Amendment_0003.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

P-1901 DLA Consolidated Warehouse, Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, Kittery, ME

The purpose of this amendment is to provide the site visit log and responses to PPIs.

The proposal due date of 26 March 2019 is hereby extended to 02 April 2019 at 2:00 PM EDT.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 2

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 15-Mar-2019

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N4008519R9002

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

22-Feb-2019

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

15-Mar-2019

CODE

NAVFAC MID ATLANTIC

ACQUISITION CORE

9324 VIRGINIA AVENUE

NORFOLK VA 23511-3095

N40085 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N4008519R9002

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

(End of Summary of Changes)

Page Section Para.

1 2/25/2019 Please clarify the applicability of Specification Sections

01 35 29.13, 02 61 13, and 02 61 23. These sections relate to the excavation, handling, removal, and disposal of contaminated soils. The drawings do not appear to identify areas of contaminated soils. Are contanimated soils expected for this project? If so, please provide analytical data and identify anticipated limits.

Hazardous or contaminated soils are not expected to be found in the project area but the spec sections were included to provide guidance if any previously unknown hazards are discovered.

2 2/25/2019 Has hazardous materials testing been performed relative to the demolition at existing Building 170A or other areas? Are hazardous materials anticipated?

No hazardous material testing has been performed. Building 170A was constructed in 2012 and no hazardous materials are anticipated.

3 2/25/2019

A‐100

Ref. New Work Keynotes 10, 11, and 12. Are the

"Portable 5'x5' Foor Pallet Scale", the "Portable

Pipe/Bar Stock Scale", and/or the "Portable

Freestanding Eye Wash Station" to be supplied under this contract? If so, please provide a specification and/or basis of design.

Items are to be provided by DLA and installed by Contractor. Contractor to coordinate equipment requirements with owner.

4 2/25/2019

S‐501

A4 Please provide a specification and/or basis of design for the "rigid permeable 'chainmail' material called for in

A4/S‐501.

Product is to be a high performance geosynthetic drainage mesh with strength to support the slab weight

(300 psf), the gravel fill (250 psf), and the live load (1500 psf).

5 3/5/2019 The Solicitation includes Wage Determination ME19, Building. This determination is missing a classification for Truck Driver that will be required for the execution of the project. We recommend that the classification

"TRUCK DRIVER: Dump Truck" be incorporated into the

Wage Determination for this project using the rates from Wage Determination ME 33, Heavy.

Pursuant to FAR 52.222‐6, Construction Wage Rate

Requirements, a classification can only be added after award.

6 3/6/2019

RFP ‐

10 of

(b)

Technic al

Factors

2nd Bullet Use of 12‐point Font is listed; however, Attachment A is prepared and downloaded in 11‐point font. Please allow the use of 11‐point font in completing Attachment A and all other proposal files.

Please submit per the requirements listed in the RFP.

7 3/6/2019

RFP ‐

7 of

00 21

3rd Par The website functionality for submitting Attachment F is not working. There is no option to "Proceed as Guest" as identified in Item 2. This needs to be corrected or an alternate process provided to allow Contractor delivery of our proposals.

Pass requests may be sent via

AMRDEC,

https://safe.amrdec.army.mil/safe/W elcome.aspx , following the same instructions listed in the RFP.

8 3/6/2019

ATT D ‐

1.2 (e) In addition to the previous question, Spec section 41 para 1.1.1.1 indicates the contractor is responsible for trade coordination including slab reinforcing prior to pouring the concrete slab, lighting, and fire protection.

This is not possible if the government waits 365‐days before awarding option 3, as this work needs to be completed based in concert with the automated handling system design. Otherwise, warehouse construction work will be put on hold awaiting government decision on Option 3.

Design of the Automated Racking

System (CLIN0003) will be awarded within 60 days of contract award. The completed design procured under this option should provide adequate information for conrete slab, lighting, and fire protection coordination.

9 3/6/2019

Dwg E‐

N/A N/A Please provide the basis of design for the automated material handling system layout provided on this lighting plan. Was there a supplier contacted to provide this layout who is interested in bidding to construction contractors, or was this a NAVFAC design team conceptual layout not associated with a particular supplier?

The design shown on the drawings is conceptual only. Actually design of the system will need to be procured as part of CLIN0003. Lighting locations will need to be coordinated with final system design.

Question No. Date Received

REFERENCE

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

10 3/6/2019

RFP 1

of 60

10 2nd Par Please extend proposal due date to Wednesday April

10th at 2:00 EDT. Many subcontractors have requested more time to obtain feedback from suppliers. Also, Monday and Tuesday are not desirable due dates considering the physical proposal delivery requirements of the solicitation.

Please see amendment 0003, which extends the proposal due date to 02

April 2019 at 2:00 EDT.

11 3/6/2019

Spec

Part 2 2.2 and 2.3 The specification suggests that there will be two separate ASRS systems, one for Lumber as outlined by

Section 2.2, and one for Pallets as outlined by Section

2.3. Please confirm this is the Government's intent.

ASRS system could be one or two units depending on equipment manufacturer's capabilities.

12 3/6/2019

Spec and A‐

N/A N/A Please confirm all automated material handling system equipment must fit within the approximately 175‐foot by 100‐foot area designated as Open Warehouse on drawing A‐100, with a maximum storage height of 35‐ feet above finished floor.

This is correct for the base bid. If

CLIN0002 is to be excercised, rack system height can be increased by 8', if allowed by system capability, to meet storage requirements.

13 3/6/2019

Spec

Lumber

ASRS

Para 2.2 Regarding the Lumber ASRS:

a. It is mentioned that there will be captive pallets.

Who is responsible for supplying these? If not

Contractor, what do these captive pallets look like?

(Pictures, dimensions, model numbers, etc.)

b. Within the list of loads and sizes, it is mentioned “43 pallets boxes of lead”. What dimensions are these loads, and should they be stored in the lumber ASRS?

c. Product flow – when looking at drawing A‐100, where would the lumber loads be coming from when inbound?

Where would they be going when outbound?

a. Captive pallets would be provided by the contractor as part of the racking system b. Pallets are to be standard 48" x 40"

c. Lumber loads would be inbound / outbound from overhead doors on plan east and plan south side of building

14 3/6/2019

Spec

Pallet

ASRS

Para 2.3 Regarding the Pallet ASRS:

a. It is requested that 9,500 pallets with a footprint of

40” x 48” be stored, with two heights of 36" and 48".

Given the available floor space of 100’ x 175’, and a max height of 35’, it would be impossible to fit anywhere close to 9,500 pallets into that space, even if all 100’ x

175’ was dedicated only to pallets and there were no aisles or clearances between pallets. Please confirm the quantity of Pallets, in addition to the Lumber storage list, that the ASRS system must accomodate in the Open

Warehouse area.

b. Throughput – the document says “approximately 20 moves per hour into or out of the facility.” Does this mean 20 total moves (combined in and out?), or 20 in and 20 out?

c. Product flow – when looking at drawing A‐100, where would the pallets be coming from when inbound?

Where would they be going when outbound?

a. Correct number of pallets should be 590, 9,500 number is a typo. b. 20 total moves is incorrect. The total in and out picks per hour is 10. c.

Materials will be coming in and out from the overhead doors on the plan east and plan south side of the building.

15 3/7/2019

1.1

41 50

13.00

1.1 Does NAVFAC have any prefferred vendors or

automated material handling systems and equipment currently in place at PNSY that they would want to match and if so, can NAVFAC provide the name of that system?

Federal Aquisistion Regulations requiring fair and open competition prevent specifying specific manufacturers.

16 3/7/2019

41 50

13.00

1.1 Can NAVFAC provide any manufactures names for

Automated Material Handling Systems they would prefer?

Federal Aquisistion Regulations requiring fair and open competition prevent specifying specific manufacturers.

17 3/7/2019

45 50

13 .00

2.2 5th line down from top of page

"States 43 pallets boxes of lead." Can you provide the size parameters for the pallet boxes?

Assume standard pallet size of 48" x

40"

18 3/7/2019 *Doors 103I and 104 are not included in hardware sets. Please clarify which hardware sets need to be used for these doors

Doors 103I and 104 to receive hardware set 3 as specified in section

08 71 00

19 3/7/2019 *I don't see anything in the specifying if this project needs to be Buy American. Please clarify if this is the case.

Please see FAR 52.225‐11, which is included in the RFP.

20 3/7/2019 *There is an alternate architectural plan, but no alternates listed in the specs calling out what specifically is the alt option. Please clarify.

Alternate drawing sheets as listed in

CLIN0002 shows dimensional and detailing differences from an 8' increase in roof height. Specified materials and techniques are unchanged with the inclusion of this alternate.

21 3/7/2019

14535 1.2 The Statement of Special Inspections and Schedule of

Special Inspections are included as an attachment to this specification.

Could not locate these attachments in the documents provided.

Please confirm Special Inspections not required for this project.

Special Inspections are required for this project. See attached special inspection forms.

22 3/7/2019

9900 1.3.2 Paint and coatings specification states that a SSPC QP 1 certification is required for any contractor performing surface preparation or coating application. SSPC QP 1 certification is usually reserved for complex industrial and marine structures.

This does not seem applicable to the paint and coating systems listed in 3.15.1.

Where a majority of the field painting is either interior

CMU, structural or gypsum, we request it be acceptable to use a contractor not yet certified to increase cost effectiveness to bidders. Applicable quality control and quality assurance testing/inspection will still apply to the contractors installation.

It is acceptable to use a subcontractor who is not SSPC QP 1 certified as long as the QA/QC testing and inspections still apply.

23 3/7/2019 Attach

F

Bid Option 2 & 3 ‐ Will the design and installation of the

AMHS need to account for the award of Bid Option 1?

In other words, if the building is taller, it may affect pricing for the design and installation of the material handling system.

The intent to exercise the higher roof option is dependent on the storage capcity of the racks and will be considered if the lower rack height cannot accomidate the requested storage capability.

24 3/7/2019

017800 1.7 Closeout and Test & Balance specifications reference building/HVAC commissioning. However, no specification is included regarding commissioning.

Will the building systems be commissioned?

Will the owner be providing the CxA services?

If so, can we be provided a specification to quantify the contractor's coordination responsibilities?

Commissioning is not required for this project.

25 3/7/2019

087100 Door hardware schedule does not include doors 103I or door 104. These appear to be electrically controlled per the E drawings. Please provide the hardware schedules for these doors.

Will these doors be controlled with badge readers?

Doors 103I and 104 to receive hardware set 3 as specified in section

08 71 00

26 3/7/2019

Attach ment F

1.2 CLIN 00004 ‐ 1.2.e General Notes:

If CLIN 00003 is not awarded, does it also cancel the option for furnish and install of the automated material handling system?

Yes, CLIN 0004 is dependent on acceptance of CLIN 0003

27 3/7/2019

2 2.2 SPEC inidcates there will be several automated rack storage systems. 21 13 13.00 Wet Pipe

Sprinkler System Drawings FX 101, FX 501, FX 502 All reference rack sprinkler systems. No rack drawings have been provided in the documents. Where are the rack drawings?

Rack design and drawings are to be procured as part of CLIN 0003.

Contractor will be required to coordinate sprinkler installation with any rack design drawings procured as part of CLIN 0003.

28 3/8/2019 415013

.0022

Automated Material Handling System‐

Specification states 'basis of design' in multiple locations, however, a BOD vendor is not listed. Can we be provided the BOD for the ASRS system?

There is no BOD for the ASRS system.

Federal Aquisistion Regulations requiring fair and open competition prevent specifying specific manufacturers.

29 3/8/2019

A601, A602

Door schedule on A601 indicates Door #103F is OVD type. Elevation below the schedule appears to show a sectional type door. However, details on A602 and specification clearly define this opening as a coiling type. Please confirm that door 103F is an overhead coiling door per the details on A602.

Door 103F is an overhead coiling door.

30 3/8/2019

A601

09900 1.11.1.2 Specification paragraph indicates 'other contiguous surfaces'. Please define what other surfaces receive paint. It is assumed that the interior CMU will receive coatings. Please confirm.

Interior drywall at rated wall and ceiling assemblies should receive paint.

31 3/8/2019

A601

09900 1.11.1.2 Specification paragraph indicates 'other contiguous surfaces'. Please define what other surfaces receive paint. It is assumed that the interior surfaces of the metal wall panels will be supplied with a factory finish and therefore do not require additional coating. Please confirm.

Interior drywall at rated wall and ceiling assemblies should receive paint.

32 3/8/2019

A601

09900 1.11.1.2 Specification paragraph indicates all exposed steel to be painted. Please confirm if steel receiving fireproofing will be coated with paint.

Fireproofed steel does not need to be painted. Steel surfaces should be prepared and/or primed as recommended by fireproofing manufacturer.

33 3/8/2019

CG100

Det. A4 Please provide clarification for Detail A4 and flow direction of Note 21 ‐ 4" PVC foundation drain.

According to the inverts shown it appears that the 4"

PVC foundation drain should flow from west to east and be tied to the 4" solid wall pipe flowing to the north to existing strom manhole. IT appears that invert connection to the south (inv. 22,9') would not be required. Please clarify.

The 4" PVC on sheet CG100 is a perforated roof drain as shown on detail A5/CG100. This pipe is used to water the landscape area on the north side of the building. The perforated roof drain is sloping in the right direction, east to west. If that pipe does fill up, then it will discharge through the 4" pipe and into the manhole located north of the site.

The foundation drain information is located on sheet CG101 Grading Plan.

34 3/8/2019

A‐101

Note 20 References Fall Protection Anchors and Lifeline. Can a specifcation for the system be provided?

Fall protection should match the fall protection devices located on the adjacent building 170A.

35 3/11/2019

FX001

Fire Protection General Notes mention a rack system design.

For bidding purposes, is the design cost for the CLIN

0003 to include a fire protection system design?

Will the rack system sprinklers installation cost be part of the ASRS installation, CLIN 0004?

A cost for the design for an in‐rack sprinkler system should be included as part of CLIN 0003. The cost for the installation of the in‐rack sprinkler system should be included as part of

CLIN 0004. The project base bid (CLIN

0001) should include the sprinkler connection points for the in‐rack sprinklers.

36 3/11/2019 04200 2.2.2.2 Provide brick with texture and color tange to match the brick indicated. Is the brick to match the existing building? Is there a specific brick chosen as the basis of design?

Brick is to match the brick on the existing warehouse addition, building

170A.

37 3/11/2019

S503, A502

04200 Detail C4/S503 shows insulation against the column.

Details A1/A2 on A502 shows cmu against the column.

Please confirm which detail should be used?

Detail on S503 should be followed.

38 3/11/2019

A301A

04200 A‐301A Key Note #1 states '4 hour rated wall construction'. However, the wall type detail on A401A shows a 3 hour wall. Which is correct?

Per the UFC, a single wythe CMU wall as shown in 1/A401 achieves a 3hr rating but a paired assembly as shown in C5/A306 achieves the required 4hr building separation.

39 3/11/2019

A‐501

04200 Details on A501 does not dimension the overall wall thickness or insulation thickness. Can we be provided these dimensions?

Overall wall thickness is 16" Insulation thickness should be as required to meet R‐Value.

40 3/11/2019

A‐

302A

04200 Sheet A302A, Details A5 and C5 show two different elevations for the top of CMU at exterior wall. Please confirm which elevation is desired.

Top of CMU should be 16'‐0" as shown on detail A1/S512

41 3/13/2019

A‐101

Keyed Note [1] calls out a 4‐Hr rated wall at the junction to Building 170A and references partition types on

Sheet A‐401. The sections on A‐303, A‐304, A‐306 and A‐

503 and Partition Type 1 on A‐401 call out a 3‐Hour wall.

Please clarify.

Per the UFC, a single wythe CMU wall as shown in 1/A401 achieves a 3hr rating but a paired assembly as shown in C5/A306 achieves the required 4hr building separation.

42 3/13/2019 Sht.

A303, A‐304

A‐306

Details show batt insulation in the cavity between the

CMU wythes of the 3hr firewall. Please clarify the product being used and thickness required.

Batt is to be mineral wool insulation as required to pack the cavity.

43 3/13/2019 04 20

2.2.2.1.3 The Specification requires brick to contain 5 percent post‐consumer and 20 percent post‐industrial recycled content. There is no brick that appears to meet these criteria. Please provide a basis of design for the brick to be used for this project.

Brick is to match the brick on the existing warehouse addition, building

170A.

44 3/13/2019 04 20

2.2.2.3 The Specification calls for salvaged brick. Please clarify where salvaged brick are required on this project.

Re‐use brick from demolished areas of building 170A if practical.

45 3/13/2019 04 20

Are colored mortar pigments required for the brick veneer on this project?

Mortar should match existing building

170A. Mortar does not have to be pigmented if a standard color matches. Submit samples to architect for review.

46 3/13/2019 04 20

2.6.6 The Specifications include several different materials for flashings. Are we correct to assume that the Copper

Coated Flashing (2.6.6.2) is the through wall flashing, the Copper or Stainless Steel Flashing (2.6.6.3) is the drip plate, and the Rubberized Flashing (2.6.6.5) is to tie into the AVB?

Correct

47 3/13/2019

A‐501

A1 Detail A1/A‐501 shows copper fabric flashing over a drip plate. Please confirm the size of the drip plate (3” wide is industry standard).

3" is acceptable

48 3/13/2019 The plans call for an 8” CMU fire wall, grouted solid, rated for 3hrs. Is this wall required to be built from 3hr rated CMU, or will the wall achieve the fire rating from being grouted solid? An 8” CMU wall that is grouted solid will exceed a 3hr rating. The rating will be the same if the wall is built with CMU that has a 3hr rating, or if it is built with standard CMU. 3hr CMU is 75%solid, leaving minimal space for grout and reinforcement.

Standard CMU grouted solid will be acceptable.

49 3/13/2019

S‐503

A‐502

C1

A1

Structural Detail for Control Joints at Steel Columns

C1/S‐503 shows rigid insulation against the steel column in the brick cavity. Architectural Detail A1/A‐502 shows

4” CMU in lieu of the insulation. Please clarify which detail is correct.

Detail on S503 should be followed.

50 3/13/2019 04 20

2.6.6.7 The only product we have been able to find that meets all the criteria of 04 20 00‐2.6.6.7 is Mortar Maze from

Advanced Building Products. This product appears to be discontinued as it is no longer listed on their website.

Please clarify what product should be used for mortar deflection.

Alternate mortar deflection materials with similar properties will be considered by NAVFAC.

51 3/13/2019

A‐504

C4 Please provide location of Roof Fixed Clip shown on

Detail C4 on Sheet A‐504.

Fixed clip to be located per roofing manufactuer's installation requirements

52 3/13/2019 83323 2.2.1.8 Can plain steel material be acceptable for the overhead drum rather than hot dipped galvanized?

Drum material should be hot dipped galvanized due to the project's coastal location.

53 3/13/2019 111319 Will (2) bumpers be acceptable to make up the length of the opening if a single bumper is not available to span the full width of the opening?

2 bumpers that provide continuous protection will be acceptable.

54 3/13/2019

E‐103

41 50

13.00

2.2 Specifcation Section 41 50 13.00 22, sect. 2.2 notes

"Provide a a two aisle automated storage and retreival system (ASRS) capable of a toal of 10 picks/hour at a maximum weight of 5,000 pounds per pallet load."

Where the reference is to pallets, is an ASRS system requested and or required for the different load configurations (i.e 20 lifts total at 43 in. wide by 28" height and 18 ft. length. 14" x 14" x18' Douglas Fir) along with other similar different sized loads listed on page 3 and 4 of this specifcation? Also, is Drawing E‐103 representative of expected layout for the racking system and the required feeds for the ASRS machines?

Drawing E‐103 is a diagramatic layout only, final rack layout will be designed under CLIN 0003 and will be based on manufacturer's capability to store the requested materials. Contractor should coordinate final lighting layout with rack design.

55 3/13/2019 41 50

13.00

All We are receiving several comments from ASRS systems suppliers noting that there is not enough information contained in the specification to provide an accurate understanding of the exact needs of the client. Will

NAVFAC provide more clarification with regards to the number of aisles required and the layout preference for the system?

Layout and aisles required will depend on the system manufacturer's requirements to store the requested materials.

56 3/13/2019 41 50

13.00

2.3 Please confirm the number (9500) contained in the

sentence reading " Provide system capable of handling pallets of 40" x 48" x 36" and 48" in height. System can utilize 2 or 3 deep storage racks and should be capable of storing approximately 9500 of these pallets." is correct. The size of the building does not appear to lend itself to this much storage.

This is a typo, the correct number should read 590.