N40085-18-R-3019-0002.pdf
PDF 188 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity Tuckpointing, NAVSTA Great Lakes, IL Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N4008518R3019
About this file
N40085-18-R-3019-0002.pdf
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| N40085-18-R-3019_ELINs.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| N40085-18-R-3019-0001.pdf | ||
| N40085-18-R-3019_ELINs.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| N40085-18-R-3019.pdf | ||
| N40085-18-R-3019_SOW_Pt_2.pdf | ||
| N40085-18-R-3019_SOW_Pt_1.pdf | ||
| N40085-18-R-3019_ELINs.xls | XLS spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30
APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84
STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
The purpose of this amendment is to incorporate Pre-Proposal Inquiry responses 19 through 46. Responses to questions 1 through 18 remain unchanged. Revised ELIN sheet is included w ith this amendment.
1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES
J 1 9
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
16C. DATE SIGNED
BY 31-Aug-2018
16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N4008518R3019
X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
11-Jun-2018
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.
Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 3 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;
or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN
REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE
CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)
6. ISSUED BY
3. EFFECTIVE DATE
31-Aug-2018
CODE
NAVFAC MID ATLANTIC
PWD GREAT LAKES
310 SEABEE WAY
GREAT LAKES IL 60088-2814
N40085 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)
4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.
CODE
See Item 6
FACILITY CODECODE
EMAIL:TEL:
N4008518R3019
SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
The following have been modified:
PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRY RESPONSES
Question
No.
Reference
(Sect/Para/Page)
QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE
1 ELIN Table Option 7 Replace
Windows (360)
Please clarify window scope for Seed project. Some windows appear to have already been replaced. Plans for Bldg 4 show a total of 106 windows, not 360 as indicated on the ELIN Schedule.
Please indicate Qty, size and type of windows to be replaced.
Please see Part 6 Reference drawings for quantities, sizes and types of windows. All windows are required to be replaced per the RFP. Counting the windows as a whole unit ie 1 cut out = 1 window, we count 108. ELIN sheet has been adjusted to reflect this quantity, but ALL windows are to be replaced.
2 All Drawings Unit Prices are called for on the drawings but they are not indicated on the ELIN Schedule. Where is this information supposed to be provided in the cost proposal?
Drawings in Part 6 are for reference only, disregard unit prices.
3 ELIN Schedule Please confirm Seed Project quantities for all ELINS shall be based on quantities provided in the ELIN Schedule
The quantities provided on the ELIN sheet shall be used for bidding purposes.
Please be advised this solicitation containts FAR clause 52.211-18, Variation in Estimated Quantity
4 ELIN Schedule Please confirm cost for waterproofing after tuckpointing belongs in Base Bid line item.
Waterproofing costs should be associated with each base and options per the
RFP.
5 N4008518R3019N 40085-18-R-3019 Solicitation (PG-56
& 57)
Instruction to offerors section 5 indicates "Electronic submission or Hand deliveries will not be accepted".
Can you please consider hand delivery of the proposal? This can buy us an extra day for submission.
Hand deliveries will not be accepted. Proposors may not have access to the base; allowing hand delivery provides an advantage to those that do.
6 N4008518R3019N 40085-18-R-3019 Solicitation (PG-
55)
Instruction to offerors indicates "The period of performance for the seed project, Bldg. 4VA, is 180 calendar days" Is this period of performance including the design period or is the design period independent of the 180 days?
Total task order completion date is being extended to 280 calendar days. This period starts at time of task order award and goes through project completion.
Please see revised Instructions to Offerors.
7 N4008518R3019N 40085-18-R-3019
Solicitation
SF1442 item 17 calls for "SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES". We didn't find any documents titled with a schedule of prices. Please confirm that the document titled as "N4008518R3019N40085-18-R- 3019_ELINs" is the document in question and required to submit the pricing concerning this bid.
The Schedule of Prices are the Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINs). In this case, there will be one CLIN with a not to exceed amount of $25,000,000.
The Exhibit Line Item Number (ELIN) pricing sheet will be used for the seed project, and the per linear foot of tuckpointing prices shall be used for future projects.
8 N4008518R3019N 40085-18-R-3019
Solicitation
Section B (Supplies or Services and Prices) is provided on Page 3 of the reference document. What does the government expect from the contractor pertaining to section B? Please explain.
No amount needs to be entered into Section B. It is $25,000,000 not to exceed.
It is called Supplies or Services, and services in this instance include construction services.
9 N4008518R3019N 40085-18-R- 3019_ELINs
Will the contractor need to fill out all the worksheets (Total Evaluated price and ELINs Base year to ELINs option year 4) on the referenced documents?
Yes.
10 N4008518R3019N 40085-18-R- 3019_ELINs
Reference document indicates base scope and 9 options. However, section
1.0 project description (N4008518R3019N40085-18-R- 3019_SOW_Pt_1 Page 194) calls for base bid and 8 options. Please clarify.
Reference Document is correct. We will update the RFP to include Asbestos allowance as Bid Option #9
11 N4008518R3019N 40085-18-R- 3019_ELINs
The project description and details provided on the document (N4008518R3019N40085-18-R- 3019_SOW_Pt_1) do not match with the description provided on the reference spreadsheet for the base bid and all other options. Will the contractor need to bid only the quantities and the construction activity shown on each row (The base bid and all other options) of the reference spreadsheet? Please clarify.
This is an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity solicitation. The Total Evaluated Price tab includes option items that are part of the seed project only. Proposors shall provide unit pricing for tuckpointing, at the quantity thresholds listed, on each ELIN tab. These unit prices shall be used on future task orders awarded on the contract resulting from this solicitation.
12 N4008518R3019N 40085-18-R-
3019_SOW_Pt_1
Section 1.0 project description of the reference document calls for "Complete tuckpoint all exterior mortar joints and replace brickwork that is damaged, cracked, spalled, missing or unsound. Mortar and brick replacement shall match existing and shall be properly sealed. Replace existing weeps and weep holes with new and include cell vents. Replace all exterior gutters, downspouts, louvers, wall vents and gutter flashing."
However, provided excel spreadsheet (N4008518R3019N40085-18-R- 3019_ELINs) base scope only shows Tuckpointing of 75098 SF, which is in conflict. Please clarify.
Reference sheet includes everything that is outlined in the RFP base bid. Same goes for each bid option, the RFP is detailed and bids shall include everything as outlined in the RFP for each base bid and bid option.
13 N4008518R3019N 40085-18-R-
3019_SOW_Pt_1
Section B201005 of the reference document calls for "replace all exterior louvers with new." Please provide size and quantity of the louvers for bidding purpose. Also, please mention which line item (base bid to option 9) should include the price of louvers?
Per RFP 1.0 base bid includes Louvers. Louvers can be seen in Part 6 of exterior elevations as well as noted at site visit.
14 N4008518R3019N 40085-18-R-
3019_SOW_Pt_1 and
N4008518R3019N 40085-18-R- 3019_ELINs
Section 1, bid option 6 and section B201004 of the document (N4008518R3019N40085-18-R- 3019_SOW_Pt_1 ) indicates "Replace all terracotta parapet cap and flashing throughout, match existing on original Building 4". Which is in conflict with the description provided on bid option 6 of the spreadsheet which calls for "replace terracotta parapet, flashing".
We did not see any terracotta parapet during the walkthrough. Is it just the parapet cap and flashing, or is the terracotta parapet just a typo? Please clarify.
The main north building has terracotta parapet cap.
This can be seen in the Part 6 Pictures.
15 During the walkthrough, we were told that window quantities provided in the spreadsheet is inaccurate and needs to be corrected. Please provide corrected numbers and sizes of the windows
See response to Question 1.
16 Who is the manufacturer that was used on the most recent roof areas replaced?
The manufacturer used for the previous roof areas was GAF Materials Corp
17 What is the make-up of the existing roofing that is to be removed and replaced? (thickness, material, etc.)
The existing roof shall be a tar and gravel system. Part 6 shows replacement details.
18 We noticed during the walkthrough that there is an existing lightning protection system sitting on the roof which needs to be removed and reinstalled during the roofing work. Is this system still under warranty?
Please provide the contact information of the contractor that installed the system. Also, please mention which option you expect us to include the price of in the proposal.
The existing Lightning protection system is not under warranty. The lighting protection shall be included in the roofing option.
19 Not including the 1958 building please clarify the style of Graham window to be used on the newer buildings (i.e.
double hung, casement, awning, hopper or fixed, etc.)
Per RFP, windows shall match. Part 6 shows an example
20 Some windows have window AC units installed. Please confirm that they will be removed and not reinstalled.
Plan on reinstalling
21 Some windows have mechanical exhausts currently in-place. Please confirm that they will be removed and not reinstalled.
Plan on reinstalling
22 Some windows have security guards / screens installed along the interior. Please confirm that they will be removed and not replaced.
Plan on re-using
23 Some windows have interior window treatments installed. Please confirm that they will be removed and reinstalled by the owner.
Window treatments shall be removed and reinstalled by the KTR
24 Repairs to interior finishes that may be required with the windows replacement are unknown. Can an allowance be established for this work?
Plan on repairing a 3 foot perimeter around the whole window on the interior side.
25 Option 7 states “replace all windows 360 ea”. Please clarify identify in elevation where those 360 ea are located. A site visit was made this quantity appears to be incorrect.
See response to Question 1.
26 A window schedule is not provided for option 7. Please provide a window schedule. If contract is required to confirm existing dimensions for bidding access will be provided to the interior of the building at all window locations. If this is required please provide a date / time that this field verification can be performed prior to the bid due date.
Please see Part 6 of the Attachments for reference drawings/take offs.
27 The pricing ELINs call for SF unit costs for various ranges of square footage of tuckpointing. As the cost per SF can vary not only with the number of SF, but also with the height at which the tuckpoinitng is taking place, please confirm that it is assumed this unit cost per SF is based on working from ground level.
The SF cost is figured for a whole wall from ground to roof.
28 Sections G103001 GRADING, G103004 FILL & BORROW, and
G103007 SLOPE STABILIZATION
from Part 3 Project Program all address earthwork, but no earthwork scope is defined elsewhere, nor is there a line item for earthwork in the ELINs, please confirm that there is no earthwork in the design/build scope.
Earthwork should be included in each ELIN where the site will be damaged, where digging is required for foundation and footings work is required.
29 Section G20 of the Project Program states "The site improvements consist of pavements and pavement related features, landscaping and other exterior site development work related to this project. Provide a pavement design by a licensed Professional Engineer familiar with conditions local to the project site. Site design, including but not limited to design of parking and pedestrian circulation, will include coordination with the Civil Engineer and the Landscape Architect." There is no mention elsewhere of any paving or other sitework being required, , nor is there a line items for paving in the ELINs, please confirm that there is no paving or landscaping in the design/build scope.
Pavement, landscaping etc as outlined in G20 should be included in each ELIN where this will be damaged, for foundation and footing work is required.
30 Typically for design/build effort, the government issues a Statement of Work document that clearly defines the desired scope of the design build effort, could NAVFAC please issue a Statement of Work that clarifies the desired scope?
The Statement of Work is defined as the RFP.
31 1. The pricing forms indicates tuckpointing of 75,098 SF only. The project description beginning indicates additional work suck as the following to be included.
a. Brick rplacement
b. Masonry sealer
c. Replace weeks
d. Replace gutters
e. Replace downspoouts
f. Replace Louvers
g. Replace wall vents
h. Replace gutter flashingi.
Please clarify if this work is also to be included.
There are 3 tuckpointing ELINS for each year of the contract which represent the estimated quantities of tuckpointing per year.
Other work types may be issued with each task order depending upon the required building repairs.
Other work types will be negotiated on a task order basis. The scope for the basic contract includes tuckpointing and other work requirements that will vary with the needed repairs for each building. The seed project, building 4VA, will be the first task order awarded under the basic contract. Building 4VA requirements contain the most types of work requirements that one may encounter under the basic contract. Every task order issued after the seed project is not expected to contain every work type.
32 ii. Please quantify the amount of brick replacement to be included if required to be included.
Estimate 25% of exterior bricks shall be replaced.
33 iii. Replace quantify the amount of weep replacement to be included if required to be included.
See revised ELIN sheet for base work supplemental to tuckpointing.
34 iv. Replace quantify and provide a specification for the louver replacement. During the pre-bid it was stated not all louvers are to be replaced.
Provide new and replace per the RFP. Quantities should have been noted at walk through and can be found in Part 6 attachments.
35 v. Replace quantify and provide a specification for the vent replacement.
During the pre-bid it was stated not all vents are to be replaced
Provide new and replace per the RFP. Quantities should have been noted at walk through and can be found in Part 6 attachments.
36 Option 1 Scope of Work:
Please clarify type of crack repair required
All types.
37 Option 2 Scope of Work:
Please clarify type of crack repair required
All types.
38 Option 3 Scope of Work:
Can a detail be provide for this repair?
This is an RFP, it is up to the DOR to determine a design.
39 Option 4 Scope of Work:
The description of work on the bid form states replace “damaged lintels / sills. Please confirm that only sills are to be included and lintels are to be included below in option 5.
Correct, concrete sills.
40 Option 4 Scope of Work:
Please confirm the quantity listed.
Please see Part 6 of the Attachments for reference drawings/take offs.
41 Option 5 Scope of Work:
Please confirm that the quantity listed should match the LF of option #4
Lintels typically span further then sills.
42 Option 6 Scope of Work:
indicates to replace 600 LF of terra cotta parapet flashing and provides a quantity of 600 LF. The quantity listed does not reflect actual field quantities. Please clarify.
Modify 600 LF to 350 LF.
See revised ELIN sheet.
43 Option 8 Scope of Work:
The quantity listed on the bid for is “2 LS”. There is only 1 porch. Please clarify.
Modify 1LS. See revised ELIN sheet.
44 Option 8 Scope of Work:
Please confirm that costs is to be included to replace the entire porch in it’s entirety and not “repair” as listed on the bid form.
Remove and replace as outlined in the RFP. See revised ELIN sheet.
45 Will the government extend the due date until 9/14/2018
Proposal due date is extended to 10 September
46 Is it possible to arrange another site visit?
No
SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM
The required response date/time has changed from 05-Sep-2018 12:00 PM to 10-Sep-2018 12:00 PM.
(End of Summary of Changes)
File details come from the government source that posted it.