N4008524R2604 Attachments C and D RFP FORMS.docx

DOCX document 40 KB Posted

Attached to
Railroad Track Maintenance and Repair in the Hampton Roads Area of Virginia
Solicitation number
N4008524R2604
Issued by

About this file

This document consists of two attachments related to a federal contract opportunity for Facility Investment Services for Regional Maintenance and Repair of Railroad, Ground Level and Elevated Crane Rail Systems in the Hampton Roads area of Virginia.

Attachment C is a Recent/Relevant Experience Data Sheet for the offeror to provide details on a relevant past contract, including contract information, type of work, contract value, and descriptions of how the work meets the scope, size, and complexity requirements of the current solicitation. Attachment D is a Past Performance Questionnaire template for the client to complete and provide an evaluation of the contractor's performance on the referenced contract.

The related federal contract opportunity is Solicitation Number N4008524R2604 issued by the Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command. The contract will provide facility investment services for maintenance and repair of railroad, ground level, and elevated crane rail systems at the Norfolk Naval Shipyard and surrounding naval installations. The solicitation requires a contract with a minimum yearly value of $550,000 for recurring services.

View the file

Other files

Show all 18

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment C

RECENT/RELEVANT EXPERIENCE DATA SHEET

Factor 2: Corporate Experience

This form is to be completed by the Offeror in accordance with Factor 2

Contract No. (check one): |_| #1 |_| #2 |_| #3 |_| #4 |_| #5

1. Contract Information for: |_| Offeror |_| Joint-Venture |_| Other (Explain)

Offeror Name & UEID:

JV Partner Name & UEID (if applicable):

Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: |_| Prime Contractor |_| Sub Contractor |_| Joint Venture |_| Other (Explain)

Percent of contract work self-performed:

If subcontractor, who was prime (Name/Phone #/UEID):

If the firm who performed the work on this contract differs from the Offeror submitting a proposal under this solicitation, identify relationship to the Offeror below:

3. Contract Number: Delivery/Task Order Number:

Title:

Location:

Contract Customer POC Name/Email/Phone Number:

4. Type of work:

|_| Maintenance |_| Repair |_| Alteration |_| Minor Construction |_| Other (explain):

5. Type of Contract/Task Order: (Check ALL that apply)

|_| Firm-Fixed Price |_| Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity |_| BOS |_| Delivery/Task Order |_| Other (explain):

6. Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Estimated Final Period of Performance End date (mm/dd/yy):

7. The Relevancy Size requirement for this solicitation is a contract with a yearly value of at least $550,000 for recurring services.

Estimated Total Contract Value/Total Award Amount for your Contract: $____________________

If the contract is an IDIQ, provide the Period of Performance and Contract value for the Recurring work/Guaranteed work Base Period and each Option Period below. The table should be expanded/contracted to capture each period of performance as necessary.

Contract Period
Period of Performance:

(start mm/dd/yy – end mm/dd/yy) Recurring/Guaranteed Contract Period Value

Base Period

Option Period 1

Option Period 2

Option Period 3

Option Period 4

8a. Provide a detailed narrative that describes how this contract meets the Scope requirements of this RFP: “Offeror must have provided all labor, management, supervision, tools, material, and equipment required to perform Facility Investment services for Construction, Maintenance and Cleaning of Railroad, Ground Level and Elevated Crane Rail Systems as described in the Performance Work Statement (PWS).”

8b.Provide a detailed narrative that describes how this contract meets the Complexity requirements of this RFP: “Responsible for responding simultaneously to requirements for several customers or installations.”

Note that the description of the contract shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the requirements of this RFP as it relates to Size, Scope, and Complexity as defined above, or the Government may consider the project not relevant.

9. Provide a detailed description of what work your firm self-performed on this contract.

10. Other Relevant Information:

Attachment D Past Performance Questionnaire

1. The NAVFAC Form PPQ shall be utilized for all evaluations that require a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ).

2. “Solicitation Submittal Requirements: For contracts submitted for Factor 2, Corporate Experience:

a. IF CPARS EVALUATION ARE AVAILABLE, THEY SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE PROPOSAL. The Offeror shall submit all CPARS evaluations available for that contract, not just the most recent.

b. IF THERE ARE NOT CPARS EVALUATIONS, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in this solicitation is provided for the Offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each Factor 2 contract. Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your proposal. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a contract(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (Attachment D), which will provide contract and client information for the respective contract(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, Mr. Jordan Cashwell, via email at jordan.r.cashwell.civ@us.navy.mil prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs or CPARS previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

AN OFFEROR SHALL NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN CPARS EVALUATIONS ARE AVAILABLE.”

Solicitation TitleNXXXXX-XX-R-XXXX
LocationSource Selection Plan

Revised April 2012 51

SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION

DISCLOSURE LIMITATIONS AS OUTLINED IN FAR 2.101 & 3.104 APPLY

ATTACHMENT D

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information
Firm Name:CAGE Code:
Address:Entity Identifier Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: |_| Prime Contractor |_| Sub Contractor |_| Joint Venture |_| Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: |_| Firm Fixed Price |_| Cost Reimbursement |_| Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work |_| High |_| Med |_| Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: NAVFAC REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO NAVFAC WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON NAVFAC SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO NAVFAC. PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR NAVFAC POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.
An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.
(VG) Very Good
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.
(S) Satisfactory
Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.
(M) Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.
(U) Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.
(N) Not Applicable
No information or did not apply to your contract
Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

Contractor Information (Firm Name): ________________________________________________ Client Information (Name): ________________________________________________________ Attachment D – Past Performance Questionnaire

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts
E VG S M U N
b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance
E VG S M U N
c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance
E VG S M U N
d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)
E VG S M U N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)
E VG S M U N
b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract
E VG S M U N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project?
E VG S M U N
b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)
E VG S M U N
c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?
E VG S M U N
d) Overall customer satisfaction
E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?
E VG S M U N
b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort
E VG S M U N
c) Government Property Control
E VG S M U N
d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel
E VG S M U N
e) Utilization of Small Business concerns
E VG S M U N
f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines
E VG S M U N
g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes
E VG S M U N
h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)
E VG S M U N

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?
E VG S M U N

Contractor Information (Firm Name): ________________________________________________ Client Information (Name): ________________________________________________________

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client
E VG S M U N
c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)
E VG S M U N
d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.
Yes No
e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.
Yes No
f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.
Yes No

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)
E VG S M U N
b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.
E VG S M U N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).
E VG S M U N
b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues)
E VG S M U N
c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below)
Yes No
d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.
E VG S M U N

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary).

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .