Conformed_List_of_PPIs.pdf
PDF 91 KB Posted
- Attached to
- West Coast General Ship Repair MAC Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N4044319R0110
- Issued by
- Department of the Navy
About this file
This document contains pre-proposal questions and answers regarding a forthcoming solicitation for general ship repair services in San Diego, California; Bremerton, Washington; and Oahu, Hawaii. The Military Sealift Command Ship Support Unit San Diego intends to issue a request for proposals to solicit small business sources capable of supporting general ship repair requirements across multiple ship classes. The solicitation will include three geographic lots for ship repair work in San Diego, Bremerton, and Oahu. Offerors must have access to a marine repair facility within 50 miles of the respective locations. The government will make multiple awards of indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contracts with a minimum guarantee of $3,000 each and a total ceiling of $45 million over five years. Evaluation will follow DoD Class Deviation 2018-O0006 to qualify all responsible offerors meeting standards for technical acceptability, past performance, and fair pricing. The applicable North American Industry Classification code is 336611.
Conformed List of PPIs (13 is new)
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| N4044319R0110__SF33_Conformed_thru_AMEND_0003.pdf | ||
| N4044319R0110_AMEND_0003_SF30.pdf | ||
| N4044319R0110_00002__SF30.pdf | ||
| N4044319R0110_CONFORMED_SF33_through_Amend_00002.pdf | ||
| N4044319R0110_CONFORMED_thru_Amend_00001.pdf | ||
| N4044319R0110_Amend_00001.pdf | ||
| L-3__Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| L-1_Pre-Proposal_Inquiry_Form.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| J-1_Technical_Non-Disclosure_Agreement.pdf | ||
| L-2_Past_Performance_Data_Sheet.docx | DOCX document | |
| N4044319R0110__SF_33.pdf |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ITEM NO:
TITLE: Technical Approach
PARA. NO: L.8
PAGE NO: 42
ITEM NO:
TITLE: CPARS
PARA. NO: L.8
PAGE NO: 44
ITEM NO:
TITLE: Past Performance
PARA. NO: 1
Page No: 44
ITEM NO: 1
TITLE: Proposal Contents
PARA. NO: 8.0 and 8.1
PAGE NO: 41
ITEM NO: 2
TITLE: Facilities
PARA. NO: Element A
PAGE NO: 42
ITEM NO: Price Proposal Spreadsheet
TITLE:
PARA. NO:
PAGE NO:
ITEM NO: Solicitation
TITLE: SF-33 Section L
PARA. NO: 8
PAGE NO:
ITEM NO: Solicitation
TITLE: Section C and Section F
PARA. NO: C.3.1, C.8.1 and F.F.2
PAGE NO:
ITEM NO: Solicitation CONTRACTOR QUESTION 9: Para 3.1of Section C states "The primary location will be San GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Offerors are only required to
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 5: To increase competition, we recommend the government amend the RFP to indicate that Offerors may submit proposals for regions in which they do not have facilities, but must present evidence that they have such facilities prior to issuance of any DO under this contract?
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: While the Government appreciates suggestions to improve competition, the Facilities requirement will remain at the basic IDIQ level to facilitate streamlined DO competitions. However, Section H has been revised to allow for the possibility of GSR MAC holders to be able to propose under LOTs not originally awarded in a type of Rolling Admissions competition (per Amendment 0001).
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 2: For past performance can CPARS be used in Lieu of submitting a PPQ.?
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Yes. Section L has been updated accordingly (per Amendment 0001).
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 8: Para C.3.1 and F.2 of the Solicitation states "The primary location will be San Diego, California (CA) (LOT A); however, work may be required throughout MSC SSU San Diego’s area of responsibility (AOR), including, but not limited to the Bremerton, Washington (WA) area (LOT B), and the Oahu, Hawaii (HI) area (LOT C).
Although unlikely, the Government may issue solicitations for requirements outside of MSC SSU SD’s primary AOR in support of MSC’s worldwide mission (i.e. GSR worldwide)". Para C.8.1 of Section C states "The Government will not reimburse or pay for any travel costs incurred by the Contractor in performing the contract". Is the Contractor allowed to include travel cost, if travel is required on future Delivery Orders, on Contractors Proposals for such Delivery Orders? Please Clarify.
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Yes. In the unlikely event GSR is required internationally, the Government will request pricing for travel in the DO Request for Proposal. Section C has been revised accordingly (per Amendment 0002).
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: No price analysis will be conducted at the basic contract level. Please see Section M for more information related to DoD Class Deviation 2018-O0006.
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 7: SF-33 States to provide 1 Original, 3 Hard Copies and 1 Electronic copy of the Proposal. Para 8 of Section L states to provide 1 Original, 4 Hard Copies and 1 Electronic copy of the Proposal. What is the correct number of Hard copies to be provided in addition to the original and the electronic copy? Please clarify.
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Four hard copies are required.
Please see revised SF 33 block 9 (per Amendment 0002).
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 6: Please provide the price proposal spreadsheet.
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: No.CONTRACTOR QUESTION 3: We understand each reference contract is limited to 3 pages, for a total of 9 pages. Would you allow an introduction to the Past Performance volume, to be limited to an additional 3 pages also?
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 4: RFP states at page 41, under 8.0 that "each volume should contain the following items, in addition to the other required items. Is it your intention that each volume must contain a separate cover letter with all of the Tabs listed at paragraph 8.1?
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: No. Paragraph 8.1 applies solely to Volume I.
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Please see revised Section L (per Amendment 0001)
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 1: Section L does not provide a page limitation for Volume II.
Can the contractor use as many pages as needed?
N404431R0110
PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRIES
TITLE: Section C
PARA. NO: 3.1 and 13 thru 13.4
PAGE NO:
ITEM NO: Solicitation TITLE: Section C PARA. NO: 3.1 and 13
PAGE NO:
ITEM NO: 1
TITLE: Volume II, Element D Page Limit
PARA. NO:
PAGE NO: 44
ITEM NO: 2
TITLE: Volume II, Element A Page Limit
PARA. NO:
PAGE NO: 43
ITEM NO: Solicitation
TITLE: Section C - S.O.W
PARA. NO: 7.6.1 - 7.6.3
PAGE NO: 7 of 49
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 13: Contractors calculation of Standard/Straight Time, Overtime, and Premium time differs from the definitions provided in paragraphs 7.6.1 - 7.6.3 on page 7 of 49 of the solicitation. We will price our work, both basic and changes, based upon company policy. Will this be an issue?
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: The Government will not dictate an offeror's cost accounting system or internal operations. However, when work must be negotiated on a sole source basis, the Government will negotiate using the methodology described in the solicitation. Contractors will need to provide detailed pricing proposals accordingly (i.e.
based upon Solicitation/Contract requirements rather than contradictory internal company policies).
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 11: In Amendment 0001 the Government limited the pages in Element D to 10 pages. However, in order to completely respond to all of the paragraphs in Element D for each of the three lots, the Offeror requests the Government increase the page limit for Element D to 15 pages.
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Please see revised Section L (per Amendment 0002).
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 12: In Amendment 0001 the Government limited the pages in Element A to 5 pages. However we are required to provide a listing of major machinery for each facility to support the various lots. Will the Government increase the page limit for Element A to 10 pages in order to account for the listing of available major machinery?
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Please see revised Section L.
Diego, California (CA) (LOT A); however, work may be required throughout MSC SSU San Diego’s area of responsibility (AOR), including, but not limited to the Bremerton, Washington (WA) area (LOT B), and the Oahu, Hawaii (HI) area (LOT C). Although unlikely, the Government may issue solicitations for requirements outside of MSC SSU SD’s primary AOR in support of MSC’s worldwide mission (i.e. GSR worldwide)". Para 13.1 States "The Contractor shall have access to a marine repair facility to perform repairs and testing to machinery and equipment or components required to be moved off-ship to accomplish requirements". Para's 1.3.1 Thru 13.4 states that the repair facility shall be within 50 miles from San Diego for LOT A, Bremerton for LOT B and Oahu for LOT C. Is the OFFER required to have access to facilities in these areas if an Offeror is only proposing to accomplish work in San Diego (LOT A)? Please Clarify.
have a facility in the area for which they are proposing. This could be limited to one or two of the geographic areas, or could include all three.
CONTRACTOR QUESTION 10: Para 13.1 of Section C states "The Contractor shall have access to a marine repair facility to perform repairs and testing to machinery and equipment or components required to be moved off-ship to accomplish requirements." Para's 1.3.1 Thru
13.4 states that the repair facility shall be within 50 miles from San Diego for LOT A, Bremerton for LOT B and Oahu for LOT C. If an Offeror only has facilities with in the 50 mile radius for San Diego (LOT A) and is only proposing for San Diego (LOT A), will the government consider the offeror successful as long as the offeror meets all other technical requirements? Please Clarify.
GOVERNMENT RESPONSE: Please see response to PPI 9.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .