N4008521R2552 RFP FOR NOSC CENTER.pdf

SOLICITATION NO. N40085-21-R-2552 DESIGN-BID-BUILD (DBB), NOSC NEW YORK CITY, WHOLE CENTER REPAIR, BRONX, NEW YORK

This project w ill renovate the existing Naval Operating Service Center, (NOSC) New York City, located in Bronx, NY. The facility is approximately 55 years old and consists of 68,000 square feet. Work w ill be completed in phases allow ing partial use of the facility during drill w eekends. Project includes provisions of temporary administration, classrooms, and toilet/show er facilities for full-time personnel w hile the facility is under renovation. Whole center repair w ork w ill renovate administrative spaces, classrooms, medical spaces, f itness room, drill hall, storage rooms, toilet rooms, and vehicle maintenance facility. This project includes civil, structural, architectural, mechanical, plumbing, electrical, force protection, and fire protection w ork.

**All correspondence regarding this solicitation shall be directed via email to Georgia Scott at georgia.scott@navy.mil.

MAGNITUDE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THIS PROJECT IS BETWEEN $10,000,000 AND $25,000,000 IN ACCORDANCE WITH DFARS 236.204.

NAICS CODE IS 236220 – Commercial and Institutional Building Construction, AND THE SMALL BUSINESS SIZE STANDARD IS $39,500,000.

GEORGIA A. SCOTT 757-322-8277

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

09-Mar-2021

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

X

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______15 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________560 calendar days after receiving aw ard, notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________FAR 52.211-10

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________1 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specif ied in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________06 Apr 2021 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time of fers are due.

B. An offer guarantee X is, is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______120 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

NAVFACSYSCOM MID-ATLANTIC

ACQUISITION CORE

9324 VIRGINIA AVENUE

NORFOLK VA 23511-3095

N40085

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

02:00 PM (hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

FAX:TEL: TEL: FAX:

N4008521R2552 64

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

N4008521R2552

Section 00 10 00 - Solicitation

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

CLIN 0001A-G- BASE PRICE

FFP

CLIN 0001A-All work in accordance with the drawings and specifications but not including the work indicated or specified under CLINs 0001B and 0001C. CLIN 0001B-Price to remove the existing damaged pipe insulation and provide pipe Insulation. CLIN 0001C-Price to include Asbestos containing boiler insulation.

CLIN 0001D-Price to include PCB Pallasts,CLIN 0001E-Price to include PCB Caulking,CLIN0001F-Price to include Mercury Lamps and CLIN 0001G-Price to include Mercury Thermostats.

FOB: Destination

NET AMT

CLIN 0002 Option Item No. 1

FFP

Price for Provision of all work of Rooftop photovoltaic systems

CLIN 0003 Option Item No. 2

FFP

Price for replacement of the Medical Suite Electric hot water heater.

CLIN 0004 Option Item No. 3

FFP

Price for Re-commissioning of the existing building HVAC equipment.

CLIN 0005 Option Item No. 4

FFP

Price for removal of pump building and parking lot expansion.

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

0001 N/A N/A N/A N/A

0002 N/A N/A N/A N/A

0003 N/A N/A N/A N/A

0004 N/A N/A N/A N/A

0005 N/A N/A N/A N/A

Section 00 21 16 - Instructions to Proposers

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. GENERAL

1.1 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF PROCUREMENT PROCESS

1.2 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF CONTRACT

2. BASIS FOR AWARD

3. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

4. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

4.1 PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE AND SITE VISIT

4.2 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

4.3 PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRIES (PPIs)

4.4 CONTRACT OPPORTUNITIES (BETA.SAM)

5. INCORPORATION OF TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

6. ATTACHMENTS: MAY BE LOCATED ON CONTRACT OPPORTUNITIES UNDER ATTACHMENTS

6.1 ATTACHMENT A - PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRY LOG (ALL QUESTIONS SHALL BE SUBMITTED ON

THIS DOCUMENT)

6.2 ATTACHMENT B - CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE PROJECT DATA SHEET

6.3 ATTACHMENT C - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE

6.4 ATTACHMENT D – SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN TEMPLATE

6.5 ATTACHMENT E – PRICE PROPOSAL FORM

6.7 ATTACHMENT F- SEC-NAV_5512_1_11787- ONE DAY PASS REQUEST FOR SITE VISIT

ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS

Complete Set of Drawings Specifications Vol 1 NOSC NYC WCR Specifications Vol 2 NOSC NYC WCR Submittal Register_EXCEL FORMAT_Final_031017 Archaeological Sensitivity Areas Attachment 1_Excerpt from NOSC NYC Phase 1 Archaeological Survey NOSC NYC Archaeological Monitoring Plan Revised

1. GENERAL OVERVIEW OF PROCUREMENT PROCESS

1.1.1 This acquisition is being solicited on an unrestricted basis, with Full and Open Competition.

1.1.2 The NAICS code for this procurement is 236220 and the size standard is $39,500,000.

1.1.3 In accordance with DFARS 236.204, The Magnitude of Construction for this Project is between $10,000,000 and $25,000,000.

1.1.4 This solicitation is formatted as a Request for Proposal according to FAR Part 15. This method permits evaluation of proposals based on price competition, technical merit and other factors; permits impartial and comprehensive evaluation of offerors' proposals; permits discussions if necessary; and ensures selection of the source whose performance provides the best value to the Government.

1.1.5 Contractor Performance Information: Contractor’s performance will be evaluated using the respective contractor performance evaluation report entry system located on the website http://www.cpars.gov/. Prior to commencement of work, the contractor is required to provide the government with the name, phone number and email address of the “Contractor’s Representative” that will be responsible for receipt and review of draft performance evaluations prepared by the government in the appropriated system. It is the contractor’s responsibility to keep this contract information current.

1.2 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF CONTRACT

Description of Work: This project will renovate the existing Naval Operating Service Center, (NOSC) New York City, located in Bronx, NY. The facility is approximately 55 years old and consist of 68,000 square feet. Work will be completed in phases allowing partial use of the facility during drill weekends. Project includes provisions of temporary administration, classrooms, and toilet/shower facilities for full-time personnel while the facility is under renovation. Whole center repair work will renovate administrative spaces, classrooms, medical spaces, fitness room, drill hall, storage rooms, toilet rooms, and vehicle maintenance facility. This project includes civil, structural, architectural, mechanical, plumbing, electrical, force protection, and fire protection work. Work includes removal of asphalt, trenching and excavation, and waterlines, roof structure, walls, floors, ceilings, roofing, mechanical systems, ductwork, controls, plumbing fixtures, piping, receptacles, lighting fixtures, wiring, sprinkler system; and provisions of waterlines, backfill, asphalt, concrete foundations and floors, roof structure, walls, painting, flooring, ceilings, toilet partitions, roofing, roof top mechanical systems, ductwork, controls, fire pump, fire pump building, underground water storage, sprinkler system, piping, plumbing fixtures and piping, electrical panels, receptacles, and lighting fixtures.

2. BASIS FOR AWARD

1. The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contract to the offeror submitting the lowest priced, technically acceptable offer.

2. As stated in the solicitation, the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

3. The LPTA process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition because the best value is expected to result from selection of the technically acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated price.

4. In order to permit efficient competition, the Navy will utilize the following methodology.

Proposals will initially be screened for price and placed in order (lowest price to highest price). The Navy will then evaluate the technical factors of the lowest priced proposal. In the event the proposal is deemed Unacceptable, the process described will be conducted again as many times as necessary, until such time as the Government identifies a technical acceptable proposal. The Navy will make award to the lowest priced technically acceptable proposal from among the lowest priced proposals. However, the Navy, at its sole discretion, reserves the right to increase the number of proposals it will review under this methodology. Accordingly, under this methodology, the technical factors of some proposals may not be evaluated by the Navy. If discussions are deemed necessary by the Contracting Officer, all proposals will be evaluated (both technical and price) for the purpose of establishing a competitive range.

5. An overall non-price factors rating must be at least “ACCEPTABLE” in order to be eligible for award. An “UNACCEPTABLE” rating in any factor results in the overall non-price factors proposal being rated “UNACCEPTABLE” unless corrected through discussions. An overall non-price factors rating of “UNACCEPTABLE” makes a proposal ineligible for award.

3. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-price factors:

Factor 1 – Corporate Experience Factor 2 – Safety Factor 3 – Past Performance

The distinction between Corporate Experience and Past Performance is Corporate Experience pertains to the types of work and volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work covered by this requirement, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past Performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

2. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

(a) Price:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The following information shall be included for Non-cost/price factors:

Include a cover page with Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, DUNS Number, Cage Code, Point of Contact, and E-mail Address;

Completed SF 1442 signed with all amendments acknowledged;

Price Proposal Form;

Copy of Representation and Certifications and proof of registration in System for

Award Management (SAM);

Confirmation of filing of Veterans’ Employment and Training (VETS) VETS-4212 for the 2018 filing cycle;

Bid Guarantee in accordance with FAR Clause 52.228-1 – Bid Guarantee (amount shall be at least 20 percent of the proposed price, but shall not exceed $3 million); and Responsibility Determination Information (see below).

Small Business Subcontracting Plan

The offeror is required to submit a complete Price Proposal Form that includes completion of all contract line item numbers (CLINs).

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO BE SUBMITTED WITH PRICE PROPOSAL PACKAGE:

RESPONSIBILITY DETERMINATION INFORMATION – In order to be eligible for award, the offeror must be determined responsible in accordance with FAR Part 9, specifically 9.104-1, General Standards. In a separate tab, the offeror shall provide the following information in the price proposal package:

1. One (1) signed bank reference demonstrating adequate financial resources. If offeror’s firm has a line of credit – provide information on how many figures offeror can borrow against the line of credit (i.e.

medium 6 figures – exact line of credit is not required).

2. The offeror shall provide the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for the prime contractor, certified by an independent accounting firm, if practicable, or signed by an authorized officer of the organization. Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital, which will be used for the performance of the resultant contract. For Joint Venture arrangements, submit the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for each company in the Joint Venture and discuss the financial responsibilities among the companies. The Government may also utilize Dun & Bradstreet reports to evaluate the financial capacity of the offeror.

3. Description of offeror’s facilities and equipment.

4. Other offeror’s work presently under contract.

Although required to be submitted with offeror’s price proposal, this information will not be evaluated as part of the price proposal. This information forms the basis of your firm’s responsibility determination should your firm be considered for award. Proposal packages from unsuccessful offerors will not be returned to the offeror, but shall be destroyed by the Contracting Officer. No certificate of destruction will be issued.

SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN INFORMATION – reference FAR 52.219-9 Alt II and

DFARS 252.219-7003).

NAVFAC’s command-wide small business subcontracting targets are shown below. These may be higher or lower than percentages that would represent realistic, challenging small business subcontracting goals for this acquisition. Offerors representing as other than small businesses shall establish small business subcontracting plan goals and shall document in their subcontracting plans the basis for all proposed goals. Plans shall be submitted with initial offers.

SB 40%

SDB 5%

HUBZone SB 3%

WOSB 9%

SBVOSB 3%

Small businesses identified by name shall be listed in small business subcontracting plans submitted pursuant to FAR 52.219-9 in order to facilitate compliance with 252.219-7003(e).

See the Small Business Subcontracting Plan Template (Attachment D) for format.

(2) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government will evaluate price based on the total price. Total price consists of the basic requirements, any planned modifications, all option items (see Section 00 10 00 – Solicitation Contract Form of the solicitation). The Government intends to evaluate all options and has included the provision FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options (JUL 1990) in Section 00 45 00 – Representations and Certifications of the solicitation. In accordance with FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s). Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.

(iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(iv) Comparison of market survey results.

(b) Non-cost/price Factors 1 through 3:

Non-price binder: The offeror shall submit one (1) original electronically, marked “Original” in accordance with the directions and submission requirements detailed in the solicitation or subsequent amendments.

Additionally, the offeror shall submit one (1) hard copy and one (1) CD-ROM, both marked “Copy”, in accordance with the directions and submission requirements detailed in the solicitation or subsequent amendments.

All hard copies shall be in separate 3-ring binders. All submissions shall including the following:

• Cover page with Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, DUNS, CAGE Code, Point of Contact, Phone Number, and Email Address;

• 8 ½ x 11 paper, 10-point font;

• Refer to individual factors for page limitations. Pages that exceed indicated page limitations shall not be evaluated;

• Additionally, include an electronic version of the price and non-price proposal on one CD-ROM.

As with the price proposal, in the event of a discrepancy between the original and copies (or CD-ROM), the electronic version marked “Original” of the proposal will govern. Furthermore, any price information within the technical proposal for Factors 1 through 3 (non-price proposal) will not be considered.

Additionally, hard copy proposals shall match the electronic version of the proposal. Likewise, any technical/non-price information within the price proposal will not be considered.

**The Government will not consider information submitted in excess of page limits provided.**

(1) Factor 1, Corporate Experience:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The offeror shall submit the following information:

Submit a minimum of two (2) to a maximum of five (5) relevant construction projects that best demonstrates your experience on projects that are similar in Size, Scope, and Complexity as detailed below. The Government will not consider more than five (5) projects and will review only the first five (5) projects if more are submitted.

For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as:

Size: A project with a cumulative square footage of 50,000 or greater.

Scope: Renovation of an administrative building consisting of multiple phase construction.

Projects demonstrating experience with new construction will not be considered relevant.

Complexity: In addition to meeting the above Size and Scope, each submitted project must demonstrate at least one of the Complexity components below. While a project meeting Size and Scope does not require demonstrated experience with all of the following components, collectively, experience with all of the elements below must be established throughout the submitted relevant projects:

a) Experience with projects in congested residential or urban areas with limited construction laydown space.

b) Experience with renovation in a facility that maintains continuous operations.

Experience of proposed subcontractors will not be considered. While the Government will consider an offeror’s experience for a project that the offeror performed as a subcontractor, the offeror must clearly demonstrate how its efforts (rather than another entity’s efforts) on the project met the Size, Scope, and Complexity requirements above or the Government may deem the project not relevant.

Projects submitted shall be completed within five (5) years prior to the date of issuance of the RFP or will be considered “Not Relevant” The Government may deem the project not relevant if the contract completion date is not clearly stated on the Project Data Sheet.

A project is defined as a project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project and will not be considered; rather, offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment B) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form nor will the Government consider information submitted via any other medium. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages).

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP as described above.

If the offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects may be submitted for the Joint Venture partners. Experience submitted for one of the Offeror’s Joint Venture partners in which the Joint Venture partner was a partner in a different Joint Venture entity may be submitted to demonstrate relevant project experience. For a JV, the offeror shall submit the signed JV agreement. For 8(a) Mentor-Protégé Joint Ventures, the offeror shall submit the signed and U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) approved Mentor-Protégé agreement. For offerors who are a Joint Venture, an offeror’s proposal may be considered ineligible for award if this information is not provided.

If the Offeror is proposing as a single corporate entity (i.e. not as a Joint Venture), the Offeror may submit relevant project experience it performed as a partner in a previous Joint Venture, but the Offeror must clearly demonstrate the work it performed and how its efforts on the project met the Size, Scope, and Complexity requirements as described above. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects.

If an offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract in order for the Corporate Experience and past performance information of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies to be considered. The proposal shall state specific commitments of technical resources (e.g. personnel, equipment) that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies commit to the performance of this contract. In particular, the proposal will clearly state the specific commitments of resources of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member that will be located at the worksites and company offices in the city/area of the project. The proposal shall also describe specific roles of the affiliate/subsidiary/ parent/LLC/LTD member companies in terms of the work it will either self-perform or manage on behalf of the offeror in performance of the contract. Any projects submitted in excess of the first five (5) will not be considered.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The basis of evaluation will include the offeror’s demonstrated experience in performing relevant projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The requirement for Acceptability will be based upon the projects submitted by the offeror in its proposal; the offeror must have at least two (2) relevant projects that meet the Size, Scope, and Complexity stated in the Solicitation Submittal Requirements above or will be considered Unacceptable.

(2) Factor 2, Safety:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit the following information: The Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate; and Total Case Rate (TCR) for the specified five (5) Calendar Years (CY) (2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020), as well as a safety narrative, as described below. For a partnership or joint venture, the Offeror shall submit separate DART and TCR rates for the specified five (5) CY for each contractor who is part of the partnership/joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. Any fatalities experienced within this 5-year timeframe must be explained in detail, to include root cause and corrective actions.

NOTE: DART and TCR shall not be submitted for subcontractors

1. DART Rate: Submit five (5) previous complete calendar years’ [CY2016, CY2017, CY2018, CY2019, and CY2020] worth of data (not an overall average). If the Offeror has no DART rate, for any year, the Offeror must affirmatively state so and explain why.

a. DART cases include injuries or illnesses resulting in death, days away from work, and/or restricted work or transfer to another job days beyond the day of injury/illness.

b. Calculation of DART rate: Multiply the total number of DART cases by 200,000, and then divide by the number of employee labor hours worked

2. TCR Rate: Submit five (5) previous complete calendar years’ [CY2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2020] worth of data (not an overall average). If the Offeror has no TCR rate, for any year, the Offeror must affirmatively state so and explain why.

a. TCR cases include injuries or illnesses resulting in death, days away from work, restricted work or transfer to another job days beyond the day of injury/illness, medical treatment beyond first aid, or loss of consciousness.

b. Calculation of TCR rate: Multiply the total number of TCR incidents by 200,000, and then divide by the number of employee labor hours worked

3. Technical Approach to Safety: Submit a narrative that addresses the following:

a. Describe the Offeror’ s approach to implementing and executing a Safety Management System (SMS) including Management/Leadership involvement, Employee involvement, Hazard prevention, Hazard control, Worksite analysis, and Safety and health training, to include the standard(s) used to benchmark the SMS.

b. Describe the evaluation process used to select potential subcontractors.

c. Describe the processes of how the Offeror will oversee safety compliance of subcontractors at all levels throughout performance of the contract (to include the Offeror’s own in-house workforce).

d. The Technical Approach to Safety narrative shall be limited to two (2) single-sided pages or one (1) double-sided page.

4. The Government reserves the right to review other available sources (public/Government internal) of information. These may include but are not limited to OSHA data, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Electronic Contract Management System (eCMS), etc.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for itself and its subcontractors. To meet the minimum requirements, the Offeror must demonstrate the following:

1. DART rates at or below 2.99.

2. TCR Rates at or below 4.49.

NOTE: If the Offeror’s DART and/or TRC rates exceed the established levels above for any of the five years, it will result in a Deficiency (for whichever rates exceed these levels).

3. Technical Approach to Safety

a. Offeror describes a viable SMS that addresses elements; such as Management/Leadership involvement, Employee involvement, Hazard prevention, Hazard control, Worksite analysis, and Safety and health training, to include the standard(s) used to benchmark the SMS.

b. Offeror describes a methodical process of evaluating subcontractor’s safety performance in their selection process.

c. Offeror describes a logical management plan to hold both themselves and their subcontractors accountable for adhering to the safety requirements of the contract.

4. The Government reserves the right to review other available sources (public/Government internal) of information. These may include but are not limited to OSHA data, NAVFAC’s Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Electronic Contract Management System (eCMS), etc.

(c) Past Performance

(3) Factor 3, Past Performance:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

IF A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION IS AVAILABLE, IT SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE

PROPOSAL. IF THERE IS NOT A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 1 – Corporate Experience. AN

OFFEROR SHALL NOT SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS IS AVAILABLE.

IF A CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (Attachment C), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, Georgia Scott, via email at georgia.scott@navy.mil prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs or CPARS previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) using all CAGE/Entity Identifier numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the offeror. It is the responsibility of the offeror to provide accurate points of contact for each identified contract and current telephone numbers and/or email addresses.

The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the offeror’s references or the references’ unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.

Offerors are highly encouraged to provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 1 – Corporate Experience. Offerors are also highly encouraged to address any adverse past performance issues. Such explanations shall not exceed two

(2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages) in total.

Performance award or additional information submitted will not be considered.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The evaluation focuses on how well the offeror performed on the relevant projects submitted under Factor 1 – Corporate Experience and past performance on other relevant projects currently documented in known sources. Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown.

The degree to which past performance evaluations and all other past performance information reviewed by the Government (e.g., PPIRS, Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), performance recognition documents, and information obtained from any other source) reflect a trend of satisfactory performance may include the following:

- A pattern of successful completion of tasks;

- A pattern of deliverables that are timely and of good quality;

- A pattern of cooperativeness and teamwork with the Government at all levels (task managers, contracting officers, auditors, etc.); and

- Recency of tasks performed that are identical to, similar to, or related to the task at hand

The Government will consider the currency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Contractor’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination.

In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “Acceptable”.

4. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

4.1. PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE AND SITE VISIT: Site Visit information will be provided via Amendment.

4.2. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS: In response to this request for proposal, the complete proposal shall include the Price Proposal and the Non-Price Factors Proposal, submitted in accordance with the above Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor and as follows:

Due to COVID 19 restrictions, proposal packages shall be sent via email and through DOD Safe file in accordance with instructions below. Hand carried or courier packages are not being accepted at this time.

1. EMAIL SUBMISSIONS: Contractors shall send their proposal submission to Georgia Scott (georgia.scott@navy.mill) via email on the required proposal due date.

In addition, due to file size limitations, contractors shall also submit proposals through the DOD Safe site in accordance with instructions below. It is the contractor’s responsibility to ensure the proposal documents are received by the Contracting Official on the date and time as specified in the solicitation.

Electronic Proposal Delivery Information via DOD Safe Site:

2. Contractors shall send their Electronic Proposal submission to Georgia Scott through the DOD Safe Site (safe.apps.mil). Only DoD SAFE is authorized for the submission of the electronic original proposal in response to this solicitation. Further guidance is provided below for submission of hard copy submissions.

a. The contractor shall send the contract specialist, Georgia Scott at georgia,scott@navy.mil, the contractor’s email address of the offeror’s point of contact who will be receiving the Drop- Off invitation to upload proposals to the DOD Safe Site no later than one (1) week prior to the proposal due date. Note: Only two email addresses may be provided per Offeror.

b. The Contractor will then follow the invitation drop off link sent to those specified email addresses to upload their electronic proposal submission by the stated due date and time, unless the date and time are changed via Solicitation Amendment, using the reference code sent by the contract specialist via DOD Safe.

c. The Contract Specialist, Georgia Scott, will “Request a Drop-Off” through DoD SAFE utilizing the provided offeror’s point of contact email address. The recipient will receive an automated email containing the information for the request and instructions for uploading. Requests from DoD SAFE will be sent on (1) one day before proposal due date.

d. If you do not receive an email containing drop off instructions on that date, please contact the Contract Specialist. Only the identified POC will be able to drop-off proposals or proposal revisions in DOD SAFE. Failure to provide accurate POC information will preclude the offeror from using DoD SAFE. Note: only two email addresses may be provided per Offeror.

e. To submit the proposal, the offeror will utilize the link provided in the automated email to take you to DoD SAFE at https://safe.apps.mil. The system will allow for inclusion of a short note to the Recipient and then the offeror will click to add files or drag and drop them. Click “Drop- Off Files” to send the files to the recipient. You should receive a notification on the site “Drop- Off Completed” “Your files have been sent successfully.” Please keep this for your records.

The file(s) are uploaded and an email will be sent to the recipient notifying them of the “drop-off”.

f. [Additional details can be viewed in the DoD SAFE User Guide available at https://safe.apps.mil]. Note that the submission of any proposal must be completed no later than the due date and time, unless the date and time are changed via Solicitation Amendment, using the link sent by the contract specialist via DOD Safe. The DoD SAFE system will record the date and time of package submittal. The date and time of package submittal recorded in DoD SAFE shall govern the timeliness of any proposal submission.

g. Offerors shall allow adequate time to upload files which may be slower for non-DoD users and to avoid other technical difficulties that may be encountered. Offerors are also responsible for submitting files in the format specified and consistent with requirements stated elsewhere in this solicitation. Files that cannot be opened, or are otherwise missing the required content are the responsibility of offerors. The maximum file size of a package is 8 GB. Up to 25 packages may be uploaded per link.

It is the sole responsibility of the Offeror to obtain the RFP files, along with any amendments, from Opportunities (www.beta.sam.gov).

Proposal Due Date: 06 April 2021, 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time Electronic Copy due: Tuesday, 06 April 2021 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time Hard Copy due: Tuesday, 13 April 2021 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time

LATE PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED.

Mailed Hard Copies

In addition, one (1) original and one (1) copy of the hard copy proposal shall be delivered by mail on the date and time listed below, respectively, unless those dates are changed via Solicitation Amendment.

Proposal shall be labeled “PRICE PROPOSAL OR NON-COST/PRICE FACTORS PROPOSAL FOR

RFP N40085-21-R-2552, ATTN: GEORGIA SCOTT, DO NOT OPEN IN MAIL ROOM”.

Hand delivered proposals will not be accepted.

Express Mail to:

Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command, Mid-Atlantic 9324 Virginia Avenue Building Z-140, Room 225 Norfolk, Virginia 23511 Attn:Georgia Scott, ACQ21

4.3. PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRIES (PPIs): All inquiries must be submitted in writing and received by the Contract Specialist within 10 business days by 12:00 p.m. EST prior to the proposal due date in order to permit adequate time to reply to the inquiry. There is no guarantee that PPI’s submitted after the cut-off date will be answered before the solicitation closes. Submit all questions to georgia.scott@navy.mil. Use of the PPI Log template is required. The PPI Log Template (Attachment A) can be found on the Contract Opportunities website under the Attachments section.

4.4 CONTRACT OPPORTUNITIES: Amendments will be posted directly to Contract Opportunities/beta.SAM. The drawings and specifications will be posted on beta.SAM under the Attachments section of this RFP. Additionally, other postings will be made to beta.SAM, such as the pre-proposal inquires (PPI) log, revised drawings, etc., under the Attachments section of the RFP. It is recommended contractors check beta.SAM and the Attachments section of the RFP periodically to see if additional postings have been made. It is the contractor’s responsibility to check beta.SAM for all postings.

5. INCORPORATION OF TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

The Contractor’s technical proposal, including revisions and amendments, made prior to contract award and a copy of which is in the possession of both parties, will be incorporated into this contract upon award by reference with the same force and effect as if set forth in full text. All contractor personnel shall meet or exceed the qualification standards, experience levels and trade background set forth in the technical proposal.

In the event of an inconsistency between the provisions of this contract and the technical proposal, the inconsistency shall be resolved by giving precedence in the following order: (i) the contract (excluding the technical proposal), and then (ii) the technical proposal.

Section 00 45 00 - Representations and Certifications

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.202-1 Definitions JUN 2020 52.203-3 Gratuities APR 1984 52.203-5 Covenant Against Contingent Fees MAY 2014 52.203-6 Restrictions On Subcontractor Sales To The Government JUN 2020 52.203-7 Anti-Kickback Procedures JUN 2020 52.203-8 Cancellation, Rescission, and Recovery of Funds for Illegal or

Improper Activity

MAY 2014

52.203-10 Price Or Fee Adjustment For Illegal Or Improper Activity MAY 2014 52.203-12 Limitation On Payments To Influence Certain Federal

Transactions

JUN 2020

52.203-13 Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct JUN 2020 52.203-14 Display of Hotline Poster(s) JUN 2020 52.203-17 Contractor Employee Whistleblower Rights and Requirement

To Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights

JUN 2020

52.204-2 Security Requirements AUG 1996 52.204-4 Printed or Copied Double-Sided on Postconsumer Fiber

Content Paper

MAY 2011

52.204-7 System for Award Management OCT 2018 52.204-9 Personal Identity Verification of Contractor Personnel JAN 2011 52.204-10 Reporting Executive Compensation and First-Tier

Subcontract Awards

JUN 2020

52.204-13 System for Award Management Maintenance OCT 2018 52.204-16 Commercial and Government Entity Code Reporting AUG 2020 52.204-18 Commercial and Government Entity Code Maintenance AUG 2020 52.204-19 Incorporation by Reference of Representations and

Certifications.

DEC 2014

52.204-23 Prohibition on Contracting for Hardware, Software, and Services Developed or Provided by Kaspersky Lab and Other Covered Entities.

JUL 2018

52.204-24 Representation Regarding Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment.

OCT 2020

52.204-25 Prohibition on Contracting for Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment.

AUG 2020

52.204-26 Covered Telecommunications Equipment or Services-- Representation.

OCT 2020

52.209-6 Protecting the Government's Interest When Subcontracting With Contractors Debarred, Suspended, or Proposed for Debarment

JUN 2020

52.209-9 Updates of Publicly Available Information Regarding Responsibility Matters

OCT 2018

52.209-10 Prohibition on Contracting With Inverted Domestic Corporations

NOV 2015

52.209-11 Representation by Corporations Regarding Delinquent Tax Liability or a Felony Conviction under any Federal Law

FEB 2016

52.209-13 Violation of Arms Control Treaties or Agreements -- Certification.

FEB 2021

52.210-1 Market Research JUN 2020

52.211-2 Availability of Specifications, Standards, and Data Item Descriptions Listed in the Acquisition Streamlining and Standardization Information System (ASSIST)

APR 2014

52.211-13 Time Extensions SEP 2000 52.211-14 Notice Of Priority Rating For National Defense, Emergency

Preparedness, and Energy Program Use

APR 2008

52.211-15 Defense Priority And Allocation Requirements APR 2008 52.211-18 Variation in Estimated Quantity APR 1984 52.214-34 Submission Of Offers In The English Language APR 1991 52.214-35 Submission Of Offers In U.S. Currency APR 1991 52.215-1 Instructions to Offerors--Competitive Acquisition JAN 2017 52.215-2 Audit and Records--Negotiation JUN 2020 52.215-10 Price Reduction for Defective Certified Cost or Pricing Data AUG 2011 52.215-11 Price Reduction for Defective Certified Cost or Pricing Data--

Modifications

JUN 2020

52.215-12 Subcontractor Certified Cost or Pricing Data JUN 2020 52.215-13 Subcontractor Certified Cost or Pricing Data--Modifications JUN 2020 52.215-15 Pension Adjustments and Asset Reversions OCT 2010 52.215-17 Waiver of Facilities Capital Cost of Money OCT 1997 52.215-18 Reversion or Adjustment of Plans for Postretirement Benefits

(PRB) Other than Pensions

JUL 2005

52.215-21 Requirements for Certified Cost or Pricing Data and Data Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing Data -- Modifications

JUN 2020

52.215-23 Limitations on Pass-Through Charges JUN 2020 52.216-24 Limitation Of Government Liability APR 1984 52.216-25 Contract Definitization OCT 2010 52.217-5 Evaluation Of Options JUL 1990 52.219-8 Utilization of Small Business Concerns OCT 2018 52.219-9 Small Business Subcontracting Plan JUN 2020 52.219-14 Limitations On Subcontracting MAR 2020 52.219-16 Liquidated Damages-Subcontracting Plan JAN 1999 52.222-3 Convict Labor JUN 2003 52.222-4 Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards - Overtime

Compensation

MAY 2018

52.222-5 Construction Wage Rate Requirements--Secondary Site of the Work

MAY 2014

52.222-6 Construction Wage Rate Requirements AUG 2018 52.222-7 Withholding of Funds MAY 2014 52.222-8 Payrolls and Basic Records AUG 2018 52.222-9 Apprentices and Trainees JUL 2005 52.222-10 Compliance with Copeland Act Requirements FEB 1988 52.222-11 Subcontracts (Labor Standards) MAY 2014 52.222-12 Contract Termination-Debarment MAY 2014 52.222-13 Compliance With Construction Wage Rate Requirements and

Related Regulations

MAY 2014

52.222-14 Disputes Concerning Labor Standards FEB 1988 52.222-15 Certification of Eligibility MAY 2014 52.222-21 Prohibition Of Segregated Facilities APR 2015 52.222-26 Equal Opportunity SEP 2016 52.222-27 Affirmative Action Compliance Requirements for

Construction

APR 2015

52.222-35 Equal Opportunity for Veterans JUN 2020 52.222-36 Equal Opportunity for Workers with Disabilities JUN 2020 52.222-37 Employment Reports on Veterans JUN 2020

52.222-40 Notification of Employee Rights Under the National Labor Relations Act

DEC 2010

52.222-50 Combating Trafficking in Persons OCT 2020 52.222-54 Employment Eligibility Verification OCT 2015 52.222-62 Paid Sick Leave Under Executive Order 13706 JAN 2017 52.223-1 Biobased Product Certification MAY 2012 52.223-2 Affirmative Procurement of Biobased Products Under Service and Construction Contracts

SEP 2013

52.223-5 Pollution Prevention and Right-to-Know Information MAY 2011 52.223-6 Drug-Free Workplace MAY 2001 52.223-11 Ozone-Depleting Substances and High Global Warming

Potential Hydrofluorocarbons.

JUN 2016

52.223-15 Energy Efficiency in Energy-Consuming Products MAY 2020 52.223-16 Acquisition of EPEAT (R) - Registered Personal Computer

Products

OCT 2015

52.223-17 Affirmative Procurement of EPA-Designated Items in Service and Construction Contracts

AUG 2018

52.223-18 Encouraging Contractor Policies To Ban Text Messaging While Driving

JUN 2020

52.225-12 Notice of Buy American Requirement - Construction Materials Under Trade Agreements

MAY 2014

52…