N61331-14-R-0014_Amendment_0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

See page 2 herein.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 8

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N61331-14-R-0014

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

04-Apr-2014

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

U0001

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

10-Apr-2014

CODE

NSWC PANAMA CITY (E. BRYANT)

ELOUISE.BRYANT@NAVY.MIL

850-234-4079

110 VERNON AVENUE

PANAMA CITY FL 32407-7001

N61331 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N61331-14-R-0014

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 01

The purpose of this amendment is to (1.) Respond to the questions submitted by Industry; (2.) Notify Industyr to delete the following attachments: N61331-14-R-0014.pdf, OPMA SPECIFICATIONS - 14Feb14_NONRuggedized.pdf, OPMA SPECIFICATIONS - 14Feb14_Ruggedized.pdf, and CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST.N6133114R0014.pdf; (3.) Correct the quantities; (4.) Clarify the verbiage in Far clause 52.212-1; (5.) Clarify the verbiage in 52.212-1 Addendum; (6.) Add FAR 52.243-1 Changes- Fixed Price; and (7.)

Revised Attachment 1, OPMA Ruggedized Specifications and Attachment2, OPMA Non-Ruggedized Specifications. Accordingly, the said solicitation is modified as follows:

Responses to Industry Questions (1-17)

Document‐ OPMA Ruggedized Specifications Page ‐1 Section‐ 1.2

1. Question ‐ For the purpose of sizing the Transit Cases, can the government provide the weight and the dimensions of the DTD Ground Station adapter and cables?

Answer- The DTD Ground Station Adapter is approximately 6 in X 4.5 in X 1.5 in in size and weighs 0.4 lbs, the cable is a standard 3 ft USB cable with one type A end and one Type B end. See Below.

DTD Ground Station Adapter dimensions in inches

2. Question ‐ What is the Transport Drive and Cables listed in section 1.2? There is no additional reference to this item in the specification.

Answer- The Transport drive is a portable external USB drive, 5.3 in X 3.2 in X 0.7 in and weighs less than .5 lbs; the cable is a standard USB dual type A on one end and mini USB connector on the other. See Below.

Transport drive dimensions in inches

3. Comment – The latest version of MIL‐STD‐810 is G.

Answer- The correct version is MIL-STD-810G

Document‐ OPMA Ruggedized Specifications Page ‐2 Section‐ 1.3

4. Question – The term “Top/Major Assembly Drawings” is not clearly defined in ASME Y14.24. Will top level drawings of the two transit cases along with the computers be sufficient?

Answer- Drawings of the cases, computer and removable drive assemblies will be sufficient.

5. Question – Are drawings required for the non rugged computer?

Answer- Drawings of non-rugged computers will not be required.

Document‐ OPMA Ruggedized Specifications Page ‐3 Section‐ 1.3

6. Question – Is support for RAID level 5 required or is level 0 and 1 acceptable?

Answer- Support of RAID level 0 and 1 is sufficient to be considered technically acceptable.

7. Question – Will the connection to the 10GB Ethernet Controller be Copper or Fiber?

Answer- The 10 GB Ethernet controllers will be copper connection.

8. Question – If the optional external eSATAp port is not included will the ruggedized computer still be considered Technically Acceptable? We would like to include this feature but based on the award criteria it is not advantageous to include optional items.

Answer- Inclusion of the external eSATAp port is desired but will not affect technical acceptability.

9. Question ‐ The McAfee Virus Scan Enterprise software has been discontinued as a standalone product. It is now part of the Endpoint Protection Suite. Is this an acceptable alternate?

Answer- McAfee Endpoint Protection Suite is acceptable as the virus protection software.

10. Question ‐ Are the latest versions of the Microsoft software acceptable or is the application software dependent on the versions specified?

Answer- Any updated versions of software may be used in place of listed versions with the following exceptions:

Windows 7 Professional 64-bit OS

Acronis Backup and Restore 11.5

Document‐ Contract Data Requirements Page ‐1 Block 16

11. Question – Is a PDF file an acceptable format for the Media Requirements of the CAD Drawings and User

Manuals?

Answer- PDF is an acceptable format for the documents listed.

Document‐ Solicitation Page ‐12 Section CLIN’s

12. Question – What fixed quantity should be used for computing the Extended Cost of CLIN’s 0101AB, 0102AA, 0102AB, 0103AA and 0103AB?

Answer- See revised 52.212-2 and 52.212-2 Addendum.

Document‐ Solicitation Page ‐10 Section CLIN’s

13. Question – There are no step ladder quantities for CLIN 0100, does this imply that the government intends to purchase a fixed quantity of 13 of the Non‐Ruggedized computers?

Answer- Yes, the Government intends to purchase a fixed quantity of 13 of the Non-Ruggedized computers.

14. Question – With the exception of CLIN 0100, should the Offeror only fill in pricing for the SUB CLIN’s?

Answer- See revised 52.212-2 and 52.212-1 Addendum.

Document‐ Solicitation Page ‐23 Section 52.212‐2

15. Question – How will the average unit price be computed?

Answer- See revised 52.212-2 and 52.212-2 Addendum.

Document‐ Solicitation Page ‐18 Section Technical Proposal

16. Questions – Are there any format restrictions for the technical proposal?

Answer- The technical proposal should be Microsoft Office 2007 and/or Adobe Acrobat (PDF).

Document‐ Solicitation Page ‐43 Section 52.217‐7

17. Question ‐ During the five year life of this program it is likely that one of more of the initially selected components, such as the nVidia Quadro K5000 and specific Intel processor will hit an end of life and no longer be available without advanced purchases or commitments. So long as the specifications are met or exceeded, is the customer agreeable to substitutions so long as the customer is given notice and approves the substitutions in advance?

Answer- If components are no longer available due to end of life, after the contract award, the Government will allow changes to the specifications as authorized in accordance with FAR 52.243-1 Changes- Fixed Price.

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

SUBCLIN 0001AB

The pricing detail quantity has decreased by 13.00 from 21.00 to 8.00.

SUBCLIN 0002AB

The pricing detail quantity has decreased by 13.00 from 23.00 to 10.00.

SUBCLIN 0003AB

The pricing detail quantity has decreased by 4.00 from 8.00 to 4.00.

SUBCLIN 0004AA

The pricing detail quantity has increased by 1.00 from 4.00 to 5.00.

SUBCLIN 0004AB

The pricing detail quantity has decreased by 3.00 from 8.00 to 5.00.

SUBCLIN 0005AA

The pricing detail quantity has increased by 1.00 from 4.00 to 5.00.

SUBCLIN 0005AB

The pricing detail quantity has decreased by 3.00 from 8.00 to 5.00.

SUBCLIN 0101AA

The pricing detail quantity 14.00 has been added.

SUBCLIN 0101AB

The pricing detail quantity 11.00 has been added.

SUBCLIN 0102AA

The pricing detail quantity 5.00 has been added.

SUBCLIN 0102AB

SUBCLIN 0103AA

SUBCLIN 0103AB

SUBCLIN 0104AB

The pricing detail quantity has decreased by 5.00 from 10.00 to 5.00.

The following have been added by reference:

52.243-1 Changes--Fixed Price AUG 1987

The following have been modified:

52.212-1 ADDENDUM

Addendum to FAR 52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS- COMMERCIAL ITEMS (JUL 2013)

Addendum to 52.212-1(c), Period for Acceptance of Offers. The paragraph is tailored as follows: “The offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm for 90 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of offers.”

ADDENDA TO 52.212-1, PROPOSAL PREPARATION AND SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

A. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of the proposal, the offeror must follow the instructions contained herein. The proposal must be complete, self-sufficient, and respond directly to the requirements of this solicitation. The response shall consist of two (2) separate parts; Part I – Price Proposal, and Part II – Technical Proposal.

B. Submit signed and dated offers to the office specified in block 9 of this solicitation no later than the time and dated specified in block 8 of this solicitation. Proposal may be sent via email to: Contracting Specialist, Elouise Bryant: elouise.bryant@navy.mil and the contracting officer, Marlene Davidson to e-mail:

marlene.davidson1@navy.mil.

PART I – Price Proposal:

(i) Complete blocks 12, 17a, and 30a, b, and c of the SF1449. In doing so, the offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the SOLICITATION, with attachments. The SOLICITATION constitutes the model contract, N61331-14-R-0014.

(ii) Insert proposed unit price and extended prices in the Pricing Schedule. The extended price shall be the unit price multiplied by the quantity specified for each CLIN and/or SubClin. The price proposal(s) must be submitted for a base year plus four (4) Option Years.

(iii) Complete the necessary fill-ins and certifications in provisions. The provisions FAR 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and Certifications – Commercial Items (Alternate I), and DFARS 252.247-7022 when it is included in solicitation shall be returned along with the proposal. )

PART II –Technical Proposal:

Offers must meet the minimum requirements specified in the solicitation and any subsequent amendments; and on a separate sheet of paper, provide specifications of proposed ruggedized and non-ruggedized items and warranty terms and conditions. In addition, identify any “exceptions” to the specifications and state precisely how the offered supplies/services differ from the applicable specification paragraph(s). Any exception which is not expressly approved by the contracting officer in writing is hereby rejected and void. Failure to comply with the submittal requirements of this paragraph may result in rejection of the offer.

EXHIBITS/ATTACHMENTS

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Exhibit A CDRLs 3 2-Dec-2013 Attachment 1 Ruggedized Specifications. Rev 1 4 10-Apr-2014 Attachment 2 Non-Ruggedized Specifications.Rev 1 2 10-Apr-2014

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (JAN 1999)

(a) The Government will award a single contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

(i) Price Evaluation for Award: For offers which meet all technical factors, award will be made to the offeror based on the lowest evaluated price. The total evaluated price for each offeror will be based on the total offered price for CLINs 0001 through 0104 (Base year and four (4) options) in accordance with FAR 52.217-7. The total evaluated price is the unit price multiplied by the specified quantity. On CLINs with SubClins, the total evaluated price is determined by the total price of the corresponding SubClins.

(ii) Technical Evaluation Factors: Offers must meet the specifications in the solicitation and any subsequent amendments; and provide the following information:

i. Product Compliance - The product offered must meet the specifications and standards listed in Attachments 1 and 2.

ii. Delivery: Offerors must meet the required delivery date specified in the Delivery Information.

iii. Responsibility: Offerors must meet the standard for FAR 9.104

iv. Warranty- Offerors must provide a warranty in accordance with commercial standards.

The technical factors will be evaluated as follows:

The proposal will be evaluated in terms of applying specific criteria against evaluation elements. The required specifications are defined in the solicitation. Offerors should rely exclusively on written material to convey their proposals. The validity and thoroughness of the Offeror's presentation will be evaluated as specific evidence of their understanding and capability to successfully provide the items as required in this solicitation. Reasonableness and clarity of the technical approach will be considered.

The Government reserves the right to evaluate each Offeror’s proposal in accordance with the stated evaluation criteria and determine which proposals meet all technical requirements and is technically acceptable. Factors 1 through 4 will be rated as either “ACCEPTABLE” or “UNACCEPTABLE” per definitions in the table below. It should be noted that any proposal that is found to be “UNACCEPTABLE” in any factor of the Technical proposal will result in the entire Proposal being deemed unacceptable.

(b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer’s specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(End of provision)

(End of Summary of Changes)

Technical Ratings

Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.