Attachment_L-9_Question_and_Responses.docx
DOCX document 16 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N6134018R0016
About this file
Attachment_L-9_Question_and_Responses.docx
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| N6134018R00160004_Conforming_Copy.docx | DOCX document | |
| N6134018R00160004_Amendment_0004.docx | DOCX document | |
| N6134018R00160003_Amendment_0003.zip | ZIP file | |
| N6134018R0016Memo.doc | DOC document | |
| N6134018R00160002_Conforming_Copy.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_L-9_Question_and_Responses_Cont.docx | DOCX document | |
| N6134018R00160002_Amendment_0002.docx | DOCX document | |
| H1__LOT__VI_N6134018R0016Docs.zip | ZIP file | |
| Industry_Day_Questions_and_Government_Response_.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_L-6_Past-Performance-Questionnaire.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
N6134018R0016 Question and Responses
22. Question:
If two parties entered into an exclusive teaming agreement to respond to this RFP but after amendment 0002 have removed all exclusive language from that teaming agreement making it non-exclusive, does the government need to see a copy of the executed revised agreement?
Response:
No, the Government does not need to see a copy of a non-exclusive teaming arrangement since that arrangement should not be expected to inhibit competition. Consistent with the Section H clause 5252.215-9505; Section L, Part B, Section 3.0, paragraph 3.4h; and Section M, Part B, Section 3.0, paragraph 4.h, information is required from offerors who propose teaming arrangements on an exclusive basis.
23. Question:
Request a minimum of 2-week extension to evaluate vendor support.
Response:
The Government extended the proposal due date to 11 April 2018 under Amendment 0003 on 9 March 2018.
Attachment L-9
File details come from the government source that posted it.