NARR_BQ's_1-109_-_FINAL.pdf

PDF 273 KB Posted

Attached to
USNS NARRAGANSETT (T-ATF 167) DPMA
Solicitation number
N50054-17-R-0003
Issued by

About this file

Government Responses to Requests for Clarification

View the file

Other files

Show all 25

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ITEM NO: 997-11-001

TITLE: Drydocking and Undocking; accomplish

PARA. NO: 3.2, 3.2.1, 3.2.2

PAGE NO: 1 of 6, 2 of 6

ITEM NO: 111-80-001

TITLE: Training Operations Center and

Berthing Installation, Boat Alt 226NS/3C;

accomplish

PARA. NO: 2.2 -2.4

PAGE NO: 1

ITEM NO:

TITLE:

PARA. NO:

PAGE NO:

ITEM NO:

TITLE:

PARA. NO:

PAGE NO:

ITEM NO: 110-21-001, others

TITLE: ABS Surveyor

PARA. NO: 3.1

PAGE NO: 1 of 2

ITEM NO: Solicitation

TITLE:

PARA. NO:

PAGE NO:

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 5:

Please clarify the language in para 3.1 of work item 110-21-001 and others work items in regards to the ABS surveyor for T&Is. Will the contractor be responsible for providing the ABS surveyor or will they be provided by the

Government?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: The ABS surveyor will be provided by the Government.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 1: Paragraph 3.2 of Item 997-11-001 requires contractor to provide a sound dock, dockmaster, qualified personnel, and equipment certified in accordance with 2.2…which is MIL-

STD-1625. Sections HQ C-2-0021 on page 19 of 97, and HQ C-2-0022 on page 20 of 97 of the solicitation also require the use of drydocks and drydock facilities certified in accordance with MIL-STD-1625. However, paragraphs 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 allude to using an independent third party certification for the drydock and dockmaster. Is an independent third party drydock certification and contractor certified dockmaster acceptable in lieu of certification to MIL-STD-1625 for this contract? If MIL-STD-1625 certification is not waived for this contract, the government could be severely limiting the competition for this contract to as few as one contractor. Please waive the requirement for certification to MIL-STD-1625 and allow independent third party certification.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Work item 997-11-001 was updated via an ERRATA. To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to

Morgan Myrick, Contracting Officer, and Desireé Logan, Contract

Specialist at MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 2: References for paragraphs 2.2-2.4 are missing from the package.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: The references have been added via the

AMRDEC website. To receive the references, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick, Contracting Officer, and Desireé Logan, Contract Specialist at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Navy took vessel in 2016. The USNS

NARRAGANSETT has been active.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 3: I see the Narraganett was contracted to

DonJon Marine for a time, when did the Navy take the vessel back over and has it been active?

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 4: Considering that the current bid date is

May 02, 2017 and as of this date we have not yet received all of the references, and along with the complexity of the bid, which will require a number of specialty subcontractors, and extensive material research, please extend the bid opening date to May 16, 2017. This should give all contractors the opportunity to prepare proposals that are most advantageous to the government

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: The proposal due date has been amended via Amendment 0001.

CONTRACTOR POC:

REQUEST FOR SPECIFICATION CLARIFICATION

Attachment J-5

CONTRACTOR PHONE:

**Newly answered questions are indicated by a BOLD

Government Response.**

DATE OF REQUEST: SOLICITATION NO: N50054-17-R-0003

TITLE: USNS NARRAGANSETT (T-AFT-167) Docking Phased Maintenance Availability (DPMA) MARMC POC: Desireé Logan

CONTRACTOR: MARMC PHONE: 757-400-0329

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: NoCONTRACTOR QUESTION 6:

Will Q.E.D. Systems be involved as the third party planner on this solicitation as they are on other MARMC solicitations?

ITEM NO: 426-80-001

TITLE: Speed Log Replacement

PARA. NO: 2

PAGE NO: 1 of 3

ITEM NO: 441-80-001

TITLE: SEATEL ANTENNA RELOCATE

PARA. NO: 2

PAGE NO: 1 OF 1

ITEM NO: 562-11-001

TITLE: RUDDER, STEERING GEAR AND

SKEG

PARA. NO: 3.2

PAGE NO: 2 OF 6

ITEM NO: 575-11-001

TITLE: STERN ROLLER FOUNDATION

PARA. NO: 2

PAGE NO: 1 of 2

ITEM NO: 672-00-100

TITLE: CONVERT LINE LOAD LOCKER

PARA. NO: 2

PAGE NO: 1of 2

ITEM NO: 593-11-001

TITLE: Collecting, Holding and Transfer

(CHT) Piping, tank, level sensors and lift stations; repair and replace

PARA. NO: 3.11 & 3.12

PAGE NO: 3 of 4

ITEM NO: 123-11-002

TITLE: Ballast Tank Inspection, repair, preserve; accomplish

PARA. NO: 2.4

PAGE NO: 1 of 5

ITEM NO: Multiple

TITLE:

PARA. NO:

PAGE NO:

ITEM NO: 111-80-001

TITLE: Training Operations Center and

Berthing Installation, Boat Alt 226NS/3C

PARA. NO: 2.0

PAGE NO: 1 of 2

ITEM NO: 672-00-001

TITLE: Convert Line Load Lockers to Storage

Spaces BOAT ALT 226NS/8C

PARA. NO: 2.2

PAGE NO: 1 of 2

ITEM NO: 245-11-001

TITLE: Propeller, repair

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 16: The work item references drawing

5111286, Line Locker Conversion to Storerooms which was not provided on either CD of references. Please provide the referenced drawing.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Reference has been added via the

AMRDEC website. To receive the references, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick, Contracting Officer, and Desireé Logan, Contract Specialist at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 17: The drawings indicate that the vessel is equipped with controllable pitch propeller system manufactured by

Propulsion Systems Inc. The work item is written as if the vessel is equipped with fixed propellers and intregral hubs, as inspection of bluing for propeller bore contact fit, and the installation of the propeller nut and keeper is included in the work item. The work item does not completely correspond to the equipment installed onboard the vessel. Paragraph 3.12 directs the contractor to remove the equipment listed in 1.3. Paragraph 1.3 lists (1) Port and (1) Starboard Propeller, not propeller assembly. Is it the governments intention for the contractor to remove the (4) propeller blades and hub for each propeller assembly from the vessel?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Work Item upated via ERRATA. To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick, Contracting Officer, and Desireé Logan, Contract Specialist at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 14:

Will the ABS be provided by the Government or to be provided by the

Contractor?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Answered in question 5

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 15: The work item references the following drawings that were not provided on each of the reference Cds received.

5111375 Partial Foc'sle Deck and Details Removal; 5111376 Berth, Training Operation Center, T-SCIF Scantlings and Details; 5111382

Training operations Center and T-SCIF False Floors Installation. Please provide the referenced drawings.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Reference has been added via the

AMRDEC website. To receive the references, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick, Contracting Officer, and Desireé Logan, Contract Specialist at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Paragraphs 3.11 and 3.12 were updated via an ERRATA. To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick, Contracting Officer, and Desireé Logan, Contract

Specialist at MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 13:

Item 123-11-002 is for Ballast Tank inspection and repairs; however, drawing 633-30698 Rev A, Hull Zinc Installation is for the hull. The

Contractor requests drawing be provide for Ballast Tank Zincs.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: To receive the references, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick, Contracting Officer, and Desireé

Logan, Contract Specialist at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 12:

Paragraph 3.11 tasks the removal and installation of the equipment listed in

1.3.7, and paragraph 3.12 requires the installation and connection of new level sensors listed in 1.3.7. However, the only location listed under paragraph 1.3 is 1.3.1, which lists the entire CHT System. Similarly, paragraph 3.2 directs the installation and testing of new material listed in

1.3 and there isn't any material listed under 1.3. Please clarify.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 11: PLEASE PROVIDE MISSING

REFERENCE 2.2

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Reference has been added via the

AMRDEC website. To receive the references, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick, Contracting Officer, and Desireé Logan, Contract Specialist at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 7: The following references are missing from the package - 2.3-2.5 and 2.8. Please provide.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: References have been added via the

AMRDEC website. To receive the references, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick, Contracting Officer, and Desireé Logan, Contract Specialist at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 10: PLEASE PROVIDE MISSING

REFERENCE 2.3

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 8: PLEASE PROVIDE MISSING

REFERENCE 2.3

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Reference has been added via the

AMRDEC website. To receive the references, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick, Contracting Officer, and Desireé Logan, Contract Specialist at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Ayers Marine ElectronicsCONTRACTOR QUESTION 9: PLEASE PROVIDE SOURCE FOR

AUTHORIZED TECHNICAL REPRESENTIVE

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Reference have been added via the

AMRDEC website. To receive the references, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick, Contracting Officer, and Desireé Logan, Contract Specialist at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

PARA. NO: 1.3, 3.2, 3.12 thru 3.12.4

PAGE NO: 1 of 7, 3 of 6

ITEM NO: 245-11-001

TITLE: Propeller, repair

PARA. NO: 1.3, 3.2, 3.12 thru 3.12.4

PAGE NO: 1 of 7, 3 of 6

ITEM NO: 123-11-001

TITLE: Tank Inspection and Repair, accomplish

PARA. NO: 3.2 and 3.4

PAGE NO: 3 of 4

ITEM NO: 633-21-001

TITLE: Impressed Current Cathodic Protection

(ICCP) System; inspect and repair

PARA. NO: 3.2.1

PAGE NO: 2 of 6

ITEM NO: 321-80-001

TITLE: Shore Power System Receptacle

Replace and Relocate, BOATALT 226NS/4C

PARA. NO: 1.3.2; 3.3

PAGE NO: 1 of 2

ITEM NO: 589-11-001

TITLE: Allied Marine Crane; repair

PARA. NO: 3.7

PAGE NO: 2

ITEM NO: 589-11-001

TITLE: Allied Marine Crane;repair

PARA. NO: 3.10

PAGE NO: 3

ITEM NO: 589-11-001

TITLE: Allied Marine Crane;repair

PARA. NO: 3.10

PAGE NO: 3

ITEM NO: 589-11-001

Allied Marine Crane; repair

PARA. NO: 3.11

PAGE NO: 3

ITEM NO: 583-11-001/589-11-001

TITLE: Marine Crane and Marine Davit repair

PARA. NO: 3.1

PAGE NO: 1

ITEM NO: 583-11-001

Marine Allied Marine Davit repair

PARA. NO: 3.2 - 3.2.1

PAGE NO: 1

583-11-001

TITLE: AlliedMarine Davit repair

PARA. NO: 3.7

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 17: The drawings indicate that the vessel is equipped with controllable pitch propeller system manufactured by

Propulsion Systems Inc. The work item is written as if the vessel is equipped with fixed propellers and intregral hubs, as inspection of bluing for propeller bore contact fit, and the installation of the propeller nut and keeper is included in the work item. The work item does not completely correspond to the equipment installed onboard the vessel. Paragraph 3.12 directs the contractor to remove the equipment listed in 1.3. Paragraph 1.3 lists (1) Port and (1) Starboard Propeller, not propeller assembly. Is it the governments intention for the contractor to remove the (4) propeller blades and hub for each propeller assembly from the vessel?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Work Item upated via ERRATA. To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick, Contracting Officer, and Desireé Logan, Contract Specialist at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: 583-11-001 2.2 is a NAVSEA STD tech manual, 2.4 is the tech manual from Allied. 589-11-001 2.2 crane serial number is 1712 SUPERVISOR to acquire Ref. To receive the

ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick, Contracting

Officer, and Desireé Logan, Contract Specialist at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 22: Paragraph 3.7 states to accomplish full teardown, inspection/ (OVERHAUL) using 2.2 through 2.9. Is overhaul based on the inspection report required paragraph 3.7.5.1 i.e additional repairs and material?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: No, a full overhaul is required. The required report in 3.7.5.1 is used for OQE of the inspection and overhaul.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 23: Paragraph 3.10 states to assemble, install, align, adjust and connect each component dissassemble, inspected and repaire in 3.4, however 3.4 states to remove and dispose of fluids. Is correct paragraph 3.7?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Yes, paragraph 3.7 is the correct reference. To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to

Morgan Myrick, Contracting Officer, and Desireé Logan, Contract

Specialist at MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Paragraph 3.10 has been updated via an

ERRATA. To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to

Morgan Myrick, Contracting Officer, and Desireé Logan, Contract

Specialist at MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 24: Paragraph 3.10 calls out to install new gaskets, o-rings, bushings, pins, keys, studs, bolts, nuts and parts listed in

5.3.2 - 5.3.7, hosever no parts are listed in paragraph 5. Is material required for renewal based on condition found report in paragrapn

3.7.5.1?

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 25: Paragraph 3.11 states to accomplish 009-

107 for cleaning and flushing of all new disturbed hydraulic piping. Is the intent of this paragraph to perform a HOT OIL FLUSH and submitting a PCP and would it also include hoses removed and hard blanked?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Yes, a PCP is required per SI 107 para

3.4, hoses must be reistalled prior to accomplising 009-107.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 26: Reference 2.2 is not for a Allied Davit.

Is reference 2.2 incorrect?

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 27: Is the Allied Tech Rep required for removal, disassembly, inspection and reinstallation as required in item

589-11-001?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Yes, para 3.2.1

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 28: Paragraph 3.7 states to accomplish full teardown, inspection/ (OVERHAUL) using 2.2 through 2.9. Is overhaul based on the inspection report required paragraph 3.7.5.1 i.e additional repairs and material?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: No, a full overhaul is required. The required report in 3.7.5.1 is used for OQE of the inspection and overhaul.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 18: Paragraph 3.2 requires the contractor to provide the services of an authorized technical representative to provide on-site technical support for inspection, special tools, reports and adjustment of the equipment. The work item does not direct the contractor to disassemble the propeller hub, which normally requires an autrhorized technical representative. If the contractor is not completing a hub overhaul, is the technical representative required?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Errata created to include overhaul of the

Hub. To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan

Myrick, Contracting Officer, and Desireé Logan, Contract Specialist at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 19: Paragraph 3.4 of the work it em directs the contractor to replace shell/hull plate and associated support structure that has detiorated 20% loss or more and interior bulkhead and support structure deteriorated 22% or more referenced from the tank inspection complete in paragraph 3.2. Paragraph 3.2 calls for a visual inspection of each tank listed in paragraph 1.2. Determination of palting deterioration should be measured using an NDE method such as Ultrasonic Testing. Will the government change paragraph 3.2 to include Ultrasonic testing requirements for the tank plating?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: UT's are in WI 110-21-001 interior

Gauging.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 20: Please provide contact information for the authorized and qualified technical representative for this item.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Contact information was included via an

ERRATA in paragraph 4.4. To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick, Contracting Officer, and Desireé

Logan, Contract Specialist at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 21: Please provide nameplate data for HPU listed in 1.3.2 for accomplishment of 009-17 as required in para 3.3.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: 460 VAC, 48.2 FLA

PAGE NO: 2

ITEM NO: 583-11-001

TITLE: Allied Marine Crane;repair

PARA. NO: 3.10

PAGE NO: 3

ITEM NO: 583-11-001

TITLE: Allied Marine Davit ;repair

PARA. NO: 3.10

PAGE NO: 3

ITEM NO: 583-11-001

Allied Marine Crane; repair

PARA. NO: 3.12

PAGE NO: 3

ITEM NO: 259-11-002

TITLE: Main, Ship Service Diesel Engine and

Fire Pump Intake/Exhaust Piping Ssystems, repairs

PARA. NO: 3.2.1

PAGE NO: 2 of 4

ITEM NO: 259-11-002

TITLE: Main, Ship Service Diesel Engine and

Fire Pump Intake/Exhaust Piping Ssystems, repairs

PARA. NO: 3.11

PAGE NO: 3 of 4

ITEM NO: 631-11-001

TITLE: Bilge; preserve

PARA. NO: 1.2.1

PAGE NO: 1 of 4

ITEM NO:

TITLE:

PARA. NO:

PAGE NO:

ITEM NO: 589-11-001

TITLE: Allied Marine Crane; repair and test

PARA. NO: 2.2

PAGE NO: 1 of 5

ITEM NO: 562-11-001

TITLE: Rudders, Steering Gear and Skeg, clean, inspect and repair

PARA. NO: 3.19

PAGE NO: 4 of 6

ITEM NO: 259-11-002

TITLE: Main and Ships Service Diesel Engine and Firepump Engine Intake/Exhaust Piping

Systems

PARA. NO: 2.4

PAGE NO: 1 of 4

ITEM NO: 243-11-001

TITLE: Propulsion Shafting, repair

PARA. NO: 2.5

PAGE NO:1 of 7

ITEM NO: 321-80-001 CONTRACTOR QUESTION 40: Please provide nameplate data for HPU listed in 1.3.2 for accomplishment of 009-17 as required in para 3.3.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: 460 VAC, 48.2 FLA

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 36: The government changed the Serial

Number of the crane in Errata 1. Reference 2.2 in not applicable to the installed crane, serial number 1712. The Technical Manual covers cranes with serial numbers 2284 through 2286 only. Please provide the correct

Technical Manual.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Correct ref is TG811-AS-MMC-

010/60848 Errata created with corrections. To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick, Contracting Officer, and Desireé Logan, Contract Specialist at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 37: Paragraph 3.19 directs the contractor to

"Disassemble and remove equipment listed in 1.3 including pins and linkages using 2.2 through 2.13 for guidance". Paragraph 1.3 includes the

Centerline Skeg. Is it the government's intention for the contractor to remove the Cernterline Skeg?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: No, Errata to remove . To receive the

ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick, Contracting

Officer, and Desireé Logan, Contract Specialist at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: In accordance with reference 2.9, contractor shall utilize MIL-G-24716, Cl B, for alternative gasket materials.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 38: Reference 2.4, Drawing 1230-001-259, Rec C part numbers J40 through J45 call for the use of compressed asbestos gasket material. Please provide an alternative to the material specified by the drawing.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 39: Reference 2.5, Technical Manual

99TA516053, Rev A, Shaft Seal is incorrect. This reference is the the main engine crankshaft seal and not the propulsion shaft seals. Please provide the correct reference.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Ref will be added and corrected by

Errata. To receive the reference and ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick, Contracting Officer, and Desireé Logan, Contract Specialist at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 35: Questions #4 and Amendment 0001 extended the bid date from May 02, 2017 to May 05, 2017, however today's

(04/18/17) ship check has generated some additional findings and subsequent questions, which will be submitted soonest. We learned at the shipcheck that an ERRATA is forthcoming. Please consider the amount of time and resources it takes to disperse this information to our subcontractors and material vendors and the time it takes to return their pricing. At that point we must evaluate each offer and incorporate into our bid to ensure submittal of the most advantageous proposal to the

Government. Assuming the ERRATA will be issued in a timely manner, please extend the bid opening date to May 16, 2017.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: The proposal due date has been amended via Amendment 0002.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 32: Is it the government's intention to have the contractor remove all intake and exhaust insulation from the engines to the intakes and the engines to the exhaust stacks for inspection?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Yes, that is the intent.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 33: In accordance with NAVSEA STD 009-

11 and MIL-STD-769, what type of insulation and lagging (covering) does the government wish to be installed on the intakes and exhausts once repairs are completed?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Refer to Reference 2.10 4842608

REV(E)

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: 1-14-0CONTRACTOR QUESTION 34: Please provide the compartment number for the space the government has indicated as the Bow Thruster

Compartment and wishes to have preserved.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 29: Paragraph 3.10 states to assemble, install, align, adjust and connect each component dissassemble, inspected and repaire in 3.6, however 3. states to disconjnect and remove davit. Is correct paragraph 3.7?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Yes, paragraph 3.7 is the correct reference. To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to

Morgan Myrick, Contracting Officer, and Desireé Logan, Contract

Specialist at MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 30: Paragraph 3.10 calls out to install new gaskets, o-rings, bushings, pins, keys, studs, bolts, nuts and parts listed in

5.3.2 - 5.3.7, hosever no parts are listed in paragraph 5. Is material required for renewal based on condition found report in paragrapn

3.7.5.1?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: No, a full overhaul is required. The required report in 3.7.5.1 is used for OQE of the inspection and overhaul.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 31: Paragraph 3.12 states to accomplish 009-

107 for cleaning and flushing of all new disturbed hydraulic piping. Is the intent of this paragraph to perform a HOT OIL FLUSH and submitting a PCP and would it also include hoses removed and hard blanked?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Yes, a PCP is required per SI 107 para

3.4, hoses must be reistalled prior to accomplising 009-107.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 28: Paragraph 3.7 states to accomplish full teardown, inspection/ (OVERHAUL) using 2.2 through 2.9. Is overhaul based on the inspection report required paragraph 3.7.5.1 i.e additional repairs and material?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: No, a full overhaul is required. The required report in 3.7.5.1 is used for OQE of the inspection and overhaul.

TITLE: Shore Power System Receptacle

Replace and Relocate, BOATALT 226NS/4C

PARA. NO: 1.3.2; 3.3

PAGE NO: 1 of 2

ITEM NO: N/A

TITLE: Proposal Section L Pre-Award

Information

PARA. NO: ( c )(1)

PAGE NO: 81

ITEM NO:

TITLE:

PARA. NO:

PAGE NO:

ITEM NO:

TITLE: 52.217-7 OPTION FOR INCREASED

QUANTITY--SEPARATELY PRICED LINE

ITEM (MAR 1989)

ITEM NO: 997-11-001

TITLE: Dry docking and Undocking

PARA. NO:

PAGE NO:

ITEM NO:

TITLE:

PARA. NO:

PAGE NO:

ITEM NO: 583-11-001/589-11-001

TITLE: Allied Marine Crane and Davit repair

PARA. NO:

PAGE NO:

ITEM NO: 583-11-001

TITLE: Allied Marine Davit (D-5300); repair and test

PARA. NO: 2.7

PAGE NO: 1 of 5

ITEM NO: Solicitation HQ F-2-0006

Milestones (NAVSEA) (SEP 1990)

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 42: The RFQ contract invokes three Contract

Data Requirements List (CDRL) that directly reference NAVSEA Standard

009-60.

A007 INTEGRATED PROJECT SCHEDULE

A002 Key Events Schedule

A001 Project Planning Chart

Each of these CDRLs reference Requirements that contradict the others and the standard item 009-60.

For example, A001 & A002, Blocks 10/12/13/14 state to submit NLT 5 days after award. However, A007 states to submit NLT start of availability, whereas 009-60 states the IPS to be submitted at A-30 and SOR at A-0

CDRL A002 states to Submit 009-60 paragraphs 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, & 3.7.

CDRL A001 calls out to provide the information covered in 009-60 para

3.5, however does not specify the paragraph number, nor covers Paragraphs

3.6, 3.8

CDRL A007 States to the initial submission will be no later than start of availability, however, 4 bullets down states to submit NLT 30 days after award.

The bidder asks that CDRL A001, A002 & A007 be consolidated and clarified to define any requirement that is not already covered in the

NAVSEA CAT 1 Standard item 009-60 and remove that which is covered so that there is no duplication of effort keeping down cost of these CDRLs that are not separately priced.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: CDRLs A001, A002, and A007 have been removed.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 40: Please provide nameplate data for HPU listed in 1.3.2 for accomplishment of 009-17 as required in para 3.3.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: 460 VAC, 48.2 FLA

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 41: Preaward Requirement requires Mooring

Calculations. Please provide arrival drafts in order to accomplish these calculations.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Ships characteristics information is provided on the work package cover sheet.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 45: As a result of the ship check it was brought to our attention that the vessel's availability or POP

(period of performance) is 120 Calendar days. Attachment J-3 states commencement at award and completion is 12/15/17.

Please clarify anticipated start date and confirm the availability of

120 Calendar Days.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: POP is 123 days to be executed in the

KTR's window of availability dates are flexable but the avail must be completed by 12/15/17.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 44: As a result of the ship check it was brought to our attention that the vessel would require 90 days in dry dock with a fleet to be performed on day 84. The Errata issued on 04/19/17 does not address this information. Please clarify.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: KTR is to determine the length of time docking they will require. Could be more or less then 90 days.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 46: What does OQE stand for answer to question 22 & 28.

Item 583-11-001 reference 2.2, 2.4, and 2.7 are incorrect for the MODEL

D5300 ALLIED DAVIT

Item 589-11-001 and 583-11-001 reference for weight testing are the same this can’t be correct TM-80-1019

Is the intent of the work items 583-11-001/589-11-001 to disassemble, inspect and report or completely overhaul units per references i.e. overhaul all electrical components, mechanical components, hydraulic components which would require renewal of all bearings, seals, bushings, ware pads, fasteners, brake disc, springs, pins, filters, gaskets etc.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: OQE refers to Objective Quality

Evidence. YES, 3.7 accomplish full teardown inspection and overhaul.

Errata created to change incorrect reference called out. To receive the

ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick, Contracting

Officer, and Desireé Logan, Contract Specialist at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 43: What does the “A” represent in A+28? Is it “Award” or “Availability”? Please Clarify.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Availability

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 47: Reference 2.7, TM-80-1019, Allied

Systems Technical Manual; Model D5300 Operational & Weight Test is incorrect. This manual is not for the D-5300 davit. Is is titled TB 60-64

Allied Marine Crane. Please provide the coorect reference for the D-5300 davit.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Ref corrected via an ERRATA website.

To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan

Myrick, Contracting Officer, and Desireé Logan, Contract Specialist at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 48: The referenced section of the solicitation indicates the the crew movement ashore and movement aboard the vessel are considered milestones within the schedule of ship repair. What, if any contractor support will the crew require to move off the vessel at the begining of the contract and aboard the vessel at the end of the contract?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: The crew has 17 or less aboard and

Minimal rigging/assist.

TITLE: Milestone Event

PARA. NO: Crew Movement

PAGE NO: 32 of 97

ITEM NO: 245-11-001

TITLE: Propeller; repair

PARA. NO: 2.10

PAGE NO: 1 of 7

ITEM NO: 245-11-001

TITLE: Propeller; repair

PARA. NO: 3.20.1 through 3.20.4 and 3.21

PAGE NO: 5 of 7

ITEM NO: 245-11-001

TITLE: Propeller; repair

PARA. NO: 3.12

PAGE NO: 3 of 7

ITEM NO: 245-11-001

TITLE: Propeller; repair

PARA. NO:

PAGE NO: 1 through 7

ITEM NO: 259-11-002

TITLE: Main and Ship Service Diesel Engine and Fire Pump Engine Intake/Exhaust Piping

System; repairs

PARA. NO: 3.2.1

PAGE NO: 2 of 4

ITEM NO: 243-11-001

TITLE: Propulsion Shafting, repair

PARA. NO: 3.15.8 through 3.15.8.1

PAGE NO: 5 of 7

ITEM NO: 633-21-001

TITLE: ICCP SYSTEM INSPECT AND

REPAIR

PARA. NO: 3.6 AND 3.6.1

PAGE NO: 5 of 6

ITEM NO: 426-80-002

TITLE: Standard Compass, Reflector, Binnacle and Foundation Removal;

PARA. NO:

PAGE NO:

ITEM NO: 441-80-001

TITLE: Seatel Antenna Relocate B/A

226NS/7C; accomplish

PARA. NO:

PAGE NO:

ITEM NO: 123-11-001

TITLE: Tank Inspection and repair; accomplish

PARA. NO: 3.4

PAGE NO: 3 of 4

ITEM NO: 123-11-002

TITLE: Ballast Tank Inspection and repair;

accomplish

PARA. NO: 3.12

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: ERRATA created. To receive the

ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick, Contracting

Officer, and Desireé Logan, Contract Specialist at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 50: The paragaphs 3.20.1 through 3.20.4 describe the proceedure for installing a fixed pitch and hub propeller, not a controllable pitch propeller hub and blades. Paragraph 3.21 directs the contractor to fill the propeller nozzle with float coat. It appears that none of these items are applicable to t he vessels propeller installation. Please verify and delete these items.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: ERRATA created. To receive the

ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick, Contracting

Officer, and Desireé Logan, Contract Specialist at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 54: The paragraph directs the contractor to complete magnetic particle testing on each tailshaft taper. The vessel is equipped with controllable pitch propellers which include a porpulsnio shaft and line shaft. Tapered tailshafts are not installed onboard this vessel.

Please remove this requirement.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Errata created to remove requirements.

To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan

Myrick, Contracting Officer, and Desireé Logan, Contract Specialist at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 52 : The contractor has been in contact with the OEM (Propulsion Systems Inc.). Their feedback on the work item indicates that there is not enough information to complete a removal, inspection, repair and reinstallation of each controllable pitch system. The

OEM specifically stated that many paragraphs are not applicable to the controllable pitch systems. Please review the specification for applicability and completeness.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 51: The paragraph directs the contractor to

"Remove the equipment listed in 1.3 and located in 1.2 using 2.2 through

2.21 for guidance". Included in paragraph 1.3 are the port and starboard hub assemblies. The work item does not include any paragraph for hub disassembly, inspection and reassembly, only removal and reinstallation.

Will the government include the hubs in the disassembly, inspection and reassembly process?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: ERRATA created. To receive the

ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick, Contracting

Officer, and Desireé Logan, Contract Specialist at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 48: The referenced section of the solicitation indicates the the crew movement ashore and movement aboard the vessel are considered milestones within the schedule of ship repair. What, if any contractor support will the crew require to move off the vessel at the begining of the contract and aboard the vessel at the end of the contract?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: The crew has 17 or less aboard and

Minimal rigging/assist.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: The correct ref added via ERRATA website. To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to

Morgan Myrick, Contracting Officer, and Desireé Logan, Contract

Specialist at MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 49: Reference 2.10, Manual 0944-055-0010, Controllable Pitch Propeller Plant is an incorrect reference to the installed equipment. The contractor has verified the the vessel has Propulsion

System Inc. controllable pitch units installed. The reference is for Escher

Wyss controllable pitch units. Please provide the correct reference.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 53: The government is tasking the contractor to remove all insulation from the exhaust systems of all seven engine systems. The contractor notices asbestos sampling points on the exhaust systems which were dated 2015. Can the government supply the contractor with the results of the asbestos sampling tests?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Ships force confirmed asbestos free but have no results of the sampling.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 57: As a result of the ship check we learned that the Seatel Antenna does not exist on this vessel. Please Clarify

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: It is for modifying the mast and mounting the antenna.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 56: As a result of the ship check we learned that this item had been completed. Please Clarify.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Work has been completed. Work Item to be removed from package.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 55: Paragraph 3.6 is to accomplish table one, line 8 for replacing new dielectric shields. This is a sprayable shield.

Paragraph 3.6.1 states inspect thickness and smoothness of newly applied capastic. These are two different applications. Is the contractor applying the sprayable or troelable shield? Please clarify.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Errata created to change line of 009-32 to Trowlable mastic. To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick, Contracting Officer, and Desireé Logan, Contract Specialist at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 59: Due to this work containing not only steel plating but also structural suppot steel, please provide steel thickness for the

750 square feet of renewal.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Errata created to add ref 4842698

REV(H) Scantling plan. To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick, Contracting Officer, and Desireé Logan, Contract Specialist at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 58: Due to this work containing not only steel plating but also structural suppot steel, please provide steel thickness for the

650 square feet of renewal.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Errata created to add ref 4842698

REV(H) Scantling plan. To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick, Contracting Officer, and Desireé Logan, Contract Specialist at

PAGE NO: 3 of 5

ITEM NO: 521-11-003

TITLE: Seawater and Bilge and Ballast Piping;

replace

PARA. NO: 3.3

PAGE NO: 2 of 3

ITEM NO: 521-11-001

TITLE: Off Ship Firefighting System Removal

B/A 226NS/1C; accomplish

PARA. NO: 2.3

PAGE NO: 1 of 2

ITEM NO: 521-11-003

TITLE: Seawater and Bilge and Ballast Piping;

replace

PARA. NO: 3.3

PAGE NO: 2 of 3

ITEM NO: Solicitation, Section F

TITLE: Deliveries or Performance

PARA. NO: (a)

PAGE NO: 31 of 97

ITEM NO: 111-80-001

TITLE: Training Operations Center and

Berthing Installation, Boat Alt 226NS/3C;

accomplish

PARA. NO: 1.1

PAGE NO: 1 of 2

ITEM NO: Solicitation, Section F

TITLE: Deliveries or Performance

PARA. NO: N/A

PAGE NO: 31 of 97

ITEM NO: 077-00-001

TITLE: Hazardous Waste Produced on Naval

Vessels; control

PARA. NO: 3.5

PAGE NO: 2, 3, and 4 of 6

ITEM NO: 123-11-001

TITLE: Tank Inspection and repair; accomplish

PARA. NO: 3.3

PAGE NO: 3 of 4

ITEM NO: 123-11-002

TITLE: Ballast Tank Inspection, repair, preserve; accomplish

PARA. NO: 3.5

PAGE NO: 3 of 5

ITEM NO: Solicitation, Section L

TITLE: Introduction

PARA. NO: 1.0

PAGE NO: 77 of 97

ITEM NO: Solicitation, Section L

TITLE: Instruction for the Submission of Offers

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 65: The Solicitation does not state how early in the availability the awrd of all Option Items will be made. These Option

Items all have direct impact to several definite work items. For planning and estimating purposes, what is the lataest date in the availability that the

Government proposes to award all Option Items?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Option have been added to the package

(no more option items). To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick, Contracting Officer, and Desireé Logan, Contract Specialist at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: The format has been corrected in pdf form. To receive table, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick, Contracting Officer, and Desireé Logan, Contract Specialist at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 67: Paragraph 3.3 requires contractor to

"Remove all existing, fit and install new all tank vent assemblies, piping and associated components…". Contractor assumes that "piping and associated components" refers to only the piping and components of the vent assemblies. Please confirm.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Yes, that is correct.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 66: The format of the quantity columns on pages 3 and 4 are skewed and in disarray, and the quatities listed don't make sense. Please reconfigure the format of this section of the work item.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 68: Paragraph 3.3 requires contractor to

"Remove all existing, fit and install new all tank vent assemblies, piping and associated components…". Contractor assumes that "piping and associated components" refers to only the piping and components of the vent assemblies. Please confirm.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Yes, that is correct.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 69: The cutoff date for questions submittal is presently 21 April 2017 at 1:00 PM. Due to the fact that there are still many outstanding questions that haven't been answered to date, and that those answers could very well generate new questions, please extend the cutoff date for questions submittal to 28 April 2017 at 1:00 PM.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: The cutoff date for questions remains at

21 April 2017 at 1:00 P.M.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: The proposal due date has been amended via Amendment 0002.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 70: Due to the number of questions, the number of unanswered questions, the time to disiminate information to subcontractors once answers are received, and receive quotes from subcontractors, and to complete the bid and review, the contractor is seeking an extension of the bid date until May 26, 2017.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: ERRATA created to provide specifications. To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to

Morgan Myrick, Contracting Officer, and Desireé Logan, Contract

Specialist at MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: The Government will allow a pre-planning period. The purpose of the Commencement and Completion

Dates is to allow the offeror to provide their best schedule within those days to perform this availability. The Government requires this ship back no later than the Latest Completion Date as designated in

Attachment J-3.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 63: The Government has stated that the delivery requirements are based on the assumption that the Government will make the award by 06/21/2017. Contractor requested the Earliest

Commencment and Latest Completion Dates as instructed and was given

06/21/2017 and 12/15/2017 as the respective dates - totalling 178 calendar days. Is the Government not going to allow a pre-planning period between the award date and the Commencement Date? How many total days is the successful contractor going to have to complete all work from

Commencement to Completion? If the Commencement date is pushed to the right to allow a pre-planning period, will the Completion date also be pushed to the right the same number of days to maintain a 178 day total availability?

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 64: Work Item 111-80-001 is not listed as an

Option Item. Work Item 583-80-001 is listed as an Option Item. Item 583-

80-001 has to be completed in order to accomplish definite Work Item 111-

80-001. Please clarify.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: 583-80-001 is no longer a Option item.

Errata created showing change. To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick, Contracting Officer, and Desireé

Logan, Contract Specialist at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 59: Due to this work containing not only steel plating but also structural suppot steel, please provide steel thickness for the

750 square feet of renewal.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Errata created to add ref 4842698

REV(H) Scantling plan. To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick, Contracting Officer, and Desireé Logan, Contract Specialist at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 60: Please provide sizes and number of valves to be renewed that compliments the piping being renewed.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: ERRATA created to provide sizes and number of valves. To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick, Contracting Officer, and Desireé Logan, Contract Specialist at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 61: Paragraph 2.3 lists reference 226NS-

1601, LAR 226NS-1601. This reference is for removal of the towing winch, accomplished in another work item. Cintractor believes the correct reference for this work item should be 226NS-1701, LAR 226NS-1701.

Please clarify.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Errata created to correct mistake. To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick, Contracting Officer, and Desireé Logan, Contract Specialist at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 62: Paragraph 3.3 requires contractor to remove deteriorated and install new, 50 feet of 4 inch CuNi 90/10 piping, 40 feet of 2 1/2 inch steel piping, 12 feet of 4 inch steel piping, 14 feet of 8 inch CuNi 90/10 piping, and 5 feet of 8 inch steel piping to include associated fittings, valves, flanges, gaskets, fasteners, and hardwarelisted in

1.3 and located in 1.2 as designated by the SUPERVISOR. Contractor has no way of knowing at this time what items the SUPERVISOR is going to designate. How many and what type and material fittings, valves, and flanges should the contractor bid on replacing? Please define exact quantities, types, sizes, and materials of each so that all contractors are bidding on the same requirement.

PARA. NO: 2.0

PAGE NO: 77 of 97

ITEM NO: 437-21-001

TITLE: Tank Level Indicating (TLI) Systems

Inspection, repair, calibrate and test, accomplish

PARA. NO: 2.6

PAGE NO: 1 of 3

ITEM NO: 437-21-001

TITLE: Tank Level Indicating (TLI) Systems

Inspection, repair, calibrate and test, accomplish

PARA. NO: 2.8

PAGE NO: 1 of 3

ITEM NO: 321-80-001

TITLE: Shore Power System Receptacle

Replace and Relocate, BoatALt 226NS/4C, OPTION

PARA. NO: 3.3

PAGE NO: 1 of 2

ITEM NO: 593-11-001

TITLE: Collecting, Holding and Transfer

(CHT) Piping, Tank, Level Sensors and Lift

Stations, repair and replace

PARA. NO: 2.4

PAGE NO: 1 of 4

ITEM NO: 593-11-001

TITLE: Collecting, Holding and Transfer

(CHT) Piping, Tank, Level Sensors and Lift

Stations, repair and replace

PARA. NO: 3.4 and 3.5

PAGE NO: 2 of 4

ITEM NO: 521-11-001

TITLE: Off Ship Firefighting System Removal, B/A 226NS/1C, OPTION

PARA. NO: 2.3

PAGE NO: 1 of 2

ITEM NO: 583-11-001

TITLE: Allied Marine Davit (D-5300), repair and test

PARA. NO: 3.7.1.1

PAGE NO: 2 of 5

ITEM NO: 562-11-001

TITLE: Rudders. Steering Gear, and Skeg;

clean, inspect and repair

PARA. NO: 3.19

PAGE NO: 4 of 6

ITEM NO: Solicitation, Section L

TITLE: General Instructions

PARA. NO: (a)

PAGE NO: 84 of 97

ITEM NO: 259-11-002

TITLE: Main and Ship Service Diesel Engine and Fire Pump Intake/Exhaust Piping system;

PARA. NO:

PAGE NO:

ITEM NO: 575-11-001

TITLE: Stern Roller Foundations and aft structural damage; repair, replace

PARA. NO: 3.4

PAGE NO: 2 of 2

ITEM NO: 581-11-002

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 81: Para: 3.4 calls out 50 sq. feet of struct repairs to include shell plate, frames, stiffeners, girders, foundations, collars, gussets, brackets, and chocks.

1) there is no indication of plate thickness or type, there are no stiffener sizes or shapes, clarify.

2) what is the extent of the fdn repair or mod if roller doesn’t need to be functional. Please clarify

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: That information is in REF 2.6 Scantling plan

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 82: Para: 3.8.3 calls out 100 sq feet of plating to be repaired along with associated support structure.

- There is no plate thickness or type identified type, shape or size of support struct.

- There is no type, shape or size of support struct. identified

Please Clarify

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Errata created to add ref 4842698

REV(H) Scantling plan. To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick, Contracting Officer, and Desireé Logan, Contract Specialist at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 80: What is the system design operating temperature?

If it is greater than 650 F it would make it P-1 and would require an X-ray on all welded joints.

If this is P-1 would the government consider the contractor conducting an elevated NDT (PT root weld and PT final weld) in lieu of x-ray?

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Refer to 3.9 SI 009-71

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 71: Paragraph 2.6 references drawing 1230-

003-437, Rev E,, Liquid Level Indicator System Electrical Details. This drawing wads not provided on the CD of references. Please provide this reference.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Reference has been added via the

AMRDEC website. To receive the references, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick, Contracting Officer, and Desireé Logan, Contract Specialist at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: No additional ship check needed.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 75: Paragraph 3.4 requires contractor to

"Remove Sewage Holding Tank, Lift Station Number One Tank, and Lift

Station Number Two Tank in the sewage system using 2.2 through 2.6 for guidance." Paragraph 3.5 directs the contractor to "Fabricate and install new tanks removed in 3.4". The Scantling Plan, drawing 4842698, Rev H.

shows that the sewage holding tank is an intregral part of the vessel's hull and cannot be removed, fabricated and installed as the lift tanks can since they are free-standing and separate tanks. Please provide direction on replacing the sewage holding tank.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE:Work item 593-11-001, reference 2.1 through 2.15, is technically sufficient, to provide direction for the removal of the primary sewage holding tank. MARMC C200 & ABS surveyors, have past performance irt CHT tank removal, and replacement of similar designed vessels. Under hull structure is noted, irt primary sewage holding tank, on drawing 4842698, rev H, and will have ABS gauging conducted on the noted section, while vessel is in dry dock.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 76: Paragraph 2.3 references 226NS-1601, LAR 226NS-1601. LAR 226NS-1601 is titled Towing Machinery Removal, not Firefirhgting System Removal. Please provide the correct reference.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Errata created to correct mistake. To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick, Contracting Officer, and Desireé Logan, Contract Specialist at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: ERRATA created. To receive the

ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick, Contracting

Officer, and Desireé Logan, Contract Specialist at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 77: Paragraph 3.7.1.1 directs the contractor to "Preserve interor surfaces". Please provide the NAVSEA STD ITEM

009-32 Table and Line that the government wishes to have the interior surface preservation meet.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 78: Paragraph directs the contractor to

"Disassemble and remove equipment listed in 1.3". Paragraph 1.3 includes two rudders, two steering gear assemblies, and the skeg. Please verify the quantity of steering gear assemblies and identify what portion of the steering gear assembly the government wants disassembled.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: ERRATA created. To receive the

ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick, Contracting

Officer, and Desireé Logan, Contract Specialist at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 79: The contractor is requesting an additional ship check date be scheduled during the week of April 24 - 28.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Errata created to Delete the requirement of 009-17, in step 3.3. Alteration electrical removal / installation data shall be documented irt 009-22, and 009-23. To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick, Contracting Officer, and Desireé Logan, Contract Specialist at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 74: Paragraph 2.4 references drawing A-

022996, Main Sewage Tank Level Modification. The drawing provided and labelled as A-022996 is actually drawing 1230-002-556, Hydraulic Systems

Piping Arrangements and Details. Please provide the correct drawing.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Errata created to correct typo on ref 2.4

(A-022896). To receive the ERRATA, please send an email request to

Morgan Myrick, Contracting Officer, and Desireé Logan, Contract

Specialist at MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 73: Paragraph 3.3 tasks the contractor to

"Accomplish the requirements of 009-17 of 2.1 for the equipment listed in

1.3.2, using 2.3 for guidance". The equipment listed in 1.3.2 is the

Hydraulic Power Unit. Since the contractor cannot complete 009-17 to the entire unit, please identify the component that the government wishes to apply 009-17 to.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 72: Paragraph 2.8 references drawing 4073-0-

01, Potable Water Tank. This drawing wads not provided on the CD of references. Please provide this reference.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Reference has been added via the

AMRDEC website. To receive the references, please send an email request to Morgan Myrick, Contracting Officer, and Desireé Logan, Contract Specialist at

MARMC_NRFK_411_PROCUREMENT@navy.mil.

GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: The proposal due date has been amended via Amendment 0002.

CONTRACTOR QUESTION 70: Due to the number of questions, the number of unanswered questions, the time to disiminate information to subcontractors once answers are received, and receive quotes from subcontractors, and to complete the bid and review, the contractor is seeking an extension of the bid date until May 26, 2017.

TITLE: Anchor, Anchor Handling Assembly, chain locker and sump

PARA. NO: 3.8.3

PAGE NO: 3 of 4

ITEM NO: 663-21-001

TITLE: Impreressed Current Cathodic

Propection System, inspect and repair

PARA. NO: 32.5

PAGE NO: 1 of 6

ITEM NO: 437-21-001

TITLE: Tank Level Indicating Systems, Inspection, repair, calibrate and test

PARA. NO: 3.3

PAGE NO: 1 of 3

ITEM NO: 437-21-001

TITLE: Tank Level Indicating Systems, Inspection,…

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .