Attachment_L-6_Past-Performance-Questionnaire.doc

N6134018R0016

ATTACHMENT # L-6

Past Performance Questionnaire Template

Instructions:

· Sections I and II to be completed by the Offeror/Major Subcontractor and provided to the assessor (Government personnel that had experience with the Offeror/Major Subcontractor on a previous relevant contract). The assessor, in turn, to verify Sections I through III, complete the questionnaire, and submit to the Contracting Office. The Offeror should also submit with its proposal (by the closing date of the Solicitation) copies of Sections I and II of all questionnaires as provided to assessors.

· Section II to be validated by the assessor. If any information is incorrect herein, please annotate and provide the correct information accordingly.

· Sections III through VII to be completed in their entirety by the assessor.

Message to the assessor: Your feedback is requested by Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division (NAWCTSD) to assist with establishing the performance history for the Contractor named below. In efforts to expedite receipt of the requested information, the Contracting Office respectfully requests that you do not mail hard copies. Instead, please e-mail the completed questionnaire(s) to: john.j.warren@navy.mil.

I. Solicitation Data (for the proposed effort)

II. Current or Historical Contract Information

Assessor: The performance data submitted by the Offeror is FORMCHECKBOX FILLIN \* MERGEFORMAT correct or FORMCHECKBOX incorrect.

CONTRACTOR NAME & ADDRESS:

Contract No

Type of Contract

Contract Value

Period of Performance/Delivery Schedule

Project/Requirement Description

Please select from the following as it applies to this contract:

PRIME

FORMCHECKBOX

SUBCONTRACTOR

Convenience

FORMCHECKBOX

Default

FORMCHECKBOX

N/A

III. Assessor Information Assessor Name

Title

Phone Number/Email Address

Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.

Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)

Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)

Contract Specialist

Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)

Technical Project Lead/Project Officer

Quality Assurance Specialist

Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) Auditor

Other:

IV. Evaluation Definitions The following definitions should be used in your assessment of Contractor performance.

V. Performance Evaluation

1. Technical Performance

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet the technical requirements?

Technical Performance

Please provide rationale for the assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s technical performance in the following areas.

Fabrication

Integration

Documentation

All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, rationale must be provided for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any of the technical problems identified in the above assessment? Please explain.

2. Schedule Performance

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet the schedule?

Schedule Performance

Please provide rationale for assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s schedule performance in the following areas.

Fabrication

Integration

Testing

Delivery of Long Lead Items

Risk Mitigation

Technical Data Items [i.e. Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL)]

Assess the Contractor’s ability to resolve Schedule Problems

All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, rationale must be provided for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any of the technical problems identified in the above assessment? Please explain.

3. Management

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s management performance?

Management

Please provide rationale for assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s management performance in the following areas.

MANAGEMENT RESPONSIVENESS—Timeliness, completeness, and quality of problem identification, proposal submittal, history of cooperative behavior, effective business relations, teamwork AND Customer satisfaction.

SUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT—Timely award and management of subcontracts and meeting subcontracting goals for small business, small disadvantaged business, etc.

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT—Effectiveness of integration and coordination of all activities required to execute the contract, use of resources, assignment of responsibility, internal coordination and communication, and risk management practices.

MANAGEMENT OF PERSONNEL—Ability to select, retain, support, and replace personnel with the experience and expertise necessary to accomplish the Government’s requirements within schedule and budget.

INTEGRATED PRODUCT TEAM MANAGEMENT—Commitment and participation to the IPT process.

All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, rationale must be provided for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any of the technical problems identified in the above assessment? Please explain.

VI. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (technical, schedule, management, and cost) on contract being assessed.

VII. General Comments:

Assessor’s Signature

Date

Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104 For Official Use Only