RFP_Attachment_A.2 _PPI_Responses _N4425515R0009 _Amendment_1.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 14 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N4425515R0009
About this file
Attachment A.2 PPI Responses
View the file
Other files
Show all 30
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PPI Log
| PPI No. | PPI | Response |
| 1 | This Solicitation is a Service-Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business Set-Aside. Many small firms do not have an opportunity to prime contract $10-M projects, as that size of project is typically set-aside for larger firms. However; the key personnel to be assigned to the project would typically have this experience. In accordance with FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iii), which states, “The evaluation should take into account past performance regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience , or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement when such information is relevant to the instant acquisition,” would the government consider key personnel or key subcontractor experience to satisfy experience requirements as long as the Offeror has majority of the projects that qualify us for the contract? | With the exception for the designer, only the offeror's experience will be considered. See note 1 on page 8 of the RFP. Experience of key personnel and subcontractors will not be considered as a substitute for the offeror's experience. |
| 2 | In order to allow stronger competition for this contract, would the government consider active projects currently in construction to satisfy the experience requirements? | No, to allow offerors a greater period from which to draw upon for experience, project completion time was extended from 5 to 7 years of the date of issuance of the RFP. |
| 3 | We are new, as of 2015, and we have not completed a project of $10,000,000 since we have started. Will this disqualify us? | RFP Page 10, one project must be greater than $10 million. If the offeror does not meet this RFP requirement, the offeror will be disqualified. |
| 4 | Most of this year, we have been getting our footing in the federal marketplace so we don’t have the Company Past Performance of projects this size. Will this disqualify us? | Firms with no prior past performance receive a neutral rating for the past performance factor which is neither favorable nor unfavorable. |
| 5 | We have bonding capacity of $20,000,000 per project so we have more than enough monetary funds to perform these projects, there just haven’t been enough of them issued in the past 9 months for us to gain the experience. Our key personnel's experience is very extensive but it is all with other companies. Can we include this? | You may NOT substitute key personnel experience for the offeror's experience. See PPI 1. |
| 6 | As a General Contractor we depend on our subcontractors as the right sub brings the experience and capabilities to our projects. In the solicitation it says we can’t can include any of their experience. In other solicitations, we have been able to supply our subs past experience, projects and qualifications to our proposals. Can we supply this info in our proposals? | No, see PPI 1. |
| 7 | For Factor 1 (a) (2) we will not have Joint Venture, Partnership or MPAs. Our design team companies will be working under a subcontract. |
Would you like to see:
1. A signed teaming agreement letter for each member on the Org Chart, or
| 2. A statement that Joint Venture, Partnership nor MPAs are NOT being used in this submittal? | RFP page 10, Factor 1(a)(2) applies only to those offerors who have formed a joint venture, partnership, or approved mentor protégé arrangement. RFP page 12, Factor 2(a)(2), fifth paragraph on page 12 states, "The Offeror may utilize experience of a design subcontractor to demonstrate design experience under this evaluation factor." However, to assist the Government in the proper evaluation of your proposal, if you sign a formal teaming agreement with a subcontractor, then please included the signed teaming agreement. | ||
| 8 | We would be very interested in submitting a proposal on the above captioned project IDIQ but I see in the RFP that firms need to have at least one $10M job. Our largest job is (REDACTED) on which we received an (REDACTED) CCPAR. From what I understand, there’s not a lot of SDV’s that have $10M job on their resumes. | ||
| I was hoping you might give me some insight as to strict you are going to hold to that requirement, or possibly amend the RFP to change that requirement to a lower, more reasonable amount. | The solicitation will not be changed to reduce the requirement. See PPI 3. | ||
| 9 | The SF1442 Item 13.A. requires an original and 2 copies of the proposal. Section 00100, 2.2.1 requires original and one copy and 1 CD. Please clarify number of required proposal copies. | The RFP on page five gives amplifying details that the offeror must submit one original with original signature and date, and two additional copies, one of which will be a hard copy and one of which will be a copy on compact disc (CD). | |
| 10 | Factor 2 – Experience requires relevant construction projects “Similar in size: between $1.5m and $15m”. Realizing this matches the intended Task Order Size for the MACC program, would a project that exceeded the $15m cap be considered provided it demonstrated all of the other criteria for relevant projects including scope, complexity and managing multiple work sites simultaneously? | Projects outside the task order dollar value range will be considered less relevant in size. | |
| 11 | |||
| 12 | |||
| 13 | |||
| 14 | |||
| 15 | |||
| 16 | |||
| 17 | |||
| 18 | |||
| 19 | |||
| 20 | |||
| 21 | |||
| 22 | |||
| 23 | |||
| 24 | |||
| 25 | |||
| 26 | |||
| 27 | |||
| 28 | |||
| 29 | |||
| 30 |
NAVFAC NW VETMACC N4425515R0009
&F
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .