7413945 Amendment 0004.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES 1 18

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

0004 07/23/2026 7413945

6. ISSUED BY Code N40085 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6.) Code

CG MCAS Cherry Point

FACILITIES, ROICC

B-87, 748 Roosevelt Blvd.

PSC BOX 8006

CHERRY POINT, NC 28533

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION Repairs to Building 3918 to Relocate USMC Post Office

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

AMENDMENT MUST BE ACKNOWLEDGED WITH YOUR PROPOSAL 10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended is not extended. Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods: (a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copy of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (if required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14. ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATION CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103 (b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER: (specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return original to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

7413945 Repairs to Building 3918 to Relocate USMC Post Office, Cherry Point, NC

This Amendment is being issued provide PPI responses.

The proposal due date remains 30 July 2026 at 12:00 PM.

See Attached.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR (Same as Item 8) 15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 16C. DATE SIGNED

BY

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070 30-105 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV.1-83) 0224-3(10-90)

PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE Prescribed by GSA

PREAWARD INQUIRY FORM

PAGE SECTION PARAGRAPH

1 6/16/2026 Will the amendments from the previous RFP for this project be incorporated?

Yes - Please see list on PPI Master Form that addresses all nine original amendments / all prior

2 6/24/2025 Is the FF&E Package to be an option and will there be a price form for that? What are we to provide in terms of the FF&E items?

Yes - Current RFP has proper bid form reflecting FF&E package.

3 6/20/2025 Wall detail sheet A501 note 2 states drywall to be type x, moisture resistant, absue resistant. There is a big difference in durability and price for each three of these types of sheetrocks.

The intent is to provide a single product with all three of these qualities. Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings and all amendments (MBFA)

4 6/20/2025 Wall detail sheet A501 note 4 states drywall to be type x, glass matt covered. There is a bigger difference for these two types of sheetrock.

Note 4 is referencing gypsum sheathing, which does not apply to this project. Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings and all amendments (MBFA)

5 6/20/2025 Can the temp walls be framed with metal studs in lieu of wood?

We take no exception to metal stud in lieu of wood. Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings and all amendments (MBFA).

6 6/20/2025 Assuming moisture resistant would go on bathroom or wet location ceilings, can the actual gypsum product needed for the walls and remaining ceiling be provided?

Per keynote 2, all gypsum board is to be type x, moisture resistant, and abuse resistant in all locations unless otherwise noted. Specific products cannot be provided.

Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings and all amendments

(MBFA)

POSTED ON

AMENDMENT

PPI #

REFERENCE

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

DATE

SUBMITTE

D

AMENDMENT

PPI # QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

SUBMITTE

D 7 6/20/2025 The finish schedule calls for the ceiling grid to be interlude 9/16" with a fine fissured square lay in tile.

Square lay in tiles require a 15/16" grid. Please confirm the grid or tile on the finish schedule.

We have updated the finish legend and spec to specify an acoustical ceiling tile to fit with a 9/16" grid profile.

8 6/24/2025 Please provide the model number of the existing RTU to determine the cost of the adapter curb?

See NAVFAC Drawing No.

12913151.

9 6/26/2025 Please provide as builts for the existing post office to be demolished.

Record Drawings provided.

Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings and all amendments

(MBFA)

10 6/26/2025 ECS Hazardous Materials report dated 12/18/2023 for building 3918. Figure 2 - Asbestos and Lead Sample Location Map: The project work area was not tested for asbestos or lead. The report says "No Access" for the area to receive renovations. Will another inspection take place in this area?

The report shows that 2 samples were taken in the project area but both tested negative for asbestos.

No lead samples were taken within the project area, but one taken directly outside the project area (L-

11) showed no lead detected. There is a small room that was unable to be tested within the project area. I have attached a picture of the room they are referencing. Nothing stands out to me as a concern in that room. We included the Lead/Asbestos spec just to be safe because lead was found in the adjacent mechanical room and across the hall from the project area. A second HAZMAT inspcection/report will not be provided. Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings and all

July 2011 # DISTRIBUTION: DoW COMMUNITY ONLY

AMENDMENT

PPI # QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSESUBMITTE

D 11 6/30/2025 In the Specs, Section 10 14 00.20 Page 2 Item 1.3. They ask for three (3) extra sign frames and blank plates for each sign type. That will add 21 more signs to a job that only has 30 signs total. How many of each sign type (frames and blank plates) do they actually want and for which sign types?

See paragraph 1.3 in spec section 10 14 00.20 Interior Signage.

NAVFAC ID has confirmed that extra end caps would be suitable based on the many variables for this project (WID)

12 6/30/2025 Is a triple hat suitable for this project, or would it be prefered for a 2 or 3 man staff?

See paragraph 1.6.1.1 in spec section 01 45 00 Quality Control.

The QC Manager may also serve as the SSHO. Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings and all amendments (FEAD)

13 6/30/2025 Will the demoed doors, frames, and hardware in Building 3918 be saved for property maintenance or recycled?

See paragraph 3.1.6 in spec section 02 41 01 Building Deconstruction.

Shop-fabricated doors and frames are to be recylced. Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings and all amendments (MBFA).

14 6/30/2025 Can a detail be provided on the concrete cut in for the underground plumbing?

Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings and all amendments

15 6/30/2025 Will the cut in need to be done after normal business hours?

See 01 14 00 Work Restrictions for work hours. Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings and all amendments (FEAD)

16 6/30/2025 Will the new location of the cooler require being recessed into the floor? If so, can a detail please be provided?

No recess into the floor is required.

Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings and all amendments

(MBFA)

AMENDMENT

PPI # QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSESUBMITTE

D 17 6/30/2025 Is the existing cooler location recessed into the floor? If so, please provide detail to cut and patch.

The existing cooler is not recessed into the floor. Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings and all amendments (MBFA).

18 6/30/2025 What is the excepted warranty of reinstallation of the existing cooler systems?

Reinstallation of existing cooler systems falls under the 1-year general contractors warranty.

Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings and all amendments

(MBFA)

19 6/30/2025 Will the access control for the renovated space be tied into the existing building system, or will the post office need to be independent?

Access control ties into existing access control system. Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings and all amendments (MBFA).

20 6/30/2025 Are as-built drawings of the fire sprinkler system available?

As-built drawings of the fire sprinkler system are not available.

Available information provided.

Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings and all amendments

(JH)

21 6/30/2025 The area labeled "not in contract" does not appear to be seperated from the remainder of the space by a firewall, and is therefore part of the same building. Given this, is there any evidence to confirm that the fire alarm and mass notification system components that are being demolished are connected to a fire alarm control unit in the area outside of the contract? Or that any devices in the "not in contract" area are connected to the panels to be demolished?

Extent of existing system to be demolished is based upon visual survey of existing notification appliance types, previous Commisary fire alarm system replacement project, and interface of the two existing systems. No additional confirmation is available. Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings and all

AMENDMENT

PPI # QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSESUBMITTE

D 22 6/30/2025 Specification section 28 31 76 states that the existing building fire alarm system is by Notifier, but it does not specify that the new system must be by Notifier. Please confirm that the new fire alarm control panel can be by any manufacturer.

The new system must be compatible with and be capable of fully networking with the existing control panel serving the commisary. The existing to remain panel is by Notifier. Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings and all amendments (MBFA)

23 6/30/2025 Drawing C-103: Existing sewer, electric, and communications are all shown being removed outside of the limits of disturbance. Would you like us to demo lines to the limits of disturbance?

See NAVFAC Drawing No.

12913057. NOTE: The limits of disturbance have been expanded to include all demolition work items.

24 7/1/2025 During the preBid Site Visit it was observed by a Sub- Contractor that the existing supervisory controller (NAE) at Building 3918 is past end of life for servicing and is no longer able to receive security patches. Please confirm replacement of NAE with new SNE-2200, and please include J&A ML-25-03 with response.

Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings and all amendments

(MBFA).

25 7/1/2025 Specification indicates a HDPE plastic lockers required but it calls for pass through capability. This makes me think that they are talking about PO box type lockers. I do not know any mfg. that would make an HDPE PO box locker. PO box lockers are normally steel body with aluminum doors. Can they clarify if this is the case?

The PO Box lockers and Parcel lockers are metal finish MTL-1 as indicated on Interior Elevation drawing sheets I-202 & I-203 (NAVFAC Drawing No.

12913102). The Pharmacy Lockers in the Mall Corridor 175 are metal finish MTL-2 as indicated on Interiors elevation A1/I-203 (NAVFAC Drawing No.

12913103). See spec section 10 51

AMENDMENT

PPI # QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSESUBMITTE

D 26 7/1/2025 There is a group of 10 lockers in Work Room 205 that I would think would be what is specified. Can they clarify that is the case?

This is correct - Work Room 205 lockers are to be HDP-1 finish as indicated on Interiors drawing B3/I- 203 (NAVFAC Drawing No.

12913103).

27 7/9/2025 The Recessed Mail Lockers and Parcel Lockers shown on drawings I-201, I-202, and I-203 are not addressed by either the Equipment Floor Plan on drawing QF101 nor the specifications. Are these items Contractor Furnished / Contractor Installed? Are they Government Furnished, Contractor Installed? Are they Government Furnished / Government Installed?

All lockers are to be Contractor Furnished / Contractor Installed.

Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings and all amendments

(WID).

28 7/9/2025 If they are to be either Contractor Furnished or Contractor Installed, it is requested specification guidance be provided

Please see 10 51 13 Spec (WID). 0001

AMENDMENT

PPI # QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSESUBMITTE

D 29 7/9/2025 During the preBid Site Visit it was observed that the walk-in coolers to be relocated per Construction Keynotes 5 and 6 on Drawing A-104 have been in service for an extended period. They were provided by the Jeffreys Cabinet Company using equipment mfr. by the W.A. Brown & Son Company. Jeffreys has been out of business for some time. The W. A. Brown & Son Company was purchased on April 30, 2012 by Imperial Manufacturing. It is now doing business as Imperial- Brown. I was advised by Ms. Stacie Sewell that Imperial-Brown did not retain any files from the W.A.

Brown & Son Company, nor does it provide any service to this old equipment. Ms. Sewell can be contacted 503- 830-3274. Specification Section 110540-1.3 required compliance with manufacturer's instructions, 110540-

3.1.2.2 requires conformance to Manufacturer's standards, 110540-3.2 requires manufacturer's representative to provide advice and service, 110540-

3.6.1 requires following manufacturer's procedures during start-up and testing, and to record manufacturer's recommending readings hourly. It is also noted that a warranty for the work to relocate the coolers cannot be provided. In the abscemce of any technical support from the original manufacturer, can specification guidance be

Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings and all amendments.

30 7/9/2025 The cooler equipment is at least 13 plus years old based on the change of ownership. It is recommended that the MCX consider requiring new Walk-In Coolers which would come with a warranty. Phasing of the work could allow construction to be completed for the New Package Store area prior to taking the existing MCX Package Store out of operation. Can the requirement for new Walk-In Coolers be added to the RFP?

This contract does not permit the purchase of new items for the use of selling merchandise. Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings and all amendments (MBFA).

AMENDMENT

PPI # QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSESUBMITTE

D 31 7/9/2025 During the preBid Site Visit it was observed there are no wire mesh partitions to connect to at the location of new Alcohol Storage Room 201. Will the new Wire Mesh Partition be required to be extended approximately 15'-8" to the masonry wall?

Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings and all amendments

(MBFA).

32 7/9/2025 During the preBid Site Visit it was observed there are Pharmacy Lockers in service on both sides of Mall 175.

The demolition of this are on drawing AD103 does not show or address either of the Pharmacy Lockers. With the Pharmacy Lockers be relocated out of the work area by others prior to the contractor beginning work?

Pharmacy lockers will be removed as a part of a separate project prior to the start of this project. Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings and all amendments.

33 6/16/2026 IAW MCAS CP FRCS Standardization for JCI Metasys branded products, please include "J&A ML-25-03 Class FRCS Cherry Point" within the next amendment.

(attached)

Government still working on an answer. Please ignore until Amendment 0003.

N/A

34 6/16/2026 11 Price Proposal Form

CLIN 0002 Can a revised Bid Form be provided with the Government's FF&E Estimate to allow for an accurate HAR calculation?

Please see updated Price Proposal sheet attached.

35 6/17/2026 M-602 Note 10 on the Rooftup Unit Heat Pump Schedule calls that the unit must not exceed 10% of the existing rooftop unit weight. Can the existing make and model number be provided?

Government to provide existing unit make and model #. Nameplate was worn and not legible. (CCE)

36 6/17/2026 M-602 Can you confirm the scheduled RTU weight of 1,156.4 lbs? That weight appears low for the specified applied-style rooftop uni with double-wall construction and associated features, and is more indicative of a light commercial unit.

DOR confirms weight of BOD is approximately 1150lb. BOD unit is

WSK102A4. (CCE)

AMENDMENT

PPI # QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSESUBMITTE

D 37 6/17/2026 M-602 RTU-1 basis of design is a catalog style unit. Schedule notes such as 2" double wall foamed construction, digital scroll compressor, SCR heat, and two filter typles are options found on semi-custom units. In order to meet the weight requirements of schedule note 10, the RTU would need to be a catalog style RTU. Are the RTU manufacturers supposed to meet the weight requirement with a catalog unit OR meet the specified options in the scheduled notes with a semi-custom unit?

They cannot meet both.

BOD unit is confirmed as a catalog style unit, WSK102A4 (Trane).

Typical cabinet unit construction is acceptable. Staged electric heat is acceptable. Multiple staged scroll compressors are acceptable.

Provide unit with 2" MERV 13 filtration. (CCE)

38 6/12/2026 3 SPECS We do not see a table of contents in the specifications-only a "list of drawings" in the SPECS. Could you please provide a table of contents for B3918 Relocate USMC Post Office?

Table of Contents provided

[MBFA]

39 6/26/2026 I-202 The Parcel Locker Sections likely require 2-key Parcel Locker Locks for package retention instead of standard keyed locks used for tenant mail. Can it be confirmed by Amendment whether or not the Government needs 2- Key Parcel Locker Locks in the Parcel Locker Sections (I-202 B1, B3, C1 C3)? If so, providing different series of mailboxes that will accommodate Parcel Locker Locks will change the layout for those spaces and would also have a slightly different look than indicated on the RFP Drawings. Will a change in the box layout also be acceptable if 2-Key Parcel Locker Locks will be required for required Parcel Lockers?

Yes, if the Govt. requires 2 key locks, an updated layout is acceptable as long as is doesn’t greatly reduce the number of lockers. (WID)

40 6/26/2026 1 of 11 RFP The project RFP states that all work shall be completed within 440 calendar days after award. Can 90 Days be added to the Project Duration by Amendment to allow for scheduling and completion of the required work?

Yes. 90 days may be added to project duration.

AMENDMENT

PPI # QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSESUBMITTE

D 41 6/29/2026 I-112 I-112 Drawing I-112 Sheet note G states to install corner guards on all outside corners in the shop areas. In review of the drawings, there is no area identified as "shop. Please clarify.

Correction. "Shop" is referring to the "Work Room" [WID]

42 6/29/2026 I-113 I-113 Drawing I-112 Sheet note G states to install end wall protectors at all open end walls. Please identify where these are to be located.

Open end wall are not in the scope.

Disregard and see attached revised sheet. [WID]

43 6/29/2026 C-101, C 02 41 00 3.1.2.2 / 01 57 19 1.7

Sheet C-101 identifies an abandoned OWS/grease trap and a water main 'believed to be abandoned in place.' No specification section or drawing note provides a disposition instruction for either utility. Please confirm:

(1) The required disposition of the abandoned OWS/grease trap and water main (remove, cap-in-place, or leave as-is); (2) Whether environmental sampling or UST abatement.

No work on OW/S. Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings, and Amendments (Avolis)

44 6/29/2026 C-100, C-101, C-502

01 57 19 1.5.1.1 Section 01 57 19 requires a traffic control plan (TCP) submitted to the CO before starting construction and compliance with MUTCD Part VI. MCAS Cherry Point is an active airfield. Please confirm: Whether there are airfield operations blackout windows or peak-hour restrictions that prohibit haul truck movements on designated routes.

No known blackout windows or peak hour restrictions. Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings, and Amendments (Avolis)

AMENDMENT

PPI # QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSESUBMITTE

D

45 6/29/2026 AD-101

thru AD- 205, A- 001 thru A-104

02 41 00 1.3 / 02 41 01 1.3.1

Demolition general notes on sheets AD-101 and AD- 201 require the contractor to provide temporary shoring and bracing where existing load-bearing elements are removed until new load-bearing structure is in place.

The drawings do not identify which walls or structural members within the renovation scope are load-bearing.

Please confirm: (1) Whether the A/E will provide a structural assessment identifying load-bearing elements requiring temporary support during demolition; (2) Whether a contractor-prepared, PE-stamped shoring design submittal is required, and what the submittal review period is; and (3) Whether temporary shoring will impact any MCX retail areas that must remain open, and how access conflicts will be resolved.

(1) All items being demolished are non-loadbearing.

(2) No shoring design is required

(3) We do not anticipate this being an issue as we are not demolishing any loadbearing structural elements. [MBFA]

46 6/29/2026 A-101 thru A-

104, AD-

01 14 00 1.3.4 Section 01 14 00 1.3.4 confirms the building is occupied during construction and requires temporary closures and dust protection. The floor plans show significant construction activity adjacent to the 'NOT IN CONTRACT' MCX retail space, but no phasing plan is included in the contract documents. Please confirm: (1) What fire-rated partition or barrier system is required at the construction/occupied MCX interface, and what its minimum fire rating must be; (2) Whether a detailed construction phasing plan is required as a preconstruction submittal.

(1) All construction walls are to be 1 hour rated. Please see the attached revised B3/A-501 indicating 1-hour fire rating.

[MBFA]

(2) Contract phasing is described in 01 14 00 Para 1.2.f. Phasing details must be identified on the construction schedule.

AMENDMENT

PPI # QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSESUBMITTE

D 47 6/29/2026 A-104, QF-101

11 05 40 1.3 / 02 41

00 3.3.2 Section 11 05 40 confirms the GC is responsible for disconnecting, relocating, and reinstalling the two walk-in coolers and ice cooler. Section 02 41 00 3.3.2 requires ODS recovery prior to equipment removal.

Please confirm: (1) What is the refrigerant type and approximate charge quantity in each unit, and will an ODS inventory be provided to bidders; (2) Who is responsible for providing temporary refrigerated storage for MCX products during the relocation period, and what is the maximum allowable downtime; and (3) What inspection or commissioning standard applies to the reinstalled cooler panels and refrigeration systems.

(1) refrigerant type R-22, 60 pounds

(2) Govt will be relocating contents of coolers. Maximum allowable downtime is 5 working days.

(3) An inspection and/or commissioning for it to be reinstalled will require the GC to replace any and all filter driers, pressure test the system, vacuum the system down to 500 microns and after the start up verify subcooling and reheat are to manufacturer specifications

48 6/29/2026 A-201, AD-201

02 41 01 3.1.3 / 04 20

Exterior elevation demolition sheet AD-201 keynote 7 requires partially demolishing CMU to receive a new door and frame (A-201 keynote 2), and keynote 10 requires partially demolishing CMU for a new cased opening. Sheet A-201 keynote 13 requires a steel lintel at the exterior steel door opening, but no lintel size, type, or structural detail is referenced anywhere in the drawing set. Please provide: (1) A structural detail for the steel lintel required at the new exterior door opening; and (2) A CMU infill detail at the removed dock lift opening, including lintel and jamb bearing i t

(1) Please see the attached revised

AD201 (12913068), A-201

(12913078), and A-602 (12913090) for lintel requirements.

(2) No infill is required at the dock lift opening. Door 210B will go within the existing masonry opening. Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings and all amendments [MBFA]

AMENDMENT

PPI # QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSESUBMITTE

D 49 6/29/2026 A-201, AD-201

07 21 16 N/A Sheet AD-201 indicates partial demolition of the existing EIFS down to substrate, and sheet A-201 keynote 6 requires sheet metal wrap at the EIFS edge where portions were removed. No EIFS product specification or repair spec section appears in the contract documents. The asbestos survey embedded in the specs (samples 19-1 through 19-7) shows the EIFS plaster is non-asbestos. Please confirm: (1) The EIFS product specification required for repair and patching at the new openings, including impact rating and wind load performance requirements; and (2) Whether a pre-construction moisture investigation of the existing EIFS is required before beginning demolition.

(1) Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings and all amendments

(2) No testing is required [MBFA]

50 6/29/2026 A-201, A-109

N/A N/A Sheet A-201 keynote 5 references a building-mounted entrance canopy. No product specification, dimensional requirement, attachment detail, or alternate/base bid designation for this canopy appears anywhere in the specification package or drawing details. Please provide: (1) The product specification and dimensional requirements for the entrance canopy; (2) An attachment detail for the CMU substrate, including anchor type and whether a pull-out test is required; and

(3) Confirmation of whether the entrance canopy is included in the base bid or designated as an alternate.

(1) Please see the attached revised A-107 (12913075) and A-504 (12913087) for dimensional requirements.

(2) See details C1 and C3 on sheet A-504 (12913087). Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings and all amendments.

(3) Entrance canopy is included in the base bid. [MBFA]

AMENDMENT

PPI # QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSESUBMITTE

D

50 6/29/2026 FD-001

thru FD-

108, FA-

001 thru

FA-109

28 31 76 1.3 / 1.9 Section 28 31 76 1.3 confirms this project involves modification and expansion of the existing Notifier fire alarm and mass notification system. Please confirm: (1) Whether a fire watch is required during any period of fire alarm system impairment, and if so, who bears the cost (government or contractor); and (3) What is the maximum allowable system outage window and required advance notice to the base fire marshal.

(1) A fire watch is required during any period of fire alarm system impairment [JH]

(2) Fire watch is the responsibility of the contractor.

(3) Request for any outage must be submitted in writing a minimum of 15 days prior to desired date of interruption per 01 14 00 1.2.d.

Per 01 14 00 1.3.5 utlity cutovers and interruptions must occur outside regular hours and outage must be kept to a minimum.

AMENDMENT

PPI # QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSESUBMITTE

D

50 6/29/2026 MD-

101, M-

23 03 00.00 20N/A Mechanical demolition note 6 on sheet MD-101 requires inspecting, cleaning, and repairing existing refrigeration fan coil units to remain in service. No specification section provides an inspection standard, acceptance criteria, or pass/fail protocol for evaluating the existing coil units. Please confirm: (1) What inspection standard or protocol governs the assessment of existing coil units (ASHRAE, manufacturer criteria, or government-specified criteria); (2) What is the change-order mechanism if inspection reveals a unit is beyond useful life, will the CO issue a modification or is a unit-price provision required; and (3) Are any existing units known to contain R-22 refrigerant, and if so what is the required disposition under ODS provisions.

(1)The intent of the note is to require inspection, cleaning, and minor repairs necessary to restore existing fan coil units to normal operating condition. Inspection shall be based on the manufacturer's recommended maintenance procedures and industry-standard HVAC maintenance practices. (2) DOR was directed to reuse existing equipment. If inspection reveals units/equipment are beyond useful life, KTR must notify the CO for direction or contract modification.

(3) The existing to remain units are known to contain R-22 refrigerant.

Any refrigerant removed from the existing equipment must be recovered and handled in accordance with the contract requirements and all applicable federal, state, and local regulations governing ODS. [CCE]

50 6/29/2026 MD-101 23 05 93.00 22§1.3 / §1.5.4 Section 23 05 93.00 22 requires TAB of existing systems and submittal of TAB reports of existing conditions prior to demolition. Mechanical demolition note 5 on sheet MD-101 requires obtaining airflows from existing grilles prior to demolition so that reused grilles can be rebalanced. Please confirm: What is the protocol if pre-demo airflow measurements are found to be deficient relative to current space requirements, is mechanical system redesign within the contract scope?

Pre-demo TAB is intended to document existing conditions and provide baseline for rebalancing of existing equipment. The KTR is not responsible for redesigning the mechanical system. If deficiencies are found that cannot be rectified through TAB or minor adjustments, notify the CO for further direction. [CCE]

AMENDMENT

PPI # QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSESUBMITTE

D 50 6/29/2026 A-109, M-601, M-602

23 81 00 N/A Roof plan sheet A-109 construction keynotes 3 and 6 indicate a new mechanical rooftop unit and new heat pump. Please confirm: (1) Whether a structural analysis of the existing roof deck is required to confirm adequacy for new equipment dead loads before proceeding with design; and (2) Whether new roof curbs or penetrations for equipment trigger any existing roof membrane warranty claim or require manufacturer l

(1) New rooftop equipment weighs approximately the same as the existing equipment it is replacing.

No structural analysis is required.

(2) Any penetrations or new curbs must maintain the existing roof warranty. [MBFA]

50 6/29/2026 P-101, P- 201, P-

22 00 00 N/A Construction floor plans show new unisex restrooms (rooms 207 and 209) and a janitor's closet with full fixture complements. No existing slab survey or sanitary riser information is provided in the documents reviewed. Please confirm: (1) The existing slab thickness, reinforcement layout, and finish floor elevation at the new restroom locations to determine feasibility of sub-slab sanitary routing; (2) The location, pipe size, and available invert elevation of the nearest existing sanitary branch for new fixture tie-in; and (3) The required disposition of any existing floor drains within the demolition scope — retain, relocate, or abandon-in-place.

Existing sanitary sewer piping location was provided based on site visit and existing drawings available. Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings and all amendments [CCE]

50 6/29/2026 C-101, C-102, E-701

26 20 00 N/A The civil site plan identifies an existing diesel generator (GEN-3918, 580 gallons) and associated transfer switches at B3918. No generator specification section appears in the contract documents. Please confirm: (1) Whether the existing GEN-3918 is intended to serve the renovated post office area under this contract; (2) What post office loads are required to be on emergency power (e.g., PO boxes, lobby lighting, EVMS, security); (3) Whether the existing transfer switch is in the contract scope for replacement or testing; and (4) Whether a load bank test of the generator is required as a contract deliverable.

Existing generator is ETR. It does not serve the Post Office. Submit proposals in accordance with RFP, Specifications, Drawings and all amendments. [CCE]

J #

AMENDMENT

PPI # QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSESUBMITTE

D 50 6/29/2026 I-101, I-

102, I-

12 00 01.00 20§1.3.1 Section 12 00 01.00 20 §1.3.1 confirms FF&E is an Option Item and may be awarded at least 6 months before contract completion. Furniture plan sheet notes confirm the GC is responsible for coordinating power and data rough-in locations. Please confirm: (1) Whether final furniture shop drawings and power/data connection layouts will be provided at least 6 months before the contract completion date to allow rough-in coordination; and (2) Whether modular furniture power strips (noted as 'not shown on drawings' in sheet I-101 notes) are included in the GC electrical scope or within the FF&E Option Item scope.

1.) Timelines will be coordinated with the contractors designer, who will work with the furniture vendor to provide final furniture plans.

2.) Furniture powers strips will be provided by the furniture vendor.

[WID]

50 6/29/2026 What is the deck height of building 3918. 17'-4" at the highest point, 16'-6" at the lowest point [MBFA]