Smoke_MOD_PRF190016(Nov2019)_Final.docx

PRF 190016

25 November 2019

Appendix C

PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION

SYSTEM SPECIFICATION

FOR

SURFACE FIRE FIGHTING TRAINER SMOKE/FOG GENERATION SYTEM

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVAL AIR WALFARE CENTER

TRAINING SYSTEMS DIVISION

12211 SCIENCE DRIVE

ORLANDO, FL 32826

APPROVED BY: DATE:

Roberto Soto-Albino Project Manager NAWCTSD Code 1.3.6.1

APPROVED BY: DATE:

Daniel Chwalisz Division Head NAWCTSD Code 4.6.8.3

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT C - Distribution authorized to U.S. Government agencies and their contractors (fill in reason) (date of determination). Other requests for this document shall be referred to (insert controlling DoD office).

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

DOCUMENT CHANGE HISTORY

Rev. Level Change Effective Date ii

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Para./Section Title Page iii

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

vi

APPENDICES

Table of Contents vii

System Specification For Surface Fire Fighting Trainer Smoke/Fog Generation System

SCOPE

This specification establishes the performance requirements for the modernization of the smoke/fog generation system of the Surface Fire-Fighting high-risk training devices. This specification also, includes the tasking requirements for the Damage Control Wet Trainers (DCWTs) non-skid replacement.

Identification The Surface Fire-Fighting Trainers (FFTs) are designated as Devices: 19F1A, 19F1B, 19F3A, 19F3B, 19F4A, 19F3C and 19F5. The primary use of the modified trainers will be to teach general and advance fire-fighting skills aboard United States (U.S.) Naval surface ships. For the purposes of this specification, terms Fire-Fighting Trainers (FFT), training system, and training device are equivalent. The DCWTs are located in Newport, Mayport and San Deigo.

APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

General The documents listed in this section are cited in sections 3, 4, 5, and Appendix A of this specification. This section does not include documents cited in other sections of this specification or recommended for additional information or as examples. While every effort has been made to ensure the completeness of this list, document users are cautioned that they must meet the specified requirements of documents cited in sections 3, 4, 5, and Appendix A of this specification, whether or not they are listed.

Government documents Specifications, standards, and handbooks The following specifications, standards, and handbooks of the exact revision listed below form a part of this specification to the extent specified herein.

(Copies of these documents are available online at http://assistdocs.com/search/search_basic.cfm, or from the Standardization Document Order Desk, 700 Robbins Avenue, Building 4D, Philadelphia, PA 19111-5094.)

Other Government documents, drawings, and publications The following Government documents, drawings, and publications of the exact revision level shown form a part of this document to the extent specified herein.

(Copies of these documents are available online at http://assistdocs.com/search/search_basic.cfm, or from the Standardization Document Order Desk, 700 Robbins Avenue, Building 4D, Philadelphia, PA 19111-5094.)

(The above documents are downloadable from ...)

(Copies of these regulations are downloadable from http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/collectionCfr.action?collectionCode=CFR)

(Copies of this document are downloadable from http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=STANDARDS&p_id=9879)

Non-Government publications The following documents of the exact revision listed below form a part of this document to the extent specified herein.

(Copies of these documents are available from www.ansi.org)

(Copies of this document are available from http://www.jedec.org)

(Copies of this document are available from http://www.asme.org)

International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC)

European Standards (EN)

Order of precedence In the event of a conflict between the text of this specification and the references cited herein, the text of this specification takes precedence. Nothing in this specification, however, supersedes applicable laws and regulations, unless a specific exemption has been obtained.

REQUIREMENTS

Performance and functional requirements The FFT shall provide an operational training environment that shall adhere to process, form, fit function, and live and or simulated functionality of the existing training device.

Training missions and objectives Surface Fire Fighting Trainer Smoke/Fog Generation System Upgrade The Smoke/Fog Generation upgrade shall retain the original functionality to operate the FFT to train Naval personnel in smoke/fog fireplace training scenarios aboard U.S. Naval surface ships.

Training system performance requirements Existing trainer performance baseline There shall be no degradation in the performance baseline of the existing trainer as a result of incorporating the required trainer modifications, unless otherwise specified herein. The trainer performance baseline is defined by the Baseline Configuration Audit (BCA) results, and all other tests or documentation from the Government Furnished Property (GFP) needed to describe the simulation characteristics and trainer performance prior to incorporation of the required trainer modifications. This includes all functional relationships between various systems of the trainer, such as the ventilation systems, propane systems, control system, and IOSs.

Trainer Smoke/Fog Generation Upgrade

a. The smoke/fog generation system shall retain the local input/output points for the trainer PLC control.

b. The smoke/fog generation system shall retain the existing number of smoke/fog modules available per fireplace compartment.

c. The smoke/fog generation system shall provide the functionality for individual smoke/fog output adjustments with an overall minimal output of 30,000 cfm.

d. The smoke/fog generation system shall include the removal of existing piping and tanks (nitrogen cylinders/fluid drums) associated with the current smoke/fog system.

e. The smoke/fog generation system shall be placed in a safe location from extinguishing elements.

f. The smoke/fog generation system shall retain the Instructor Operator System (IOS) local/remote controls, Compartment Control Panel (CCP) controls and Remote Control Unit (RCU) controls.

g. The smoke/fog system shall include terminations of non-use existing electrical connections.

h. The smoke/fog generation system shall provide the functionality for a DMX-512 Central Control Unit (CCU) to power on multiple smoke machines at a discharge level that can maintain continuous smoke generation.

i. Multiple CCUs can be used. The control of one smoke machine per CCU shall not be acceptable.

j. The smoke/fog generation system shall provide the functionality for a return signal from the Smoke Machine to the DMX-512 CCU to confirm a ready/operational condition.

k. The use of a single Serial DMX-512 control chain for multiple smoke machines is preferred.

l. The smoke/fog generation system shall include anti-corrosion ducting allowing for fireplace smoke distribution.

m. The smoke/fog generation system shall communicate via existing discrete DC voltage input/output to the GE-IP Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) control modules.

n. The smoke/fog generation system shall operate with a non-proprietary water-based type fluid.

o. All programming developed for the CCUs shall be Programmable Automation Controller (PAC) programmed with PLC code with Functional Block Diagram (preferred) or Ladder Logic.

p. The smoke/fog generation system PLC software programming shall meet current engineering standards and IEC 61131-3.

q. The smoke/fog generation system shall not include any program structures such as: Structured Text (ST), Instruction List (IL), and Sequential Function Chart (SFC) or C/C++ language modules.

r. The Contractor shall deliver all smoke/fog generation systems free of technical data or computer software with less than Government Purpose Rights or less than commercial computer software rights in COTS computer software. The Contractor shall not, for example, embed proprietary modules, algorithms, or functions in any deliverable under this contract.

s. The smoke/fog generation system software developed or modified shall be sole property of the U.S Navy in accordance with DFARS 252.227-7020.

Smoke/Fog Generation System software for the 19F1A and 19F3A

a. If the Smoke/Fog Generation System upgrade should require modification of the existing GE-IP PLC software, the software shall retain the trainer’s current Ladder Diagram (LD) logic program code.

b. Specific Smoke/Fog Generation System lines of code shall be programmed in Functional Block Diagram (FBD) to work with the current Ladder Diagram (LD) program code.

Smoke/Fog Generation System software for the 19F1B, 19F3B, 19F3C and 19F4A

a. If the Smoke/Fog Generation System upgrade should require modification of the existing GE-IP PLC software, the software shall retain the trainer’s current Functional Block Diagram (FBD) logic program code.

b. Specific Smoke/Fog Generation System lines of code shall be programmed in Functional Block Diagram (FBD).

AFFF Trainer System Removal (19F1A, 19F3A, 19F1B, 19F3C 19F3B and 19F4A)

a. The AFFF System shall be removed which consists of mixing tanks, holding tanks, associated piping, pumps and frame structure.

b. The AFFF surrogate and system components shall be removed and disposed of in accordance with (IAW) state EPA disposal regulations.

c. The AFFF System electrical shall be terminated in a junction box and tagged out.

d. The AFFF System piping shall be terminated and capped at the ends of each section piped to another location.

e. All regular Firemain water pass throughs to the hose stations shall be retained and painted red.

f. Firemain water pass through shall be re-plumbed to provide for the use of current hose reel stations.

g. The Firemain piping pressure gauge functionality shall be retained.

Smoke/Fog Generation System for the 19F5

a. The existing standalone smoke system for the Egress Chamber compartment shall be replaced with a remote controlled unit.

Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) Trainer System Removal (19F5)

a. The existing AFFF system shall be retained except for the removal/flush and cap of the AFFF surrogate fluid.

b. The AFFF surrogate shall be removed and disposed of IAW state EPA disposal regulations.

c. The enclosed compartment containing the AFFF surrogate shall be certified free of all gases prior to accessing the compartment to flush the AFFF surrogate.

Damage Control Wet Trainer (DCWT) non-skid Replacement

a. The DCWT existing non-skid shall be stripped and prepped for resurfacing of the non-skid.

b. The DCWT non-skid replacement shall include replacement of non-repairable surface areas before the application of the new replacement non-skid.

c. The DCWT replacement non-skid preparation shall include procedures to correct puddling and allow for proper drainage.

d. The non-skid replacement shall be waterproof to include resistant components for chemicals and corrosion.

Damage Control Wet Trainer (DCWT) compartment hatches and scuttles replacement The DCWT hatches and scuttles shall be removed and replaced with new hatches and scuttles. All removed components shall be disposed IAW local state regulations. The following are the number of hatches and scuttles per site that shall be replaced:

a. San Diego: (4) hatches and (4) scuttles.

b. Norfolk: (1) hatch and (1) scuttle.

c. Newport: (2) hatches and (2) scuttles.

Reliability All added or modified FFT smoke/fog generation components shall meet or exceed the current component MTBF that it replaces.

Maintainability Quantitative maintainability requirements for the entire trainer shall be a Mean-Time-To-Repair (MTTR) of 60 minutes, a Maximum-repair-time (MMAX) of 120 minutes to the 90th percentile for Unscheduled On-site Maintenance (see 5.1.11), and a Mean-Preventive-Maintenance-Time (MPT) of 30 minutes per day for Scheduled Maintenance (see 5.1.9).

Materials and processes Materials and processes shall be IAW Appendix A (see A.1).

Electromagnetic Environmental Effects (E3) Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) Each system shall be electromagnetically compatible among all subsystems and equipment within the system and with environments caused by emitters and other electromagnetic sources external to the system to ensure safe and proper operation and performance.

Intersystem EMC The radiated and conducted electromagnetic emissions generated by the system shall not be a source of electromagnetic interference to other electronic equipment operated at the respective installation sites. The system operations shall not create Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) or radiation hazard problems to personnel or adjacent installations. The trainers shall exist within the electromagnetic environment without operational degradation to electronic, electro-mechanical, or electrical components operating in the respective site installation’s electromagnetic environments.

Intrasystem EMC The system shall be electromagnetically compatible within itself such that it meets system operational performance requirements.

Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) The trainer shall operate without being a source of EMI or a victim of site-generated radiated or conducted electromagnetic emissions. Individual subsystems and equipment shall meet interference control requirements of 47 CFR 15, EN 55032:2015 (CISPR 32), EN 55035:2017, or MIL-STD-461G, as applicable.

Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) Electrical and electronic systems devices shall withstand ESD during normal installation, handling, testing, maintenance, and operation. The ESD environment is defined as a 2, 4, 6, and 8-kilovolts (kV) contact-discharge or a 15-kV air-discharge ESD, discharging from a 150-picofarad capacitor through a 330-ohm resistor with a circuit inductance not to exceed 5-microhenry to the electrical/electronic subsystem.

Lightning The system shall meet its operational performance requirements for indirect effects of lightning. Indirect effects are those resulting from electrical transients induced in electrical circuits due to coupling of the EM fields associated with lightning and the interactions of these fields with equipment in the system.

Bonding The system electrical bonding shall provide electrical continuity across external mechanical interfaces on electrical and electronic equipment, both within the equipment and between the equipment and other system elements, for control of E3 such that the system operational performance requirements are met.

Direct Current (DC) bonding levels For instances where specific controls have not been established for a system and approved by the procuring activity, the following DC bonding levels shall apply throughout the life of system:

a. 10 milliohms or less resistance from the equipment enclosure to system structure, including the cumulative effect of all faying surface interfaces.

b. 15 milliohms or less from cable shields to the equipment enclosure, including the cumulative effect of all connector and accessory interfaces.

c. 2.5 milliohms or less resistance across individual faying interfaces within the equipment, such as between subassemblies or sections.

Nameplates and product markings Nameplates and markings shall be IAW Appendix A (see A.2).

Interchangeability Interchangeability shall be IAW Appendix A (see A.3).

Safety Safety requirements shall be IAW Appendix A (see A.4).

Human engineering Human engineering requirements shall be IAW Appendix A (see A.5) Security and privacy Cybersecurity The trainer shall meet the CS criteria specified in DODI 8510.01 Risk Management Framework (RMF) security control set as defined in NIST SP 800-53 Revision 4 for a Security Categorization as (Confidentiality=Low), (Integrity=Low), (Availability=Low) as further defined in Naval Air Systems Command (NAWC) Training Systems Domain Guide, Version 1.0 dated September 2016 for Targets of Evaluation (TOE) Low-Impact Group A (LIGA).

IA requirements for operating systems The trainer shall incorporate Operating Systems that have been validated or are under evaluation by National Information Assurance Partnership (NIAP) or Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme (CCEVS).

Virus protection Trainer shall incorporate the Department of Defense (DoD) approved antivirus software. Antivirus software is Government- furnished.

Configuration criteria IT products provided with the trainer shall be configured IAW NAWC Training Systems Domain Guide, Version 1.0 dated September 2016 in Appendix A for TOE LIGA and IAW Security Assessment Procedures Document for the Omnibus Standalone-Unclassified Training Systems.

Cabinet door locks When equipment cabinets are added as a result of the required trainer modifications, the equipment cabinet doors shall have key operated locks that are keyed alike.

Logistics Maintenance Maintenance concept The maintenance concept is defined as on-equipment, Organizational (O-level), and off-equipment, Intermediate (I-level) maintenance. The trainer equipment and associated technical documentation shall provide the means for the trainer to be maintained using the following levels of maintenance.

On-equipment, O-level maintenance O-Level maintenance shall pertain to all trainer equipment (COTS, Commercial Items, NDI (CaNDI), and TPE).

Preventative and corrective (O-level) maintenance O-Level maintenance consists of scheduled preventative maintenance and unscheduled corrective maintenance, which is performed on the trainer and may employ the device as a maintenance test bed during periods of scheduled maintenance. O-level maintenance shall include the following:

a. Verify that the trainer is ready for training by performing appropriate tests and inspections.

b. Isolate trainer malfunctions to faulty parts or Line Replaceable Unit (LRU) through the use of General Purpose Electronic Test Equipment (GPETE), computer-based Built-in-Test diagnostics, and maintenance documentation.

c. Perform system alignments, adjustments, and calibration.

d. Remove and replace faulty modules in a manner that minimizes device downtime by replacing the item with a spare.

e. Perform scheduled preventative maintenance and inspections during non-training hours IAW the Planned Maintenance System (PMS).

f. Isolate and document software related failures.

Off-Equipment, I-level maintenance I-level maintenance is the corrective maintenance performed on failed repairable LRUs (e.g., motorized valves, gas regulators, circuit cards, power supplies, and computers) which have been functionally and physically removed from the trainer as part of the trainer O-level maintenance. Maintenance documentation, provisioning (repair kit), and trainer unique tools and test equipment shall support all trainer equipment at this level following tasks. I-level maintenance task consists of the required analysis, troubleshooting, disassembly, repair or replacement, reassembly, adjustment, calibration and testing using general purpose electronic test equipment to correct malfunctions and to test and verify proper operation.

Qualitative maintainability requirements Qualitative maintainability requirements shall be IAW Appendix A (see A.6).

Facilities and facility equipment The Government intends to house the FFT training device modification in its existing locations. The FFT trainer modification, in its operational configuration, shall fit within the existing facilities trainer power requirements.

Power-line monitoring and protection Power-line monitoring and protection shall be IAW Appendix A (see A.7).

Fabrication Workmanship Workmanship shall be IAW Appendix A (see A.8).

VERIFICATION

Methods of verification The following methods will be utilized to accomplish the verification of requirements to the extent specified in 4.3:

1. Analysis (see 5.1.13.1) Demonstration (see 5.1.13.2) Examination (see 5.1.13.3) Test (see 5.1.13.4) Classification of verifications The trainer will be subject to the verification classifications defined in the Test and Evaluation requirements of the contract. Under each verification classification, the trainer will be subject to the verifications specified in 4.3.

a. Developmental Test-2 (DT-2) (Contractor Preliminary Inspection (CPI))

b. DT-3 (Government Preliminary Inspection (GPI))

c. DT-4 (Contractor Final Inspection (CFI))

d. DT-5 (Government Final Inspection (GFI))

e. Physical Configuration Audit (PCA)

Inspections and tests Mission tests Mission test shall be conducted to demonstrate that the trainer performance satisfies the specified training requirements. Mission tests shall simulate representative training situations and shall consist live-fire training scenarios, for each mode of operation. Mission tests will be defined by the Government test team.

Stress tests The stress tests shall consist of a series of tests at the subsystem, system, inter-system and trainer integrated system levels to exercise the simulation and stimulation design in the worst case loading and most stringent and demanding computation situation where maximum calculations, signal generation, and data transfer is taking place. The stress test mission scenario will be defined by the Government and identified in the TEMP defined in the contract.

Malfunctions tests Malfunction tests shall consist of operator initiated and simulation system scenario generated malfunctions and verification of the trainer indications and resultant responses to the malfunctions.

Training system performance verifications The training system performance verifications shall consist of the following inspections, analysis, tests, and examinations.

Training system performance requirement #1 verification Reliability verification The reliability verification shall consist of a system-level reliability assessment IAW the following requirements.

Assessment duration The reliability assessment shall be performed concurrently with the other training system tests starting with DT-2 (CPI) and extending to the end of Government final acceptance.

Data collection and tracking Data to be collected and tracked during the assessment period shall consist of trainer operating hours, failure occurrences, and the achieved MTBF. Operating hours are only those hours where the system is under test.

Failure criteria Failures (see 5.1.4) occurring during the reliability assessment shall be classified as Relevant (see 5.1.4.4) or Non-relevant (see 5.1.4.3) and be subject to analysis, reporting, and corrective action. The Government will make the final determination of failure classifications.

Relevant failure classification Relevant failures shall be further classified as Chargeable (see 5.1.4.1) and Non-chargeable (see 5.1.4.2).

Failures applicable to MTBF determination Only those failures classified as chargeable shall be used for determining the achieved MTBF.

Reliability assessment conditions During the reliability assessment, the trainer shall be exercised at frequencies and durations typical of those occurring in normally scheduled training operations.

Environmental conditions during reliability assessment The environmental conditions to be applied and their variation with time shall be representative of the actual operational environment at the trainer site.

Electrical stresses during reliability assessment Electrical stresses shall consist of ON-OFF cycling and operation under the specified operating modes and duty cycles.

Maintainability verifications The maintainability verifications shall consist of a maintainability assessment conducted concurrently with the reliability assessment period specified above. Trainer maintenance actions shall be monitored, recorded, and evaluated to demonstrate compliance with the quantitative maintainability requirements specified in 3.1.4.

MTTR elements subject to tracking MTTR elements subject to tracking during maintenance actions shall consist of fault detection, fault isolation, Line Replaceable Unit (LRU) removal and replacement, calibration, alignment, and system verification.

Thermal survey The thermal survey shall verify the maximum heat generation of the trainer and the equipment cooling requirements.

Temperature measurements Temperature measuring shall be performed during the trainer operation tests with covers in place and doors closed and at the upper limits of the operating temperature and humidity specified herein.

Temperature measuring instruments Temperature measuring instruments shall be placed at critical points throughout the trainer; covering suspected high temperature areas.

Data recording Data shall be recorded no less than once during each hour of trainer operation.

Data to be collected Data thus obtained shall indicate location of the measuring instrument, the temperature (deg. C) at the measured point, and the ambient temperature (deg. C).

Hot spots Detected hot spots shall be eliminated.

E3 verifications EMC verifications Intersystem EMC verifications The trainer shall not experience degradation or malfunction due to EMC, as verified during monitored susceptibility testing. This monitoring can be accomplished through the use of Daily Operational Readiness Test (DORT), visual displays, aural outputs, and other measurements of signal outputs and interfaces. Monitoring the trainer performance through installation of special circuitry in the Trainer is permissible; however, these modifications shall not influence test results.

Intrasystem EMC verifications The system shall not experience degradation due to failure to meet EMC requirements. Verification of EMC shall include systematic evaluation of potential interference between source and victim pairs while exercising the subsystems and equipment onboard the system through various modes and functions while monitoring the remaining items for degradation.

EMI verifications Training systems shall comply with the maximum field-strength specifications for the test spectrum of 2 Megahertz (MHz) to 18 Gigahertz (GHz) listed in 47 CFR 15, EN 55032:2015 (CISPR 32), or MIL-STD-461G, as applicable. The trainer-off ambient RF field measurements taken two times a day, midmorning, and midafternoon shall comprise the baseline of the RF environment description from which to measure deltas with the trainer-on. The trainer-on RF emanations measurements shall not exceed the limits specified for the specified test-spectrum.

ESD verifications ESD test points The electrostatic discharges shall be applied to those points and surfaces of the trainer which are accessible to the operator/installer during normal use. Test points to be considered shall include the following locations as applicable: all conductive or non-conductive points in the control or keyboard area and all other points of human contact such as switches, knobs, buttons, indicators LEDs, and other accessible areas. As a minimum, each face shall be included.

ESD tests The ESD tests shall apply discharges to each of the specified application-points using the charging voltages of 2, 4, 6, and 8 kV for contact discharge, and 15 kV for air-discharge. ESD testing shall include five applications of each charging Voltage at each polarity to each application-point with 10-second rest-intervals interspersing each ESD. Each temporary and permanent anomaly shall be recorded. Where the air-discharge test-method is used on non-conductive surfaces, the generator repetition-rate shall be 20 pulses per second and the application of the generator's discharge-probe shall be a slow proximity-pass across the surface to be tested. The air-discharge test shall include a record of all ESD and their effects on the Trainer's operation, as witnessed by the Test Director.

Lightning verification Lightning protection verification shall include inspection of lightning-rods, bonding, external grounding, and Earth-grounding.

Bonding verification This test gives general indication of bond-adequacy, based on the DC-resistance of the bond. Bonding measurements shall be taken from bonding points to the ground plane using a milliohm meter to the nearest 10th of a milliohm. Bonding verification shall be comprised of:

a. Testing the equipment enclosure to system-structure and the cumulative-effect of faying surface interfaces,

b. Testing faying surfaces within the equipment between subassemblies and sections,

c. A record of measured results logged in the test procedure.

IA verifications The IA verifications shall consist of executing a set of test procedures and using automated tools such as the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) Security Content Automation Protocol (SCAP) Tool, the eEye Retina vulnerability scanner or other DOD approved scanning tools. These approved DOD tools validate compliance with the DOD approved Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) and the specified trainer IA controls. The DISA SCAP tool and DISA STIG benchmarks are available at the following URL: http://iase.disa.mil/stigs/scap/index.html.

Computational system verifications The Computational system verifications shall consist of a complete test run of the trainer’s test procedures.

NOTES

Definitions The following definitions are applicable to this specification.

Commercially available off-the-shelf (COTS) item COTS item is defined in the FAR, Part 2.101.

Commercial Item Commercial Item is defined in the FAR, Part 2.101.

Control Drawing A drawing disclosing engineering form, fit, and function performance specifications for the acquisition of interchangeable vendor or commercial items of existing designs, and of items specially developed by vendors to the control drawing requirements.

Failure definitions and criteria A failure is defined to be a component failure, software failure, BIT anomaly, complete malfunction, or a reduction in the performance of the trainer below the requirements of this specification.

Reserved

Reserved

Non-relevant failures Non-relevant failures are trainer equipment failures that cannot be expected to occur during field service. Non-relevant failures include:

1. Installation damage

1. Accident or mishandling

1. Failures of the test facility or test equipment

1. Failures caused by an externally applied overstress condition, in excess of the approved test requirements

1. Normal operating adjustments (non-failures) specified in the approved equipment operating instructions

1. Secondary failures within the equipment, which are proven to be caused by non-relevant or relevant primary failures.

1. Failures caused by human error Relevant failures Relevant failures are trainer equipment failures that can be expected to occur during field service. Relevant failures include:

1. Intermittent failures

1. Unverified failures (failures which cannot be duplicated, which are still under investigation, or for which no cause could be determined)

1. Verified failures not otherwise excluded under the other failure categories.

1. Pattern failures (two or more failures of the same part in identical or equivalent applications when the failure are caused by the same basic failure mechanisms) IA-Enabled Operating System An IA enabled operating system is a NIAP or CC validated system that normally has a full User Interface (see 5.1.12) with full access to the system that it interfaces with or controls.

Initial Support Kit (ISK) The ISK includes:

1. Spares (repairable items) and repair parts that are manufactured, subcontracted, or modified by the prime contractor having the design control responsibility.

1. Spares that support vendor hardware utilized by the device, which can be procured on the open market or from established sources and for which the prime contractor is not the design activity.

1. Support items that are not an integral part of the end item, but are required to inspect, test, calibrate, service, repair, or overhaul the end item, which are manufactured, subcontracted, or modified by the prime contractor having the design control responsibility.

1. Items required for support of the trainer system (excluding common hand tools), which can be procured on the open market or from established sources and for which the prime contractor is not the design activity.

Interchangeable item An item which:

1. Possesses such functional and physical characteristics as to be equivalent in performance, reliability, and maintainability, to another item of similar or identical purposes, and

1. Can be exchanged for the other item without selection for fit or performance, and without alteration of the items themselves or of adjoining items, except for adjustment.

Non-Developmental Item (NDI) NDI is defined in the FAR, Part 2.101.

Scheduled Maintenance Those maintenance tasks performed at predetermined time intervals IAW maintenance documentation prepared by the contractor to ensure continuous satisfactory operation of the equipment.

Trainer Peculiar Equipment (TPE) The following types of equipment are defined as TPE:

1. Training device equipment which has not been classified by the Government as a Commercial Item, Government-Furnished Equipment (GFE), NDI, or Contractor Acquired Operational Equipment (CAOE).

Commercial item, NDI, GFE, or CAOE, that:

1. Needs other than Minor Modifications (see FAR, Part 2.101) or modifications which are not of a type customarily available in the commercial marketplace to meet the requirements of the contract, or:

Does not have sufficient existing product documentation for Government logistic support.

Unscheduled On-site Maintenance Those corrective maintenance tasks performed on-line at the equipment by maintenance personnel to remedy malfunctions and return the equipment to an operable status.

User Interface A User Interface is the aggregate of means by which the people (users) interact with a particular machine, device, computer program, or other complex system. The user interface provides means of:

1. Input – Allowing the users to manipulate a system.

Output – Allowing the system to produce the effects of the user’s manipulation.

Verification methods The following defines the verification methods specified in section 4 of this specification.

Analysis An element of verification that utilizes established technical or mathematical models or simulations, algorithms, charts, graphs, circuit diagrams, or other scientific principles and procedures to provide evidence that stated requirements were met.

Demonstration An element of verification that generally denotes the actual operation, adjustment, or reconfiguration of items, to provide evidence that the designed functions were accomplished under specific scenarios.

Examination An element of verification and inspection that consists of investigation, without the use of special laboratory appliances or procedures, of items to determine conformance to those specified requirements, which can be determined by such investigations. Examination is generally nondestructive and typically includes the use of sight, hearing, smell, touch, and taste; simple physical manipulation; mechanical and electrical gauging and measurement; and other forms of investigation.

Test An element of verification and inspection that generally denotes the determination, by technical means, of the properties or elements of items, including functional operation, and involves the application of established scientific principles and procedures.

Appendix A Ancillary Requirements

Appendix A

Appendix A

Table of Contents

Para./Section Title Page

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

FIGURES

Ancillary Requirements

A.1 Materials and Processes A.1.1 Parts The trainer equipment shall consist of Commercial Items (see 5.1.2), Commercially available off-the-shelf (COTS) items (see 5.1.1), and Non-Developmental Items (NDI - see 5.1.8). Trainer Peculiar Equipment (TPE - see 5.1.10) shall be kept to a minimum.

A.1.1.1 Custom designed microelectronic devices The use of custom designed microelectronic devices shall be avoided unless no reasonable alternative exists. Commercial Items, COTS items, NDI, and GFE are exempt.

A.1.1.2 Power supplies All power supplies to be used in the trainer shall be COTS or Commercial Items.

A.1.2 Materials A.1.2.1 TPE reparability Materials selected for TPE shall ensure that the TPE can be repaired.

A.1.2.2 Flammable materials Materials shall be noncombustible or fire retardant when exposed to the operating and non-operating trainer environmental conditions.

A.1.2.2.1 Fire retardant additives Only permanent fire retardant additives shall be used.

A.1.2.3 Hazardous materials The equipment shall not expose personnel or the environment to hazardous levels of toxic, carcinogenic, teratogenic, and otherwise hazardous materials as defined by 29 CFR 1910.

A.1.2.3.1 Use of hazardous materials If hazardous materials are needed in order to meet the performance requirements of this specification, only Government-authorized materials shall be used.

A.1.2.3.2 Marking of hazardous items The hazardous items…