Attachment_5_-_PP_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 18 KB Posted

Attached to
NSWC-PC TIME CHARTER Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
N62387-15-R-2017
Issued by
Department of the Navy Military Sealift Command

About this file

ATTACHMENT 5 - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to NSWC-PC TIME CHARTER, newest first.
File Type Posted
Amend_6.doc DOC document
Attachment_7_-Amendment_0003_-_Vessel_Minimum_Requirements.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
NSWC-PC_AMEND_5.doc DOC document
RFP-RFQ_Q_AND_A__4__NSWC-PC.pdf PDF
Attachment_7_-Amendment_0002_-_Vessel_Minimum_Requirements.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amendment_0004.doc DOC document
Attachment_3_-_Amendment_0001_-_Basic_Pricing_Data.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFP-RFQ_Q_AND_A__5__NSWC-PC_-_LA_22615.docx DOCX document
N62387-15-R-2017-0003.doc DOC document
pd256B7.doc DOC document
RFP-RFQ_Q_AND_A__3__NSWC-PC_21915.pdf PDF
RFP-RFQ_Q A__2_NSWC_PC_FINAL.pdf PDF
Attachment_7_-Amendment_0001_-_Vessel_Minimum_Requirements.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
pd251D0.doc DOC document
RFP-RFQ_Q_AND_A_NSWC-PC_(1.0).pdf PDF
Attachment_2_-_Wage_Determination.txt TXT text file
Attachment_6_-_PP_Data_Sheet.doc DOC document
Attachment_7_-_Vessel_Minimum_Requirements.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_4_-_SF_LLL.pdf PDF
N62387-15-R-2017.pdf PDF
Attachment_3_-_Basic_Pricing_Data.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_1_-_List_of_GFP.pdf PDF
Show all 22

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

FROM: FACSIMILE:

TO: PHONE:

INFORMATION REQUEST

Military Sealift Command (MSC) is currently in the process of soliciting offers for a contract. ____________________ has provided your name and organization as a reference regarding their record of past performance under Contract No. ___________________. Specifically, we are looking for performance information in the following areas:

a.) Quality of Product or Service b.) Schedule c.) Business Relations d.) Management of Key Personnel (Including Subcontractors) e.) Utilization of Small Business

In order for our team to compile its evaluation, we request that you complete the attached questionnaire and email it, and any other pertinent information, BEFORE THE CLOSING DATE OF THIS SOLICITATION, to Mr. James Wood at james.wood4@navy.mil. Any relevant information you have would be vital in our assessment of the aforementioned Contractor.

Thank you,
Richard Lee Anderson
Contracting Officer

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

CONTRACTOR NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:

EVALUATION PERIOD: DELIVERY ORDER NO.:

1. Please describe the service/supply provided by the Contractor for your organization.

2. Please provide ratings and comments regarding the Contractor’s performance in each area below using the following ratings: Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory. See next page for definition of ratings. For ratings of “Exceptional” or “Unsatisfactory,” please provide a brief explanation.

EXCEPTIONAL
VERY GOOD
SATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
UNSATISFACTORY

OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING

Please provide an overall rating of the Contractor’s performance for the referenced contract/delivery order.

a.) Quality of Product or Service: Conformance to contract requirements, appropriateness of personnel, accuracy of reports, and technical excellence b.)Schedule: Timeliness of performance, met interim milestones, reliable, responsive to technical and contractual direction as to scheduling.

c.) Business Relations: Effective management, prompt notification of problems, reasonable/cooperative behavior, proactive, timely award and management of subcontracts, effective small business/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program and satisfaction with Contractor’s service.

d.) Management of Key Personnel (Including Subcontractors): Qualified personnel, effective performance and conduct.

e) Utilization of Small Business: Provides for maximum participation of small businesses in the award of subcontracts consistent with efficient contract performance.

3. Would you hire this Contractor to provide supplies/services for your organization in the future? Yes |_| No |_| Please provide comments using additional pages if desired.

Signed:__________________________________

DEFINITION OF RATINGS FOR PAST PERFORMANCE

Exceptional
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded many to the customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
Performance meets/met contractual requirements and exceeds/exceeded some to the Customer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear to be or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance does not/did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet or did not identify corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not/did not meet most contractual requirements and if currently being performed, recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .