________
b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client
E VG S M U N
c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)
E VG S M U N
d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.
Yes No
e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.
Yes No
f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.
Yes No
6. SAFETY/SECURITY
a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues?
(Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)
E VG S M U N
b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.
E VG S M U N
7. GENERAL
a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).
E VG S M U N
b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) E VG S M U N
c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes No
d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.
E VG S M U N
Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks.
Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITVE INFORMATION
DISCLOSURE LIMITATIONS AS OUTLINED IN FAR 2.101 & 3.104 APPLY
ATTACHMENT E
SAFETY DATA SHEET
N6247319R1209 This form is to be completed by the Offeror. Use this form to provide safety information for the Safety factor. EMR, DART and TRC rates shall not be submitted for subcontractors.
Joint Venture (JV) or Partnership: Complete Blocks 1 through 8 for each contractor who is part of the JV or partnership. Only one safety narrative (Block 9) is required.
1. Offeror Name:
Name of JV partner providing the information below (if applicable):
Offeror’s Three Previous Complete Calendar Years of Reported Safety Data:
Only complete year safety data will be considered. Indicate data rates as decimal figures, not whole numbers.
2. Experience Modification Rate (EMR):
2015 2016 2017
3a. For EMRs greater than 1.0, explain any extenuating circumstances and corrective actions taken:
3b. Explain any negative EMR trends:
3c. If you do not have an EMR for a given year, state so here and explain why:
4. Insurance Carrier Information:
Insurance Carrier Name:
Agent’s name: Phone No.: Email:
5. U.S. Dept. of Labor, OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate
Instructions for calculating the DART rate can be found at http://www.bls.gov/iif/osheval.htm.
6a. For DART Rates of 3.0 or greater, explain any extenuating circumstances and corrective actions taken:
6b. Explain any negative DART Rate trends:
6c. If you do not have a DART Rate for a given year, state so here and explain why:
SAFETY NARRATIVE
N6247319R1209
7. U.S. Dept. of Labor, OSHA Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rate
Instructions for calculating the TRC rate can be found at http://www.bls.gov/iif/osheval.htm.
8a. For TRC Rates of 4.5 or greater, explain any extenuating circumstances and corrective actions taken:
8b. Explain any negative TRC Rate trends:
8c. If you do not have a TRC Rate for a given year, state so here and explain why:
9. Technical Approach for Safety: Provide the Safety Narrative using this form. Do not exceed page limitation specified in the RFP. Any additional pages will not be considered.
Describe the plan that the Offeror will implement to evaluate safety performance of potential subcontractors, as a part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors:
Describe the safety management system that the Offeror will use to oversee the safety compliance and performance of self-performed and subcontractor performed work:
9. Technical Approach for Safety (continuation): Provide the Safety Narrative using this form. Do not exceed page limitation specified in the RFP. Any additional pages will not be considered.
Describe any innovative methods that the Offeror will employ to ensure and monitor safe work practices at self-performed/and or all subcontractor levels:
Describe the methodology that the Offeror will use in order to execute an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques and processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps:
Financial Questionnaire, Page 1 of 1
Please provide any additional comments that may help determine the business and financial reputation and integrity of the prospective contractor on a separate sheet.
ATTACHMENT F
FINANCIAL QUESTIONNAIRE
N62473-19-R-1209
(To be completed by Financial Institution and submitted by Offeror)
NAVFAC Southwest, San Diego, California is currently considering award of a Navy contract to this firm. Prior to award, the Navy requests the financial information listed below with regard to this firm. In order to be responsive to the Navy’s needs, it is requested that you complete this financial questionnaire with regard to this firm. Upon completion of the questionnaire it is requested that you place the completed questionnaire in a sealed envelope showing the return address of the financial institution and forward it to the Offeror shown below. The requested information must be received by the contractor no later than _______________________
Prospective Contractor for which information is being requested:
Name:
Point of Contact:
Signature of Prospective Contractor or Contractor Representative Requesting Financial Information
Name of Financial Institution:
Account Number:
Type of Account:
Average Balance Figure :
Does the Contractor have a line of credit? Yes No
What is the limitation?
Remaining Balance:
What is the Contractor’s relationship with the bank?
Outstanding Satisfactory Other (explain):
How long has the Contractor been a client?
Name and Title of person providing the above information:
Signature of person providing the above information
PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE
9 JANUARY 2019
Mariner’s Park is located off of the main Naval Base San
Diego compound on 32nd Street, across the street from the Navy Exchange complex. There is no need to obtain a base access pass to enter the park. The gate will be open at 12:45 PM. The pre-proposal conference will be held in the small amphitheater located within the park, beginning at 1:00 PM.
| Attachment A - RFI Form |
| Attachment B - Surety Form |
| Attachment C - Construction Experience Project Data Sheet |
| Attachment D - Past Performance Questionnaire |
| Attachment E - Safety Data Sheet |
| Attachment F - Financial_Questionnaire |
| Attachment G - Pre-Proposal_Conference_Location_Map |
| Attachment H - Site Visit Location Map |
File details come from the government source that posted it.