COMBINED_IDIQ_RFP_EXHIBITS.pdf

EXHIBIT “A”

OFFEROR TEAM COMPOSITION AND MANAGEMENT

Use this form to provide information regarding the primary members, composition, and management of the proposed team for Factor 1, ABILITY TO MANAGE MULTIPLE SIMULTANEOUS PROJECTS. If Offeror is a partnership (e.g., JV, Mentor-Protégé), list each partner as a separate team member. If the experience of an entity is being claimed in Factor 2, that entity must be identified and described on this Exhibit. Modify form as necessary to include all primary construction and primary design team members. PLEASE

NOTE – “TEAM MEMBER” MEANS A COMPANY, LLC, ETC., NOT AN INDIVIDUAL PERSON. Do not include information for individuals. Do not exceed two (2) pages. IF YOUR PROPOSAL IS BASED ON 100% IN-HOUSE LABOR (I.E. NO

SUBCONTRACTORS OR CONSULTANTS), WRITE “NOT APPLICABLE.”

Team Member 1 Name: Location: DUNS:

Contractual relationship to the team:

Describe team member role, responsibilities, and meaningful involvement in performance of the contract:

If located outside of California, explain how entity will have meaningful involvement from a remote location.

Team Member 2 Name: Location: DUNS:

Describe team member role, responsibilities, and meaningful involvement in performance of the contract:

If located outside of California, explain how entity will have meaningful involvement from a remote location.

Team Member 3 Name: Location: DUNS:

Describe team member role, responsibilities, and meaningful involvement in performance of the contract:

If located outside of California, explain how entity will have meaningful involvement from a remote location.

Team Member 4 Name: Location: DUNS:

Describe team member role, responsibilities, and meaningful involvement in performance of the contract:

If located outside of California, explain how entity will have meaningful involvement from a remote location.

Team Member 5 Name: Location: DUNS:

Describe team member role, responsibilities, and meaningful involvement in performance of the contract:

If located outside of California, explain how entity will have meaningful involvement from a remote location.

Discuss the rationale for proposing this team arrangement:

Note: Form may be expanded.

EXHIBIT “B”

CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE PROJECT DATA SHEET – OFFEROR

This form is to be completed by the Offeror. Submit (one per project) in order to provide supporting project information for

Factor 2, Experience. Only projects that are within the project description parameters of the solicitation will be considered relevant. Submit five (5) projects. All other projects will not be considered.

Project No. (check one): - 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5

Contractor:

1. Offeror Name:

Firm who performed the work:

Performed this work as: Prime Contractor Subcontractor Joint Venture

Other (explain):

If subcontractor, name of prime: Phone #:

If the firm who performed this project differs from the Offeror proposing on this contract, identify the firm’s relationship to the Offeror:

Joint Venture Partner

Partner

Subcontractor

Parent Company

Subsidiary

Satellite Office

Predecessor Company

Other:

Explain how this firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract:

Construction Contract:

2. Contract/Project No.: Delivery/Task Order Number:

Title:

Location:

3. Award Date (mm/dd/yy): Award Amount: $

Completion Date (mm/dd/yy): Final Price: $

This is the: total project subcontract price

4. Type of Contract:

Design-Build. If D-B, design firm was:

(check one) Design-Bid-Build

Customer:

5. Name:

Point of Contact Name/Title:

POC Phone Number: POC Email Address:

Project Description:

6. Type of Work (check all that apply): New Construction Renovation Repair

7. Provide a detailed description of the project and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP:

8. If project is design-build, provide a detailed description of the design effort:

9. Percentage of work your firm self-performed (see definition): %

Provide a detailed description of the work your firm self-performed on this project.

Exhibit “C” – PPQ, Page 1 of 4

(Rev 12/11)

EXHIBIT “C”

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)

CONTRACT INFORMATION

1. Contractor Information

Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain)

Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine

How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION

5. Client Information

Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: NAVFAC REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE

OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO NAVFAC WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY

DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON NAVFAC SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED

TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO

NAVFAC. PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR NAVFAC POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO

VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

Exhibit “C” – PPQ, Page 2 of 4

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the

Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating.

Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the

Government/Owner. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract.

There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the

Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable No information or did not apply to your contract Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

Exhibit “C” – PPQ, Page 3 of 4

Contractor Information (Firm Name): ________________________________________________

Client Information (Name): ________________________________________________________

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

E VG S M U N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E VG S M U N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

E VG S M U N

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

E VG S M U N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff

(including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes;

responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

E VG S M U N

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

E VG S M U N

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force

E VG S M U N

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines E VG S M U N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

E VG S M U N

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

E VG S M U N

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)

E VG S M U N

Exhibit “C” – PPQ, Page 4 of 4

Contractor Information (Firm Name): ________________________________________________

Client Information (Name): ________________________________________________________

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client.

E VG S M U N

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns).

E VG S M U N

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

Yes No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

Yes No

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

Yes No

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues?

(Includes: following the user’s rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

E VG S M U N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations

(including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

E VG S M U N

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) E VG S M U N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes No

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.

E VG S M U N

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

EXHIBIT “D”

SAFETY DATA SHEET

This form is to be completed by the Offeror. Use this form to provide safety information for the Safety factor. EMR, DART and TRC rates shall not be submitted for subcontractors.

Joint Venture (JV) or Partnership: Complete Blocks 1 through 8 for each contractor who is part of the JV or partnership. Only one safety narrative (Block 9) is required.

1. Offeror Name:

Name of JV partner providing the information below (if applicable):

Offeror’s Three Previous Complete Calendar Years of Reported Safety Data:

Only complete year safety data will be considered. Indicate data rates as decimal figures, not whole numbers.

2. Experience Modification Rate (EMR):

2015 2016 2017

3a. For EMRs greater than 1.0, explain any extenuating circumstances and corrective actions taken:

3b. Explain any negative EMR trends:

3c. If you do not have an EMR for a given year, state so here and explain why:

4. Insurance Carrier Information:

Insurance Carrier Name:

Agent’s name: Phone No.: Email:

5. U.S. Dept. of Labor, OSHA Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate

Instructions for calculating the DART rate can be found at http://www.bls.gov/iif/osheval.htm.

6a. For DART Rates of 3.0 or greater, explain any extenuating circumstances and corrective actions taken:

6b. Explain any negative DART Rate trends:

6c. If you do not have a DART Rate for a given year, state so here and explain why:

http://www.bls.gov/iif/osheval.htm

EXHIBIT “D” (continuation)

SAFETY NARRATIVE

7. U.S. Dept. of Labor, OSHA Total Recordable Case (TRC)

Rate

Instructions for calculating the TRC rate can be found at http://www.bls.gov/iif/osheval.htm.

8a. For TRC Rates of 4.5 or greater, explain any extenuating circumstances and corrective actions taken:

8b. Explain any negative TRC Rate trends:

8c. If you do not have a TRC Rate for a given year, state so here and explain why:

http://www.bls.gov/iif/osheval.htm

9. Technical Approach for Safety: Provide the Safety Narrative using this form. Do not exceed page limitation specified in the RFP. Any additional pages will not be considered.

Describe the plan that the Offeror will implement to evaluate safety performance of potential subcontractors, as a part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors:

Describe the safety management system that the Offeror will use to oversee the safety compliance and performance of self-performed and subcontractor performed work:

Note: Form may be expanded up to the page limit specified in the RFP.

9. Technical Approach for Safety (continuation): Provide the Safety Narrative using this form. Do not exceed page limitation specified in the RFP. Any additional pages will not be considered.

Describe any innovative methods that the Offeror will employ to ensure and monitor safe work practices at self-performed/and or all subcontractor levels:

Describe the methodology that the Offeror will use in order to execute an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques and processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps:

FINANCIAL QUESTIONNAIRE

(To be completed by Financial Institution and submitted by Offeror)

NAVFAC Southwest, FEAD San Diego is currently considering award of a Navy contract to this firm. Prior to award, the Navy requests the financial information listed below with regard to this firm. In order to be responsive to the Navy’s needs, it is requested that you complete this financial questionnaire with regard to this firm. Upon completion of the questionnaire it is requested that you place the completed questionnaire in a sealed envelope showing the return address of the financial institution and forward it to the Offeror shown below. The requested information must be received by the contractor no later than _______________________

Prospective Contractor for which information is being requested:

Name:

Address:

Phone Number:

Point of Contact::

Signature of Prospective Contractor or Contractor Representative Requesting Financial Information

Name of Financial

Institution:

Account Number:

Type of Account:

Average Balance Figure :

Does the Contractor have a line of credit? Yes No

What is the limitation?

Remaining Balance:

What is the Contractor’s relationship with the bank?

Outstanding Satisfactory Other (explain):

How long has the Contractor been a client?

Name and Title of person providing the above information:

Signature of person providing the above information

SURETY FORM

(Bonding Capacity)

(To be completed by Surety and submitted by Offeror)

Surety Name:

Agent’s Name:

Contractor (Offeror)

Name:

How long have you provided bonding for the above Contractor?

How would you rate your relationship with this contractor?

Excellent Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Other:

If Unsatisfactory please explain:

Bonding limit for a single project? $

Aggregate bonding amount? $

Current available bonding? $

Have you ever had to complete a project for the Contractor? YES NO

If yes, explain:

Have there been complaints of non-payment by subcontractors/suppliers? YES NO

If yes, explain:

Has the surety had to pay subcontractors/suppliers? YES NO

If yes, explain:

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI)

The Government does not intend to respond to inquiries submitted less than 10 days before the proposal receipt date shown in the solicitation. Please submit questions to _____________ by email at

Firm Name:

POC:

Email Address:

QUESTION IS REGARDING:

Section of the RFP::

Paragraph::

Page Number::

QUESTION:

EXHIBIT H – GENERIC UFGS SPEC SECTIONS FOR PROJECTS (subject to change and/or editing at the Task Order level)

Full Guides can be found at: http://www.wbdg.org/ccb/browse_cat.php?c=3

APPLIES TITLE

Division 01 - General Requirements

X UFGS 01 11 00 Summary of Work

X UFGS 01 14 00 Work Restrictions

X UFGS 01 20 00.00 20 Price & Payment Procedures

UFGS 01 22 00.00 10 Price & Payment Procedures

X UFGS 01 30 00 Administrative Requirements

UFGS 01 32 01.00 10 Project Schedule

X UFGS 01 32 16.00 20 Small Project Construction Progress Schedules

UFGS 01 32 17.00 20 Cost-Loaded Network Analysis Schedules (NAS)

X UFGS 01 33 00 Submittal Procedures

UFGS 01 33 29 Sustainability Reporting

UFGS 01 33 23.33 Aviation Fuel System Submittal Requirements

UFGS 01 35 13 Special Project Procedures

UFGS 01 35 13.43 10 Special Project Procedures for Contaminated Sites

X UFGS 01 35 26 Governmental Safety Requirements

UFGS 01 35 29.13 Health, Safety & Emergency Response Procedures for Contaminated Sites

UFGS 01 35 45.00 10 Chemical Data Quality Control

X UFGS 01 42 00 Sources for Reference Publications

UFGS 01 42 15 Metric Measurements

UFGS 01 45 00.00 10 Quality Control

UFGS 01 45 00.00 20 Quality Control

UFGS 01 45 00.00 40 Quality Control

UFGS 01 45 00.10 10 Quality Control System (QCS)

X UFGS 01 45 00.10 20 Quality Control for Minor Construction

UFGS 01 45 35 Special Inspections

X UFGS 01 50 00 Temporary Construction Facilities & Controls

X UFGS 01 57 19 Temporary Environmental Controls

X UFGS 01 57 19.01 20 Supplemental Temporary Environmental Controls

UFGS 01 58 00 Project Identification

UFGS 01 73 19 Installation of Government-Furnished Medical Equipment

X UFGS 01 74 19 Construction & Demolition Waste Management

X UFGS 01 75 00.00 40 Starting & Adjusting

X UFGS 01 78 00 Closeout Submittals

X UFGS 01 78 23 Operation & Maintenance Data

UFGS 01 78 23.33 Operation & Maintenance Manuals for Aviation Fuel Systems

X UFGS 01 78 24.00 20 Facility Electronic Operation & Maintenance Support Information (eOMSI)

UFGS 01 83 00.07 40 Reliability Centered Acceptance for Facility Shells

UFGS 01 83 13.07 40 Reliability Centered Acceptance for Superstructure Performance Req

UFGS 01 86 12.07 40 Reliability Centered Acceptance for Mechanical Systems

UFGS 01 86 26.07 40 Reliability Centered Acceptance for Electrical Systems

X UFGS 01 91 00.00 40 Commissioning http://www.wbdg.org/ccb/browse_cat.php?c=3

EXHIBIT J

POST-AWARD CONTRACTOR’S LIMITATIONS

ON SUBCONTRACTING CERTIFICATION

From: Contractor Name, Street Address, City, State, Zip

To: Contracting Officer, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Southwest

Subj: Contract No. N62473-XX-D-XXXX

1. Prime contractor is to complete and submit the following for each reporting period (6 months) for each performance period (Base Year and Options)

Block 1

Period of

Performance

Block 2

Task Order # (list TO#)

Block 3

Prime Labor Cost

Block 4

Subcontractor Labor Cost

Block 5

Total FFP or Task Order Labor Cost

Block 6

% Cost Performed by

Prime

Block 7

% Cost Performed by Subcontractor

Base Period

(Insert reporting period dates)

TO # 0001

TO # 0002

TO # 0003

** add rows here

TOTAL FOR REPORTING

PERIOD

Base Period

(Insert reporting period dates)

TO XXXX

TO XXXX

Etc.

** add rows here

TOTAL FOR REPORTING

PERIOD

TOTAL PERFORMANCE PERIOD

(Base Year)

2. Furthermore, in accordance with the provisions of FAR 52.219-14, Limitations on Subcontracting (Nov 2011), 13 CFR 124.510 and 13 CFR 125.6, in the performance of this contract, In the case of a contract for services (except construction), your Company Name has performed at least 50 percent of the cost of the contract incurred for personnel with its own employees.

In the case of a contract for supplies or products (other than procurement from a non-manufacturer in such supplies or products your Company Name has performed at least 50 percent of the cost of manufacturing the supplies or products (not including the costs of materials).

In the case of a contract for general construction, your Company Name has performed at least 15 percent of the cost of the contract with its own employees (not including the costs of materials).

In the case of a contract for construction by special trade contractors, your Company Name has performed at least 25 percent of the cost of the contract with its own employees (not including the cost of materials).

I certify that to the best of its knowledge and belief, the information provided in this report is accurate, complete, and current as of the date of report.

CONTRACTOR:

SIGNATURE NAME AND TITLE DATE

EXHIBIT K – COEFFICIENT BREAKDOWN FORM

PRE-PRICED COSTS MATERIALS LABOR EQUIPMENT AMOUNT

RS MEANS BARE COST

(PRESUMED ANNUAL

AMOUNT) $ 2,520,000.00 $ 1,400,000.00 $ 80,000.00 $ 4,000,000.00

WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE 15% $ 210,000.00

AVERAGE FIXED LABOR

OVERHEAD 16% $ 224,000.00

PROJECT OVERHEAD PRE-

PRICED 8% $ 112,000.00

MATERIAL MARKUP 5% $ 126,000.00

EQUIPMENT MARKUP 5% $ 4,000.00

SUBTOTAL $ 676,000.00

GENERAL AND

ADMINISTRATIVE 8% $ 112,000.00

PROFIT 5% 5% 5% $ 200,000.00

TOTAL $ 988,000.00

COEFFICIENT FACTOR (TOTAL

DIVIDED BY PRESUMED

ANNUAL AMOUNT) 0.247

RS MEANS BARE COST

ADJUSTMENT

(PRODUCTION/DISCOUNT -

FACTOR) 0.900

PRE-PRICED COEFFICIENT 1.147

NON PRE-PRICED BARE

COSTS (PRESUMED ANNUAL

AMOUNT) $ 252,000.00 $ 140,000.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 400,000.00

WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE 15% $ 21,000.00

AVERAGE FIXED LABOR

OVERHEAD 16% $ 22,400.00

PROJECT OVERHEAD NON

PRE-PRICED 18% $ 25,200.00

MATERIAL MARKUP 5% $ 12,600.00

EQUIPMENT MARKUP 5% $ 400.00

SUBTOTAL $ 60,600.00

GENERAL AND

ADMINISTRATIVE 8% $ 11,200.00

PROFIT 5% 5% 5% $ 20,000.00

TOTAL $ 91,800.00

BARE COST $ 400,000.00

COEFFICIENT FACTOR (TOTAL

DIVIDED BY BARE COST) 0.2295

NON-PRE-PRICED BARE COST

ADJUSTMENT

(PRODUCTION/DISCOUNT -

FACTOR) 1.000

NON PRE-PRICED

COEFFICIENT 1.2295

Offerors should fully understand "at a minimum" what is to be included in the coefficient. Section B of the RFP, and more specifically paragraphs B.2 OFFEROR'S COEFFICIENT AND PRE-PRICED WORK (and its subparagraphs) and B.3 NON PRE-PRICED WORK (and its subparagraphs) define the requirements for the pre-priced and non-pre-priced coefficients.

The amounts shown above are based on the presumption that the Contractor has an annual billing amount of $4,000,000 and up. The amounts listed herein are fictitious as are the cost items. These examples should not be construed to be minimum or maximum, or even normal, amounts. Cost items should be added, removed, or separated as the Offeror deems necessary to demonstrate a detailed breakdown of coefficient cost. Any Offeror edits to the form must be explained in detail in the

Offeror’s proposal.

NOTE: The profit percentage proposed by the contractor on this form to be included in its pre-priced and non-pre-priced coefficients shall be binding and shall be the maximum profit rate the Contractor will be allowed to propose for all task orders and/or subsequent modifications issued under this contract.

The Contractor may propose a lower profit rate when responding to an individual task order request

(or subsequent modifications) based on the tasks identified in the request. Profit will be negotiated on an individual Task Order and modification basis, but shall never exceed the maximum profit rate proposed by the Contractor on this form. The maximum profit rate shall be binding even if the DFARS

215.404-73 ALTERNATE STRUCTURED APPROACH PROFIT WORKSHEET would result in a higher profit.

The maximum profit rate shall not be construed as a “fixed” profit percentage for all Task Orders or

Modification actions issued under this contract. If DFARS 215.404-73 ALTERNATE STRUCTURED

APPROACH PROFIT WORKSHEET calculations indicate a lower profit rate is merited, the lower profit percentage shall be applied.

SAMPLE SUBMITTAL REGISTER

SUBMITTAL/BENCHMARK DURATION BENCHMARK REQUIRED STATUS

1 Quality Control Plan Prior to Start of Construction

2 Material Safety Data Sheets Prior to Start of Construction

3 Planning/Construction Schedule Within 15 days After Award

4 Waste Management Plan Prior to Start of Construction

5 Safety and Health Plan or Accident Prevention Plan

Prior to Start of Construction

6 Utility Outage Plan Prior to Start of Construction

7 Schedule of Prices Within 21 days After Award

8 Operation and Maintenance Information

Prior to Final Payment

9 Licenses and Permits Prior to Start of Construction

10 Badge Requests, DBIDS requests

Prior to Any work on

Government

Property

11 Statement of Acknowledgement

SF 1413 for each subcontractor

Prior to Any work on

Government

Property

12 Demolition and Work Plan Prior to Start of Construction

13 Design Development Docs (i.e.

HVAC preliminary drawings of equipment and air distribution layout, structural cals and drawings, preliminary electrical single line drawings)

Prior to Start of Construction

14 Final Design Docs (i.e. HVAC shop drawings of equipment and air distribution layout, structural shop drawings, electrical single line shop drawings)

15 Submittal Register Prior to Start of Construction

16 Performance/Payment Bonds Within 15 days

After Award

17 Environmental Protection Plan Prior to Start of Construction

18 Certificates of Insurance Prior to Start of Construction

19 Door Details / Drawings Prior to Start of Construction

20 Manufacturer Material Cut Sheets and Specifications

Prior to Start of Construction

21 eOMSI Prior to BOD

22 Operating and Maintenance Support Hazard Analysis