N44255-15-R-0004.pdf

INDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY (IDIQ) MULTIPLE AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT (MACC) FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION, RENOVATION , ALTERATION, DEMOLITION AND REPAIR WORK BY DESIGN-BUILD OR BY DESIGN-BID-BUILD OF FACILITIES LOCATED PRIMARILY WITHIN THE NAVFAC NW AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY (AOR) INCLUDING WASHINGTON, OREGON, IDAHO, MONTANA, ALASKA, IOWA, MINNESOTA, NORTH DAKOTA, SOUTH DAKOTA, NEBRASKA, AND WYOMING. IT IS ANTICIPATED THAT MOST OF THE WORK WILL

OCCUR IN WASHINGTON STATE.

Types of projects include, but are not limited to administrative facilities, housing facilities, child care centers, recreation/f itness centers, retail complexes, manufacturing and industrial facilities, communication facilities, special access program facilities (SAPF) or sensitive compartmented information facilities (SCIF’s), aviation facilities (i.e. hangars, control tow ers, etc.), or other similar facilities.

THIS PROCUREMENT IS A 100% SMALL BUSINESS SET ASIDE COMPETITIVE PROCUREMENT.

NAICS: 236220

Maximum Dollar Value for all Contracts Combined: $240,000,000 Task Order Range: $10,000,000 to $30,000,000 Minimum Guarantee: $25,000

Construction Contract: 14 days for payment (FAR 52.232-27)

SHANNON N. MELAND 360-396-0263

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

09-Jul-2015

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

X

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______1 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________365 calendar days after receiving aw ard, notice to proceed. This performance period is X mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________4 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specif ied in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________27 Aug 2015 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee X is, is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______180 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

NAVFAC NORTHWEST

1101 TAUTOG CIRCLE

SILVERDALE WA 98315-1101

N44255

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

02:00 PM (hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

FAX:TEL: TEL: FAX:

N44255-15-R-0004 74

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

N44255-15-R-0004

Section 00010 - Solicitation Contract Form

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 240,000,000 Project

NAVFAC NW MEGA MACC

FFP

This is an indefinite delivery indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contract with no preestablished fixed contract prices. The actual amount of work to be performed and the time of such performance will be determined by the Contracting Officer or his/her properly authorized representative, who will issue Task Order Requests for Proposal (RFP) to MACC awardees. Award of Task Orders will be on a firm fixed price basis. The resultant contract will be a base year plus four one-year option periods, or a maximum of $240,000,000 for all contracts combined, whichever occurs first.

FOB: Destination

NET AMT

SF 1442 CONTINUATION SHEET

READ THE FOLLOWING IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE ACQUISITION REQUIREMENTS

Proposals must be set forth full, accurate, and complete information as required by this request for proposal (including attachments). The penalty for making false statements in proposals is prescribed n 18 U.S.C. 1001.

INTENT TO AWARD WITHOUT DISCUSSIONS: The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award without discussions. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if it is later determined by the Contracting Officer to be necessary. Therefore, each initial offer should contain the best terms from a technical and price standpoint. Offerors should not assume that they would be contacted or afforded an opportunity to qualify, discuss, or revise their proposals. Offerors are cautioned that a proposal containing qualifications, conditions, or expressing unilateral interpretations of the RFP/contract requirements may be rejected and the Offeror excluded from the potential competitive range.

Proposals will be evaluated on the basis of the established criteria and award will be made to the Offeror whose proposal represents the best value to the Government.

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE TERMS

Supplies/services will be inspected/accepted at:

CLIN INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY

0001 N/A N/A N/A Government

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS UIC

0001 N/A N/A N/A N/A

Section 00100 - Bidding Schedule/Instructions to Bidders

INSTRUCTION TO OFFERORS

1. INQUIRIES. Offerors who determine that the technical and/or contractual requirements of this RFP require clarification(s) in order to permit submittal of a responsive technical proposal shall submit all questions in writing on a Pre-Proposal Inquiry (PPI) Form, Attachment A. Inquiries shall follow the instructions on Attachment A and be submitted via e-mail to shannon.meland@navy.mil. Offerors shall submit only one (1) inquiry per PPI Form. Pre-proposals inquiries will be accepted up to 10 days prior to the due date of the proposals. A response will be provided via amendment to the solicitation.

2. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

2.1 Pursuant to FAR 4.502, this solicitation is being conducted electronically. All Phase I solicitation documents will be posted to Federal Business Opportunities (FBO) at https://www.fbo.gov/.

2.2 Proposals submitted in response to this solicitation shall be formatted and submitted as follows:

2.2.1 PHASE ONE:

Phase One proposals shall be submitted in hard copy as follows:

Offerors shall affix their names and return addresses to the upper left corner of the proposal packages. Each package shall include the solicitation number and must be sealed. Submit proposals to:

Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Northwest Attn: Ms. Shannon Meland 1101 Tautog Circle, Suite 209 Silverdale, WA 98315-1101

Email or Facsimile transmissions of proposals, acknowledgement of amendments or modifications of proposals is not allowed.

If the Offeror is mailing its proposal, mail to the address above.

If the Offeror is hand-delivering its proposal and has not made arrangements for badges, NAVFAC Northwest personnel will be at Pass & ID, Building 1033, Naval Base Kitsap, Bangor, for one (1) hour, prior to the proposal submittal deadline.

Whenever possible use the forms provided; however, Offerors may substitute their own forms as long as the information submitted is substantially the same as that shown on each form. Paper dimension shall be 8 ½ x 11”.

The font size shall be no smaller than 11 pitch.

Each copy of the proposal shall be securely fastened/ bound. Tab and label all attachments. Provide a table of contents. For recycling purposes, a soft cover or title sheet is sufficient.

• Phase One Proposal: one (1) original with original signature and date, four (4) additional hardcopies, and one (1) copy on CD. If there is a discrepancy between the original, hardcopies, or copy on CD, the original takes precedence.

• The original proposals shall be identified as “Original” on the cover. See Proposal submission requirements for additional details.

CLOSING DATE AND LATE SUBMISSIONS. The closing date and time for receipt of Proposals shall be as follows:

Phase One Proposals shall be received no later than 2:00 p.m. local time on 27 August 2015 NO EMAIL or

FACSIMILE PROPOSALS WILL BE ALLOWED.

Late submissions shall be handled in accordance with FAR 52.215-1, INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERS – COMPETITIVE ACQUISITION (JAN 2004) reference subparagraphs (c)(3)(ii)(A) and (1), and FAR 15.208.

A cover letter shall accompany the Phase One Proposal and shall include:

(a) The solicitation number;

(b) The name, address, telephone and facsimile numbers, and email addresses of the Offeror and Lead

Design Firm;

(c) The DUNS Number, CAGE Code, and Tax Identification Number (TIN) of the Offeror and Lead

Design Firm;

(d) A statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation and agreement to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item;

(e) Names, titles, phone and facsimile numbers, and email addresses of persons authorized to negotiate on the Offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation and;

(f) Name, title, and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal. Proposals signed by an agent shall be accompanied by evidence of that agent’s authority, unless that evidence has been previously furnished to the issuing office.

Phase One Proposals shall be organized and include the following:

(a) Cover Letter

(b) SF1442 (Solicitation, Offer, and Award) with Blocks 14 through 20c completed

(c) Representations and Certifications, including the supplemental certifications in Section 00600 and VETS-100 confirmation of filing. If an Offeror is not required to file a VETS-100 report, the Offeror shall provide an explanation.

(d) Tab 1: Factor 1-Technical Approach (Narrative, Joint Venture Agreement, if applicable)

(e) Tab 2: Factor 2- Experience (Attachment “B”)

Factor 3- Past Performance (Immediately behind Factor 2 Project) (Evaluations/Attachment “C”)

Offerors are asked to submit only the information/Attachments required. Do not submit any additional information such as brochures, or other pre-printed materials.

2.2.2 PHASE TWO:

Instructions to be amended into this document prior to entering Phase Two of the procurement. Do not submit Phase Two information in Phase One proposals.

3. PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE

A pre-proposal conference will be held. Information to be amended into this document prior to entering Phase Two of the procurement.

4. SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT (SAM)

The System for Award Management (SAM) www.sam.gov is combining federal procurement systems and the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance into one new system. This consolidation is being done in phases. The first phase of SAM includes the functionality from the following systems: * Central Contractor Registry (CCR) * Federal Agency Registration (Fedreg) * Online Representations and Certifications Application (ORCA) * Excluded Parties List System (EPLS).

Contractors must be registered in SAM prior to award of a DoD contract. A contract cannot be awarded to a contractor not registered in SAM. Remember to review your NAICS codes listed in your SAM record to make sure that you have listed the NAICS code for this procurement. Please note that Offerors proposing as a Joint Venture or Mentor Proteges must have a current registration in SAM prior to contract award.

For additional information, including how to register, please go to www.sam.gov.

5. FEDERAL CONTRACTOR PROGRAM

In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 22.1303, any contractor or subcontractor with a contract of $100,000 or more with the Federal Government must take affirmative action to hire and promote qualified targeted veterans which includes, special disabled veterans, veterans of the Vietnam-era, recently separated veterans, and any other veterans who served on active duty during a war or in a campaign or expedition for which a campaign badge has been authorized.

Companies must file an annual VETS-100 report, which shows the number of targeted veterans in their work force by job category, hiring location, and number of new hires, including targeted veterans hired during the reporting period and the maximum number and minimum number of employees of such contractor during the period covered by the report. Instructions, information and follow-up assistance is provided at VETS-100 Internet site at http://www.dol.gov/vets/vets-100.html or employers may contact the VETS-100 office at (866) 237-0275 or e-mail at VETS100-customersupport@dol.gov. A contract cannot be awarded to a contractor that has not submitted a required annual form VETS-100, Federal Contractor Veterans’ Employment Report (VETS-100 Report) if subject to the reporting requirements of 38 U.S.C. 4212(d) for that fiscal year.

A confirmation of the VETS-100 Report filing shall be submitted with the Phase One Proposal. If an Offeror is not required to file a VETS-100 report, the Offeror shall provide an explanation.

6. INCURRED EXPENSES

The Government is not responsible for any costs incurred or associated with preparation and submission of a proposal in response to this solicitation.

7. PROJECT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

Phase Two of this solicitation includes technical requirements package/plans and specifications for the seed project only. No technical requirements package/plans and specifications will be included in the basic MACC’s. Each task order request for proposal will be issued with its own plans and specifications specific to that project.

BASIS OF AWARD

BASIS OF AWARD AND EVALUATION FACTORS

1. BASIS OF AWARD

1. The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contracts; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contracts to the offerors submitting the proposals determined to represent the best value—the proposals most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

2. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

3. The tradeoff process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition. The Government considers it to be in its best interest to allow consideration of award to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror.

4. Any proposal found to have a deficiency in meeting the stated solicitation requirements or performance objectives will be considered ineligible for award, unless the deficiency is corrected through discussions. Proposals may be found to have either a significant weakness or multiple weaknesses that impact either the individual factor rating or the overall rating for the proposal. The evaluation report must document the evaluation board’s assessment of the identified weakness(s) and the associated risk to successful contract performance resulting from the weakness(s). This assessment must provide the rationale for proceeding to award without discussions.

5. The Government reserves the right to award only the initial seed project identified in the RFP as a single-action contract. Provided the Government evaluation determines a sufficient number of qualified proposals are received, the Government anticipates awarding up to eight IDIQ contracts to the offerors found to offer the best value. The offeror presenting the best value will receive award of an IDIQ contract and Task Order 0001 for the seed project, which will meet or exceed the minimum guarantee. Any additional selected offerors will receive an IDIQ contract award and Task Order 0001 in the amount of $25,000 to cover the minimum guarantee. Offerors are also advised that the Government reserves the right to award all contracts with only the minimum guarantees.

6. Evaluation methods for subsequent MACC projects will be delineated in future respective Task Order

RFPs. The Government makes no representation as to the number of task orders or the actual amount of work to be ordered. Contract awardees are not guaranteed work in excess of the minimum guarantee. Subsequent Task Order evaluation methods may include trade off or low price technically acceptable (LPTA) selection procedures. Each contract awardee shall be provided a fair opportunity to be considered for each Task Order award, except under those circumstances described in FAR 16.505(b)(2).

2. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-cost/price factors:

Phase One:

Factor 1 – Technical Approach Factor 2 – Experience Factor 3 – Past Performance

The distinction between corporate experience and past performance is corporate experience pertains to the types of work and volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work covered by this requirement, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

Phase Two:

Factor 4 – Safety Factor 5 – Technical Solution Factor 6 – Energy and Sustainable Design

Note 1: If the offeror presents experience, past performance and/or safety data for an entity with a different CAGE Code or DUNS number, the information will NOT be considered unless the offeror establishes a nexus or connection between itself and the other entity. The offeror MUST clearly explain how the resources of the other entity will be provided and relied upon for contract performance such that the other entity will have meaningful involvement in contract performance. This explanation will be limited to one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages) and should be included under Factor 2, Experience. Failure to prove an adequate nexus between the offeror and the entity with a different CAGE CODE or DUNS number could result in the finding of a deficiency, thereby making the offeror ineligible for award without discussions.

Note 2: While the Government may elect to consider data obtained from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate, and complete technical approach, experience, past performance, technical solution, and safety information rests with the offeror.

Note 3: The non-price proposal shall be separate from the price proposal. See Section 00100, Instructions to Offerors for additional instructions, format, and submission quantities required for the proposal.

Note 4: The page limitation for each factor/subfactor is provided in the submission requirements for each factor found later in this section. Page limitations will be strictly enforced. Any pages submitted in excess of the page limitations will not be reviewed and any data or material they contain will not be considered. Specific submission items which are excluded from the page count are listed in each factor later in this section.

Note 5: Projects submitted for Factor 2, Experience, shall be the same projects submitted for Factor 3, Past Performance.

Note 6: Failure to meet solicitation submittal requirements may result in a lower rating.

2. The relative order of importance of the non-cost/price evaluation factors is as follows:

Phase One:

For the purposes of determining the offeror who will move on to Phase Two, the factors will be evaluated as follows:

Phase One will consider Factors 1, 2, and 3

Factor 1, Technical Approach, will only be rated Acceptable or Unacceptable. If an Offeror is rated Unacceptable in Factor 1, then they will not be considered for Phase Two. The relative order of importance of the non-cost/price evaluation factors is the technical factors (Factors 1 and 2) are approximately equal in importance to each other and, when combined are approximately equal in importance to the past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment factor (Factor 3).

Following the review, evaluation, and rating of Phase One proposals, the Government intends to select the highest rated Offerors to receive the technical requirements package to participate in Phase Two of this solicitation process.

Offerors should be advised the determination of prequalified firms may be made without communications or clarifications or any contact concerning the prequalification submission received. Only Offerors receiving a technical rating of “Acceptable” in Factor 1, an overall combined rating of “Acceptable” or higher for Factors 1 and 2, and a confidence assessment rating of “Unknown,” “Satisfactory,” or higher for Factor 3 during Phase One, and which are determined as being among the highest rated Offerors will be eligible to participate in the Phase Two process of this solicitation. Offerors determined eligible to participate in Phase Two will receive the technical requirements package containing Factors 4, 5, 6 and price related requirements. A maximum number of approximately 15 Offerors will be selected to submit Phase Two proposals.

Phase Two:

Phase Two will consider Factors 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and price

The relative order of importance of the non-cost/price evaluation factors is the technical factors (Factors 2, 4, 5, and

6) are approximately equal in importance to each other and, when combined are approximately equal in importance to the past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment factor (Factor 3). When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance/performance confidence assessment factor combined (i.e., the non-cost/price evaluation factors) are approximately equal to price.

The importance of price will increase if the Offerors’ non-cost/price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-cost/price proposal’s superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible Offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

3. Phase One Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

Factor 1 – Technical Approach:

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The composition and management of the firms proposed as the design-build (DB) team for this contract will be evaluated in this factor.

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

(1) Provide a narrative describing the proposed primary construction firms and primary design firms for this contract and the rationale for proposing this arrangement. Provide the role, responsibilities, and contractual relationships between the various firms (see FAR Subpart 9.6). The narrative shall also include a simple organizational chart that clearly identifies the lines of authority between the entities. If the experience of an entity is being claimed in Factor 2, that entity must be named in the above narrative and organizational chart.

The technical approach narrative shall be limited to one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages) including the organizational chart. The information requested in item #2 below is not included in this page limitation.

(2) In addition to the narrative, the Offeror shall submit a signed copy of a joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, approved mentor protégé agreement (MPA) as applicable for each member of the Offeror’s team identified above (e.g., joint venture member, partner, or mentor protégé member).

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The assessment of the Offeror’s technical approach will be used as a means to evaluate the organizational structure and teaming relationships proposed by the Offeror. This factor will be rated on an Acceptable or Unacceptable basis.

Factor 2 – Experience:

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

(1) Construction Experience:

Submit a maximum of five (5) relevant construction projects for the Offeror that best demonstrates your experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as:

Similar in size: Construction project between $10,000,000 to $30,000,000.

One construction project must be greater than $20,000,000.

Similar in scope: New construction, repair, alteration, or renovation by design-build or design-bid-build of administrative facilities, housing facilities, child care centers, recreation/fitness centers, retail complexes, manufacturing and industrial facilities, communication facilities, special access program facilities (SAPF) or sensitive compartmented information facilities (SCIF’s), aviation facilities (i.e. hangars, control towers, etc.), or other similar facilities.

Similar in complexity: Involving multiple trades, working in areas with limited access, constructing various projects simultaneously, or managing multiple work sites

At least one project shall demonstrate the ability to successfully manage multiple work sites simultaneously (separate and distinct) under a single project.

Projects submitted for the Offeror shall be completed within the past seven (7) years of the date of issuance of this

RFP.

A project is defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project;

rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The use of the attached Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment B) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. If the same project is being used to demonstrate construction and design experience, submit separate Project Data Sheets for construction and design. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages).

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e.: unique features, area, construction methods). In addition, the description should also address any sustainable features for the project, including specific descriptions of those features. Provide applicable documentation on projects that were validated and/or certified through U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) or the equivalent organization or process.

If the Offeror is a joint venture, partnership, or mentor protégé, relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the joint venture, partnership, or mentor protégé entity. If the joint venture, partnership, or mentor protégé does not have shared experience, projects may be submitted for the joint venture, partnership, or mentor protégé members. At least one relevant project shall be submitted for each joint venture, partnership or mentor protégé member. Offerors who fail to submit experience for all joint venture, partnership, or mentor protégé members may be rated lower. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.

Experience of a subcontractor will not be considered.

(2) Design Experience

Submit a maximum of five (5) relevant design projects for the design team that best demonstrates design experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as

Similar in size: Construction project between $10,000,000 to $30,000,000.

One construction project must be greater than $20,000,000.

Similar in scope: New construction, repair, alteration, or renovation by design-build or design-bid-build of administrative facilities, housing facilities, child care centers, recreation/fitness centers, retail complexes, manufacturing and industrial facilities, communication facilities, special access program facilities (SAPF) or sensitive compartmented information facilities (SCIF’s), aviation facilities (i.e. hangars, control towers, etc.), or other similar facilities.

Similar in complexity: Involving multiple trades, working in areas with limited access, or designing various projects simultaneously.

Projects submitted shall be completed within the past seven (7) years of the date of issuance of this RFP.

A project is defined as a complete design effort performed under a single task order or contract/subcontract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The use of the attached Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment B) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. If the same project is being used to demonstrate construction and design experience, submit separate Project Data Sheets for construction and design. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages).

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e.: unique features, area, construction methods). In addition, the description should also address any sustainable features for the project, including specific descriptions of those features. Provide applicable documentation on projects that were validated and/or certified through U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) or the equivalent organization or process. Also, the description should address features detailing how the work was completed in accordance with the "Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties.”

The Offeror may utilize experience of a design subcontractor to demonstrate design experience under this evaluation factor. The Offeror must provide a supporting joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, or approved mentor protégé agreement as applicable and an explanation of the meaningful involvement for the design subcontractor, see Note 1.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction and design projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The Government will only review five projects for construction and five for design. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) for Construction Experience and five (5) for Design Experience will not be considered.

Relevant projects where the Offeror and the proposed design firm(s) have previously worked together may be considered more favorably than those that have not worked together.

Relevant projects that demonstrate design-build experience may be considered more favorably than those that do not have design-build experience.

Relevant projects that demonstrate experience with sustainable features may be considered more favorably than those that do not demonstrate experience with sustainable features.

Factor 3 – Past Performance:

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

If a completed Construction Contractor Appraisal Support System (CCASS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 2 for construction experience. If a completed AE Contractor Appraisal Support System (ACASS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 2 for design experience. If there is not a completed CCASS or ACASS evaluation then submit Past Performance Questionnaires (Attachment C.1 and C.2) for each project included in Factor 2 for both Construction Experience and Design Experience. The Offeror should provide completed Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) in the proposal. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). The Government may make reasonable attempts to contact the client noted for that project(s) to obtain the PPQ information. However, Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to help ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Shannon Meland, shannon.meland@navy.mil.

Offerors may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 2 – Experience. Offerors may also address any adverse past performance issues as they relate to this solicitation. Explanations shall not exceed two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages) in total.

The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the Offeror’s references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.

Performance award or additional information submitted will not be considered.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

This evaluation focuses on how well the Offeror performed on the relevant projects submitted under Factor 2 – Experience and past performance on other projects currently documented in known sources. More emphasis will be placed on more relevant projects. In addition to the above, the Government reserves the right to obtain information for use in the evaluation of past performance from any and all sources including sources outside of the Government.

Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of Contractors who are part of a partnership, joint venture, or mentor protégé identified in the Offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the Offeror.

The Government will consider the currency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Contractor’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination. The assessment of the Offeror’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the Offeror’s probability to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

Offerors lacking relevant past performance history will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably in past performance and will receive an Unknown Confidence rating.

4. Phase Two - Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

Factor 4 – Safety:

(a) Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit a narrative that fully describes the safety management system that they will use to oversee the safety compliance and performance of self-performed and sub-contractor performed work and the Offeror’s method for qualifying, evaluating, selecting all tiers of sub-contractors. The narrative shall include:

(1) Safety program performance, including, but not limited to the OSHA Total Recordable Case (TRC) rate and OSHA Days Away, Restricted Duty or Transferred (DART) rates for the most recent five (5) complete calendar years. The narrative shall address any observed trend, serious mishaps, including fatalities, and any mitigating circumstances associated with the mishap rates. If negative trends are noted, the narrative shall address corrective measures taken to prevent repeat occurrences of similar mishaps.

(2) Methodology used in those projects identified in the past performance evaluation factor to qualify, evaluate, select, and oversee sub-contractors based on their safety performance, such as OSHA Total Recordable Case (TRC) rates, and OSHA Days Away, Restricted Duty or Transferred (DART) rates.

(3) Methodology intended to be used to qualify, evaluate, select, and oversee subcontractors for this project, highlighting what specific management practices will be in place for providing deliberate safety program management and mishap prevention support to those sub-contractors whose EMR is greater than 1.0, whose TRC is greater than 4.0 and whose DART rate is greater than 2.0.

The narrative shall be limited to one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages) in total. (For a partnership, joint venture, or mentor protégé, the mishap rates are required for each contractor who is part of the partnership, joint venture, or mentor protégé; however, only one safety narrative is required. Safety narratives for joint ventures may be up to two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages) in total.)

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for its self-performed work and the work of its subcontractors. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s overall safety management system, safety performance record, and the Offeror’s methodology of qualifying, evaluating, selecting and overseeing its subcontractors. The Government’s sources of information for evaluating safety will include, but are not limited to:

OSHA, NAVFAC’s Enterprise Safety Applications Management System (ESAMS) database, and other related databases. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete safety information regarding these submittal requirements rests with the Offeror.

The Government will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project and the specific management practices that will be in place for providing deliberate safety program management and mishap prevention support to those sub-contractors whose EMR is greater than 1.0, whose TRC is greater than 4.0 and whose DART rate is greater than 2.0. Those Offerors who demonstrate an effective safety management system, as indicated by the required information provided in their safety narrative may be considered more favorably in the evaluation.

Offeror’s OSHA Total Recordable Case (TRC) Rates will be evaluated against the following Navy standards:

Risk TRC Very High Greater than 4.0

High From 2.75 to 4.0

Moderate From 1.25 to 2.75

Low From 0.50 to 1.25

Very Low Less than 0.50

Offeror’s DART rates will be evaluated against the following Navy standards:

Risk DART Very High Greater than 2.0

High From 1.0 to 2.0

Moderate From 0.50 to 0.99

Low From 0.25 to 0.49

Very Low Less than 0.25

Factor 5 – Technical Solution

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Provide a narrative describing the technical solution to the project that meets the requirements of the RFP. Include the following:

- Interior circulation/adjacencies

- Exterior façade describing how the proposed construction integrates with the surrounding area and existing base facilities design or architectural theme.

- Site layout including a description of the building orientation, roadways, parking (include ingress and egress), emergency vehicle access, and ATFP standoff distances. Also include in the narrative a description of the general concept proposed to meet low impact development (LID).

Narrative shall not exceed three (3) double-sided pages (or six (6) single-sided pages). Up to three (3) conceptual drawings may be provided to supplement the narrative (i.e. floor plan, exterior elevation, and site plan).

The Government will evaluate the narrative and conceptual drawings (if included) considering the extent to which the Offeror demonstrates a clear understanding of the architectural and engineering requirements of the project. The Government will evaluate the Offeror's technical solution to determine adherence to the technical requirements of the RFP.

Factor 6 – Energy and Sustainable Design

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Provide the following information, which describes how the project will meet or exceed the following sustainable design contract requirements.

(1) EPAct 2005 Energy Efficiency Narrative:

Using the guidance outlined in Part 3 of this RFP, provide a detailed narrative to describe whether the proposed solution will meet or exceed the goal of a 30% energy reduction using the ASHRAE Std 90.1-2007, Appendix G, Building Performance Rating Method, excluding receptacle and process loads. Provide the proposed percent energy reduction. Provide the assumptions the Offeror will use to obtain a high-performance building, which will comply with these energy reduction goals. Describe the Offeror’s proposed building with regards to building orientation, shape, fenestration, solar heat gain coefficients (SHGC), wall and roof insulation values (U-values), HVAC systems, water heating systems, lighting systems, and control systems. Organize/divide the assumptions into four areas; building orientation and configuration, building envelope, mechanical systems, and electrical systems. If the Offeror cannot achieve the 30% reduction within the budget identified, the Offeror shall state what percent energy reduction is proposed within their proposal. Do not exceed two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages). Note: Building performance rating and percent energy reduction are calculated in terms of energy rather than energy cost.

(1a) Whole Building Energy Simulation:

Provide a Whole Building Energy Simulation summary following the procedure outlined in LEED 2009, Credit EAc1 – Optimize Energy Performance, Option 1 – Whole Building Energy Simulation, except utilize the “Baseline Building Performance Rating” shown in the RFP, Part 6, to demonstrate the percentage improvement in the “Proposed Building Performance Rating”. Provide a completed Performance Rating Method Compliance Report, Table 3, page 279-283 in the LEED 2009 Reference guide for New Construction. Utilize the default simulation factors and energy rates included in the RFP, Part 6.

The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s response to the Energy and Sustainable Design Factor considering the proposed energy savings.

EPAct 2005 Energy Efficiency Narrative: The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s proposed energy budget reduction relative to EPAct 2005 energy efficiency goals, including evaluation of assumptions.

Whole Building Energy Simulation: The Government will evaluate the Whole Building Energy Simulation to determine the validity of the design assumptions, thoroughness of the Energy Simulation, and the percent improvement above the Government’s “Baseline Building Performance Rating”.

Price (Seed Project)

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The Offeror’s price proposal shall be separate from the technical proposal. Complete and submit the following:

(1) Cover letter in accordance with FAR 52.215-1(c)(2), including DUNS number

(2) SF 1442, Solicitation, Offer, and Award Blocks 14 through 20c

(3) Seed Project, Task Order N44255-15-R-0004/0001, SF 1442 Blocks 14 through 20c.

(4) Bid Bond in the amount of 20% of the Seed Project (Task Order N44255-15-R-0004/0001)

(5) Letter from the Offeror’s surety. The letter should verify the Offeror has a minimum of $25,000,000 bonding capacity per project and provide the Offeror’s aggregate maximum bonding capacity.

(6) Ensure the Offeror’s Representations and Certifications, including the supplemental certifications included in Section 00600, are current and posted in the System for Award Management (SAM).

(b) Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate price based on the total price. Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(1) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(2) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.

(3) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(4) Comparison of market survey results.

(5) Congruence between the technical and price proposals shall also be utilized to determine the reasonableness of the proposed price as well as potential performance risk.

The Government will evaluate the Seed Project price based on the total price, consisting of CLIN 0001.

Evaluation of the price proposal will determine the reasonableness, realism, and completeness of the Offeror’s proposal.

Evaluation will determine the Offeror’s comprehension of the requirements of the RFP as well as to assess the degree to which the proposed price accurately reflects proposed performance.

A price found to be either unreasonably high or unrealistically low in relation to the proposed work may negatively impact the Offeror’s ranking.

The Bid Bond will be evaluated for accuracy and completeness in accordance with FAR 28.101.

The letter from the bonding company will be evaluated to assess the risk of the Offeror listed in Block 15A of the SF1442 being able to provide sufficient bonding for both individual and multiple task orders during the life of this contract.

Representations and Certifications will be reviewed in the System for Award Management (SAM) to ensure they are complete.

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.204-16 Commercial and Government Entity Code Reporting NOV 2014 52.211-6 Brand Name or Equal AUG 1999 52.216-27 Single or Multiple Awards OCT 1995 52.217-5 Evaluation Of Options JUL 1990 52.222-5 Construction Wage Rate Requirements--Secondary Site of the

Work

MAY 2014

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.215-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS--COMPETITIVE ACQUISITION (JAN 2004)

(a) Definitions. As used in this provision--

“Discussions” are negotiations that occur after establishment of the competitive range that may, at the Contracting Officer's…