18R4008_P1804_SF1442.pdf

MILCON PROJECT P-1804, CONSTRUCT HYDRANT SYSTEM AT NAS SIGONELLA, ITALY

OFFERORS ARE ADVISED THAT FUNDING MAY NOT BECOME AVAILABLE, IF FUNDS ARE NOT AVAILABLE, NO AWARD WILL BE MADE AS

A RESULT OF THIS SOLICITATION.

TIME AND DUE DATE FOR PROPOSALS IS LISTED IN BLOCK 13 BELOW & IN SECTION 00100 BIDDING SCHEDULE/INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS

SEE SECTION 00100 BIDDING SCHEDULE/INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS FOR BASE ACCESS PROCEDURES FOR DELIVERY OF PROPOSALS

SEE SECTION 00100 BIDDING SCHEDULES/INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS FOR SITE VISIT INFORMATION

OFFERORS WILL NOT BE REIMBURSED FOR ANY EFFORT OR PROPOSAL COSTS RESULTING FROM THIS SOLICITATION

PHILLIP MATTHEWS 001-757-322-8334

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

02-Oct-2018

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______15 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________736 calendar days after receiving aw ard, X notice to proceed. This performance period is X mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________4 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specif ied in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________27 Nov 2018 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee is, X is not required.

C. All of fers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______120 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

COMMANDER NAVFAC ATLANTIC

6506 HAMPTON BLVD

NORFOLK VA 23508-1278

N62470

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

02:00 PM (hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

FAX:TEL: TEL: FAX:

N6247018R4008 44

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specified below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

N6247018R4008

Section 00 10 00 - Solicitation

DESCRIPTION OF WORK

This Request for Proposal is for a Design-Bid-Build, firm-fixed-price contract for MILCON Project P-1804 Construction of Hydrant System Piping Loop at Naval Air Station Sigonella in Sicily, Italy. This will be an unrestricted, full and open competitive procurement.

P-1804 will replace the aging and inadequate JP-5 Type III Hydrant System Piping Loop and the Pump Control Panel at Naval Air Station Sigonella, in Sicily, Italy with a new Type III Hydrant System Piping Loop and Pump Control Panel that will service fueling operations on Ramps 1, 2 and 3. The new piping system will also provide pantograph flushing capability near the pantograph storage area. This project will be designed in accordance with the latest DoD Standard Designs and Criteria and will include a Hydrant Loop with 7 hydrant refueling pits, Pantograph Flush/Checkout Stand Facility, Pantograph Storage Area, Replacement of the Pump Control Panel

A significant part of the mission of Naval Air Station Sigonella in Italy is refueling NATO, USTRANSCOM strategic aircraft, and other US strategic and tactical aircraft in support of CENTCOM and AFRICOM's AOR and tasked contingency plans. This project will increase the efficiency of refueling by decreasing the amount of time the refueling operations take and decreasing the number of personnel required to refuel the aircraft during peak air operations. The scope of this project demolishes the three existing aircraft refueling hydrant pits and provides seven new in-ground refueling pits and associated hydrant loop piping designed in accordance with the latest military standards (UFC 3-460-01, NATO/USAFE Airfield Standard Design and DoD Pressurized Hydrant Fueling System, Type III). This project will also provide a pantograph flush/checkout station, a nearby pull-through pantograph parking area, and replace the existing pump control panel.

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

CLIN 0001

FFP

Price for the entire work for MILCON Project P1804 Construct Hydrant System at NAS Sigonella, Italy, in accordance with drawings and specifications.

FOB: Destination

NET AMT

0002 3,000 Cubic

Centimeter

Planned Modification 0001

FFP

Unit Price per cubic meter for removal, stockpiling, testing and off station disposal of contaminated soil.

0003 160,000 Liter Planned Modification 0002

FFP

Unit price per liter for removal, testing and off station disposal of contaminated ground water.

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

0001 N/A N/A N/A N/A

0002 N/A N/A N/A N/A

0003 N/A N/A N/A N/A

Section 00 21 00 - Instructions

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

List of Attachments:

(A) Construction Experience Project Data Sheet

(B) Past Performance Questionnaire

(C) SECNAV Form 5512/1

(D) Pre Proposal Inquiry Form

(E) Schedule B, Pricing Form

(F) Specifications

(G) Drawings (8 files total)

(H) Storm Water Pollution Plan

(I) Safety and Coordination Plan

OFFERORS SHOULD CHECK “ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS” FEATURE OF NECO.NAVY.MIL TO

ACCESS ALL POSTED DOCUMENTS. FOR TECHNICAL ISSUES PLEASE CONTACT NECO HELP DESK

1. OVERVIEW OF THIS SOURCE SELECTION:

This solicitation is being conducted using a one phase design-bid-build procedures in accordance with FAR Part 36.

The best value continuum source selection process used in this acquisition is the tradeoff process. Award will be made to that responsible offeror whose proposal, conforming to the solicitation, is determined to offer the best value to the Government considering the technical and price factors stated herein.

The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration any or all offerors at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; to award the contract to other than the offeror submitting the lowest total price; and to award the contract to the offeror submitting the proposal determined to be the best value.

This acquisition will result in a firm fixed price contract for design/build construction services. In accordance with FAR 36.205 statutory cost limitation for P1804 Construction of Hydrant System Piping Loop is $22,400,000 USD.

The contract completion time is 736 days after the initial Notice to Proceed.

The Government intends to award a contract to a single contractor for CLIN 0001, with CLIN 0002 and CLIN 0003 as planned modifications. Offerors must submit a price for each of the CLINs numbered 0001 - 0003. Offerors not submitting pricing for all CLINS will be considered noncompliant to the solicitation and will not be evaluated. Offerors must submit a price for CLIN 0001 at or below the budget amount to be eligible for award.

INTENT TO AWARD WITHOUT DISCUSSIONS: Proposals must be set forth full, accurate and complete information as required by this Request for Proposal (including attachments). The penalty for making false statements in proposals is prescribed in 18 U.S.C. § 1001. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award without discussions. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if it is later determined by the Contracting Officer to be necessary. Therefore, each initial offer should contain the best terms from a technical, cost and price standpoint.

2. SITE VISITS

A site visit to Naval Air Station Sigonella, Sicily, Italy is not mandatory for this procurement, but highly recommended. Refer to Clause 52.236-27 Alternate I – Site Visit (Construction) for instructions.

3. ELIGIBILITY FOR AWARD

SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT

To be eligible for award, your firm(s) must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) database as required as required by FAR 52.204-7, System for Award Management (Oct 2016).

Note that the System for Award Management (SAM) is required for all offerors; including Joint Ventures (JV) (registration must state the NAME of the JV). Offerors not currently registered in SAM must obtain a DUN & Bradstreet (DUNS) number and a CAGE or NCAGE prior to registering in SAM.

All offerors, including JV offerors, must submit with their proposal a DUNS number. In addition to the DUNS number required for JV offerors, JV offerors must submit with their proposal a DUNS number for each member comprising the JV. DUNS numbers can be obtained at http://fedgov.dnb.com/webform. The DUNS number is required in order to register in SAM (see above.)

CAGE/NCAGE – A CAGE/NGAGE code is required for all offerors, including JV offerors. JV offerors must acquire a CAGE Code registered in the JV name.

(a) U.S. Offerors, including Joint Venture offerors: U.S. offerors must obtain a CAGE Code prior to registering in the SAM database, part of the SAM registration process (see paragraph above.)

4. CERTIFICATE OF CLASSIFICATION

SOCIETÀ ORGANISMI DI ATTESTAZIONE (SOA) CERTIFICATION.

The following SOA Certifications are required, offeror must show that the necessary Certifications are in effect as of the date proposals are due, and must be submitted with the Price Proposal:

The Prevailing Work Category: OG-6

Percentage of Work 31%

The related classifications (sub-categories) and percentages for this work category:

Classification OS-1

Percentage of Work 10%

All Additional Work Categories other than the Prevailing Category (as required).

First additional Work Category OG-3

Percentage of Work 18%

The related classifications (sub-categories) and percentages for this work category:

Classification OS-26

Percentage of Work 9.5%

Second Additional Work Category OG-12

Percentage of Work 8%

The related classifications (sub-categories) and percentages for this work category:

Classification OS-23

Percentage of Work 7%

Companies that are QUALIFIED in the Prevailing Work Category and pertinent Classification, but NOT QUALIFIED also in the Additional Work Categories and pertinent Classification, can still bid against the subject solicitation, by forming a Joint-Venture or subcontracting for the execution of the work pertaining to the categories (or alternatives) for which they are not qualified. Offerors must declare their intention of forming the Joint-Venture or awarding a subcontract. A "Teaming Agreement" or "Letter of Commitment" with the subcontractor must be submitted with the proposal and must identify the qualifications of the subcontractor (attaching the pertinent SOA certificate) and what work they will perform (identifying type and percentage of the work covered by specific SOA certificate).

In the case of a JV prime offeror, at least one member of the JV must have the required SOA Certifications. The JV member who has the SOA Certification must perform the majority of the work pertinent to the certification. In the case of a JV certification submitted by a subcontractor will not be accepted.

As required by DPR 554, art 75 and DPR 412 /2000, the Contracting Officer shall require the apparent successful bidder/offeror to submit additional documentation, upon Contracting Officer’s demand, for evaluation of firm's technical and financial qualifications to execute the work.

Debarment from Award:

As required by article 75 of DPR 554 and DPR 412/2000, Contractors cannot bid if they have a history of, or there is an existing question relative to:

- Bankruptcy

- Pending Charges

- Final Penal Judgment for moral and/or professional misconduct

- Breach of use of unauthorized subcontractors, i.e. anti-trust laws

- Breach of safety / security or labor regulations

- Serious malpractice or negligence

- Tax payments violations

- False or fraudulent representations in prior solicitations

Contractor must submit extract from criminal record or affidavits released by the local court of Contractor’s residence.

Contracting Officer shall review Contractors’ certifications for compliance. Firms who obtained SOA certification are listed in the SOA website, but certification must still be submitted with the proposal. Not submitting the additional documentation is treated as a noncompliance issue. Contracting Officer shall ensure that the contract provisions stipulate that the contract may be terminated for default if it is discovered after award that the Contractor failed to meet the certification requirements of D.P.R. n. 34, or art 75 of DPR 554, and DPR 412/2000.

5. ANTI-MAFIA LAW

Pre-Award Effect of Anti-Mafia Procedures: Inasmuch as the work of this solicitation is to be performed on land owned by the Italian State, the prospective contractor will be subject to all Italian legislation concerning anti-mafia documentation, including, without limitation: Legislative Decree no. 159 of September 6, 2011, Decree of the President of the Republic no. 252 of June 3, 1998, Legislative Decree no. 490 of August 8, 1994, Law Decree No.

629 of September 6, 1982, and any subsequent anti-mafia laws, integrations and amendments. Only firms that submit the requested documentation will be considered for award. In the event that prior to award any mafia infiltration attempt is determined by the competent Prefect (Prefetto) against an offeror, pursuant to Art. 4 of Legislative Decree

no. 490/1994, Art. 10 of Decree of the President of the Republic no. 252/1998, or any other anti-mafia law, no award will be made to said offeror. Furthermore, in the event that prior to award any additional information against an offeror is obtained and validated by the government or provided by the competent Prefect (Prefetto) pursuant to Art.

1, Section 7 of Law decree 629/1982, Art. 10, paragraph 9, of Decree of the President of the Republic no. 252/1998, or any other anti-mafia law, the Government may decide, at its sole discretion, that no award will be made to said offeror.

Subcontractors: ALSO, the Offeror is responsible for complying with Italian Anti-Mafia laws with respect to its subcontractors; and, if necessary, requesting additional information regarding attempts of mafia infiltration from a competent Prefect (Prefetto). The Offeror agrees to provide the Government any appropriate documentation that may indicate mafia-collusion, to include, if available, results of any Prefect (Prefetto) investigations. If after award, a competent Prefect (Prefetto) determines that mafia infiltration attempts have occurred with a subcontractor, then the Offeror agrees, if requested by the Government, to promptly terminate the subject subcontract and replace the mafia-colluded subcontractor at its own cost with a compliant company.

Termination: If during the life of this contract, any mafia infiltration attempt is determined by the Government to have occurred or additional information is provided by the Prefect (Prefetto) against any component of the Contractor or any Subcontractor, pursuant to Art. 1, Section 7 of Law Decree 629/1982, Art 4 of Legislative Decree no.

490/1994, Art. 10 of Decree of the President of the Republic no. 252/1998, or any other anti-mafia law, the Government at its sole discretion may consider this a failure to execute the work and may terminate the contractor's right to proceed with the work under the "Default" clause of this contract.

Documentation Requirements: Contractor shall submit the following:

The offeror SHALL include a “self-declaration” in accordance with DPR 445/2000, stating that “pursuant to any applicable anti-mafia law in force, none of the causes of forfeiture, suspension or prohibition set forth by Art. 67 of the Code exist with regard to all the persons involved in the subject contract.”

This documentation is to be included in your Price Proposal.

6. ENGLISH SPEAKING REPRESENTATIVE

At all times when any performance of the work at the site is being conducted by any employee of the Contractor or his subcontractors, the contractor shall have a representative present on the site capable of explaining the work operations and receiving instructions in the English language. The Contracting Officer shall have the right to determine, without appeal of such decision, whether the proposed representative has sufficient technical and lingual capabilities, and the Contractor shall immediately replace any individual not acceptable to the Contracting Officer.

7. INQUIRIES, PROPOSAL FORMAT AND DUE DATE

All pre-proposal inquiries (PPI) regarding this RFP shall be submitted electronically to Phil Mathews by e-mail at philip.mathews@navy.mil. Offerors are requested to use the PPI’s submittal Form (Attachment D). Responses will be published as an amendment to the solicitation.

The Government does not intend to respond to inquiries submitted less than 15 calendar days before the solicitation closing date in order to permit adequate time to reply to the inquiries. There is no guarantee that PPI submitted after cutoff date will be answered before the solicitation closes.

Amendments will be posted directly to Navy Electronic Commerce Online (NECO). Additionally, other postings will be made to NECO under the Additional Documents section on NECO website. Postings to the Additional Documents section of NECO DO NOT generate an automated email to contractors. It is recommended contractors check the NECO Additional Documents section of the RFP periodically to see if additional postings have been made. It is the contractor’s responsibility to check NECO for all postings. Proposals shall be delivered to:

Commander Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Atlantic Building A Mailroom ATTN: Phil Mathews ACQ34 6506 Hampton Blvd Norfolk, VA 23508-1278

ALL SUBMITTALS MUST BE RECEIVED AT THE LOCATION SPECIFIED ABOVE PRIOR TO 2:00

PM (EST), TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 27, 2018. LATE SUBMITTALS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED.

Proposal must be clearly marked on the outside of the package with the solicitation number.

ELECTRONIC/FACSIMILE SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.

Proposal shall be labeled “PRICE PROPOSAL OR NON-PRICE TECHNICALFACTORS PROPOSAL FOR RFP N62470-18-R-4004, NAVFAC ATLANTIC P-1804 CONSTRUCTION OF HYDRANT SYSTEM PIPING LOOP AT NAVAL AIR STATION SIGONELLA, SICILY, ITALY ATTN: PHIL MATHEWS.” All pages shall be numbered and binders shall be appropriately tabbed, conforming to the proposal submittal requirements’ structure for each evaluation factor. Price and Non-Price Factors proposals must be submitted in sealed envelopes/boxes. Any pricing information included in the Non-Price Factors proposal will not be considered. Similarly, any Non-Price information included in the Price Proposal will not be considered.

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

The offeror’s proposal must include all data and information required and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions. The offeror shall be compliant with the requirements as stated herein, for nonconformance may result in an unfavorable proposal evaluation.

Special Joint Venture (JV) Requirements:

NOTE #1: FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SOLICITATION A JOINT VENTURE (JV) REFERS TO

EITHER (1) A U.S.-STYLED FORMAL LEGAL ENTITY IN THE NATURE OF A PARTNERSHIP,

CORPORATION, LLC, OR OTHER LEGAL ENTITY, COMPRISED OF TWO OR MORE PERSONS OR

COMPANIES, WITH THE NEW ENTITY ACTING AS THE PRIME CONTRACTOR, OR (2) AN

AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO OR MORE PERSONS OR COMPANIES TO PROPOSE AS A TEAM,

WITH EACH INDIVIDUAL MEMBER ACTING AS A PRIME CONTRACTOR. EACH JOINT

VENTURE MUST PROVIDE ONE (1) NCAGE CODE AND ONE (1) DUNS NUMBER FOR THE JOINT

VENTURE AND ONE (1) DUNS NUMBER FOR EACH MEMBER COMPRISING THE JOINT

VENTURE. EACH JOINT VENTURE MUST BE REGISTERED IN SAM USING THE NAME OF THE

JOINT VENTURE.

JV offerors shall provide with their proposal a notarized legal document that establishes the JV. The JV Agreement shall take effect upon the submission of the proposal and shall remain in effect until one (1) year after the work has been finally inspected and accepted by the Government. Submission of the notarized legal document that establishes the JV shall be furnished with the price proposal in its original language version along with a certified English translation of the notarized JV. The Joint Venture must be formed and valid at the time of submission of the proposal. The validated notarized legal document must include language that each member of the JV will be jointly and severally liable for the performance of the whole contract and will be incorporated into the contract award if award is made to the JV.

1. The Joint Venture Agreement shall include, at a minimum, the following:

(a) Name of firms that form the JV and the name of the JV.

(b) Name and title of the corporate officials signing on behalf of each firm that forms the JV.

(c) Solicitation number.

(d) Description of the responsibilities in terms of work category for each member (for example: Firm A performing 100% of _____)

(e) The statement "The composition and structure of the JV will remain unchanged from award to one (1) year after the work has been finally inspected and accepted by the Government.”

(f) Date of issuance of the agreement and notarized signature of the corporate officials signing on behalf of each party.

(g) Language establishing that each member of the JV will be jointly and severally liable for the performance of the whole contract.

(h) Statement under oath stating that the Joint Venture (JV) is in compliance at the time of proposal submission with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations. This statement must be signed under oath by all members comprising the Joint Venture.

2. The U.S. Government reserves the right to review the actual JV Agreement to determine its basis and compliance with the applicable laws. Any internal agreements affecting the internal composition of the existing JV and its potential liabilities in relation to the contract (performance guarantee, insurance, etc) must be sent to the Contracting Officer to provide notice of the same. Any change in the composition of the JV will require the JV to formally request a Novation Agreement in accordance with FAR 42.12, which will be approved/disapproved at the discretion of the Contracting Officer.

Only offers from Prime Contractors and Joint Ventures (JV) will be accepted. Offers from Associazione Temporanea d'Imprese (ATI) or Offers using a contract of availment (contractto de avvalirnento) will not be accepted for this procurement and will be considered noncompliant to the solicitation's requirements

PROPOSALS MAY BE MAILED OR HAND DELIVERED.

HAND DELIVERIES OF PROPOSALS:

All visitors to the Lafayette River Annex (LRA) who do not have or meet the requirements for a permanent DBIDS, CAC, Military or Military dependent ID badge who visit LRA or any installation in the Mid-Atlantic Region must complete and submit the SECNAV FORM 5512/1 to NAVFAC LANT Security a minimum of 17 days prior to the proposed date of visit in order to allow security personnel ample time to process and submit requests.

The SECNAV FORM 5512/1 can be found at the following link:

https://www.cnic.navy.mil/content/dam/cnic/hq/images/DBIDS/SECNAV%20Form%205512-1.pdf

Visitor’s must transmit the completed SECNAV FORM 5512/1 form which contains Privacy Act / PII data to NAVFAC Atlantic Security via AMRDEC Safe File Exchange (SAFE) website found at the following link:

https://safe.amrdec.army.mil/safe/Welcome.aspx

Please forward the SECNAV FORM 5512/1 via the AMRDEC SAFE website to all three of the NAVFAC LANT security personnel listed below:

Robert Hernandez / Email: Robert.hernandez3@navy.mil

Iris Gholston / Email: iris.gholston@navy.mil Steven K. Anderson / Email: steven.k.anderson@navy.mil

Visitors can contact the NAVFAC Atlantic Security department at 757-322-8116/8044/8116 if they have questions or need assistance.

Commercial couriers such as FEDEX, DHL or UPS follow the same visitor procedures listed above and they are required to have a background check if they do not have a CAC badge. Commercial couriers must also have their vehicle inspected at location listed in the attached LRA commercial vehicle inspection procedures prior to accessing the LRA.

Offerors should check with their intended courier to ensure they have the proper identification credentials to access the LRA.

DBIDS passes must be picked up by the approved visitor from the Naval Station Pass and ID Office located at the following address prior to visiting NAVFAC Atlantic on LRA:

Address: Naval Station Pass and ID Office 9040 Hampton Blvd Norfolk, VA 23505 Telephone Number: 757-322-2975 Hours of Operation: 0700-1530 on Monday through Friday

8. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of the following non-price factors:

Factor 1– Safety Factor 2 – Construction Experience Factor 3 – Technical Solution Factor 4– Past Performance

The distinction between experience and past performance is that experience pertains to the volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work described under the definition of recent, relevant projects, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

2. Factor 1, Safety, will only be rated Acceptable or Unacceptable. If an offeror is rated Unacceptable for Factor 1, they will not be eligible for award, unless the deficiency(ies) is/are remedied through discussions (if held). In making the best value award decision, the Government will consider Factors 2, 3, 4, and price. The relative order of importance of the non-price evaluation factors is the technical factors Construction Experience & Technical Solution) are of equal importance to each other and, when combined are equal in importance to the past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment factor (performance confidence assessment). When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance/performance confidence assessment factor combined (i.e., the non-price evaluation factors) are approximately equal to price

The importance of price will increase if the Offerors’ non-price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-price proposal’s superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible Offeror whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

3. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

(a) Non-price Factors:

The offeror shall submit one (1) printed original, marked “Original”, four (4) copies marked “copy”, each in a separate three-ring binder, and two (2) electronic copies on separate CDs, with the following characteristics:

•Text pages 8 ½ x 11-inch format (A4 paper is also acceptable) •12-point font, Times New Roman

• Include a cover page with Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, DUNS, Cage Code, Point of Contact, Title, phone number, and email address.

•Each electronic copy must be formatted as a single Portable Document Format (.pdf) searchable file, each on a separate CD (include with the “Original” technical submission). If there are any conflicts between hard copies and/or electronic copies, the “Original” hard copy will govern.

Factor 1, Safety:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit the following information: (for a partnership or joint venture, only one safety narrative is required).

Describe the Offeror’s technical approach to safety for its employees as well as the plan that the Offeror will implement to evaluate and measure safety performance of potential subcontractors as a part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors. The Safety narrative shall be limited to one (1) single-sided, 8 ½ x 11 page size.

(ii) Basis of evaluation:

The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for itself and its subcontractors. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s technical approach narrative, including the plan for safety of its employees and the Offeror’s plan to select and monitor subcontractors. The Government may also consider the Offeror’s overall safety record. The Government’s sources of information for evaluating safety may include, but are not limited to, Government agencies, OSHA, NAVFAC’s Facility Accident and Incident Reporting (FAIR) and Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS) databases, and other related resources. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete safety information regarding these submittal requirements rests with the Offeror. The evaluation will collectively consider the Offeror’s technical approach to safety and other sources of information available to the Government. The Government will also evaluate the narrative to determine whether subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project.

This Safety Factor will be rated on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis.

Factor 2 Construction Experience:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

Submit a minimum of two (2) up to a maximum of five (5) construction projects that best demonstrate experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP. To be considered, projects submitted for the Offeror must have been completed within the past ten (10) years from the date of issuance of this RFP.

For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as construction of a new Aviation Aircraft Pressurized Hydrant Direct Fueling System with a construction cost no less than $3,000,000.

A project is defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or standalone contract. Multiple construction award, Indefinite delivery or Indefinite quantity contracts as a whole should not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors should submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment A) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages) 8-1/2” X 11” page size.

DUNS numbers for the entity that performed the project shall be noted for the construction projects.

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e.: unique features, area, construction methods). The description must demonstrate that it satisfies the definition of a relevant project as defined in this RFP. The offeror must provide the construction cost of the example project in US Dollars. Failure to do so may result in a project being found non-relevant.

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV) , relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have experience, projects should be submitted for each Joint Venture partner. Offerors who fail to submit experience for all Joint Venture partners may be rated lower. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate the manner in which the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract for the experience information of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies in order to be considered. The proposal shall state specific commitments of technical resources (e.g. personnel, equipment) that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies will commit to the performance of this contract. In particular, the proposal will clearly state the specific commitments of resources of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member that will be located at the worksites and company offices in the city/area of the project. The proposal shall also describe specific roles of the affiliate/subsidiary/ parent/LLC/LTD member companies in terms of the work it will either self-perform or manage on behalf of the Offeror in performance of the contract.

The Offeror may utilize experience of a subcontractor that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement to demonstrate construction experience under this evaluation factor. The Offeror must provide a letter of commitment from the subcontractor and an explanation of the meaningful involvement that the subcontractor will have in performance of this contract. Substitution of subcontractor(s) shall be avoided to the maximum extent possible, and any proposed substitutions shall have verifiable, equivalent experience to the subcontractor being replaced.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The Government will only review a maximum of five (5) projects. If more than the maximum number of projects is submitted, the Government will evaluate projects in order of submission up to the maximum number and will not evaluate projects beyond the maximum number specified in the submission requirements.

Offerors that demonstrate experience with relevant projects contracted with the United States Department of Defense may be considered more favorably than offerors who do not demonstrate this experience.

Offerors that demonstrate experience with relevant projects located in Italy may be considered more favorably than offerors who do not demonstrate this experience.

Offerors that demonstrate experience with relevant projects constructing a Type III Fuel Hydrant Piping Loop may be considered more favorably than offerors who do not demonstrate this experience.

Factor 3, Technical Solution:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Provide a narrative describing the technical solution to the project that meets the requirements of the RFP. Include the following:

Summary of the technical approach, including the means/methods, material and tools to be utilized to complete the work; mitigation plans for anticipated problems, logistical challenges and site constraints.

A Project organizational chart that lists the key positions (Project Manager, Site Safety & Health Officer, Design QCM, Construction QCM, Superintendent, and subcontractors).

-Provide a project schedule with a Gantt chart. Include the contract duration and all major aspects of construction project. The contract timeframe identified in the RFP defines the acceptable contract duration; a shorter contract duration is desirable. The Government will evaluate a comparison of the contractor’s proposed contract duration and the acceptable contract duration. The Government’s evaluation of the contractor’s proposed schedule is a means of determining whether the contractor understands the scope of work and approaches the tasks in a logical and effective manner. Provide a narrative that explains the proposed contract duration, scheduling innovations and methods to provide a shorter contract duration.

-Provide a description of your understanding of phasing requirements and contract duration.

Narrative shall not exceed five (5) 8 ½ x 11” double-sided pages (or ten (10) single-sided pages). In addition, one

(1) single-sided 11” x 17” organizational chart may be provided. One (1) single-sided 11” x 17” schedule Gantt Chart to graphically present the contract duration.

In addition to the narrative, the Offeror shall submit a signed copy of a joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, approved mentor protégé agreement (MPA), or letter of commitment for each member of the Offeror’s team identified above (e.g., joint venture member, partner, team member, subcontractor, parent company, subsidiary, or other affiliated company, etc.). Documents submitted in addition to the narrative do not count against the page limitations of Factor 3 specified in the paragraph above

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government will evaluate the narrative, organizational chart, and schedule considering the extent to which the Offeror demonstrates a clear understanding of the architectural and engineering requirements of the project. The Government will evaluate the effectiveness of the technical solution to determine the likelihood that the work will be performed in accordance with the technical requirements of the RFP.

A higher rating may be provided for a schedule that clearly identifies realistic accelerated contract completion durations.

In addition, the contractor’s proposed contract duration shall become an enforceable part of the contract and will be reflected in the awarded Contract Completion Date (CCD) to the successful offeror.

Factor 4 Past Performance:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

If a completed Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 2 for construction experience. If there is not a completed CPARS evaluation, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team member to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor

2. AN OFFEROR SHALL NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS IS AVAILABLE.

If there is not a completed CPARS evaluation, then the offeror must submit Past Performance Questionnaires (Attachment B) for each project included in Factor 1 for Construction Experience. The Offeror should provide completed Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) with the proposal. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). The Government may make reasonable attempts to contact the client noted for that project(s) to obtain the PPQ information. However, Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to help ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Mr. Phil Mathews, at philip.mathews@navy.mil.

IMPORTANT: It is the responsibility of the offeror to provide accurate points of contact for each identified contract and current telephone numbers and/or email addresses. Failure to provide requested data, accessible points of contact, or valid phone numbers could result in a firm being considered less qualified.

The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the Offeror’s references or the references’ unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.

Offerors may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 2, Construction Experience. Offerors may also address any adverse past performance issues.

Such explanations shall not exceed two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages) in total.

Performance awards, customer letters of commendation, or additional information submitted will not be considered.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

This evaluation focuses on how well the Offeror performed on the relevant projects submitted under Factor 2, Construction Experience and past performance on other relevant projects currently documented in known sources.

In addition to the above, the Government reserves the right to obtain information for use in the evaluation of past performance from any and all sources including sources outside of the Government. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of Contractors who are part of a partnership or joint venture identified in the Offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the Offeror.

The Government will consider the currency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Contractor’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination. The assessment of the Offeror’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the Offeror’s probability to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance, or for whom information on past performance is not available, or the past performance record is so sparse that a performance assessment rating cannot reasonably be assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance, and will receive an Unknown Confidence (Neutral) rating.

(b) Price:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: Offeror shall submit one (1) printed version marked “Original” and one

(1) printed copy, each in a separate three-ring binder, and one (1) CD containing an electronic version, with the following:

•SF-1442, signed •Amendments (SF30s) Acknowledged •Completed Schedule B (Attachment E), Pricing Form, offerors should submit prices on the provided Schedule B only.

•Copy of Representation and Certifications from SAM •Include a cover page with Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, DUNS, Cage Code, Point of Contact and their phone and email address.

•Required Contractor Responsibility documentation •Societa’ Organismi d’Attestazione (SOA) Certification •Joint Venture Agreement •Documents establishing the Contractor’s Responsibility as outlined in the paragraph below.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO BE SUBMITTED WITH PRICE PROPOSAL PACKAGE:

RESPONSIBILITY DETERMINATION INFORMATION - In order to be eligible for award, the offeror must be determined responsible in accordance with FAR Part 9, specifically 9.104-1, General Standards. No purchase or award shall be made unless the Contracting Officer makes an affirmative determination of responsibility. To be determined responsible, a prospective contractor must have adequate financial resources to perform the contract, or the ability to obtain them. The Contracting Officer shall require acceptable evidence of the prospective contractor’s current sound financial status, as well as the ability to obtain required resources if the need arises. In regard to resources, the contractor must be prepared to present acceptable evidence of subcontracts, commitments or explicit arrangements that will be in existence at the time of contract award, to rent, purchase or otherwise acquire the needed facilities, equipment, services, materials, other resources or personnel. Consideration of a prime contractor’s compliance with limitations on subcontracting shall be taken into account for the time period covered by the contract base period or quantities, plus option periods or quantities, if such options are considered when evaluating offers for award. Pursuant to FAR 9.104-4, the Contracting Officer reserves the right to request adequate evidence of responsibility on the part of any prospective subcontractor(s). In the absence of information clearly indicating that the prospective contractor is responsible, the Contracting Officer shall make a determination of non-responsibility.

As a minimum requirement, all offerors are requested to submit, as part of the price proposal submissions, the following

1. One (1) Signed Bank Reference demonstrating adequate financial resources. If offeror’s firm has a line of credit – provide information on how many figures offeror can borrow against the line of credit (i.e. medium 6 figures – exact line of credit is not required).

2. The offeror shall provide the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for the prime contractor, certified by an independent accounting firm, if practicable, or signed by an authorized officer of the organization.

Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital, which will be used for the performance of the resultant contract. For Joint Venture arrangements, submit the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for each company in the Joint Venture and discuss the financial responsibilities among the companies. The Government may also utilize Dun & Bradstreet reports to evaluate the financial capacity of the offeror.

3. Point of contact from a bank or any financial institution with which the offeror transacts business. Although required to be submitted with offeror’s price proposal, this information will not be evaluated as part of the price proposal. This information forms the basis of your firm’s responsibility determination should your firm be considered for award. Proposal packages from unsuccessful offerors will not be returned to the offeror, but shall be destroyed by the Contracting Officer. No certificate of destruction will be issued.

(2) Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate price based on the total price. Total price consists of CLIN 0001, CLIN 0002 and CLIN 0003. Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.

(iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(iv) Comparison of market survey results.

9. PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE / BOND

PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE

Submittal Time: The offeror whose offer…