Solicitation Amendment N4019225R50010002 SF 30_23SEP2025.pdf

R

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

Block 14 (Description of Amendment/Modification):

Amendment 0002, RFP N40192-25-R-5001, Environmental Compliance Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Services At Joint Region Marianas (JRM), Guam

AMENDMENT 0002

A. RFP Notice No. 2 revised 23 September 2025 is provided herein as Enclosure (1) in response to requests for information (RFI).

B. RFP Notice No. 3 is provided herein as Enclosure (2) in response to RFIs.

C. RFP Sections L.4.1, L.4.2, and M.2(3)(b) are revised. Changes are highlighted below; however, revised sections shall be reviewed in its entirety.

D. RFP Section J, Attachment JL-6 Written Pre-Proposal Conference is replaced in its entirety and provided herein as Enclosure (3).

E. The date of receipt of proposals in Block 9 of the SF33 is hereby extended from 03 October 2025 to 17 October 2025 at 4:30pm (ChST).

F. Offerors shall acknowledge this amendment, and all previous amendments, in Block 14 of the Standard Form 33 with its proposal.

G. All terms and conditions of the solicitation remain unchanged.

(End of Summary of Changes)

Section A - Solicitation/Contract Form

The following changes have been made:

INFORMATION FROM TO

Response Due Date 03 Oct 2025 17 Oct 2025

N4019225R50010002

Section L - Instructions, Conditions, & Notices to Offerors or Quoters

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

L.1 INSTRUCTIONS FOR SUBMITTING REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION (RFI)

Inquiries regarding the Request for Proposal (RFP) shall be submitted in writing via electronic mail using the Request for Information (RFI) form provided as ATTACHMENT JL-1. The Point of Contact (POC) for inquiries is Jerica A. Santos at 671-339-5063, by email at jerica.a.santos.civ@us.navy.mil and Andrew James C. Cortez at 671-333-3175, by email at andrewjames.c.cortez.civ@us.navy.mil. Verbal queries will not be accepted. Responses to the RFI will be provided via Solicitation amendment and will be posted to the website https://piee.eb.mil. The Government does not intend to respond to inquiries submitted less than 10 days before the proposal receipt date.

L.2 AMENDMENTS AND NOTICES TO THE SOLICITATION

Solicitation, amendments, and notices will be posted to the website under the Solicitation Module. Contractors can view https://piee.eb.mil solicitations in the Solicitation Module at by selecting "SOLICITATION SEARCH" in the Award section or "Solicitation https://piee.eb.mil Search" under the SUPPORT section. Contractors choosing to submit an offer/proposal in the Solicitation Module must register in PIEE and submit a request for the Proposal Manager role. All Amendments SHALL be acknowledged in the Offeror's proposal per instructions. It is the Offeror's responsibility to check the websites periodically for any amendments to the solicitation. Please note that notices do not change the solicitation. Changes to the solicitation can only be made by the issuance of amendments.

In accordance with FAR 52.215-1(b), Amendments to solicitations, if this solicitation is amended, all terms and conditions that are not amended remain unchanged. Offerors shall acknowledge receipt of any amendment to this solicitation by the date and time specified in the amendment(s).

L.3 ALL OR NONE OFFERORS

Offers are solicited on an "all or none" basis and FAR 52.215-1, INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS-COMPETITIVE ACQUISITION in Section L, is hereby modified. Failure to submit offers for all line items listed shall be cause for rejection of the offer.

L.4 PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

Proposals submitted in response to this solicitation shall be formatted and furnished in the number of copies stated in paragraphs L.4.1 and L.4.2 of this section. The Offeror's proposal shall contain a response to each of the evaluation factors and shall be in the form prescribed in Section M.

Evaluation factors are divided into two categories: Non-Price (Factors 1 through 4) and Price. The non-price evaluation factors for this acquisition are:

FACTOR 1 - Experience of the Firm FACTOR 2 - Technical and Management Approach FACTOR 3 - Safety FACTOR 4 - Past Performance

L.4.1 PROPOSAL FORMAT

Offerors SHALL submit their proposals electronically via PIEE AND provide hard copies. See Section L.5 for submittal instructions.

Hard copies of proposals shall be submitted in three ring binders, with tabs or separators, and submitted on 8.5" X 11" paper utilizing both sides of the paper. Page refers to one printed side of a piece of paper. The non-price and price proposals shall be submitted in separate binders.

For both electronic proposals and hard copy proposals, page limits, where stipulated, shall be adhered to. Refer to each non-price factor for page numbering instructions. If discussions are conducted, page limits set forth in this RFP shall apply to revised

Both proposal proposals and Final Proposal Revisions (FPR) unless this RFP is amended to change the page limitation.

submissions shall also use 0.5-inch margins and no less than 10 pitch font. Proposals, as described in Section M, shall be appropriately

Offerors are asked to submit only the information/exhibits required. Do not submit any tabbed and present a clear, concise offer.

additional information such as brochures or other pre-printed materials.

Proposals shall be submitted in two volumes:

N4019225R50010002 https://piee.eb.mil/sol/xhtml/unauth/index.xhtml https://piee.eb.mil https://piee.eb.mil

Volume I: PRICE PROPOSAL Volume II: NON-PRICE PROPOSAL (Factors 1, 2, 3, and 4)

Cover Letter, RFP Documents (including responses to Section K), and Pre-Award Survey (see Section L.11) shall be included complete in Volume I: Price Proposal.

TheA cover letter shall include --accompany the non-price and price proposals, and shall

a. The solicitation number;

b. The name, address, telephone and facsimile numbers, and e-mail addresses of the Offeror;

c. The Unique Entity Identifier (UEI), CAGE Code, and Tax Identification Number (TIN) of the Offeror;

d. A statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation and agreement to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item;

e. Names, titles, phone and facsimile numbers, and email addresses of persons authorized to negotiate on the Offeror's behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation and;

f. Name, title, and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal. Proposals signed by an agent shall be accompanied by evidence of that agent's authority, unless that evidence has been previously furnished to the issuing office.

i. Individuals. A contract with an individual shall be signed by that individual. A contract with an individual doing business as a firm shall be signed by that individual, and the signature shall be followed by the individual's typed, stamped, or printed name and the words "an individual doing business as [insert name of firm]."

ii. Partnerships. A contract with a partnership shall be signed in the partnership name.

iii. Corporations. A contract with a corporation shall be signed in the corporate name, followed by the word "by" and the signature and title of the person authorized to sign.

iv. Joint Ventures. A contract with a joint venture may involve any combination of individuals, partnerships, or corporations. The contract shall be signed by each participant in the joint venture in the manner prescribed in paragraphs (a) through (c) above for each type of participant.

v. Agents. When an agent is to sign the contract, other than as stated in paragraphs (a) through (d) above, the agent's authorization to bind the principal must be established by evidence satisfactory to the Contracting Officer.

g. Joint Venture Agreement, Binding Teaming Agreement, or other contractual agreement (if applicable).

h. Offerors shall confirm its proposal is valid for 120 calendar days from date of proposal receipt.

i. Copy of the email confirmation of successful submission of the most recent VETS-4212 Report or a statement specifying the reason a VETS-4212 Report has not been filed.

L.4.2 PROPOSAL COPIESHARD AND CDS

Proposals in response to this RFP must be submitted in the format and number of copies as follows:hard

a. Cover Letter, RFP Documents (including responses to Section K), and : One (1) complete Pre-Award Survey (see Section L.11) original, one (1) hard copy, and one (1) electronic copy in Adobe Acrobat PDF format provided on a compact disc (CD). Electronic copy must be searchable.

b. Non-Price Proposal: One (1) original, , and one (1) electronic copy in Adobe Acrobat PDF format provided on a three (3) hard copies CD. Electronic copy must be searchable.

c. Price Proposal (In Sealed Envelope): One (1) original, , and one (1) electronic copy in Adobe Acrobat PDF and one (1) hard copy Microsoft Excel format provided on a CD. Electronic copy must be searchable.

The Offeror is responsible for ensuring that all original paper and electronic copies submitted on PIEE and CDs are identical. Should there be a discrepancy between the paper and electronic versions, the original paper copy shall govern.

L.5 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION

Offerors SHALL submit their proposals electronically via PIEE AND provide hard copies.

a. ELECTRONIC SUBMITTAL: Electronic proposals shall be received in PIEE no later than the date and time stated in Block 9 of the

SF33.

i. Offerors shall submit all volumes and required information in accordance with Section L of this RFP electronically using PIEE Solicitation module at website https://piee.eb.mil.

ii. Register at PIEE using the PIEE Vendor Registration Guide, provided in Attachment JL-4.

iii. Follow the PIEE Proposal Manager, Proposal Manager Functions and Posting Offer Guides, Attachment JL-4.

iv. Electronic proposal files shall include searchable documents (e.g. Excel files, Adobe PDF). Ensure all links to external files from the proposal spreadsheets/formulas have been removed. Excel spreadsheets shall not contain macros, circular references or iterative formulas.

v. Electronic submissions shall be compatible with Windows type CPUs and Microsoft Word 2016, Excel 2016 (file extension shall be .xlsx or .xls), and Adobe Acrobat Software.

b. HARD COPY SUBMITTAL: Hard copies of proposals shall be received by this office no later than five (5) business days after the . Offerors shall address all evaluation factors and shall submit hard copies of its proposal to date and time stated in Block 9 of the SF33 the following address:

Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command Marianas Environmental Contracts Production Support Division (ACQ21) Attention: Jerica A. Santos Bldg 4175, 3rd Floor, Room A315 Pedro LG Roberto Drive, Apra Heights, Santa Rita, Guam 96915

Proposals must be clearly marked on the outside of the package with the solicitation number.

NOTE: Firms are advised that the Contracting Officer is on a secured base and access is required to enter the building. You must call 671- 339-5063 (Jerica A. Santos) to request access to the building. Anticipate delays in accessing the building and plan accordingly. It is the contractor's responsibility to ensure timely delivery to the specified location.

PROPOSALS MUST BE RECEIVED AND DATE/TIME STAMPED BY THE CONTRACTING OFFICE ON OR BEFORE THE DATE AND TIME SPECIFIED IN THE RFP. LATE SUBMITTALS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED UNLESS IT MEETS THE

REQUIREMENTS IN FAR 52.215-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS - COMPETITIVE ACQUISITION.

L.6 PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE

A written pre-proposal conference relative to this RFP is provided in writing with pre-proposal conference slides (ATTACHMENT JL-6) and included in this solicitation. Offerors are strongly encouraged to read the presentation slides and provide comments, constructive criticism, and identification/notification of RFP inconsistencies using ATTACHMENT JL-1 of the solicitation. Offerors are requested to submit completed ATTACHMENT JL-1, no later than ten days prior to the proposal receipt date to Ms. Jerica Santos via email at jerica.a.santos.civ@us.navy.mil.

ALL QUESTIONS MUST BE IN WRITING. Responses to submitted questions regarding the written pre-proposal conference information will be posted via Solicitation Amendment.

No site visits will be held for this requirement.

L.7 JOINT VENTURE, LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES AND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

a. Joint Venture Offerors shall provide a copy of the joint venture agreement. The agreement shall include information that identifies the responsibilities for each entity under this contract, demonstrate the relationship between firms, and identify contractual relationships and authorities to bind each entity of the joint venture. The Joint Venture also needs to complete the online representations and certifications for each joint venture member as well as for the joint venture itself.

b. Joint Ventures and Limited Liability Companies and Limited Partnerships shall submit the following additional documentation regarding their business entities:

i. A copy of the JV, LLC, or LTD agreement.

ii. A detailed statement outlining the following in terms of percentages where appropriate:

1. The relationship of the team/partners/parties in terms of business ownership, capital contribution, profit distribution or loss sharing.

2. The management approach in terms of who will conduct, direct, supervise, and control.

N4019225R50010002 https://piee.eb.mil/sol/xhtml/unauth/index.xhtml.

https://piee.eb.mil/sol/xhtml/unauth/index.xhtml.

3. The structure and decision-making responsibilities of the partners/parties in terms of who will control the manner and method of performance of work.

4. Identify (by name and title) the personnel having the authority to legally bind the partners/parties (including authority to execute the contract documents and bonds).

iii. A list of partners/parties, to include company name, UEI and CAGE Numbers, Address, Point of Contact, e-mail address, phone number and facsimile number

L.8 SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT REGISTRATION

The implementation of the System for Award Management (SAM), among other changes, brings together the capabilities of the former Central Contractor Registration (CCR) and Online Representations and Certifications Application (ORCA).

Firms offering a response to this notice should ensure that they are registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) database (https://www.sam.gov), and complete the provisions associated with the annual representations and certifications identified in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) subpart 4.1202 and Defense FAR Supplement (DFARS) subpart

204.1202. Firms shall also ensure to obtain a registered Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) prior to award.

NOTE: CONTRACTORS MUST COMPLETE BOTH THE FAR AND DFARS REPRESENTATIONS AND

CERTIFICATIONS ON THE SAM WEBSITE. CONTRACTORS ARE PROVIDED ACCESS TO THE DFARS

PROVISIONS ONLY WHEN THEY ANSWER AFFIRMATIVELY THAT THEY WOULD LIKE TO DO BUSINESS WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. Contractors are advised that both FAR and DFARS provisions must be listed on their SAM record in order to participate in this solicitation.

L.9 FEDERAL CONTRACTOR PROGRAM

In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 22.1303, any contractor or subcontractor with a contract of $150,000 or more with the Federal Government must take affirmative action to employ, and advance in employment, qualified special disabled veterans, veterans of the Vietnam era, and other eligible veterans without discrimination based on their disability or veteran's status.

Companies must file an annual VETS-4212 report, which shows the number of targeted veterans in their workforce by job category, hiring location, and number of new hires, including targeted veterans hired during the reporting period and the maximum number and minimum number of employees of such contractor during the period covered by the report.

Instructions, information and follow-up assistance is provided at the VETS-4212 Internet site at https://www.dol.gov/vets /vets4212.htm or employers may contact the VETS-4212 Customer Support at (866) 237- 0275 or e-mail at VETS4212-customersupport@dol.gov. A contract cannot be awarded to a contractor that has not submitted a required annual form VETS-4212, Federal Contractor Veterans' Employment Report (VETS-4212 Report) if subject to the reporting requirements of 38 U.S.C. (S) 4212(d) for that fiscal year.

L.10 INCURRED EXPENSES

The Government is not responsible for any costs incurred or associated with preparation and submission of a proposal in response to this solicitation.

L.11 PRE-AWARD SURVEY/RESPONSIBILITY DETERMINATION

This pre-award survey/responsibility determination is not part of the technical evaluation. FAR subpart 9.104 requires prospective contractors to demonstrate that they have adequate financial resources to perform the contract or the ability to obtain them; capability to comply with the required performance schedule; satisfactory performance record; and be otherwise eligible to receive an award under applicable laws and regulations. This pre-award survey shall be submitted

:with the cover letter and RFP documents

a. Company financial statements (balance sheets and income statements) for the past three years.

b. Financial resources available to perform the contract. Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital that will be used for the performance of the contract. If the Offeror plans to rely on financial support from other sources, identify the maximum lines of credit that will be available to include documentation to support the amounts.

The maximum lines of credit should be based upon the inclusion of this contract effort. For joint ventures discuss the financial responsibilities among companies and provide the same information for each partner.

c. Newly-formed entities (e.g. limited liability companies (LLC)), limited partnerships (LTD) and newly created corporate subsidiaries) that are the entity liable on the contract ordinarily have no record or an insufficient record of relevant experience, past performance, and financial capability to support a responsibility determination. In such cases, the Offeror may rely on the resources of the LLC member, parent, limited partner, or other entities related to the Offeror for responsibility purposes where the offer submits a guaranty from the entity providing the resources.

d. A list of existing commercial and government business commitments to include contract numbers, names of Contracting Officers, telephone numbers, value of contract, completion date and percent complete. If the list of existing commitments is extensive, provide the required information on at least five projects of similar dollar value and a summary of the existing commitments to include number of contracts, total dollar value of all contracts, and total dollar value of work remaining.

L.12 MINIMUM ACCEPTANCE PERIOD

The Government requires a minimum acceptance period of 120 calendar days for awarding a contract from the date specified for receipt of proposals. Offerors may specify a longer acceptance period in Block 12 of the SF 33 than the Government's minimum requirement. Offers providing less than 120 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due will not be considered and will be rejected.

Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

M.1 BASIS FOR AWARD

1. The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contract to the offeror submitting the proposal determined to represent the best value--the proposal most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

2. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

3. The tradeoff process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition. The Government considers it to be in its best interest to allow consideration of award to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror.

4. All technical factors when combined are of equal importance to the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating; and all technical factors and the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating, when combined are approximately equal to price.

5. Any proposal found to have a deficiency in meeting the stated solicitation requirements or performance objectives will be considered ineligible for award, unless the deficiency is corrected through discussions. An Unacceptable rating in any of the non-price factors will result in an overall rating of "Unacceptable" for the non-price factors, unless corrected through discussions. Proposals may be found to have either a significant weakness or multiple weaknesses that impact either the individual factor rating or the overall rating for the proposal.

M.2 EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-price factors:

Factor 1- Experience of the Firm

Factor 2 - Technical and Management Approach

Factor 3 - Safety

Factor 4 - Past Performance

The distinction between experience and past performance is that experience pertains to the volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work described under the definition of recent, relevant projects, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

2. The relative order of importance of the non-price evaluation factors is the technical factors (Factors 1, 2, and 3) are of equal importance to each other and, when combined are equal in importance to the past performance evaluation /performance confidence assessment factor (Factor 4). When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance/performance confidence assessment factor combined (i.e., the non-price evaluation factors) are approximately equal to price.

The importance of price will increase if the Offerors' non-price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-price proposal's superiority to the Government.

Award will be made to the responsible Offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

3. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

(a) :PRICE

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The Offeror shall submit the price proposal separate from the non-price proposal, and include the following:

(i) Solicitation, Offer, and Award (SF 33) - Offeror is to complete Blocks 14 through 18 on the SF 33 form and Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINs) 0001 through 0014 in Section B.

(ii) Section J, Exhibits A through F - Offeror shall enter unit prices and amounts for Exhibit Line Item Numbers (ELINs) as indicated in the schedules. OFFERORS MUST MANUALLY ROUND UNIT PRICES

TO THE NEAREST PENNY.

(2) Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate price based on the total price. Total price consists of the basic requirements and all option items (see Section B of the solicitation). The Government intends to evaluate all options and has included the provision FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options (JUL 1990) in Section M of the solicitation. In accordance with FAR 52.217-5, evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s). Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.

(iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

In the event there is a difference between a unit price and the extended total amount, the unit price will be held to be the intended offer and the total of the ELINs will be recomputed accordingly. If the Offeror provides a total amount for an ELIN but fails to enter the unit price, the total amount divided by the ELIN quantity will be held to be in the intended unit price.

(b) :NON-PRICE FACTORS

(1) Factor 1, Experience of the Firm

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: In Tab 1 of the non-price proposal, the Offeror shall submit the following information:

(A) Submit a minimum of two (2) and a maximum of five (5) recent and relevant projects that best demonstrate experience on relevant projects that are similar in size (dollar value), scope, and complexity to the Request for Proposal (RFP). Projects are defined as either stand-alone contracts, or individual task orders under an indefinite-delivery indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contract. DO NOT submit an IDIQ contract as a project; for work performed under an IDIQ contract, submit only the individual task orders that best demonstrate experience as indicated above. Projects submitted under this factor that do not conform to the solicitation submittal requirements will not be evaluated.

(B) Recent projects are those that have been 100% completed within five (5) years prior to the issuance date of this solicitation.

(C) Relevant projects are those similar in size, scope and complexity anticipated under this contract. For purposes of this solicitation, size, scope and complexity are defined as follows:

Size - The aggregate value of recent projects combined meeting the scope and complexity of this requirement is at least $1,000,000.00.

Scope - Tasks described in Section C, Annex 1800000 Specification Item 3 for recurring work.

Complexity - Depth and diversity of technical experience performing the tasks described in Section C, Annex 1800000 Specification Item 3 for recurring work.

(D) Offerors may include projects performed by key subcontractors. Key subcontractors are those anticipated to perform 25% of the work under this contract. The Government will not consider the experience of a subcontractor unless the prime contractor clearly provides, in its proposal, evidence of a legally binding teaming agreement or other contractual agreement which creates legal responsibility on the part of the subcontractor for performance on this contract.

(E) Demonstrated experience: Offerors MUST demonstrate experience in environmental compliance programs including, at minimum, clean air act, safe drinking water act, and clean water act. Experience MUST collectively demonstrate the following elements:

(1) Prepare and develop plans, certifications, and permit applications to include compliance with permit requirements /conditions,

(2) Conduct inspections, studies, surveys, assessments, monitoring, and prepare associated reporting, and

(3) Perform sample collection, testing and laboratory analysis.

(F) Projects shall be submitted on ATTACHMENT JL-2, Project Data Sheet. Each Project Data Sheet SHALL NOT exceed three (3) pages. The Offeror shall not deviate from the basic format of the form, although the equivalent of single-sided blocks may be expanded to allow for additional space, but shall not exceed the page limit per Project Data Sheet.

PROJECTS NOT SUBMITTED ON THE APPROPRATE FORM WILL NOT BE EVALUATED.

(G) Offerors must add page numbers to their Factor 1 proposal beginning with page 1.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

(A) The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror's demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing recent and relevant projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the Offeror's recent, relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the Offeror's capability to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

The Government will not review any projects above the maximum allowed and will review them in the order presented.

(B) Offerors who demonstrate experience in elements of Section C, Annex 1800000, Specification Item 3 for recurring work, that exceed the specific elements listed in the criteria identified in Factor 1, Experience of the Firm solicitation submittal requirements, may be considered more favorably.

(C) Offerors who demonstrate experience in environmental compliance programs, beyond the minimum requirement (clean air act, safe drinking water act, and clean air act), specifically hazardous waste, solid waste management, AND oil and storage tank management in at least one (1) of the elements listed below may be considered more favorably:

(1) Prepare and develop plans, certifications, and permit applications to include compliance with permit requirements /conditions,

(2) Conduct inspections, studies, surveys, assessments, monitoring, and prepare associated reporting, or

(3) Perform sample collection, testing and laboratory analysis.

(D) Offerors who demonstrate the ability to perform tasks in multiple locations may be considered more favorably.

(E) Offerors who demonstrate experience in projects performed directly on federal or local government contracts may be considered more favorably.

(2) Factor 2, Technical and Management Approach

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: In Tab 2 of the non-price proposal, the Offeror shall submit a narrative not to exceed the seven (7) pages using 0.5-inch margins and no less than 10 pitch font, describing each of the topics equivalent of single-sided below, tabbed in the technical proposal, and discussed separately. Pages that exceed the maximum number allowed will be removed prior to evaluation and will not be considered.

(A) Technical Approach: Offerors shall demonstrate understanding of and approach to accomplishing the complexity and magnitude of service requirements set forth in the performance objectives and standards of the Performance Work Statement Section C, Annex 1800000 Specification Item 3 for recurring work.

(B) Phase-In Transition Plan: Describe what will be done to "start-up" for performance of this contract. The Offeror shall include a schedule of key events, personnel actions, identification of key personnel, and their responsibilities which demonstrates an executable plan for having equipment and personnel in place to commence work.

(C) Workforce Management: The offeror shall:

(1) Include a simple organizational chart that clearly identifies the lines of authority of your organization to include key personnel;

(2) Provide a narrative that describes the lines of management authority, supervision, span of control and accountability, including the relationship between overall management (key personnel and on-site), administration, and subcontractors. If subcontractors will not be utilized, affirmatively state so; and

(3) Demonstrate the ability to provide and maintain a qualified workforce. The Offeror shall also demonstrate the ability to manage different workforce and competing priorities at various sites.

(D) Offerors must add page numbers to their Factor 2 proposal beginning with page 1.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which the Offeror demonstrates a clear understanding of the complexity and magnitude of service requirements (Technical Approach), proposes an executable plan for having equipment and personnel in place to commence work (Phase-In Transition Plan), and provides an acceptable management approach with the capability to meet performance objectives and standards of the Performance Work Statement (Workforce Management).

(3) Factor 3, Safety

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: In Tab 3 of the non-price proposal, the Offeror shall submit the following information:

The Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate; and Total Case Rate (TCR) for the specified five (5) Calendar Years (CY), as well as a safety narrative, as described further below. For a partnership or joint venture, the Offeror shall submit separate DART rates and TCR for the specified five (5) CY for each contractor who is part of the partnership/joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. Any fatalities experienced within this 5-year timeframe must be explained in detail, to include root cause and corrective actions.

NOTE: DART and TCR shall not be submitted for subcontractors.

(A) DART Rate: Submit five (5) previous complete calendar years' [CY2020, CY2021, CY2022, CY2023, and CY2024] worth of data (not an overall average). If the Offeror has no DART rate, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. Should a negative trend occur above moderate risk levels, an acceptable/detailed explanation is required that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

1. DART cases include injuries or illnesses resulting in death, days away from work, and/or restricted work or transfer to another job days beyond the day of injury/illness.

2. Calculation of DART rate: Multiply the total number of DART cases by 200,000, and then divide by the number of employee labor hours worked.

DART RATE = Number of DART Incidents x 200,000 Total Number of Employee Labor Hours Worked

(B) TCR Rate: Submit five (5) previous complete calendar years' [CY2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, and 2024] worth of data (not an overall average). If the Offeror has no TCR rate, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. Should a negative trend occur above moderate risk levels, an acceptable/detailed explanation is required that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

1. TCR cases include injuries or illnesses resulting in death, days away from work, restricted work or transfer to another job days beyond the day of injury/illness, medical treatment beyond first aid, or loss of consciousness.

2. Calculation of TCR rate: Multiply the total number of TCR incidents by 200,000, and then divide by the number of employee labor hours worked.

TCR RATE = Number of TCR Incidents x 200,000 Total Number of Employee Labor Hours Worked

(C) Technical Approach to Safety: Submit a narrative that addresses the following:

1. Describe the Offeror' s approach to implementing and executing a Safety Management System (SMS) including Management/Leadership involvement, Employee involvement, Hazard prevention, Hazard control, Worksite analysis, and Safety and health training, to include the standard(s) used to benchmark the SMS.

2. Describe the evaluation process to be used in selecting potential subcontractors, regardless whether or not you anticipate utilizing subcontractors.

3. Describe the processes of how the Offeror will oversee safety compliance of subcontractors at all levels throughout performance of the contract (to include the Offeror's own in-house workforce), regardless whether or not you anticipate utilizing subcontractors.

4. The Technical Approach to Safety narrative shall not exceed three (3) pagesthe equivalent of single-sided single- , using 0.5-inch margins and no less than 10 pitch font, and must start on a separate page from DART and TCR sided rates. Information on pages beyond this page limit will not be considered.

(D) Offerors must add page numbers to their Factor 3 proposal beginning with page 1.

(E) The Government reserves the right to review other available sources (public/Government internal) of information. These may include but are not limited to OSHA data, NAVFAC's Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Electronic Contract Management System (eCMS), etc.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for itself and its subcontractors. The evaluation will collectively consider the DART rate, TCR, Technical Approach to Safety, and other sources of information available to the Government as part of such collective evaluation. The board will evaluate the DART rates and TCR to determine if the Offeror has demonstrated a history of safe work practices taking into account any negative trends and extenuating circumstances that impact the rating.

(A) DART Rate: The board will evaluate trends over the last five years considering changes that take it from one risk level (or more) to the next up or down. Negative trends occurring above moderate risk levels require the offeror to provide a detailed explanation that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

1. Missing data without an explanation is considered a deficiency.

2. Declining trends that push the risk levels from Moderate Risk (MR) or higher to Low Risk (LR) or Very Low Risk (VLR) would indicate a strength.

3. An increasing DART rate trend could be considered a weakness (i.e. MR or better to High Risk (HR) or Extremely High Risk EHR)) if an acceptable explanation is not provided for any trends that rise above Moderate.

4. This chart correlates the DART rate to the level of risk:

Risk DART Rate Very Low Risk Less Than 1.0 Low Risk From 1.0 to 1.99 Moderate Risk From 2.0 to 2.99 High Risk From 3.0 to 4.0 Extremely High Risk Greater than 4.0

(B) TCR Rate: The board will evaluate trends over the last five years considering changes that take it from one risk level (or more) to the next up or down. Negative trends occurring above moderate risk levels require the offeror to provide a detailed explanation that includes any corrective actions taken for improvement.

1. Missing data without an explanation is considered a deficiency.

2. Declining trends that push the risk levels from Moderate Risk (MR) or higher to Low Risk (LR) or Very Low Risk (VLR) would indicate a strength.

3. An increasing TCR rate trend could be considered a weakness (i.e. MR or better to High Risk (HR) or Extremely High Risk EHR)) if an acceptable explanation is not provided for any trends that rise above Moderate.

4. This chart correlates the TCR rate to the level of risk:

Risk DART Rate Very Low Risk Less Than 2.49 Low Risk From 2.5 to 3.49 Moderate Risk From 3.5 to 4.49 High Risk From 4.5 to 5.9 Extremely High Risk Greater than 6.0

(C) The Technical Approach to Safety Narrative. To determine the degree to which the Offeror:

1. Describes a viable SMS that addresses elements; such as Management/Leadership involvement, Employee involvement, Hazard prevention, Hazard control, Worksite analysis, and Safety and health training, to include the standard(s) used to benchmark the SMS.

2. Describes a methodical process of evaluating subcontractor's safety performance in their selection process, regardless whether or not you anticipate utilizing subcontractors.

3. Describes a logical management plan to hold themselves and their subcontractors accountable for adhering to the safety requirements of the contract, regardless, whether or not you anticipate utilizing subcontractors.

4. The Technical Approach to Safety narrative shall not exceed three (3) pagesthe equivalent of single-sided single- , using 0.5-inch margins and no less than 10 pitch font, and must start on a separate page from DART and TCR sided rates. Information on pages beyond this page limit will not be considered.

(D) The Government reserves the right to review other available sources (public/Government internal) of information.

These may include but are not limited to OSHA data, NAVFAC's Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Electronic Contract Management System (eCMS), etc.

(4) Factor 4, Past Performance

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: In Tab 4 of the non-price proposal, SUBMIT A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION FOR ALL PROJECTS SUBMITTED FOR FACTOR 1, EXPERIENCE OF THE FIRM ONLY. IF A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 1. Projects considered recent and relevant in Factor 1, will also be considered recent and relevant in Factor 4. Ensure project numbers are in the same numeric order as Factor 1 projects. ADDITIONALLY, OFFERORS MUST SUBMIT ONLY ONE CPARS

OR PPQ PER PROJECT.

IF A CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs shall be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (Attachment JL-3), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors shall follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, Jerica A. Santos via email at jerica.a.santos.civ@us.navy.mil, Andrew James C. Cortez via email at andrewjames.c.cortez.civ@us.navy.mil and Elaine R. Dell'Isola via email at elaine.r.dellisola.

civ@us.navy.mil prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs or CPARS previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

Also include performance recognition documents received within the last three (3) years such as awards, award fee determinations, customer letters of commendation, and any other forms of performance recognition.

Sources of Past Performance Information for evaluation that may be used are as follows:

Past performance information provided by the offeror;

Past performance information obtained from questionnaires for this acquisition; and Past performance information obtained from any other sources available to the Government, to include, but not limited to, Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), or other databases; the Defense Contract Management Agency; and interviews with Program Managers, Contracting Officers, and Fee Determining Officials.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests solely with the Offeror.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation: The degree to which past performance evaluations and all other past performance information reviewed by the Government (e.g., CPARS, Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), performance recognition documents, and information obtained from any other source) reflect a trend of satisfactory performance considering:

A pattern of successful completion of tasks;

A pattern of deliverables that are timely and of good quality;

A pattern of cooperativeness and teamwork with the Government at all levels (task managers, contracting officers, auditors, etc.); and Recency of tasks performed that are identical to, similar to, or related to the task at hand.

M.4 COMPETITIVE RANGE

The Government intends to evaluate all proposals received and to award a contract without discussions. Therefore, the Offerors initial proposal shall contain the Offerors best terms from a price and technical standpoint. However, if discussions are deemed necessary to maximize the Government's ability to obtain the best value, discussions will be held with those Offerors within a competitive range. The Government may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

M.5 ENFORCEABILITY PROPOSAL

The proposal must set forth full, accurate and complete information as required by this solicitation. The Government will rely on such information in the award of the contract. By submission of the offer, the Offeror agrees that all items proposed (e.g., key personnel, subcontractors, materials, etc.)

will be utilized for the duration of the contract and any substitutions will require prior Contracting Officer's approval and shall be equal or better, in the judgment of the Contracting Officer, than the items originally proposed.

M.6 FINAL SELECTION

Final selection will be made to the responsible Offeror whose offer, conforming to the solicitation, is determined to be the most advantageous to the Government considering price and non-price evaluation factors.

PSC 455 BOX 195, FPO AP 96540-2937

FPO, AP 96540-2937

UNITED STATES

JERICA SANTOS, Email: jerica.a.santos.civ@us.navy.mil Telephone: 6713395063 AdminBy:

SCD: PAS: