N4523A18R1058_RFC_008.pdf

PDF 250 KB Posted

Attached to
Maintenance, Preservation, and Repair of YT-800
Solicitation number
N4523A18R1058
Issued by

About this file

N4523A18R1058 RFC

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
N4523A18R1058_Attachment_J-1__SOW_Errata_2_YT_800_Posted_28JUN2018.pdf PDF
N4523A18R1058_YT-800__Amendment_0003.pdf PDF
N4523A18R1058_YT-800__Amendment_0002.pdf PDF
N4523A18R1058_RFC_009.pdf PDF
N4523A18R1058__RFC_005.pdf PDF
N4523A18R1058_RFC_002.pdf PDF
N4523A18R1058_YT-800_SOW_Errata_One_12JUNE2018.pdf PDF
N4523A18R1058__RFC_004.pdf PDF
N4523A18R1058_YT-800_SOW_reference_drawing_Errata_One.zip ZIP file
N4523A18R1058_RFC_006.pdf PDF
N4523A18R1058_YT-800__Amendment_0001.pdf PDF
N4523A18R1058__RFC_003.pdf PDF
N4523A18R1058_RFC_001.pdf PDF
N4523A18R1058_Updated_5-way_break_out_13JUNE2018.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N4523A18R1058_RFC_007.pdf PDF
N4523A18R1058_YT-800_Solicitation.pdf PDF
N4523A18R1058_Attachment_J-1_SOW_YT_800.pdf PDF
N4523A18R1058_Attachment_J-7_GFP.pdf PDF
N4523A18R1058_Attachment_J-5_Corporate_Experience_Data_Sheet.docx DOCX document
N4523A18R1058_Attachment_J-4_Contract_Performance_Data_Sheet.docx DOCX document
N4523A18R1058_Attachment_J-2_YT-800_5-way_break_out.xls.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N4523A18R1058_Attachment_J-8_BAVR_Instructions.pdf PDF
N4523A18R1058_Attachment_J-3_Request_for_Clarification_(RFC)_Form.docx DOCX document
N4523A18R1058_YT_800_SOW_Draft.pdf PDF
Show all 24

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

REQUEST FOR SPECIFICATION CLARIFICATION

DATE OF REQUEST: 6/14/18 QUESTION NO: 008

REQUIREMENT: REQUISITION NO.: N4523A18R1058

ITEM NO: 3.7.2

TITLE: Accomplish Top End Overhaul for Main

Engines

ISSUING OFFICE POC (CODE 440.22):

Brittany Chartier: (360) 476-5708

Brittany.chartier@navy.mil

PARA. NO: 3.7.1 PAGE NO: 42 CONTRACTOR:

PLANNER’S NAME: ATTACH. NO: CONTRACTOR POC & PHONE:

CONTRACTOR QUESTION:

Specification 3.7.2 provides direction for Contractor to complete ME overhauls. Contractor has found that OEM tech rep may provide a credit for the replaced core. Is it the Government’s intent for the

Contractor to return the cores to the Government or can the Contractor return the cores to the OEM for credit?

DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE

SPEC CHG: Y/N DWG/REF CHG. Y/N RQMTS CHG: Y/N MAT'L CHG: Y/N

TECHNICAL REVIEW: SERIAL NO:

The Government considers the cores as scrap per clause HQ C-2-0018 Disposal of Scrap in the solicitation. Reference clause for additional information.

ALL REQUESTS FOR CLARIFICATION MUST BE RECEIVED BY THE ISSUING OFFICE POC NO

LATER THAN THE DATE & TIME IDENTIFIED IN THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL.

File details come from the government source that posted it.